Arterial blood pressure in anesthetized neonates and infants: a retrospective analysis of 1091 cases

Continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow during general anaesthesia in infants

Background

General anaesthesia is associated with neurocognitive deficits in infants after noncardiac surgery. Disturbances in cerebral perfusion as a result of systemic hypotension and impaired autoregulation may be a potential cause. Our aim was to study cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity continuously during general anaesthesia in infants undergoing noncardiac surgery and compare variations in CBF velocity with simultaneously measured near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), blood pressure, and heart rate.

Methods

NeoDoppler, a recently developed ultrasound system, was used to monitor CBF velocity via the anterior fontanelle during induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia until the start of surgery, and during recovery. NIRS, blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored simultaneously and synchronised with the NeoDoppler measurements.

Results

Thirty infants, with a median postmenstrual age at surgery of 37.6 weeks (range 28.6-60.0) were included. Compared with baseline, the trend curves showed a decrease in CBF velocity during induction and maintenance of anaesthesia and returned to baseline values during recovery. End-diastolic velocity decreased in all infants during anaesthesia, on average by 59%, whereas peak systolic- and time-averaged velocities decreased by 26% and 45%, respectively. In comparison, the reduction in mean arterial pressure was only 20%. NIRS values were high and remained stable. When adjusting for mean arterial pressure, the significant decrease in end-diastolic velocity persisted, whereas there was only a small reduction in peak systolic velocity.

Conclusions

Continuous monitoring of CBF velocity using NeoDoppler during anaesthesia is feasible and may provide valuable information about cerebral perfusion contributing to a more targeted haemodynamic management in anaesthetised infants.

Children and neonates anesthesia in magnetic resonance environment in Italy: an active call survey

Background

Pediatric anesthesia care in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a challenge for clinicians. The recent debate about the role of anesthetic agent on neural development, encouraged an evaluation of their actual activity in this environment. In this active call survey, the authors sought to delineate the Italian situation regarding national centers, staff involved, monitoring tools available and sedation techniques.

Methods

A complete sample of all national centers performing almost a pediatric discharge in the 2014 was obtained from Health Ministry registers. All Institutions were contacted for a prospective phone investigation and a three-section survey was fill out with the Physician in charge. A descriptive and exploratory analyzes about the organization setting of the Centers were performed.

Results

Among 876 Institution screened, only 106 (37%) met minimal criteria for inclusion. Children are managed by anesthesiologists in the 95% of cases, while neonates in the 54%. A dedicated nurse is present in 74% of centers. While a pulse oximetry is present in 100% of centers, the rate of prevalence of other monitoring is lower. A specific MRI-compatible ventilator is available in the 95% of Centers, but many tools are not equally homogenously distributed. Pharmacological approach is preferred in pediatric age (98%), but its use for newborns is reduced to 43%.

Conclusions

We found significant heterogeneity in the daily clinical practice of sedation in MRI. Our results could be a starting point to evaluate the further evolution of approach to children and neonates in magnetic resonance setting.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04775641.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01821-3.

Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the pediatric population: a systematic review of the clinical evidence

Background: Exposure to general anesthesia (GA) in early life is known to be neurotoxic to animals. Objectives: To evaluate the risk of GA inducing long-term neurodevelopmental deficits in human children. Design: Systematic review. Methods: We included observational and randomized studies that compared the long-term neurodevelopment of postnatal children exposed to GA to the long-term neurodevelopment of children not exposed to GA. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science for relevant studies published in the year 2000 or later. We screened all the identified studies on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A risk of bias assessment was made for each included study. We identified 9 neurodevelopmental domains for which a sub-analysis was made: intelligence; memory; learning; language/speech; motor function; visuospatial skills; development/emotions/behavior; ADHD/attention; autistic disorder. Results: We included 26 studies involving 605.391 participants. Based on AHRQ-standards 11 studies were of poor quality, 7 studies were of fair quality and 8 studies were of good quality. The major causes of potential bias were selection and comparability bias. On 2 neurodevelopmental domains (visuospatial skills and autistic disorder), the available evidence showed no association with exposure to GA. On 7 other neurodevelopmental domains, the available evidence showed mixed results. The 4 studies that used a randomized or sibling-controlled design showed no association between GA and neurodevelopmental deficits in their primary endpoints. Limitations: The absence of a meta-analysis and funnel plot. Conclusions: Based on observational studies, we found an association between GA in childhood and neuro-developmental deficits in later life. Randomized and sibling-matched observational studies failed to show the same association and therefore no evidence of a causal relationship exists at present. Since GA seems to be a marker, but not a cause of worse neurodevelopment, we argue against delaying or avoiding interventional or diagnostic procedures requiring GA in childhood based on the argument of GA-induced neurotoxicity.

