Global surgery in the 21st century: The voice from Africa - We need a new model

Global Surgery: The Challenges and Strategies to Win a War That Must Be Won

Background

Modern science has conquered seas, land, and space. Although great strides have been made in technology and infectious diseases, global surgery, which was reborn in 2015, has not made much progress. The burden of surgical disease in low- and middle-income countries remains seemingly unconquerable, and its growth unstoppable. The myriad challenges in meeting the surgical needs of 5 billion people has intrigued the author.

Methods

The author collected the views of plastic surgeons on sources and impediments to the scale-up of plastic surgery in low- and middle-income countries, as well as potential strategies for overcoming these obstacles. The author then performed a literature search reviewing the topics that arose from those discussions. The author proposes a strategy using plastic surgery as a model surgical discipline.

Results

A root-cause analysis suggests that the Alma Ata Declaration, with its focus on primary healthcare, is the probable genesis of global surgery (GS) woes. The absence of a clear GS community leader and the fragmented nature of GS advocates who operate in multiple silos, without a clear unified goal, are the primary reasons GS advocates have achieved so little on the ground.

Conclusions

Global surgery requires a business model to sustainably meet the surgical needs of the 5 billion people globally. The proposed and implemented strategies must meet rigorous criteria to ensure sustainability, as quick-fix solutions are counterproductive. The development of centers of excellence offers a viable solution to problems that must be addressed successfully.

The State of Surgical Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Urgent Call for Surgical Research Trainers

Background

Surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is poorly developed because of years of neglect. Sustained research on global surgery led to its recognition as an indivisible and indispensable part of primary healthcare in 2015. However, this has had little visible effect on surgical ecosystems within LMICs, especially in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). SSA surgical research systems strengthening, which includes skills transfer, with local priority setting driving the research agenda, is needed to propel global surgery into the future.

Methods

The authors performed a literature review of the state of surgical research within SSA and also report the initial efforts of two research training nonprofits to empower young African surgeons with research skills.

Results

Surgical research in SSA is disadvantaged even before it is birthed, facing monumental challenges at every stage of development, from research agenda determination to funding, study execution, and publication. Compared with a global output of 17.49 publications per 100,000 population, SSA produces 0.9 (P < 0.0001). The Surgeons in Humanitarian Alliance for Reconstructive, Research, and Education and Enabling Africa Clinical Health Research programs are involved in the longitudinal research mentorship of surgical residents within SSA; the improved quality of research and successful publications by participants suggest nascent steps in growing young surgical scientists.

Conclusions

In the absence of an existing surgical research infrastructure within LMICs, global surgery research trainers should link up and collaborate to help develop a surgical research community that will provide the local data required to help transform the SSA surgical ecosystem.

African primary research publications in plastic surgery: A PRISMA-S-compliant systematic review

BACKGROUND

Plastic surgery (PS) in Africa is a relatively young surgery specialty, and the number of available plastic surgeons on average is one or two surgeons per country in many African low-income countries. This systematic review aims to geographically map the research activities through scientific publications of African PS centres, between February 2012-February 2023.

METHODS

We searched four literature databases (Medline, Embase, Google Scholar and African Journal Online) and did a manual search. We included case reports, randomised controlled trials, and clinical, comparative, observational and multicentre studies conducted in Africa and published in English and French. In the Google Scholar database, we analysed the first 200 references (scientific articles) selected per relevance according to the Boolean terms. In the African Journals Online database, we analysed the references from the first five pages. The selected keywords were: burns, trauma reconstruction, pressure injuries, wound, cleft lip and palate, breast reconstruction, microsurgery, aesthetic surgery, face surgery, head and neck surgery, hand surgery, open fracture surgery, oculoplastic surgery, skin surgery, and soft tissue surgery.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 228 articles. Out of the 73 African centres we identified, 27 were in the North, 22 in the West, 8 in the East, 3 in the Centre, and 14 in the South. Most of the retrieved 228 articles involved burns (60, 26.31%), congenital abnormalities (52, 22.80%) and reconstruction (28,12.80%); however, other conditions, such as breast or skin cancer, hand surgery, microsurgery or aesthetics are emerging. The studies were case reports/case series (93, 40.78%), retrospective (78, 34.21%), prospective (36, 15.78%), randomised controlled studies (10, 4.38%), cross-sectional (5, 2,19%) and cohort (2, 0.87%).

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond burns, congenital abnormalities, or reconstructions, other PS indications are emerging, such as skin cancer, breast reconstruction, hand surgery, microsurgery, and aesthetics.

