1
|
Deer TR, Russo M, Grider JS, Sayed D, Lamer TJ, Dickerson DM, Hagedorn JM, Petersen EA, Fishman MA, FitzGerald J, Baranidharan G, De Ridder D, Chakravarthy KV, Al-Kaisy A, Hunter CW, Buchser E, Chapman K, Gilligan C, Hayek SM, Thomson S, Strand N, Jameson J, Simopoulos TT, Yang A, De Coster O, Cremaschi F, Christo PJ, Varshney V, Bojanic S, Levy RM. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for Spinal Cord Stimulation Long-term Outcome Optimization and Salvage Therapy. Neuromodulation 2024:S1094-7159(24)00078-3. [PMID: 38904643 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has recognized a need to establish best practices for optimizing implantable devices and salvage when ideal outcomes are not realized. This group has established the Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® to offer guidance on matters needed for both our members and the broader community of those affected by neuromodulation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS The executive committee of the INS nominated faculty for this NACC® publication on the basis of expertise, publications, and career work on the issue. In addition, the faculty was chosen in consideration of diversity and inclusion of different career paths and demographic categories. Once chosen, the faculty was asked to grade current evidence and along with expert opinion create consensus recommendations to address the lapses in information on this topic. RESULTS The NACC® group established informative and authoritative recommendations on the salvage and optimization of care for those with indwelling devices. The recommendations are based on evidence and expert opinion and will be expected to evolve as new data are generated for each topic. CONCLUSIONS NACC® guidance should be considered for any patient with less-than-optimal outcomes with a stimulation device implanted for treating chronic pain. Consideration should be given to these consensus points to salvage a potentially failed device before explant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
| | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Erika A Petersen
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Teaching Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
| | - Corey W Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute, Ichan School of Medicine, Mt Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Chris Gilligan
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Salim M Hayek
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon Thomson
- Pain & Neuromodulation Consulting Ltd, Nuffield Health Brentwood and The London Clinic, Brentwood, UK; Pain & Neuromodulation Centre, Mid & South Essex University NHS Hospitals, Basildon, UK
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Thomas T Simopoulos
- Arnold Warfield Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ajax Yang
- Spine and Pain Consultant, PLLC, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | | | - Fabián Cremaschi
- Department of Neurosciences, National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Paul J Christo
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vishal Varshney
- Providence Healthcare, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stana Bojanic
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert M Levy
- Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kochat S, Byers J, Yi PK. Case report: Dorsal root ganglion stimulator lead fracture. Pain Pract 2024; 24:673-676. [PMID: 38102861 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the unique advances in neuromodulation for chronic pain has been spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and dorsal root ganglion stimulators (DRG-S). These devices have aided in conditions such as neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndromes, failed back surgery, and peripheral neuropathies. With these benefits, however, complications from implantable stimulators have included lead fractures and migration. The authors reviewed a lead migration, kinking, and subsequent fracture event involving a patient with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) II, who was treated with a DRG-S. CASE PRESENTATION The case report follows this patient, from their past medical history to assessment of appropriate qualifications for neuromodulation, to successful surgical placement, to follow-up care. The authors further monitored assessment of inefficacy of pain relief, and identification of lead migration and kinking through imaging. In the process of removal, due to lead stress, lead fracturing occurred. After lead removal, the leads were fully replaced, and the patient was followed up and experienced improved pain relief. CONCLUSION The case report assesses probable mechanisms of lead fracture and considerations for physicians for future assessment and triage of neuromodulation efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhas Kochat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jacob Byers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter K Yi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chapman KB, Yousef T, Amireh A, Kallewaard JW, van Helmond N. Lead migration rate in dorsal root ganglion stimulation using lead anchoring techniques: A follow-up study. Pain Pract 2024; 24:72-75. [PMID: 37606489 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lead anchoring has previously been shown to reduce the rate of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) lead migration. The aim of this study was to assess longer-term follow-up and consistency of lead migration prevention with lead anchoring in a new cohort of patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review from September 2017 to November 2022 of all patients who had DRG-S implants at our institute to identify the number of lead migrations that occurred over this period. The first cohort consisted of patients reported on in a previous publication (implanted from September 2017 through September 2020) subdivided into unanchored or anchored lead groups. The second cohort consisted of patients implanted during or after October 2020 who were not previously reported on for whom leads were anchored using silastic anchoring only. RESULTS At the November 2022 data cutoff, in the initial cohort, 8 migrations had occurred in unanchored leads over an average follow-up of 49 months, equating to a migration rate of 9.1% per lead. Patients with anchored leads in the initial cohort experienced 2 migrations over an average follow-up of 38 months (0.7% migration rate per lead). There were no new lead migrations in these groups over the extended follow-up reported here. The migration rate in the new cohort was similar, with 1 migration over an average follow-up of 13 months (0.5% migration rate per lead). CONCLUSION These results underscore the necessity of anchor placement during DRG-S lead implantation to prevent lead migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York City, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, Manhasset, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York City, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq Yousef
