Cuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes-Outer cuff diameters compared to age-related airway dimensions

Airway Management in Pediatric Patients: Cuff-Solved Problem?

Traditionally, uncuffed tubes were used in pediatric patients under 8 years in pursuit of reducing the risk of postextubation stridor. Although computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies confirmed that the subglottic area remains the narrowest part of pediatric airway, the use of uncuffed tubes failed to reduce the risk of subglottic swelling. Properly used cuffed tubes (correct size and correct cuff management) are currently recommended as the first option in emergency, anesthesiology and intensive care in all pediatric patients. Clinical practice particularly in the intensive care area remains variable. This review aims to analyze the current recommendation for airway management in children in emergency, anesthesiology and intensive care settings.

Compatibility of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes with tracheal and bronchial dimensions: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLT) continue to be the most widely used method for obtaining lung isolation during anesthesia. We compared recommendations for DLT size selection with radiologically assessed lower airway dimensions gathered from a large patient population.

METHODS

For this retrospective comparative study, we assessed computed tomography (CT) scans of 150 adults with no known airway pathologies. Using these scans, we measured the diameter and length of the trachea and the diameter of the mainstem bronchi. These airway dimensions were then compared to the dimensions of left-sided DLTs of three different manufacturers. Size selection was based on one standard textbook's recommendations.

RESULTS

We found the recommended DLT sizes were occasionally too small but more often too large, particularly in the endobronchial airway. With the DLT Vivasight-DL®, mismatching occurred in 28.7% (43/150) of the patients at the distal mainstem bronchus and 8% (12/150) at the tracheal level. This mismatching happened most often in females (left distal mainstem bronchus 34/68, 50%; trachea 9/68, 13.2%). Conversely, the DLT was more often too small for male patients in both the left main bronchus (SHER-I-BRONCH®: 8/82, 9.8%) and the trachea (SHER-I-BRONCH®: 2/82, 2.4%). The endobronchial tube portion was more often too long in females (Vivasight® DLT: 11/68, 16%) than males (9/82, 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of the recommended DLT sizes from all three manufacturers was incompatible with individual patient's lower airway dimensions.

Insertion of cuff inflation line into pediatric tracheal tubes related to oral and nasal tracheal intubation depth

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the cuff inflation line of cuffed pediatric tracheal tubes often interferes with securing tracheal tubes.

METHODS

The insertion site of the cuff inflation lines and the lengths of four different brands and nine sizes of commonly used cuffed pediatric tracheal tubes were measured and compared in vitro with oral and nasotracheal intubation depths as calculated by different formulas for pediatric patients aged from birth to 16 years. Motoyama's recommendation was used for age-related size selection of cuffed pediatric tracheal tubes.

RESULTS

The proportion of the distance from the tracheal tube tip to the insertion site of the cuff inflation line varied considerably between the tracheal tubes (Microcuff: 48.5-60.7%; Parker: 48.7-73.2%; Ruesch: 59.1-77.8%; and Shiley: 46.0-60.3%). Using different formulas for oral or nasotracheal intubation depth, the insertion site of the cuff inflation line was placed within the oral or nasal cavity or within an area 1 cm beyond the teeth or the nostrils in almost all tracheal tubes tested. Positioning the insertion site 2 cm from the proximal end of the tracheal tubes resulted in a cuff line-free tube area of ≥1 cm in all orally and almost in all nasally inserted tracheal tubes, considering maximum recommended tracheal intubation depths.

CONCLUSION

The cuff inflation line in almost all commonly used cuffed pediatric tracheal tubes interferes with securing the tracheal tube due to its insertion site into the tracheal tube. This potentially carries the risk of kinking, obstruction, or damage to the cuff inflation line with ensuing failure to deflate or inflate the cuff. The proposed position of the insertion of the cuff inflation line 2 cm from the proximal end of the tracheal tube would ensure a 1-cm-wide cuff line-free circular area beyond the oral or nasal cavity in nearly all assessed tracheal tube sizes.

Prediction of endotracheal tube size using a printed three-dimensional airway model in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: a prospective, single-center, single-group study

Background

To determine the correct size of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) for endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients, new methods have been investigated. Although the three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been successful in the field of surgery, there are not many studies in the field of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a 3D airway model for prediction of the correct ETT size, and compare the results with a conventional age-based formula in pediatric patients.

Methods

Thirty-five pediatric patients under six years of age who were scheduled for congenital heart surgery were enrolled. In the pre-anesthetic period, the patient’s computed tomography (CT) images were converted to Standard Triangle Language (STL) files using the 3D conversion program. A Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) type 3D printer was used to print 3D airway models from the sub-glottis to the upper carina. ETT size was selected by inserting various sized cuffed-ETTs to a printed 3D airway model.

