Mucosal mast cell counts in pediatric eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease

Redefining Histological Cell Counts Using a Standardized Method: The Leuven Intestinal Counting Protocol

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases is largely based on mucosal eosinophil counts, but thresholds and normal ranges beyond the esophagus are debated, calling for much-needed methodological standardization. We aimed to develop a standardized workflow for duodenal cell quantification and estimate duodenal eosinophil and mast cell numbers in healthy controls.

METHODS

Software-based histological cell quantification using free-sized or fixed-sized regions was developed and applied to digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from 58 individuals (healthy controls [HCs] and patients with functional dyspepsia). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) compared inter-rater reliability between software-based and microscopic quantification. Reproducibility of the software-based method was validated in an independent cohort of 37 control and functional dyspepsia subjects. Eosinophil identification on H&E staining was compared to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Normal eosinophil (H&E) and mast cell (cKit) ranges were determined in 70 adult HCs.

RESULTS

Eosinophil quantification on digitized slides demonstrated excellent (ICC = 0.909) and significantly improved reproducibility over microscopic evaluation (ICC = 0.796, P = 0.0014), validated in an independent cohort (ICC = 0.910). Duodenal eosinophils were more abundant around crypts than in villi ( P < 0.0001), while counts were similar on matched H&E- and IHC-stained slides ( P = 0.55). Mean ± SD (95th percentile) duodenal eosinophils and mast cells in HC were 228.8/mm 2 ± 94.7 (402.8/mm 2 ) and 419.5/mm 2 ± 132.2 (707.6/mm 2 ), respectively.

DISCUSSION

We developed and validated a standardized approach to duodenal histological cell quantification, generalizable to various mucosal cell types. Implementation of software-based quantification identified 400 eosinophils/mm 2 and 700 mast cells/mm 2 as thresholds for abnormal duodenal infiltration.

Pathophysiology of Non-Esophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EGID) is an umbrella term encompassing a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterized by eosinophil-rich inflammation affecting one or more segments of the gastrointestinal tract. A recent consensus in nomenclature and emerging data made possible through multi-center consortia are beginning to unravel the molecular and cellular underpinnings of EGIDs below the esophagus. These emerging findings are revealing both overarching commonalities related to a food allergen-driven, chronic, Th2-mediated immune response as well as location-specific nuances in the pathophysiology of the collective EGIDs. Altogether, these advances offer promise for improved diagnoses and more efficacious interventional strategies.

Mucosal Mast Cell Distribution in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Children: A Preliminary Study for Establishing Reference Values

OBJECTIVES

The physiological number and distribution of mast cells (MCs) in the pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) tract is not well defined and reference values of normality are missing. To define a physiological and disease defining cut-off, a systematic histological exploration of MC distribution from the esophagus to the rectum in healthy as well as in patients with gastrointestinal food allergies (GFA) was performed.

METHODS

Nine pediatric subjects that exhibited unremarkable histopathological evaluations or underwent endoscopy for surveillance reasons after a previous polypectomy of single colonic juvenile polyps served as reference cohort. In all of these subjects, a chronic inflammatory disease (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease) or allergy was excluded. In addition, a group of 15 patients with gastrointestinal complaints suspected to be caused by a GFA were investigated. Immunohistochemistry was performed from all biopsies using CD117 (c-Kit) as a reliable marker to identify MCs in the lamina propria.

RESULTS

There were distinct differences of MC counts in all parts of the pediatric GI tract. The highest counts of MCs in both symptomatic patients and control cohort, were found in the duodenum, terminal ileum, cecum and ascending colon. The lowest counts were found in the esophagus. Significant disparities between GFA and healthy subjects were found in the gastric corpus (22.1 ± 4.0/ high power field [HPF] vs 32.0 ± 10.1/HPF; P = 0.034) and ascending colon (44.8 ± 10.4/HPF vs 60.4 ± 24.3/HPF; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal MC counts in the pediatric GI tract are higher than previously reported, with a considerable overlap between healthy and GFA patients. These results provide detailed information on distribution and numbers of MCs in pediatric allergic patients while allowing estimates of physiological values in childhood for the first time. With regard to diagnostic procedures in GFA further laboratory parameters have to be integrated.

Duodenal mast cells and eosinophils in children with celiac disease: occurrence and distribution pattern

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize duodenal mast cell (MC) and eosinophil (EO) numbers, their distribution within the lamina propria and possible impact on disease severity of paediatric celiac patients compared to children without celiac disease (CD).

METHODS

We analysed duodenal samples of 215 children (109 CD, 106 controls) who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy from 2010 to 2018. After immunohistochemical staining, average MC and EO counts were histologically examined in ten high-power-fields. Additionally, cell-distribution within the lamina propria was analysed. Possible influence of relevant clinical parameters was evaluated.

STATISTICS

Student's-t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square-test, ANOVA, significance-level <.05. Trial registration-number: DRKS00024669.

