Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the European Portuguese Version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in Adolescents With Musculoskeletal Chronic Pain

Predictors of improvement in community adolescents with chronic neck pain: A secondary analysis using different improvement criteria

BACKGROUND

Interventions based on pain neuroscience education and exercise have emerged as effective in the management of chronic neck pain in adolescents. No studies have explored factors that might be associated with recovery in adolescents with neck pain.

OBJECTIVE

To explore predictors of improvement after an intervention based on exercise and pain neuroscience education.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

127 community adolescents with neck pain.

INTERVENTIONS

Blended-learning intervention based on exercise and pain neuroscience education.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A set of variables including sociodemographic data, pain characteristics, physical activity, disability, sleep, catastrophizing, fear of movement, self-efficacy, symptoms of central sensitization, knowledge of pain neuroscience, pressure pain thresholds, and neck muscles endurance were used to predict a clinical response at 1 week after intervention and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Different predictors of improvement and non-improvement to intervention were found, but common predictors were not found for all the improvement criteria explored and time points.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that using different criteria to characterize adolescents with neck pain as improved and non-improved after pain neuroscience education and exercise have an effect on the variables associated with a response to the intervention.

Associations between pain intensity, pain sensitivity, demographics, psychological factors, disability, physical activity, pain phenotype and COVID-19 history in low back pain: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Knowledge of the factors affecting pain intensity and pain sensitivity can inform treatment targets and strategies aimed at personalizing the intervention, conceivably increasing its positive impact on patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between demographic factors (sex and age), body mass index (BMI), psychological factors (anxiety and depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing), self-reported physical activity, pain phenotype (symptoms of central sensitization, and nociceptive or neuropathic pain), history of COVID-19 and pain intensity and sensitivity in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional secondary analysis with 83 participants with chronic non-specific LBP recruited from the community between August 2021 and April 2022. BMI, pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), pain sensitivity at the lower back and at a distant point [pressure pain threshold], catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), pain phenotype (Central Sensitization Inventory and PainDetect Questionnaire), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) were assessed. Multiple linear regression analyses with pain intensity and sensitivity as the dependent variables were used.

RESULTS

The model for pain intensity explained 34% of its variance (Adjusted R2 = -0.343, p < 0.001), with depression and anxiety (p = 0.008) and disability (p = 0.035) reaching statistical significance. The model for pain sensitivity at the lower back, also explained 34% of its variance (Adjusted R2 = 0.344, p < 0.001) at the lower back with sex, BMI, and kinesiophobia reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05) and 15% of the variance at a distant body site (Adjusted R2 = 0.148, p = 0.018) with sex and BMI reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

This study found that different factors are associated with pain intensity and pain sensitivity in individuals with LBP. Increased pain intensity was associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression and disability and increased pain sensitivity was associated with being a female, higher kinesiophobia, and lower BMI.

Relationship Between Central Sensitization-Related Symptoms and Pain-Related Disability After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Structural Equation Model

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if central sensitization (CS)-related symptoms have an intermediate role that might explain how disability develops from pain after cervical spinal surgery.

AIMS

The study aim was to investigate the role of CS-related symptoms in the relationship between pain and disability reported after cervical spinal surgery.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary care spinal surgery center.

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

The participants included individuals with a cervical degenerative condition who had undergone surgery.

METHODS

The following patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated: (1) Numerical Rating Scale; (2) Neck Disability Index; and (3) Short Form of the Central Sensitization Inventory. A hypothesized model containing the CS-related symptoms and the relationships between pain and disability was constructed and tested by structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were mailed to 280 individuals, and responses were obtained from 145 participants. Of these respondents, 99 (68.3%) were males and 46 (31.7%) were females, with a mean age of 64.4 ± 12.3 years. The latent variable for pain, represented by the neck (coefficient: 0.856, p < .001) and upper limb pain (0.568, p < .001), influenced CS-related symptoms (coefficient: 0.504, p < .001). Pain directly affected disability (coefficient: 0.497, p < .001) and indirectly through CS-related symptoms. Bootstrap analysis confirmed this indirect effect (point estimate: 2.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 6.30, p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that neck and upper limb pain affected disabilities both directly and through CS-related symptoms. Future research should focus on the efficacy of biopsychosocial approaches for patients after cervical spine surgery with a high risk of disability due to CS-related symptoms.

