Sex-specific Differences in Multisite Pain Presentation among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss

Potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with lower-limb loss

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of, and explore factors related to, prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among older adults with lower-limb loss (LLL).

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional dataset collected through an interdisciplinary limb loss clinic between September 2013 and November 2022. Self-report medication lists were reviewed during in-clinic face-to-face interviews and compared to the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria corresponding to the patient's evaluation year.

RESULTS

Of 82 participants (72.9 ± 6.6 years-old; 78.0 % male), n = 41 (50.0 %) reported using one or more PIM. PIM prescription was significantly associated with presence of phantom limb pain, history of upper gastrointestinal issues, and a greater number of medications.

DISCUSSION

Polypharmacy and PIM use are common among older adults with LLL. Greater attention should be paid to medications post-amputation, especially pain management medications, to minimize potential adverse side-effects.

Pain, Balance-Confidence, Functional Mobility, and Reach Are Associated With Risk of Recurrent Falls Among Adults With Lower-Limb Amputation

Objective

The study evaluated whether pain intensity and extent, balance-confidence, functional mobility, and balance (eg, functional reach) are potential risk factors for recurrent falls among adults with a lower-limb amputation.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Research laboratory.

Participants

Eighty-three adults with unilateral lower-limb amputation that occurred >1 year prior (26 transfemoral- and 57 transtibial-level amputation; 44.6% women; 51.8% traumatic cause of amputation; N=83).

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Participants reported on the number of falls in the past year, as well as pain intensity in the low back, residual, and sound limbs. Balance-confidence (per the Activities-Specific Balance-Confidence Scale [ABC]), functional mobility (per the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility ([PLUS-M]), and balance (per the Functional Reach and modified Four Square Step Tests) were obtained.

Results

After considering non-modifiable covariates, greater extent of pain, less balance-confidence, worse self-reported mobility, and reduced prosthetic-side reach were factors associated with recurrent fall risk. Adults reporting pain in the low back and both lower-limbs had 6.5 times the odds of reporting recurrent falls as compared with peers without pain. A 1-point increase in ABC score or PLUS-M T score, or 1-cm increase in prosthetic-side reaching distance, was associated with a 7.3%, 9.4%, and 7.1% decrease in odds of reporting recurrent falls in the past year, respectively.

Conclusions

Of the 83 adults, 36% reported recurrent falls in the past year. Presence of pain in the low back and both lower-limbs, less balance-confidence, worse PLUS-M score, and less prosthetic-side reaching distance were identified as modifiable factors associated with an increased odd of recurrent falls.

Key Modifiable Factors in Community Participation Among Adults With Lower Limb Amputation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to identify factors that may predict community participation among adults with lower limb amputation.

DESIGN

This study is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional data set, including 126 community-dwelling adults, ≥1 yr after unilateral transfemoral- ( n = 44; mean age = 59 ± 14 yrs) or transtibial-level amputation ( n = 82; mean age = 59 ± 14 yrs) seen in an outpatient limb loss clinic. Participation was assessed with the Community Integration Questionnaire. Factors, that is, demographics, comorbidities, prosthesis use per the Houghton Scale, Socket Comfort Score, assistive device use, falls history, and activity level per General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire were evaluated. Moreover, balance confidence per the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, mobility per the Locomotor Capabilities Index, fast and self-selected gait speed per 10-meter walk tests, and functional mobility via Timed Up and Go were also included.

RESULTS

Community participation was correlated with several factors ( P ≤ 0.050). Stepwise regression of correlated factors found absence of peripheral neuropathy and greater self-reported physical activity, balance confidence, and prosthesis use, as the strongest correlates, collectively explaining 50.1% of the variance in community participation post-lower limb amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings identify key modifiable factors for consideration in future prospective research seeking to enhance community reintegration and participation among adults living with a unilateral transfemoral- or transtibial-level amputation.

Post-amputation pain: Comparing pain presentations between adults with and without increased amputated-region sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Among adults with persistent post-amputation pain, increased amputated-region pain sensitivity may reflect peripheral sensitization or indicate underlying central sensitization. To determine whether underlying central sensitization may contribute to increased pain sensitivity in this population, this study compared clinical signs and symptoms associated with central sensitization between adults with post-amputation pain who demonstrate or lack increased amputated-region sensitivity (as compared to reference data).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SUBJECTS

Ninety-nine adults (60 with a unilateral, transtibial amputation and post-amputation pain, 39 pain-free controls with intact limbs).

METHODS

Participants underwent pain-pressure threshold testing of amputated-region and secondary (non-amputated region) sites and completed outcome measures assessing central sensitization symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® pain intensity and interference domains, Central Sensitization Inventory). Among the full sample, the presence and frequency of specific central sensitization symptoms were evaluated. Participants with post-amputation pain were then grouped based on whether normalized, amputated-region pain-pressure thresholds fell below (i.e., sensitive) or above (i.e., non-sensitive) the 25th percentile of sex-specific reference data. Between-group differences in normalized secondary-site sensitivity were evaluated using a multivariate analysis of variance; central sensitization symptom scores were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Noteworthy symptoms associated with central sensitization (e.g., fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive difficulty) were reported by 33%-62% of participants. Secondary-site pain sensitivity was greater among individuals with increased amputated-region sensitivity (n = 24) compared to peers without increased amputated-region sensitivity ([n = 36], mean difference > 1.33 standard deviation [SD], p < 0.001). Central sensitization symptom scores, however, were similar between groups (p > 0.187).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with increased amputated-region sensitivity demonstrate generalized, secondary-site pain hypersensitivity, potentially indicating underlying central sensitization. Central sensitization symptom scores, however, were similar between groups, suggesting differences in physiological pain sensitivity may not manifest in subjective post-amputation pain descriptions.