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Ahmad Amireh
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York City, USA
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York City, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chapman KB, Tupper C, Yousef T, van Helmond N. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation to Treat Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Case Report. A A Pract 2023; 17:e01718. [PMID: 37966349 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
A 67-year-old man presented with severe 9 of 10 intractable pain of the left shoulder joint after arthroplasty and revision surgeries, with associated weakness, atrophy, and limited range of motion in all directions. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) at the left C4, C5, and C6 levels was used after failed conservative and interventional measures, resulting in significant improvement in pain, function, and quality of life measures through 6 months postimplantation. Larger studies should examine if DRG-S is effective in treating chronic arthritic joint pain as well as chronic postsurgical pain of the shoulder that is not predominantly neuropathic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- Pain Management, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Connor Tupper
- Pain Management, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Tariq Yousef
- Pain Management, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York
| | - Noud van Helmond
- Pain Management, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapman KB, Tupper C, Vissers KC, van Helmond N, Yousef T. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the treatment of joint pain with predominantly nociceptive characteristics: A case series. Pain Pract 2023; 23:317-324. [PMID: 36334041 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has recently emerged as a novel therapy in neuromodulation that demonstrated a higher rate of success than spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a prospective, head-to-head randomized comparative trial to treat complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and causalgia. In contrast to SCS, DRG-S also shows promise in treating conditions that are not purely neuropathic such as axial low back pain, which has a prominent nociplastic pain component. It is not known to what extent the effectiveness of DRG-S for such indications is due to effective treatment of the neuropathic pain component versus the effects of DRG-S on mechanical pain. Although rarely studied, reporting outcomes of DRG-S to treat predominantly mechanical/nociceptive pain may help point toward expanding the utility of this therapy. Here, we present five cases of refractory mechanical pain treated with DRG-S. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a successful DRG-S trial and implant between September 2017 and September 2021 at our institute was performed. Patients who had intractable joint pain without strong evidence of neuropathic pain were included in this case series. The Budapest criteria for CRPS, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) survey, or a definable nerve injury were used to determine the presence of neuropathic pain. Baseline assessments for pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D]), and other applicable joint surveys were extracted from pre-trial baseline and follow-up appointments. RESULTS Five patients were identified and included. Patient diagnoses consisted of refractory joint pain of the hip, knee, or ankle. Mean NRS pain scores improved by 74% from 9.2 at baseline to 2.4 at the last follow-up (mean = 28 months post-implant). From baseline to the last follow-up, mean ODI scores improved by 65% from 66 to 23 and EQ-5D scores more than doubled from an average of 0.371 to 0.797. CONCLUSION This clinical report illustrates the potential utility DRG-S has in treating pain that clinically presents as predominantly refractory mechanical joint pain without a significant neuropathic component. The physiological reasons for our observations may be that DRG-S is able to directly influence the conduction of nociceptive signaling at the DRG and within the spinal cord. Further investigations are warranted to determine if DRG-S is a potential treatment option for chronic mechanical pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Departement of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Connor Tupper
- Creighton University Medical College, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kris C Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Noud van Helmond
- Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq Yousef
- Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res 2023; 16:839-879. [PMID: 36942306 PMCID: PMC10024474 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s364370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
With continued innovations in neuromodulation comes the need for evolving reviews of best practices. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has significantly improved the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and it has broad applicability across a wide range of other conditions. Through funding and organizational leadership by the American Society for Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN), this best practices consensus document has been developed for the selection, implantation, and use of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. This document is composed of a comprehensive narrative literature review that has been performed regarding the role of the DRG in chronic pain and the clinical evidence for DRG-S as a treatment for multiple pain etiologies. Best practice recommendations encompass safety management, implantation techniques, and mitigation of the potential complications reported in the literature. Looking to the future of neuromodulation, DRG-S holds promise as a robust intervention for otherwise intractable pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Kenneth B Chapman, NYU Langone Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Pain Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, 1360 Hylan Boulevard, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA, Email