Pain intensity and pain sensitivity are not increased by a single session of high-intensity interval aerobic exercise in individuals with chronic low back pain: A randomized and controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the acute impact of high-intensity interval aerobic exercise on pain is scarce. This type of exercise might be perceived as increasing pain intensity and pain sensitivity negatively impacting adherence. More evidence on the acute effects of high-intensity interval aerobic exercise in individuals with low back pain (LBP) is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the acute effects of a single session of high-intensity interval aerobic exercise, continuous moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, and no exercise on pain intensity and pain sensitivity in patients with chronic non-specific LBP.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with three arms.

METHOD

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups (i) continuous moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, ii) high-intensity interval aerobic exercise, and iii) no intervention. Measures of pain intensity and pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the lower back and at a distant body site (upper limb) were taken before and after 15 min of exercise.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine participants were randomized. A significant main effect of time was found for pain intensity (p = 0.011; η2p = 0.095) and for PPT at the lower back (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.280), but not a time versus group interaction (p > 0.05). For PPT at the upper limb, no main effect of time or interaction was found (p > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Fifteen minutes of high-intensity interval aerobic exercise does not increase pain intensity or pain sensitivity compared to both moderate-intensity continuous aerobic exercise and no exercise, suggesting that high-intensity interval aerobic exercise can be used in clinical practice and patients reassured that it is unlikely to increase pain.

Central sensitization syndrome in patients with rotator cuff tear: prevalence and associated factors

INTRODUCTION

A significant number of rotator cuff tear (RCT) patients developed chronic shoulder pain that did not correspond to physiological changes. Central sensitization syndrome (CSS) is a neurophysiological adaptation process that can result in hypersensitivity to peripheral stimuli. Although there is evidence of an association between CSS and musculoskeletal problems, no studies have focused on the association between CSS and RCT. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of CSS in patients with RCT. The secondary purpose was to document the associated conditions and comorbidity that were associated with the CSS.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with RCT who completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Patients with score of ≥ 40/100 were considered positive for CSS. Demographic and clinical data and CSI results were collected to analyze the prevalence and associated factors of CSS in RCT patients.

RESULTS

A total of 404 RCT patients were included, and the CSS prevalence was 39.4%. Compared to the non-CSS group, the CSS group had an odds ratio of 4.13 (95% CI, 2.70-6.32; p＜0.001) for ages 51-60, 3.07 (95% CI, 2.00-4.69; p＜0.001) for symptoms lasting more than 6 months, 6.08 (95% CI, 3.90-9.47; p＜0.001) for nonphysical laborers, 3.69 (95%CI, 2.42-5.61; p＜0.001) for long head of biceps (LHB) abnormality, 2.93 (95% CI, 1.93-4.45; p＜0.001) for concurrent shoulder stiffness, 4.82 (95% CI, 2.55-9.10; p＜0.001) for anxiety or panic episodes, and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.12, 4.00; p＜0.001) for depression.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CSS in patients with RCT was relatively high at 39.4%. The CSS was associated with higher age, female gender, and clinical findings of symptoms lasting over six months, nonphysical laborers, abnormal LHB, concurrent shoulder stiffness, anxiety, and depression.

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory to Address Human Assumed Central Sensitization: Newly Proposed Clinically Relevant Values and Associations

Central sensitization cannot be directly demonstrated in humans and thus a gold standard is missing. Therefore, we used human assumed central sensitization (HACS) when associated with humans. The central sensitization inventory (CSI) is a screening questionnaire for addressing symptoms that are associated with HACS. This cross-sectional study compared patients with chronic pain and at least one central sensitivity syndrome with healthy, pain-free controls via ROC analyses. Analyses were performed for all participants together and for each sex separately. Regression analyses were performed on patients with chronic pain with and without central sensitivity syndromes. Based on 1730 patients and 250 healthy controls, cutoff values for the CSI for the total group were established at 30 points: women: 33 points; men: 25 points. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify possible predictors for the CSI score in 2890 patients with chronic pain. The CSI score is associated with all independent factors and has a low association with pain severity in women and a low association with pain severity, age, and body mass index in men. The newly established CSI cutoff values are lower than in previous studies and different per sex, which might be of clinical relevance in daily practice and importance in research.