Results

The 3D method selected the correct ETT size in 21 out of 35 pediatric patients (60%), whereas the age-based formula selected the correct ETT size in 9 patients (26%).

Conclusions

Prediction of the correct size of ETTs using a printed 3D airway model demonstrated better results than the age-based formula. This suggests that the selection of ETT size using a printed 3D airway model may be feasible for helping minimize re-intubation attempts and complications in patients with congenital heart disease and/or those with an abnormal range of growth and development.

Cuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates and infants of less than 3 kg body weight-A retrospective audit

BACKGROUND

Large prospective clinical studies have shown that modern cuffed pediatric tracheal tubes can be used safely, even in children weighing ≥3 kg. There is a growing interest in their use in children weighing <3 kg so that they, too, can benefit from the potential advantages, particularly the high probability of these tubes fitting into and sealing the pediatric airway at the first intubation attempt. This study aimed to find a cut-off body weight for procedures requiring a cuffed tracheal tube to seal the airway in children weighing <3 kg and to evaluate the frequency and predictive factors for the requirement to place a cuffed instead of an uncuffed tracheal tube.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of 269 children weighing 2000-2999 g, primarily intubated by pediatric anesthetists. Frequency of intubation with uncuffed Sheridan tubes versus cuffed Microcuff^® Pediatric Endotracheal Tube (PET) 3.0 mm ID was studied. Predictive variables were assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. The ROC curve for weight at intubation time and Youden index was calculated.

RESULTS

The 149 (55.4%) children were finally intubated with a cuffed tracheal tube. Logistic regression demonstrated that body weight at tracheal intubation and birth weight were the strongest predictors for the appropriateness of cuffed/uncuffed tracheal tubes. The threshold weight at tracheal intubation was 2700 g for a probability >50% of using a cuffed tracheal tube.

CONCLUSION

Half of the children weighing 2000-2999 g received a Microcuff^® PET 3.0 mm ID, especially those with a body weight above 2700 g. Because of the anatomical dimensions in patients with a body weight of 2000-2999 g, cuffed tracheal tubes with smaller outer diameters may be required to better fit their airways.

Anatomical In Vitro Investigations of the Pediatric Larynx: A Call for Manufacturer Redesign of Tracheal Tube Cuff Location and Perhaps a Call to Reconsider the Use of Uncuffed Tracheal Tubes

BACKGROUND

Some in vivo studies question the traditional "funnel-shaped" infant larynx; further anatomic examinations were warranted. Examination of fixative free fresh autopsy laryngeal and upper tracheal specimens and multiple measurements was needed to determine consistency between current tracheal tube designs and anatomic observations.

METHODS

Larynges from 19 males and 11 females (Caucasian term newborn to 126 months) were examined by the same forensic pathologist. Measurements included anterior/posterior (A/P) and transverse (T) diameters of the cricoid outlet (CO), interarytenoid diameter (IAD), cricothyroid membrane (CTM), distance from the vocal cords (VC) to CO (VC-CO), and calibration of the larynx lumen with uncuffed tracheal tubes as measuring rods. Assessment of "safe tracheal tube placement" was assessed using manufacturer recommended cuffed Microcuff (Kimberly-Clark, Koblenz, Germany) tubes.

RESULTS

In 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58-90) of specimens, the proximal end of the cuff was within the CO and in 23% even with or close to the CO. The VC-CO varied from 9.1 to 13.17 mm in infants, 11.55 to 15.17 mm in toddlers, and 13.19 to 18.34 mm in children. The AP/T ratio of the CO was nearly 0.99 in most larynges; the IAD was greater than CO in all specimens. The CTM could be minimally distended in all specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

First, despite being marketed as a safer tracheal tube design, the proximal end of the Microcuff cuff rested within or close to the cricoid cartilage theoretically increasing potential cuff-induced injury when using the VC markings for positioning. Our data suggest that the optimal cuff free distance (VC-CO) would be ~13.5 mm for a Microcuff internal diameter (ID) size 3.0, ~15 mm for size 3.5, and ~16 to 19 mm for greater sizes.Second, the CO was virtually circular in all specimens, suggesting that appropriately sized uncuffed tubes should provide an adequate seal in most neonates and toddlers, thus avoiding the potential for cuff-related necrosis injury.Third, the IAD was always greater than CO confirming that the narrowest point of the infant larynx is the nondistensible cricoid cartilage and not the easily distended glottis.Fourth, appropriately sized Microcuff tubes with the cuff deflated completely filled the lumen of the CO and proximal trachea in all specimens. Our data suggest the need for all manufacturers to further evaluate tracheal tube cuff locations and lengths in relation to the VC safe insertion markings, particularly for neonates and toddlers.Fifth, the CTM is minimally distensible, thus having important implications for emergency surgical airway access with most currently available emergency airway devices.