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Tim Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David W Lee
- Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1024-1032. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Chapman KB, Yang A, Mogilner AY, Mandelberg N, Patel KV, Lubenow T, Deer T, Kallewaard JW, van Helmond N. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Device Explantation: A Multicenter Pooled Data Analysis. Pain Pract 2022; 22:522-531. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.13113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B. Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Ajax Yang
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Alon Y. Mogilner
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY NY USA
| | | | - Kiran V. Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Timothy Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias Charleston WV
| | | | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Cooper University Hospital Camden NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chapman KB, van Helmond N, Kallewaard JW, Vissers KC, Patel KV, Motivala S, Hagedorn JM, Deer TR, Dickerson DM. An Anatomy-Informed, Novel Technique for S1 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Lead Placement. PAIN MEDICINE 2022; 23:1750-1756. [PMID: 35426940 PMCID: PMC9527614 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective A heightened and organized understanding of sacral anatomy could potentially lead to a more effective and safe method of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) lead placement. The aim of this technical note is to describe a standardized access method for S1 DRG-S lead placement. Design Technical note. Methods The described approach utilizes alignment of the lumbosacral prominence and is measurement-based, allowing for standardized sacral access, even when visualization is suboptimal. The medial-to-lateral needle trajectory is designed to limit interaction with the sensitive neural structures and allows for a more parallel orientation of the lead to the DRG and nerve root. Conclusions The described technique potentially improves the safety of S1 DRG-S lead placement. The parallel lead orientation to the DRG may also increase efficacy while lowering energy requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- Correspondence to: Kenneth B. Chapman, MD, The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, 860 Fifth Ave, New York City, NY 10065, USA. Tel: +1.212.724.7246; Fax: 718.727.7474; E-mail:
| | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kris C Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Soriaya Motivala
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - David M Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Prospective Observational Cohort Study on Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Results of Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:998-1005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
11
|
Deer TR, Russo MA, Grider JS, Pope J, Rigoard P, Hagedorn JM, Naidu R, Patterson DG, Wilson D, Lubenow TR, Buvanendran A, Sheth SJ, Abdallah R, Knezevic NN, Schu S, Nijhuis H, Mehta P, Vallejo R, Shah JM, Harned ME, Jassal N, Gonzalez JM, Pittelkow TP, Patel S, Bojanic S, Chapman K, Strand N, Green AL, Pahapill P, Dario A, Piedimonte F, Levy RM. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations for Surgical Technique for Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1-34. [PMID: 35041578 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The field of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain is a rapidly developing area of medicine. Although neurostimulation therapies have advanced significantly as a result of technologic improvements, surgical planning, device placement, and postoperative care are of equal importance to optimize outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for these often-overlooked areas of neurostimulation practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Authors were chosen based on their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from the last NACC publication in 2017 to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on evidence strength and consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS This NACC project provides guidance on preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management in the form of consensus points with supportive evidence. These results are based on grade of evidence, strength of consensus, and expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS The NACC has given guidance for a surgical plan that encompasses the patient journey from the planning stage through the surgical experience and postoperative care. The overall recommendations are designed to improve efficacy and the safety of patients undergoing these neuromodulation procedures and are intended to apply throughout the international community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
| | - Marc A Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jason Pope
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- Department of Spine Surgery and Neuromodulation, PRISMATICS Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ramana Naidu
- California Orthopedics & Spine, Larkspur, CA, USA
| | | | - Derron Wilson
- Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Timothy R Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Samir J Sheth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Rany Abdallah
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Milford, DE, USA
| | - N Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery at University of Illinois, Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stefan Schu
- Leitender Arzt Neuromodulation, Neurochirurgie, Sana Kliniken Duisburg GmbH, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Harold Nijhuis