Do "central sensitization" questionnaires reflect measures of nociceptive sensitization or psychological constructs? A systematic review and meta-analyses

ABSTRACT

Central sensitization (CS) is defined as an increased nociceptive responsiveness due to sensitization of neurons in the central nervous system, usually the result of prolonged nociceptive input or a disease state associated with noxious inputs (eg, polyarthritis). The concept of CS has recently been adopted in clinical assessments of chronic pain, but its diagnosis in humans may now include a wide range of hypervigilant responses. The purpose of this review is to ascertain whether self-report questionnaires linked with CS are associated with enhanced nociceptive responses or whether they measure sensitivity in a broader sense (ie, emotional responses). According to our published, PROSPERO-registered review protocol (CRD42021208731), a predefined search of studies that involve the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) or Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), correlated with either nociceptive sensory tests or emotional hypervigilance was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Correlations between the CSI or PSQ with our primary outcomes were extracted and meta-analysed. A review of 66 studies totalling 13,284 participants found that the CSI (but not the PSQ) strongly correlated with psychological constructs: depression, anxiety, stress, pain catastrophising, sleep, and kinesiophobia. The CSI and PSQ showed weak or no correlations with experimental measures of nociceptive sensitivity: pain thresholds, temporal summation, or conditioned pain modulation. The PSQ did, however, correlate strongly with phasic heat and tonic cold pain tests. The studies reviewed did not provide sufficient evidence that self-report measures reflect a canonical understanding of CS. The CSI more closely reflects psychological hypervigilance than increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons.

Association of the Degree of Varus Thrust during Gait Assessed by an Inertial Measurement Unit with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Knee Osteoarthritis

This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of varus thrust (VT) assessed by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Seventy patients (mean age: 59.8 ± 8.6 years; women: n = 40) were instructed to walk on a treadmill with an IMU attached to the tibial tuberosity. For the index of VT during walking (VT-index), the swing-speed adjusted root mean square of acceleration in the mediolateral direction was calculated. As the PROMs, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were used. Data on age, sex, body mass index, static alignment, central sensitization, and gait speed were collected as potential confounders. After adjusting for potential confounders, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the VT-index was significantly associated with the pain score (standardized β = -0.295; p = 0.026), symptoms score (standardized β = -0.287; p = 0.026), and activities of the daily living score (standardized β = -0.256; p = 0.028). Our results indicated that larger VT values during gait are associated with worse PROMs, suggesting that an intervention to reduce VT might be an option for clinicians trying to improve PROMs.

Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of Central Sensitization Inventory in Arabic language

PURPOSE

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a tool that aid in identifying symptoms associated with nociplastic pain. The aim of this study is to adapt CSI to Arabic language, and to examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Adaptation process followed recommended guidelines. Participants with self-reported chronic pain completed a web-based survey. The internal consistency was calculated. Test-retest reliability was examined by allowing 7-9 day gap between two rounds of measurements. Convergent validity was examined by measuring the correlation with Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), EQ-VAS, and EQ-5D-3L. Discriminant validity was examined by testing four priori hypotheses. Factor analysis with principal components extraction was conducted.

RESULTS

CSI-Arabic (CSI-Ar) was successfully produced. Its internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.88 and ICC_2,1=0.94). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change 95% were 3.45 and 9.57, respectively. CSI total score correlation with PCS, EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-VAS was moderate. The results lend support to the four hypothesis related to discriminant validity. Factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure of CSI-Ar.

CONCLUSIONS

CSI-Ar showed an internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity that are comparable to similar studies. The results support the use of CSI-Ar in assessing chronic pain in Arabic-speaking population.Implications for rehabilitationCentral sensitization (CS) mechanisms are thought to contribute to chronic pain.Identifying the presence of CS would personalize management.The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is a valid and reliable tool to aid in identifying symptoms associated with CS.The Arabic version of the CSI is valid and reliable to use in Arabic speaking patients suffering from chronic pain.

Associations between insomnia and central sensitization in cancer survivors undergoing opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain: A STROBE-compliant prospective cohort study

Several risk factors for insomnia in cancer patients have been recognized, including chronic pain and treatment with opioid. Although associations between insomnia and central sensitization were previously reported in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, those have not been elucidated among cancer survivors undergoing opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. To investigate the associations between insomnia and central sensitization among cancer survivors undergoing opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain, consecutive patients undergoing chemotherapy with chronic cancer pain under opioid therapy on an outpatient basis were enrolled from September 2019 to August 2020 and answered questions from the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) for assessing insomnia. Pain characteristics, including pain intensity, neuropathic pain, central sensitization assessed using the central sensitization inventory (CSI), opioid use disorder, and pain-related psychological symptoms were also examined. Uni- and multivariate regression analyses were performed to elucidate correlations between the AIS score and these pain characteristics. Of 44 enrolled patients, 20 patients completed to answer all questions. Insomnia was identified in 9 patients (45%). Although AIS scores showed no significant associations with pain intensity, neuropathic pain, opioid use disorder, or psychological symptoms, multivariate regression analysis revealed that CSI scores showed a positive relationship with AIS scores (P = .004). Discrimination was assessed using linear regression analysis which confirmed a significant association between the AIS and CSI scores (P = .002). Insomnia appears to be associated with central sensitization in cancer survivors with chronic cancer pain under opioid therapy.