Adults with unilateral lower-limb amputation: greater spatial extent of pain is associated with worse adjustment, greater activity restrictions, and less prosthesis satisfaction

OBJECTIVES

This study's primary purpose was to determine if the extent of bodily pain, as evaluated with pain body diagrams, is associated with prosthetic-related activity restrictions, adjustment, and satisfaction among adults with a major unilateral lower-limb amputation. A secondary objective was to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability for pain body diagrams among adults with lower-limb amputation.

METHODS

Adults with a lower-limb amputation that occurred ≥1 year prior participated in an online, cross-sectional research study. Outcome measures included pain body diagrams and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which evaluates post-amputation activity restrictions, psychosocial adjustment, and prosthesis satisfaction. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate associations between the number of painful body regions and prosthetic outcomes, after considering covariates (alpha ≤ 0.010). A subset of participants recompleted pain body diagrams to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Data from 74 participants (n = 32 female; n = 42 transtibial-level; n = 27 traumatic etiology) were available. Beyond covariates (i.e., age, sex, amputation level), the total number of painful body regions was significantly associated with all Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised subscales (p < 0.001-0.006), with the exception of Social Adjustment (p = 0.764). The total number of painful body regions explained 14.5, 11.8, 11.6, and 7.4% of the variance in Functional Satisfaction with the Prosthesis, Adjustment to Limitation, General Adjustment, and Activity Restriction, respectively. In a subset (n = 54), test-retest reliability for total number of painful body regions per body diagrams was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)3,1 = 0.84].

CONCLUSIONS

A greater number of painful body regions is associated with greater activity restriction, worse adjustment, and lower prosthesis satisfaction, supporting the need to enhance post-amputation pain management and both amputated- and secondary-site pain prevention.

ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER

IRB #1611862.

Residual and sound limb hip strength distinguish between sedentary and nonsedentary adults with transtibial amputation

Following a transtibial amputation (TTA), physical activity has known benefits for health and quality of life. Adults post-TTA, however, demonstrate reduced physical activity, predisposing them to adverse health outcomes. Identifying adults at the risk of sedentarism post-TTA via commonly used, objective clinical measures may enhance clinical decisions, including prosthesis prescription. The study's purpose was to determine whether residual and sound limb hip strength distinguishes between sedentary and nonsedentary adults post-TTA. A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional dataset (n = 44) was conducted. Participant residual and sound limb hip flexion, extension, abduction and adduction strength were assessed via handheld dynamometry. Physical activity was monitored for 7 days and participants were classified as sedentary (<5000 steps/day; n = 13) or nonsedentary (≥5000 steps/day; n = 31). Receiver operating curves revealed that residual and sound limb hip extension, abduction and adduction strength distinguished between sedentary and nonsedentary adults post-TTA (P < 0.050). Preliminary cut-points for hip strength measures to classify adults at the risk of sedentarism were determined. A hip strength composite score (0-6) estimates a 2.2× increased odds of being sedentary with each additional hip strength deficit. Post-TTA, residual and sound limb hip strength can help identify adults at risk of sedentarism to aid clinical decision making, including prosthesis prescription.

Mechanical Pain Sensitivity in Postamputation Pain

OBJECTIVES

Postamputation, clinical markers of pain-related peripheral and central nervous system hypersensitivity remain understudied. This study aimed to identify whether adults with postamputation pain demonstrate greater pain sensitivity in primary (ie, amputated region) and secondary (ie, nonamputated region) sites, as compared with pain-free peers and controls with intact limbs.

METHODS

Ninety-four participants postunilateral, transtibial amputation (59 with pain, 35 pain-free) and 39 controls underwent pain-pressure threshold (PPT) testing at 10 sites. Pain-pressure thresholds were normalized to sex-specific control data using Z score conversions. Normalized primary-site and secondary-site PPTs were compared between groups using multivariate analysis of variance (P<0.050).

RESULTS

Compared with pain-free peers, adults with postamputation pain demonstrated reduced normalized PPTs across primary and secondary sites (mean difference=0.61-0.74, P=0.001 to 0.007). Compared with controls, adults with postamputation pain demonstrated reduced normalized PPTs (mean difference=0.52, P=0.026) only at primary sites.

DISCUSSION

Adults with postamputation pain demonstrate greater amputated region pain sensitivity as compared with pain-free peers or controls with intact limbs, indicating peripheral sensitization persists even after limb healing. Secondary-site pain sensitivity was similar between controls and adults with postamputation pain, suggesting central nervous system hypersensitivity may not be ubiquitous with postamputation pain. Studies are needed to investigate mechanisms underlying pain sensitivity differences between adults with and without postamputation pain.