Safety and Sustainability: Optimizing Outcomes and Changing Paradigms in Global Health Endeavors

Background

The need to address inequities in global surgical care has garnered increased attention since 2015, after the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery underscored the importance of ensuring safe, accessible, affordable, and timely surgical and anesthetic care. The vast unmet global plastic surgery needs make plastic surgery care essential in reducing the global burden of disease. In the past, many nonprofit organizations undertook humanitarian activities within low- and middle-income countries that were primarily service-provision oriented. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery report prompted a shift in focus from direct patient care models to sustainable global surgical models. The realization that 33% of deaths worldwide were due to unmet surgical needs led to a global shift of strategy toward the development of local systems, surgical capacity, and a focus on patient safety and quality of care within international global surgery partnerships.

Methods

In this report, the authors explore some of the primary components of sustainable international global surgical partnerships discussed in a recent panel at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Plastic Surgery The Meeting 2022, titled "Safety and Sustainability Overseas: Optimizing Outcomes and Changing Paradigms in Global Health Endeavors." A literature review elaborating the topics discussed was performed.

Results

This report focuses on cultural competence and humility, international collaboration, and the use of technology and innovation, all of which are needed to promote sustainability and patient safety, within global surgery efforts.

Conclusions

The adoption of these components into international surgical collaborations will lead to greatly enhancing the development and sustainability of mutually beneficial relationships.

Building Anesthesia Capacity in the Developing World

Over two-thirds of the world's population do not have access to safe surgical and anesthetic care. Barriers to care include a lack of specialty trained personnel and unavailability of essential operating room resources. Aid efforts with the greatest impact focus on forming partnerships between high- and low-income communities, with the goal of creating self-sustaining programs run by local communities. Together these partnerships can work to build local capacity and expand the trained workforce by educating local providers.

Global pediatric surgery and anesthesia inequities: how do we have a global effort?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the inequities in access to healthcare while also revealing our global connectivity. These inequities are emblematic of decades of underinvestment in healthcare systems, education, and research in low-middle income countries (LMICs), especially in surgery and anesthesiology. Five billion people remain without access to safe surgery, and we must take appropriate action now.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pediatric perioperative mortality in low-resourced settings may be as high as 100 times greater than in high-resourced settings, and a pediatric surgery workforce density benchmark of 4/1 million population could increase survivability to over 80%. Delay in treatment for congenital surgically correctable issues dramatically increases disability-adjusted life years. Appropriate academic partnerships which promote education are desired but the lack of authorship position priority for LMIC-based researchers must be addressed. Five perioperative benchmark indicators have been published including: geospatial access to care within 2 h of location; workforce/100,000 population; volume of surgery/100,000 population; perioperative mortality within 30 days of surgery or until discharged; and risks for catastrophic expenditure from surgical care.

SUMMARY

Research that determines ethical and acceptable partnership development between high- and low-resourced settings focusing on education and capacity building needs to be standardized and followed.

Access to training in neurosurgery (Part 1): Global perspectives and contributing factors of barriers to access

Introduction

Neurological disorders are one of the leading causes of death and disability adjusted life years (DALYs). Efforts have been made to increase the neurosurgical workforce in an attempt to address the global disease burden. Despite these efforts, there continues to be a shortage of neurosurgeons in both high-income countries (HICs) and low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Research question

The aim of the study was to identify the barriers to neurosurgical training in LMICs and HICs.

Materials and methods

We administered an electronic survey targeting medical students, neurosurgery residents, and recent neurosurgery graduates from 69 countries in both HICs and LMICs. Questions were framed to assess barriers to training.

Results

Of the 198 responses received (31.3% response rate), 72% identified as male, 27% female, and 0.5% as non-binary gender. 33 respondents were from HICs and 165 were from LMICs. 70.1% of respondents reported no availability of dissection labs in their home institutions. There was a significant difference in availability of subspecialty training between LMICs and HMICs (p ​= ​0.001) but no significance was seen for competitiveness of programs (p ​= ​0.473).

Discussion and conclusion

There are limitations to our study: it is not comprehensive of training programs globally, there is sampling bias, especially among LMICs, and the accuracy of responses is unclear. Nonetheless, our results highlight the need for a deliberate focus on designing and implementing both short and long term goals in tackling barriers to access to neurosurgical training, with a conscientious effort to involve interested stakeholders and governments to invest in the training and education of their neurosurgical workforce.

•

In comparing LMICs to HICs, there was no significant difference found in ranked competitiveness for entering neurosurgical training.

•

A significant difference was found in weekly work hours (p ​= ​0.016) and subspecialty training availability (p ​= ​0.001) between LMICs and HMICs.

•

54.4% of countries represented in our study did not have neurosurgical subspecialty training available.

•

A significant number of our respondents (70.1%) reported no availability of dissection and surgical skills labs in their home institutions.