The associations between ADHD, pain, inflammation, and quality of life in children and adolescents-a clinical study protocol

New research shows that the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is increased in children and adolescents as well as in adults with chronic pain, compared to those without chronic pain. Children and adolescents with ADHD also have an increased incidence of various physical conditions associated with pain, and they more frequently suffer from inflammatory diseases. Moreover, parents of children with ADHD can often suffer from pain conditions. These epidemiological and clinical observations form the scientific basis of our study, which aims to map the relationships between ADHD, altered pain experiences/central sensitization, and inflammation in children and adolescents. We will investigate the presence of central sensitization in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed ADHD and compare it with those who have not been diagnosed with ADHD. Participants (and their biological parents) will complete surveys about their somatic health, pain experience, and quality of life. Biological samples (saliva and stool) will be collected, aiming to utilize proteome and metabolome data to discover disease mechanisms and to predict, prevent and treat them. The results from our investigation should enable an expanded understanding of the pathophysiology behind both ADHD and pain/central sensitization. Presently, there are no established protocols for addressing psychiatric symptoms when examining patients with pain conditions in a somatic care setting, nor is there any knowledge of offering patients with ADHD or other neurodevelopmental disorders adapted treatments for pain conditions. Our results, therefore, can contribute to the development of new treatment strategies for pathological pain conditions in children and adolescents with ADHD. They may also increase awareness about and provide opportunities for the treatment of attention and impulse control problems in children and adolescents with pain syndromes.

Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise in High School Students With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and exercise have emerged as potential interventions in adolescents with chronic pain; however, very few studies have explored their effectiveness. Blended-learning approaches combining face-to-face and online educational sessions have also emerged as facilitating methods of health education. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of exercises and PNE versus exercise alone in adolescents with chronic neck pain (NP).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted in 2 high schools. Over 8 weeks, a total of 127 adolescents with chronic NP were randomly allocated to either (1) perform functional and region-specific exercises, including generalized neuromuscular control, endurance, and strength exercises, as well as exercises targeting the deep neck flexor and extensor muscles and scapular stabilizer muscles; or (2) perform the same exercise-based intervention plus PNE. Pain intensity (primary outcome), disability, sleep, catastrophizing, fear of movement, self-efficacy, and knowledge of pain neuroscience were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up. Neck and scapular muscle endurance and pressure pain thresholds were assessed at baseline and postintervention. Patient's Global Impression of Change was assessed postintervention and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in pain intensity from baseline to postintervention and from baseline to follow-up in both groups, but there were no between-group differences or interactions between time and groups. These results were similar for the secondary outcomes, except for knowledge of pain neuroscience, for which a significant group and time interaction was found.

CONCLUSION

Exercise and exercise plus PNE were similarly effective in treating adolescents with chronic NP, and the results were maintained for up to 6 months. Further studies are needed to explore the effect of these interventions for longer follow-ups.

Impact of sex, sleep, symptoms of central sensitization and psychosocial factors in adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain-an exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore and compare the association between psychosocial factors, sleep, central sensitization, and chronic neck, back, limbs, and multiregional pain and disability.

METHODS

1730 adolescents responded to an online questionnaire containing: sociodemographic data, Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Functional Disability Inventory, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, Basic Scale on Insomnia Complaints and Quality of Sleep, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Child Self-Efficacy Scale and Central Sensitization Inventory. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the associations between these variables and pain and disability.