RESULTS

MC-density was higher in CD-patients compared to the control-group (23.7 (±12.1)/HPF versus 19.7 (±9.1)/HPF; p = .008), varying in number interindividually. Eosinophils were also increased in the duodenum of celiac patients (23.3 (±9.3)/HPF versus 12.2 (±6.3)/HPF; p= <.001). MCs were distributed more often homogenously in all parts of CD lamina propria (44 biopsies (40.4%), residing more distant from the intestinal lumen in controls (0 biopsies with homogenous distribution-pattern (0%); p= <.001). Regarding EOs no polarity was observable. Atopic diseases did not occur significantly more often in patients with elevated EO-counts.

CONCLUSION

MC- and EO-numbers were increased in the duodenum of CD-patients and MCs showed a different distribution-pattern in the lamina propria of celiac patients. These findings support the concept that both cell-types contribute to disease-pathogenesis. However, functional studies highlighting both cell-types' and their mediators' role regarding mucosal alterations during the course of the inflammatory process in celiac patients are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND URL

DRKS00024669; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/.

Mast Cell and Eosinophil Counts in Gastric and Duodenal Biopsy Specimens From Patients With and Without Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Mast cells are believed to contribute to the development of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs). We quantified mast cells and eosinophils in biopsy specimens from patients with EGIDs and without known esophageal or gastrointestinal disease to investigate associations between these cell types and EGID and its features.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with EGID (n = 52) and of children and adults who underwent upper endoscopy and were found to have no evidence of gastrointestinal or systemic conditions (n = 123). We re-reviewed archived gastric and duodenal biopsy specimens to quantify mast cells (by tryptase immunohistochemistry) and eosinophils. We calculated the specificity of cell count thresholds for identification of patients with EGIDs and evaluated the correlation between mast cell and eosinophil counts and clinical and endoscopic features.

RESULTS

In the gastric biopsy specimens from patients without esophageal or gastrointestinal diseases, the mean mast cell count was 18.1 ± 7.2 cells per high-power field (hpf), and the peak mast cell count was 21.9 ± 8.2 cells/hpf. In the duodenal biopsy specimens from patients without esophageal or gastrointestinal diseases, the mean mast cell count was 23.6 ± 8.1 cells/hpf and the peak mast cell count was 28.1 ± 9.3 cells/hpf. The mean and peak eosinophil counts in gastric biopsy specimens from patients without disease were 3.8 ± 3.6 eosinophils/hpf and 5.8 ± 5.0 eosinophils/hpf; the mean and peak eosinophil counts in duodenal biopsy specimens were 14.6 ± 8.9 eosinophils/hpf and 19.5 ± 11.0 eosinophils/hpf. A mean count of 20 eosinophils/hpf in gastric biopsy specimens or 30 eosinophils/hpf in duodenal biopsy specimens identified patients with EGIDs with high specificity. Gastric and duodenal biopsy specimens from patients with EGIDs had significant increases in mean mast cell counts compared with biopsy specimens from patients without EGIDs. There was a correlation between mean mast cell and eosinophil counts in duodenal biopsy specimens (R = 0.47; P = .01). The mean mast cell and eosinophil counts did not correlate with symptoms or endoscopic features of EGIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified thresholds for each cell type that identified patients with EGIDs with 100% specificity. The increased numbers of mast cells and eosinophils in gastric and duodenal tissues from patients with EGIDs supports the concept that these cell types are involved in pathogenesis. However, cell counts are not associated with symptoms or endoscopic features of EGIDs.

Targeted Therapies for Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

The growing recognition of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders has revealed the limitations of current treatment (mainly based on dietary modification and corticosteroids), and include refractoriness, high recurrence rates, and the need for long-term therapy. Research efforts, mainly in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), have unveiled essential pathophysiological mechanisms leading to these disorders, which bear some similarities to those of atopic manifestations and are shared by eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) and eosinophilic colitis (EC). Novel targeted therapies, some imported from bronchial asthma and atopic dermatitis, are currently being assessed in EoE. The most promising are monoclonal antibodies, including those targeting interleukin (IL)-13 (cendakimab) and IL-4 (dupilumab), with phase 3 trials currently ongoing. The potential of anti-integrin therapy (vedolizumab) and Siglec-8 blockers (antolimab) in EGE are also promising. Non-biological therapies for eosinophilic gut disorders, which include preventing the activation of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and chemoattractant receptor expressed on T helper 2 cells (CRTH2) signaling pathways, and other potential targets that deserve investigation in eosinophilic gut disorders, are reviewed.

Nonesophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders: Clinical Care and Future Directions

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are a set of conditions with a wide range of clinical manifestations and treatment modalities. The disorders are suspected to result from an abnormal inflammatory response to allergen (s), and individuals may develop a relapsing or chronic disease, if the allergen is not eliminated. Mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, including the humoral immune response, need to be fully elucidated. A variety of therapies are used, although there is a lack of well-defined randomized, prospective studies. Other therapeutic options are needed as the current treatments have potential concerns; elimination diets may impair a child's quality of life, and corticosteroids have adverse risks with long-term use. We review what is known about nonesophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and discuss research investigations which need to be conducted to facilitate diagnosis and enhance treatment methods.