A practical approach to cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) directed hemodynamic management in noncardiac pediatric anesthesia

Safeguarding cerebral function is of major importance during pediatric anesthesia. Premature, ex-premature, and full-term neonates can be vulnerable to physiological changes that occur during anesthesia and surgery. Data from studies performed during pediatric cardiac surgery and in neonatal/pediatric intensive care units have shown the benefits of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring of regional cerebral oxygenation (c-rSO₂ ). However, NIRS monitoring is seldom used during noncardiac pediatric anesthesia. Despite compelling evidence that blood pressure does not reflect end-organ perfusion, it is still regarded as the most important determinant of cerebral perfusion and the most relevant hemodynamic management target parameter by most (pediatric) anesthetists. The principle of NIRS monitoring is not self-explanatory and sometimes seems even counterintuitive, which may explain why many anesthesiologists are reserved regarding its use. The first part of this paper is dedicated to a clinical introduction to NIRS monitoring. Despite scientific efforts, it has not yet been possible to define individual lower limit c-rSO₂ values and it is unlikely this will succeed in the near future. Nonetheless, published treatment algorithms usually specify c-rSO₂ values which may be associated with cerebral hypoxia. Our treatment guideline for maintaining sufficient cerebral oxygenation differs fundamentally from all previously published approaches. We define a baseline c-rSO₂ value, registered in the awake child prior to anesthesia induction, as the lowest acceptable limit during anesthesia and surgery. The cerebral rSO₂ is the single target parameter, while blood pressure, heart rate, P_a CO₂ , and SaO₂ are major parameters that determine the c-rSO2. Cerebral NIRS monitoring, interpreted together with its continuously available contributing parameters, may help avoid potentially harmful episodes of cerebral desaturation in anesthetized pediatric patients.

Randomised controlled trial of dexmedetomidine sedation vs general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery on perioperative outcomes in infants

BACKGROUND

Neonates and infants undergoing general anaesthesia for hernia surgery are at risk of perioperative cardiorespiratory adverse events. The use of regional anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine preserves airway tone and may potentially avoid these complications. This study compares the perioperative conditions and adverse events between dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block and general anaesthesia with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery in infants.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Singapore involving 104 infants younger than 3 months, who were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine sedation (DEX) with caudal block or general sevoflurane anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and caudal block (GA) for inguinal hernia surgery. Perioperative conditions, haemodynamics and adverse events were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-one infants received DEX and 48 infants received GA. In the DEX group, 46 infants (90.2%) had their operations completed solely under this technique, two (3.9%) were converted to general anaesthesia with intubation, and three (5.9%) required brief administration of nitrous oxide or low-dose sevoflurane. Overall, 96.1% of infants in the DEX group did not require intubation. Perioperative conditions were similar in both groups. The DEX group had significantly lower heart rates and higher mean arterial pressures intraoperatively. Two infants in the DEX group (3.9%) required postoperative intensive care admission compared with six infants (12.5%) in the GA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block provides a feasible alternative to general anaesthesia in infants undergoing hernia surgery. This technique avoids the need for tracheal intubation, which may be beneficial in neonates.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02559102.

An International, Multicenter, Observational Study of Cerebral Oxygenation during Infant and Neonatal Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia during infancy is associated with neurocognitive abnormalities. Potential mechanisms include anesthetic neurotoxicity, surgical disease, and cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. This study aimed to determine the incidence of low cerebral oxygenation and associated factors during general anesthesia in infants.

METHODS

This multicenter study enrolled 453 infants aged less than 6 months having general anesthesia for 30 min or more. Regional cerebral oxygenation was measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. We defined events (more than 3 min) for low cerebral oxygenation as mild (60 to 69% or 11 to 20% below baseline), moderate (50 to 59% or 21 to 30% below baseline), or severe (less than 50% or more than 30% below baseline); for low mean arterial pressure as mild (36 to 45 mmHg), moderate (26 to 35 mmHg), or severe (less than 25 mmHg); and low pulse oximetry saturation as mild (80 to 89%), moderate (70 to 79%), or severe (less than 70%).

RESULTS

The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe low cerebral oxygenation were 43%, 11%, and 2%, respectively; mild, moderate, and severe low mean arterial pressure were 62%, 36%, and 13%, respectively; and mild, moderate, and severe low arterial saturation were 15%, 4%, and 2%, respectively. Severe low oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry was associated with mild and moderate cerebral desaturation; American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status III or IV versus I was associated with moderate cerebral desaturation. Severe low cerebral saturation events were too infrequent to analyze.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild and moderate low cerebral saturation occurred frequently, whereas severe low cerebral saturation was uncommon. Low mean arterial pressure was common and not well associated with low cerebral saturation. Unrecognized severe desaturation lasting 3 min or longer in infants seems unlikely to explain the subsequent development of neurocognitive abnormalities.

