1
|
Porto Junior S, Meira DA, da Cunha BLB, Fontes J, Pustilnik HN, da Silva da Paz MG, Araujo TB, Alcântara T, Dourado JC, de Avellar LM. Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 242:108296. [PMID: 38749357 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Craniosynostosis, a developmental craniofacial anomaly, can impair brain development and cause abnormal skull shape due to premature closure of one or more cranial sutures. Traditional surgical treatments have evolved from open operations to minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic approach in craniosynostosis correction. METHODS Adhering to Cochrane Group standards and the PRISMA framework, this review utilized databases like PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on clinical and surgical outcomes of endoscopic craniosynostosis operations up to December 2023. Inclusion criteria emphasized studies with at least five patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, while exclusion criteria involved non-English papers, incomplete texts, and overlapping data. Statistical analysis used R software with various packages, and methodological bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I framework. RESULTS The review included 30 studies (4 prospective, 26 retrospective) with 2561 patients. The median age at operation was 3.20 months. Findings showed a mean operative time of 68.06 min, median hospital stay of 1.28 days, and mean blood loss of 29.89 ml. Blood transfusion was required in 9.97% of cases. Helmet therapy post-operation was common, with a median duration of 9 months. The rate of postoperative complications was 1.86%, and the reoperation rate was 3.07%. No procedure-related mortality was observed. The study noted substantial variations in the handling of craniosynostosis and a lack of consensus on the optimal timing and surgical approach. CONCLUSION Endoscopic techniques for craniosynostosis repair demonstrate safety and effectiveness, characterized by low complication risks and favorable surgical outcomes. However, due to the limitations of observational studies and inherent heterogeneity, further comprehensive and controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and understand the long-term outcomes of the endoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Porto Junior
- Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Dom João VI Avenue, 275, Brotas, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
| | - Davi Amorim Meira
- Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Dom João VI Avenue, 275, Brotas, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Jefferson Fontes
- Metropolitan Union of Education and Culture, Luiz Tarquinio Pontes Avenue, 600, Fazenda Pitangueira, Lauro de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Hugo Nunes Pustilnik
- University of Salvador, Dr. José Peroba Street, 251, Stiep, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Matheus Gomes da Silva da Paz
- General Hospital Roberto Santos, Neurosurgery Department, Direta do Saboeiro Street, s/n, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Taiane Brito Araujo
- General Hospital Roberto Santos, Neurosurgery Department, Direta do Saboeiro Street, s/n, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Tancredo Alcântara
- General Hospital Roberto Santos, Neurosurgery Department, Direta do Saboeiro Street, s/n, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; NICC - Núcleo Integrado do Cérebro e Coluna, Pediatric Neurosurgery Department, Av. Juracy Magalhães Junior, 2096, Rio Vermelho, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Jules Carlos Dourado
- General Hospital Roberto Santos, Neurosurgery Department, Direta do Saboeiro Street, s/n, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; NICC - Núcleo Integrado do Cérebro e Coluna, Neurosurgery Department, Av. Juracy Magalhães Junior, 2096, Rio Vermelho, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Miranda de Avellar
- General Hospital Roberto Santos, Neurosurgery Department, Direta do Saboeiro Street, s/n, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pediatric Neuroanesthesia — a Review of the Recent Literature. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-022-00540-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Pediatric neuroanesthesia is a growing and still challenging subspecialty. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available knowledge and highlight the most recent findings of the literature on non-traumatic pediatric neuroanesthesia care.
Recent Findings
Several human studies have confirmed the negative effects of early life anesthetic exposure. According to non-human studies, volatile anesthetics and opioids contribute to tumor progression. Tranexamic acid effectively reduces perioperative blood loss; it is used in several different doses without standard guidelines on optimal dosing. The widespread use of neuromonitoring has necessitated the development of anesthetic methods that do not affect neuromuscular transmission.
Summary
Pediatric anesthetic neurotoxicity, management of intraoperative bleeding, and the effect of anesthesia on tumor growth are among the most debated and researched topics in pediatric neuroanesthesia. The lack of evidence and clinical guidelines underlines the need for further large prospective studies in this subspecialty.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fassl V, Ellermann L, Reichelt G, Pape P, Blecher C, Hoffmann C, Ringel F, Al-Nawas B, Heider J, Ottenhausen M. Endoscopic treatment of sagittal suture synostosis - a critical analysis of current management strategies. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:2533-2546. [PMID: 35384543 PMCID: PMC9349114 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01762-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
While many centers nowadays offer minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of single suture synostosis, surgical techniques and patient management vary significantly. We provide an overview of how scaphocephaly treated with endoscopic techniques is managed in the reported series and analyze the crucial steps that need to be dealt with during the management process. We performed a review of the published literature including all articles that examined sagittal-suture synostosis treated with endoscopic techniques as part of single- or multicenter studies. Fourteen studies reporting results of 885 patients were included. We identified 5 key steps in the management of patients. A total of 188 patients were female and 537 male (sex was only specified in 10 articles, for 725 included patients, respectively). Median age at surgery was between 2.6 and 3.9 months with a total range from 1.5 to 7.0 months. Preoperative diagnostics included clinical and ophthalmologic examinations as well as neuropsychological and genetic consultations if needed. In 5 publications, a CT scan was routinely performed. Several groups used anthropometric measurements, mostly the cephalic index. All groups analyzed equally recommended to perform endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis surgery with postoperative helmet therapy in children < 3 months of age, at least for non-syndromic cases. There exist significant variations in surgical techniques and patient management for children treated endoscopically for single suture sagittal synostosis. This heterogeneity constitutes a major problem in terms of comparability between different strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Fassl
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Laura Ellermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriele Reichelt
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Phillipe Pape
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Christian Hoffmann
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bilal Al-Nawas
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Heider
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Malte Ottenhausen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|