Successful desensitization to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin acetate using a sustained-release depot preparation

Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Reactions with Leuprolide Acetate and Triptorelin Acetate in Children

INTRODUCTION

Gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) are commonly used to treat central precocious puberty (CPP). Generally, they are well-tolerated; however adverse reactions have been reported. Local adverse events occur in 10-15% of the patients who were treated with GnRHa. Anaphylactoid reactions with GnRHa are very rarely seen. The aim of this study is to report our clinical experience with hypersensitivity reactions seen in pediatric patients receiving leuprolide acetate (LA) and triptorelin acetate (TA) in CPP at the single pediatric tertiary medical center and to evaluate the incidence rate of hypersensitivity reactions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children with CPP who were treated with GnRHa (LA and TA) at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2020. We analyzed clinical characteristics of patients who experienced adverse reactions and analyzed the incidence rate.

RESULTS

Seven side effects (adverse reactions) (0.69%) were observed among total of 1010 CPP patients who were treated with TA and LA. Sterile abscesses were observed in 3 patients (0.29%). None of the patients had an anaphylaxis. Tremors of both hands, a vomiting episode, an urticarial rash, and musculoskeletal stiffness were observed in one patient each.

CONCLUSION

In our study, mild reactions were seen in 7 patients. GnRHa can be safely used and well-tolerated medications; but exceedingly rare, severe reactions can be developed.

Management of Systemic Hypersensitivity Reactions to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues during Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty

BACKGROUND

Besides local reactions, systemic hypersensitivity reactions such as urticaria, anaphylaxis, serum sickness and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) have been reported during gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue treatment.

AIM

To present the clinical presentation of 9 cases with systemic hypersensitivity reactions to GnRH analogues and discuss the management of such reactions based on our experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine of 232 (3.8%) patients with central precocious puberty receiving GnRH analogue treatment had systemic hypersensitivity reactions in 4 years' period. Six patients had a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction (generalized hives, pruritus, and/or edema) to triptorelin acetate (TA), 2 patients to leuprolide acetate (LA), and 1 patient to both medications who also developed anaphylaxis to LA during intradermal test (IDT). Another patient on TA had skin lesions suggestive of HSP. GnRH analogue treatment was discontinued in 2 patients after discussion with the parents. Treatment was changed to another GnRH analogue preparation in 6 patients and was maintained with the same medication with antihistamines and corticosteroid premedication in 1 patient. None of the patients developed new reactions after these precautions.

CONCLUSION

Systemic hypersensitivity reactions should be carefully evaluated and cross-reaction to the other GnRH analogues should be kept in mind. Discontinuation of GnRH analogue is always an option. However, if continuation of GnRH analogue is elected, we recommend switching to an alternative GnRH analogue, which should be considered only after a skin prick test (SPT) and IDT. In the lack of the possibility to perform SPT and IDT, injections may be administered under strict medical supervision in a well-equipped facility to manage anaphylaxis. We discuss additional options in situations where alternative GnRH analogues are unavailable, which enabled us to continue treatment in most cases without further problems.

Protocols for drug allergy desensitization in children

Introduction: When a drug hypersensitivity reaction is proven, desensitization protocols allow the reintroduction of the molecule in patients for whom such therapy is essential. Through drug desensitization (DDS), a temporary immune tolerance is maintained for the single course of a specific therapy. In pediatrics, indications for such a procedure include children with chronic diseases, severe infectious diseases and/or malignancies, who have a proven drug hypersensitivity.Areas covered: We ran a search on PubMed and Web of Science for papers on DDS and on DDS in children. Most protocols and recommendations on DDS focus on adults and have been adapted for children. The best candidates for desensitization are children with a history of immediate, IgE-mediated drug allergy, but this therapy may be applied also in nonallergic hypersensitivities and in non-immediate reactions. Most protocols in literature focus on antibiotics, especially beta-lactams, on chemotherapeutic agents, and on monoclonal antibodies.Expert opinion: Pediatric allergists should cooperate with specialists in infectious diseases and onco-hematology to provide DDS to children in need. Standardized protocols and international guidelines are still needed to optimize such treatment and to implement it in clinical daily practice.

Food and drug allergy, and anaphylaxis in EAACI journals (2018)

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) supports three journals: "Allergy," "Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (PAI)," and "Clinical and Translational Allergy (CTA)." One of the major goals of EAACI is to support health promotion in which prevention of allergy and asthma plays a critical role and to disseminate the knowledge of allergy to all stakeholders including the EAACI junior members. This paper summarizes the achievements of 2018 in anaphylaxis, and food and drug allergy. Main topics that have been focused are anaphylaxis, mechanisms of food allergy (FA), epidemiology of FA, food allergens, diagnosis of FA, prevention and control of FA, FA immunotherapy, drug allergy, and political agenda.