Xenon as an adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia in children younger than 4 years of age, undergoing interventional or diagnostic cardiac catheterization: A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Xenon has repeatedly been demonstrated to have only minimal hemodynamic side effects when compared to other anesthetics. Moreover, in experimental models, xenon was found to be neuroprotective and devoid of developmental neurotoxicity. These properties could render xenon attractive for the anesthesia in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. However, experience with xenon anesthesia in children is scarce.

AIMS

We hypothesized that in children undergoing cardiac catheterization, general anesthesia with a combination of sevoflurane with xenon results in superior hemodynamic stability, compared to sevoflurane alone.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial, children with a median age of 12 [IQR 3-36] months undergoing diagnostic/interventional cardiac catheterization were randomized to either general anesthesia with 50-65vol% xenon plus sevoflurane or sevoflurane alone. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraprocedural hemodynamic instability, defined as the occurrence of: (i) a heart rate change >20% from baseline; or (ii) a change in mean arterial blood pressure >20% from baseline; or (iii) the requirement of vasopressors, inotropes, chronotropes, or fluid boluses. Secondary endpoints included recovery characteristics, feasibility criteria, and safety (incidence of emergence agitation and postoperative vomiting.

RESULTS

After inclusion of 40 children, the trial was stopped as an a priori planned blinded interim analysis revealed that the overall rate of hemodynamic instability did not differ between groups [100% in both the xenon-sevoflurane and the sevoflurane group. However, the adjuvant administration of xenon decreased vasopressor requirements, preserved better cerebral oxygen saturation, and resulted in a faster recovery. Xenon anesthesia was feasible (with no differences in the need for rescue anesthetics in both groups).

CONCLUSION

Our observations suggest that combining xenon with sevoflurane in preschool children is safe, feasible, and facilitates hemodynamic management. Larger and adequately powered clinical trials are warranted to investigate the impact of xenon on short- and long-term outcomes in pediatric anesthesia.

Defining hypotension in anesthetized infants by individual awake blood pressure values: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) is the most commonly applied clinical surrogate parameter for tissue perfusion and cerebral autoregulation. Hypotension during anesthesia may contribute to unfavorable outcome in young children. Hypotension in anesthetized infants can be defined using BP values relative to individual awake baseline or absolute BP values.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the two definitions and to compare the incidences of hypotension.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study in 151 infants <12 months of age. The percentage of successful awake BP measurements was calculated and related to the infant's behavioral state. Hypotension under sevoflurane anesthesia was defined by a decrease of mean arterial pressure (MAP) relative to awake baseline (>20% in infants <6 months, >40% in infants >6 months) or absolute MAP values (<35 mmHg in infants <6 months, <43 mmHg in infants >6 months). The incidences of hypotension using the two definitions were compared.

RESULTS

Awake BP values were obtained in 85% of the patients. Calm patients were more likely to allow their BP to be measured than anxious patients. Anxious patients had higher preinduction MAP values than calm patients. The relative BP approach resulted in a higher incidence of postinduction hypotension than using absolute BP values.

CONCLUSIONS

Awake BP values were unobtainable in 15% of our patients, resulting in the necessity to define hypotension under anesthesia using absolute BP values. Definitions of hypotension using either absolute MAP or values relative to awake baseline are not interchangeable.

The timing and prevalence of intraoperative hypotension in infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypotension may be associated with adverse outcomes in children undergoing surgery. Infants and neonates under 6 months of age have less autoregulatory cerebral reserve than older infants, yet little information exists regarding when and how often intraoperative hypotension occurs in infants.

AIMS

To better understand the epidemiology of intraoperative hypotension in infants, we aimed to determine the prevalence of intraoperative hypotension in a generally uniform population of infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

METHODS

Vital sign data from electronic records of infants who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy with general anesthesia at a children's hospital between January 1, 1998 and October 4, 2013 were analyzed. Baseline blood pressure (BP) values and intraoperative BPs were identified during eight perioperative stages based on anesthesia event timestamps. We determined the occurrence of relative (systolic BP <20% below baseline) and absolute (mean arterial BP <35 mmHg) intraoperative hypotension within each stage.

RESULTS

A total of 735 full-term infants and 82 preterm infants met the study criteria. Relative intraoperative hypotension occurred in 77%, 72%, and 58% of infants in the 1-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days age groups, respectively. Absolute intraoperative hypotension was seen in 21%, 12%, and 4% of infants in the 1-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days age groups, respectively. Intraoperative hypotension occurred primarily during surgical prep and throughout the surgical procedure. Preterm infants had higher rates of absolute intraoperative hypotension than full-term infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative intraoperative hypotension was routine and absolute intraoperative hypotension was common in neonates and infants under 91 days of age. Preterm infants and infants under 61 days of age experienced the highest rates of absolute and relative intraoperative hypotension, particularly during surgical prep and throughout surgery.