The correlation between local impedance drop and catheter contact in clinical pulmonary vein isolation use

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Local impedance drop-guided versus lesion size index-guided pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Local tissue impedance drop (LID) and lesion size index (LSI) technologies are valuable for predicting effective lesion formation. This study compares the acute and long-term efficacy of LID-guided versus LSI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two patient groups undergoing radiofrequency PVI. In the LID-guided group (n = 35), ablation was performed without contact force monitoring, stopping at the LID plateau (target LID 12 Ohm posterior, 16 Ohm anterior). In the LSI-guided group (n = 31), ablation used contact force information with target LSI (5 anterior, 4 posterior). Both groups utilized a power of 40 W anterior and 30 W posterior, with < 6 mm inter-lesion distance. Gap mapping and touch-up ablation were done if necessary.

RESULTS

PVI was achieved with a significantly shorter ablation time in the LSI-guided group (25 min [21;31] vs 30 [27;35], p = 0.035). PV gaps were more frequent in the LID-guided group (74% vs 42%, p = 0.016). Over 11.5 ± 2.9 months follow-up, arrhythmia recurrence was higher in the LID-guided group (34.3% vs 16.1%, p = 0.037). A redo procedure performed in 10 (28.6%) patients in the LID-guided group and 3 (9.7%) in the LSI-guided group showed chronic PV reconnections in 7 out of 10 (70%) and 2 out of 3 (67%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LSI-guided ablation results in shorter ablation time and fewer PV gaps compared to LID-guided ablation. Despite initial success, LID-guided ablation had higher arrhythmia recurrence and PV reconnections during long-term follow-up compared to LSI-guided ablation.

Determinants of left atrial local impedance: Relationships with contact force, atrial fibrosis, and rhythm

INTRODUCTION

The relationships between baseline tissue local impedance (LI), contact force (CF), atrial fibrosis, and atrial rhythm are uninvestigated in a clinical setting. We compared the relationship of LI and CF between atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus rhythm (SR) accounting for the effects of atrial fibrosis as assessed by bipolar voltage and LI.

METHODS

Patients undergoing persistent AF ablation were recruited. LI was recorded referenced to patient blood pool (LIr) and concurrent to changes in CF, with data collected at the same locations in AF and SR.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were recruited. 109 locations were sampled obtaining 1903 data points (SR: 966, AF: 937). CF correlated strongly with LI (repeated measures correlation = 0.64). The relationship between CF and LIr was logarithmic. Rhythm and CF had a significant main (both p < .0005) and interaction effect (p = .022) on tissue LI: AF demonstrated higher LIr values than SR for similar CF. Bipolar voltage had no effect on the relationship of CF to LIr in either rhythm. Assessing fibrosis using LIr showed an interaction effect with CF for LIr in SR and AF, (SR: p < .0005, AF: p = .01), with increased fibrosis showing lesser change in LIr per gram of CF.

CONCLUSIONS

CF and rhythm significantly affect the measured LIr of LA myocardium. Optimal catheter-tissue coupling may be better achieved with higher levels of CF and in AF rather than SR. Atrial fibrosis, as assessed by LIr but not bipolar voltage, affected the CF-LI relationship.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Radiofrequency lesion formation prediction with contact force versus local impedance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Safe and effective radiofrequency (RF) myocardial ablation requires real-time monitoring of lesion formation. Here, we review conventional and novel approaches proposed to guide titration of RF energy application.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional monitoring modalities, such as ablation electrode temperature, generator impedance, and tissue electrophysiological properties have been of limited value in predicting efficacy and safety of ablation. Therefore, several input-driven indices have been proposed to improve the quality and durability of RF ablation lesion while maintaining safety. These metrics predominantly incorporate RF power output, duration of RF application, and firmness and stability of electrode-tissue contact. More recently, novel catheters have enabled measuring local impedance at the catheter-tissue interface, which has been found valuable for real-time monitoring of RF lesion formation.

SUMMARY

It is likely that using the combination of multiple metrics would be required to improve the quality and safety of RF lesions, but further investigation is still required.

Monitoring Spike Potential and Abrupt Impedance Rise with Concomitant Temperature/Contact Force Change for Timely Detection of the Occurrence of “Silent” or “Nonaudible” Steam Pop

Aim. Steam pop (SP) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause cardiac perforation, which may require drainage and emergent thoracotomy or even lead to death. Data investigating the timely detection of the occurrence of “silent” or “nonaudible” SP events are limited. Methods and Results. A total of 516 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent index PVI were included in this retrospective observational study. The duration, power, impedance, temperature, and contact force (CF) of RFCA were continually monitored and recorded throughout the procedure. A total of 15 (2.9%) audible SP events occurred in 14 patients; 2 of the patients developed pericardial tamponade, 1 patient underwent drainage, and 1 patient underwent emergent thoracotomy. The time from RFCA initiation to the occurrence of audible SP was 19.4 ± 6.9 s. Abrupt temperature change occurred in 13 (86.7%) of the 15 SP events, of which 8 (53.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature rise of 2.3 ± 1.0°C, 5 (33.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature drop of 2.3 ± 1.3°C, and 2 (13.3%) exhibited no discernible temperature change. Conclusions. In conclusion, simultaneously recorded spike potentials and abrupt impedance rise with concomitant temperature and/or CF change could be a feasible method for the timely detection of the occurrence of audible, “silent,” or “nonaudible” SP events, particularly in regions where the risk of perforation may be of concern.

Combined contact force and local impedance dynamics during repeat atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Background: Optimal lesion formation during catheter-based radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation depends on electro-mechanical tip-tissue coupling measurable via contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) monitoring. We aimed to investigate CF and LI dynamics in patients with previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation who frequently present with heterogenous arrhythmia substrate.

Methods: Data from consecutive patients presenting for repeat AF or atrial tachycardia ablation using a novel open-irrigated single-tip ablation catheter were studied. RFC applications were investigated regarding CF, LI and the maximum LI drop (∆LI) for evaluation of ablation efficacy. ∆LI > 20 Ω was defined as a successful RFC application.

Results: A total of 730 RFC applications in 20 patients were analyzed. Baseline CF was not associated with baseline LI (R = 0.06, p = 0.17). A mean CF < 8 g during ablation resulted in lower ∆LI (<8 g: 13 Ω vs. ≥ 8 g: 16 Ω, p < 0.001). Baseline LI showed a better correlation with ∆LI (R = 0.35, p < 0.001) compared to mean CF (R = 0.17, p < 0.001). Mean CF correlated better with ∆LI in regions of low (R = 0.31, p < 0.001) compared to high (R = 0.21, p = 0.02) and intermediate voltage (R = 0.17, p = 0.004). Combined CF and baseline LI predicted ∆LI > 20 Ω (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.75) better compared to baseline LI (AUC 0.72), mean CF (AUC 0.60), force-time integral (AUC 0.59) and local bipolar voltage (0.55).

Conclusion: Combination of CF and LI may aid monitoring real-time catheter-tissue electro-mechanical coupling and lesion formation within heterogenous atrial arrhythmia substrate in patients with repeat AF or atrial tachycardia ablation.