Metacognitive improvement and symptom change in a 3-month treatment for borderline personality disorder

Borderline personality disorder, metacognition and psychotherapy

BACKGROUND

Deficits in the ability to think about own mental states and that of others (mindreading) are seen as key aspects of borderline personality disorder (BPD), which could sustain BPD symptoms. Interestingly, some studies showed that in BPD patients metacognition is selectively compromised and could improve during treatments. However, empirical findings are inconsistent, and it is debatable whether BPD presents a specific profile of mindreading impairments that could improve during treatments.

METHODS

We performed a bibliographic research on PubMed , Google Scholar and Scopus of all studies investigating a) the metacognitive functioning in the BPD patients and b) the link between psychotherapy, metacognition improvement and BPD symptomatology. A total of 11 studies met our inclusion criteria and considered metacognition following the definition proposed by Semerari.

RESULTS

Overall, the results suggest that BPD metacognitive profile mainly includes difficulties in metacognitive sub-domains of integration, differentiation and mastery. The type of treatment most appropriate to improve metacognitive abilities and reduce symptoms seemed to be a long term treatment and specifically focused on metacognitive deficits.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of a control group, small sample sizes and heterogeneity in terms of gender, age, comorbidities and other ongoing treatments are the key limits of the original studies reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results sustain the hypothesis of a selective and specific metacognitive impairment in BPD patients that could improve during treatments together with their symptomatology. However, more studies are needed to further investigate the role of metacognition in the effectiveness of treatments.

Stressful life events and hopelessness in adults: the mediating role of mentalization and emotional dysregulation

Objective:

Hopelessness is considered a risk factor for several mental and behavioral disorders. Research has shown that a stressful life event can be a significant predictor of hopelessness. The aim of the current research study was to explore the relationship between stressful life events and hopelessness, as well as to analyses the mediation effect of both mentalization and emotional dysregulation on this relationship.

Methods:

In a cross-sectional design, 607 participants recruited from the Spanish general population completed a series of measures.

Results:

Hopelessness was significantly related to stressful life events (r = 0.24, p < 0.001), emotion dysregulation variables (r = 0.18/0.38), and most measures of mentalization (r = 0.02/0.34). A good-fitting structural equation modeling-based mediation model (χ²/df = 2.04; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.042 [90%CI 0.033-0.050]; comparative fit index = 0.97; non-normed fit index = 0.97) showed that mentalization significantly mediated the relationship between stressful life events and hopelessness, while emotion dysregulation had no significant mediating effect.

Conclusions:

These results could have important clinical implications, such as the development of mentalization-based interventions for people living under a large number of stressors.

Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the DMRS-SR-30, a Novel Self-Report Measure Based on the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

Defense mechanisms are psychological factors that influence emotional distress and quality of life. There are a number of measures assessing the construct of defense mechanisms, but only few available instruments reflect the gold-standard theoretical hierarchical organization of defenses. We report on the development of a novel 30 item self-report questionnaire, the DMRS-SR-30, based on the parent instrument, the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS). This study tested preliminary reliability and validity of the Italian version of the DMRS-SR-30. We first extracted 30 items from the DMRS Q-sort version (DMRS-Q) and adapted them for a self-reported format. We then applied the DMRS quantitative scoring algorithms to provide proportional scores for the 28 individual defenses and summary scores for seven defense levels and overall defensive functioning (ODF) scores. A dynamic interview was used for assessing participant's defense mechanisms with the observer-rated DMRS and DMRS-Q. We examined internal consistency of the scales along with criterion, concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity among participants (N = 94) who completed the DMRS-SR-30, SCL-90, BDI, and IES-R. Results showed very good internal consistency for ODF (Cronbach's alpha = .890) and the high adaptive defense level, whereas some subscales with few items had lower values. Correlation analyses between DMRS-SR-30 and the two DMRS-based observer-rated measures showed very good criterion and concurrent validity for ODF and moderate to high for defense levels subscales. Correlations between the DMRS-SR-30 ODF and SCL-90 GSI, BDI and IES=R (r = -.456, r= -.540, r = -.402, respectively, all p <.001), indicated good convergent validity. Despite the well-known limitations of self-report methods of psychodynamic phenomena, self-report measures are highly practicable for assessing large samples. The DMRS-SR-30 is the first self-assessed measure describing the whole hierarchy of 28 defense mechanisms and providing scores for ODF, defensive categories, defense levels, and individual defenses. Preliminary examination of the Italian version of the DMRS-SR-30 showed promising results of internal consistency, criterion and concurrent validity, and convergent validity and of the measure. Further validation is needed to confirm these findings and explore other aspects of validity and reliability.

How Personality Disorders Change in Psychotherapy: a Concise Review of Process

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review summarizes the current state of the art in psychotherapy processes during treatments for clients with personality disorders. We outline some methodological challenges in the discipline of process research, give a brief historical account on process research, and then focus on specific processes studied from an empirical perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current review acknowledges the centrality of the therapeutic relationship, in particular the therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, and responsiveness in explaining outcome across treatment modalities for personality disorders. The review describes evidence from three overall and overlapping lines of inquiry that have garnered scientific interest in the past years. For emotional change (regulation, awareness, and transformation), socio-cognitive change (mentalizing, meta-cognition, and interpersonal patterns), and increase in insight and change in defense mechanisms, evidence is moderate to strong for these processes to contribute to healthy change in treatments for personality disorders, in particular borderline personality disorder. Avenues of future studies are outlined.

Impulsivity issues in borderline personality disorder and it's links with insight: the role of urgency

Objective

Impulsivity plays a major role in a wide range of disorders including Borderline Personality Disorder. Another crucial clinical dimension is insight. This clinical dimension is linked with symptomatology and treatment issue. The present study aims to investigate the impact of positive and negative urgency on insight in Borderline Personality Disorder.

Methods

We recruited eighty-one women with Borderline Personality Disorder and assessed insight level and impulsivity scores using the Beck Cognitive insight scale and the UPPS-short form scale.

Results

Our results showed interesting links between positive urgency and insight quality.

Conclusion

Negative emotions play a fundamental role for the insight quality, but positive emotions are surprisingly related to clinical insight. We discuss the possible therapeutical impact of this results on treatment adaptation.