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jay M Shah
- SamWell Institute for Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA
| | - Michael E Harned
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Jose Manuel Gonzalez
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Málaga, Spain
| | - Thomas P Pittelkow
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Stana Bojanic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Kenneth Chapman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, The Pain and Spine Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alexander L Green
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Peter Pahapill
- Functional Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Alessandro Dario
- Department of Neurosurgery, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Robert M Levy
- International Neuromodulation Society, Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chapman KB, van Helmond N. Response to: "Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Device-Related Complications Related to Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Pain Relief in 31 Patients". Neuromodulation 2021; 24:1501-1502. [PMID: 34748680 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chapman KB, Spiegel MA, Dickerson DM, Billet B, Patel KV, Hunter C, Antony A, van Helmond N, Deer T, Kallewaard JW, Hagedorn JM, Yang A. A Paramedian Approach for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Placement Developed to Limit Lead Migration and Fracture. Pain Pract 2021; 21:991-1000. [PMID: 34328256 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S), has demonstrated superiority in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia. Lead migration and fracture impact DRG-S therapeutic stability. Lead anchoring reduces DRG-S lead migration without increasing lead fracture. Lead fracture may be related to lead entrapment in the superficial fascial plane. A novel medialized approach for lead placement and anchoring is presented to address these issues. METHODS We suggest an alternative technique for implanting percutaneous DRG-S leads at the T10-L5 levels. RESULTS A novel medialized ipsilateral technique for lead placement and anchoring for single, bilateral, and adjacent segment placement is presented. The Tuohy needle puncture site is medial to the pedicle and adjacent to the spinous process, two vertebral levels caudad to the target foramen. Trajectory is maintained in the sagittal plane, to access the caudad interlaminar space near the midline. This technique allows for ipsilateral or contralateral lead placement. After epidural access, the introducer sheath is rotated toward the targeted foramen and advanced. The guidewire followed by the lead is passed, and once lead position is confirmed, tension 'S' loops are created, followed by anchoring to the deep fascia. CONCLUSION We describe a new paramedian technique for DRG-S lead placement. We propose it will decrease DRG-S complication rates through anchoring to reduce migration and by avoiding the fascial planes thought to be responsible for fracture. Long-term outcomes applying our proposed techniques are required for determining the true impact, however, early anecdotal results suggest that these new techniques are favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Matthew A Spiegel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - David M Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.,Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bart Billet
- Department of Anesthesiology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Noud van Helmond
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV
| | | | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ajax Yang
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hines K, Swaminathan V, Thalheimer S, Kogan M, Wu C, Sharan A. Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Device-Related Complications Related to Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Pain Relief in 31 Patients. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:1040-1044. [PMID: 34309131 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is a form of neuromodulation used to treat neuropathic pain due to a myriad of etiologies. Though this relatively new therapy has been shown to be quite effective, complications associated with the implantation of this therapy have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to describe the device-related complications associated with DRG stimulator implantations. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 31 patients who underwent full implantation of neuromodulation hardware marketed for DRG stimulation. The predefined endpoints included device-related complications associated with DRG implantations, such as hardware failure, explantation procedures, and revision surgery. Additional endpoints included percentage of patients receiving therapy and pain as measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale at initial, six-month, and 12-month follow-up after hardware implantation. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were included out of 42 patients trialed. Baseline VAS in patients was 7.7 (31 patients). At initial follow-up, six-month follow-up, and one-year follow-up, VAS scores were 4.7 (31 patients), 5.3 (20 patients), and 5.5 (13 patients), respectively. Paired t-test between preoperative VAS (mean 7.3) and one-year follow-up VAS (5.5) demonstrated statistical significance (p = 0.027). At initial, six-month, and one-year follow-up, 30/31 (97%), 19/24 (79%), and 18/23 (78%) patients were confirmed to be receiving DRG stimulation therapy after permanent implant. Of the 31 patients who were implanted with a permanent system, 8 (26%) were explanted and an additional 10 (29%) required revision surgery. CONCLUSION In this study, we examine the various device-related complications associated with DRG stimulation requiring repeat surgery. High rates of hardware failure, revision surgery, and explantation of stimulators illustrate the need for hardware optimization to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Hines
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vishal Swaminathan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sara Thalheimer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Kogan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashwini Sharan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|