RESULTS

Groups were categorized into neck (n = 54), back (n = 80), upper limb (n = 52), lower limb (n = 109) and multiregional (n = 1140) pain. Multivariable analysis showed that symptoms of central sensitization increased odds of neck, back, and multiregional pain; depression, anxiety and stress, and physical activity increased odds of multiregional pain; and fear of movement increased odds of lower limb pain. Female gender increased the odds of pain in all groups, except in the lower limb group. Depression, anxiety, and stress also remained associated with disability in neck, back, upper limb, and multiregional pain; poorer sleep remained associated with disability in neck, upper limb, and multiregional pain; catastrophizing remained associated with back, and multiregional pain; and fear of movement and symptoms of central sensitization were only associated with disability in multiregional pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There are similar but also different variables associated with the presence of pain and disability in the neck, back, limbs, and multiregional pain.

The Onset of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in High School Adolescents: Associated Factors and the Role of Symptoms of Central Sensitization

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between sociodemographic data, physical activity, depression, anxiety, and stress, sleep, and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization at baseline, in asymptomatic adolescents, and the onset of pain at 6-months follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 252 asymptomatic adolescents were assessed at baseline with an online questionnaire that included sociodemographic data, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire; the International Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents; the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale for Children; the Basic Scale on Insomnia complaints and Quality of Sleep; and the Central Sensitization Inventory. The same questionnaire was repeated at 6-months follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 231 (91.7%) adolescents who completed the questionnaire at the follow-up, 127 (55.0%) remained asymptomatic and 88 (38.1%) reported a new onset of pain. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean (SD) number of painful body sites was 1.81 (1.04), and the neck region was the most reported (n = 29, 33%). Multivariable analysis showed that being female (OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.28-4.27) and reporting more self-reported symptoms of central sensitization (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.07) were associated with the onset of chronic pain at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Female sex and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization were considered risk factors for the onset of pain in adolescents but should be further explored in future studies.

IMPACT

Considering the increasing prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain in adolescents, understanding the factors that may be associated with its new onset may help to better design preventive strategies and thus minimize the appearance of this type of pain in adolescents.

Predictors of pain persistence and disability in high-school students with chronic neck pain at 6-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Neck pain tends to persist for periods of 1 to 4 years of follow-up in adolescents, and a high percentage of them report disability. However, studies assessing the factors associated with persistent neck pain and disability in this age group are scarce. This study aimed to explore the association between psychosocial factors, sleep, and symptoms of central sensitization at baseline and the persistence of neck pain and disability at 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 710 adolescents with chronic neck pain were assessed at baseline with an online questionnaire that collected information on sociodemographic data, presence of musculoskeletal pain, pain intensity, physical activity, functional disability, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of sleep, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, and symptoms of central sensitization. At 6-month follow-up, adolescents were reassessed for disability and pain intensity and categorized as recovered or reporting persistent neck pain.

RESULTS

Of the 710 participants with neck pain at baseline, 334 were classified as having persistent neck pain and 375 adolescents as being recovered at 6-month follow-up. Multivariable analysis showed that female gender (OR 1.47; p = 0.04) and symptoms of central sensitization (OR 1.02; p = 0.001) at baseline were positively associated with the persistence of neck pain at 6-month follow-up. Similarly, higher levels of disability (β = 0.41; p < 0.001) and symptoms of central sensitization (β = 0.28; p < 0.001) at the baseline were positively associated with disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of central sensitization and disability at baseline should be considered in the assessment and design of interventions for adolescents with chronic neck pain as an attempt to minimize its future impact on pain persistence and disability.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the central sensitization inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control

BACKGROUND

Central Sensitization (CS) involves dysfunction in neurophysiological mechanisms that increase neuronal responses to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli in the central nervous system. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is considered the leading patient-reported outcome measure for assessing CS-related symptoms. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CSI into Finnish (CSI-FI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Translation and cross-cultural validation of the CSI was conducted according to established guidelines. The validation sample was 229 subjects, including 42 pain free controls and 187 subjects with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The CSI-FI was evaluated for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction, relationship with subject-reported outcome measures [Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), the Depression scale (DEPS), 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5 L-5D), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Pain and Sleep Questionnaire Three-Item Index (PSQ-3)], pain history, subjective symptoms of dizziness, and CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Furthermore, we studied the ability of the CSI-FI to distinguish pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. In addition, we studied the relationship of CSI-FI scores with postural control on a force plate.

RESULTS

The CSI-FI demonstrated good internal consistency (0.884) and excellent test-retest reliability (0.933) with a 7 ± 1 day gap between test administrations. Exploratory factor analysis with maximum likelihood extraction yielded a one factor solution. Fair to good correlations were found between the CSI-FI and the TSK, DEPS, EQ-5 L-5D, RMDQ, and PSQ-3. Subjective symptoms of dizziness correlated better with CSI-FI scores than any of the CS-related diagnoses on CSI part B. Total CSI-FI scores successfully distinguished between pain free controls, subjects with chronic pain in a single body area, and subjects with multisite chronic pain. The multisite pain group reported significantly more dizziness symptoms than the other two groups. Force plate measurements showed no relationship between postural control and CSI-FI scores.

CONCLUSION

The CSI-FI translation was successfully cross-culturally adapted and validated into Finnish. CSI-FI psychometric properties and scores were all in acceptable levels and in line with previous CSI validations. The CSI-FI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing CS-related symptomology in Finnish-speaking populations.

Structural validity and reliability of the Spanish Central Sensitization Inventory in breast cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

One of the most widely used instruments to identify symptoms that may be related to central sensitization is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Although this instrument has been translated and validated in Spanish patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, no psychometric analysis has been carried out in breast cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric analysis of the Spanish version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-Sp) in Spanish breast cancer survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A validation study was carried out in 183 breast cancer survivors. A psychometric analysis of internal consistency, factor structure, and test-retest reliability of the CSI-Sp was performed. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Type 2.1. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the internal structure of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The internal consistency was high (α = 0.91). The test-retest reliability was satisfactory with excellent values (ICC 2.1 = 0.95). The exploratory factor analysis yielded a one factor structure explaining the 33.88% of total variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSI-Sp has demonstrated to be a psychometrically strong measure for assessing central sensitization symptoms in breast cancer survivors based on internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and structural validity. Further studies that analyze other measurement properties in different Spanish clinical populations are needed.

Central Sensitivity Is Associated with Poor Recovery of Pain: Prediction, Cluster, and Decision Tree Analyses

The process of pain recovery varies and can include the recovery, maintenance, or worsening of symptoms. Many cases of patients with pain show a tendency of recovering as predicted; however, some do not. The characteristics of cases that do not fit the prediction of pain recovery remain unclear. We performed cluster and decision tree analyses to reveal the characteristics in cases that do not fit the prediction of pain recovery. A total of 43 patients with musculoskeletal pain (nonoperative: 22 patients, operative: 13 patients) and central pain (brain disease: 5 patients, spinal cord disease: 3 patients) were included in this longitudinal study. Central sensitivity syndrome (CSS) outcome measures (Central Sensitisation Inventory), pain intensity-related outcome measures (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SFMPQ-2)), and cognitive-emotional outcome measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Pain Catastrophising Scale-4) of all patients were assessed at baseline and after 1-2 months. Regression analysis was used to calculate pain recovery prediction values. A hierarchical cluster analysis based on the predicted change of SFMPQ-2 and the observed change of SFMPQ-2 was used to extract subgroups that fit and those that do not fit pain recovery prediction. To extract the characteristics of subgroups that do not fit the prediction of pain recovery, a decision tree analysis was performed. The level of significance was set at 5%. In the results of cluster analysis, patients were classified into three subgroups. Cluster 1 was characterised by worse pain intensity from baseline, cluster 2 by pain, having recovered less and mildly than the predicted value, and Cluster 3 by a marked recovery of pain. In the results of the decision tree analysis, the CSI change was extracted as an indicator related to the classification of all clusters. Our findings suggest that the poor improvement of CSS is characteristic in cases that do not fit the prediction of pain recovery.

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Serbian Version of the Central Sensitization Inventory

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the present study was to explore additional evidence of validity of the Serbian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), a patient-reported outcome measure of symptoms that have been found to be associated with central sensitization (CS). The CSI has been found to be psychometrically sound, and has demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity in numerous published studies and in multiple languages.

METHODS

CSI data were collected from 399 patients with chronic pain who had various diagnoses and from 146 pain-free controls. In addition, the patient sample completed a battery of validated patient-reported outcome measures of sleep problems, cognitive problems, pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear-avoidance, decreased quality of life, and decreased perception of social support. Six patient subgroups were formed, with presumably different levels of CS (including those with fibromyalgia, multiple pain sites, and localized pain sites).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in total CSI scores among the controls and patient subgroups. Those with fibromyalgia and multiple pathologies scored highest and the control subjects scored lowest. Other patient-reported CS-related symptom dimensions were significantly correlated with total CSI scores. When the patients were divided into CSI severity subgroups (from subclinical to extreme), the severity of these other symptom dimensions increased with the severity of CSI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study successfully demonstrated additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Serbian version of the CSI.