Pediatric keloids: A 6-year retrospective review

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Pathologic Scars Within a Pediatric Otolaryngology Practice

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to review the spectrum of scarring that may present to an urban, pediatric otolaryngology practice and determine if associations exist between race, scar location, treatment modality, and outcomes following interventions for scarring.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study among 115 pediatric patients with 138 unique keloids or hypertrophic scars (HTS), and 141 children presenting for tonsillectomy at Tufts Medical Center. Age at presentation and sex assigned at birth were collected for both populations. For those presenting for pathologic scars, income quintile, self-identified race/ethnicity, anatomical location, treatment number and type, and clinical outcome were also analyzed. Multivariate analyses calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between scar subsite, intervention type, and persistence after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to individuals presenting for tonsillectomy, a disproportionate percentage of patients presenting for scarring identified as Black (26.6% vs. 13.5%) or Asian (17.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.016) or were male (61.7% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.053). Individuals identifying as Black or Asian were more likely to present with ear lobe and neck scars, respectively (50.0% vs. 45.5%, p = <0.001). Ear scars were significantly more likely to receive excision at initial treatment (aOR = 5.86 [1.43-23.96]) compared to other subsites, and were more likely to require >1 treatment (aOR = 5.91 [1.53-22.75]).

CONCLUSION

Among pediatric patients presenting with keloids or HTS, children who identified as Black or Asian were more likely to present with ear and neck scars, respectively. Ear scars were frequently treated with excision and appear more likely to require adjuvant treatments and multiple interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3127-3135, 2024.

Needle-Free Jet Injector-Assisted Triamcinolone Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children

BACKGROUND

Keloids and hypertrophic scars can cause severe pain, pruritus, and psychological distress. Conventional intralesional corticosteroid treatment with needle injections remains challenging, especially in children with needle phobia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of intralesional treatment with triamcinolone acetonide using a needle-free electronic pneumatic jet injector in children with keloids and hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in children with keloids and hypertrophic scars who received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide treatments using an electronic pneumatic jet injector. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Global Aesthetic Improvement Score at follow-up versus baseline. Tolerability was assessed with reported adverse effects and injection-related pain using a visual analog scale. Satisfaction questionnaires were used to evaluate treatment-related patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Six female patients and five male patients aged 5-17 years, with a total of >118 keloids or hypertrophic scars were included. Electronic pneumatic jet injector treatment led to a significant reduction in the total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale observer and patient scores compared with baseline, with a median reduction of 28.9% and 23.8%, respectively (p = 0.005; p = 0.009). Median visual analog scale pain scores for electronic pneumatic jet injector treatment were significantly lower compared with needle injections, 3.0 versus 7.0, respectively (p = 0.027). No severe adverse effects were reported. Overall, 6 patients were 'satisfied' and five patients were 'very satisfied' with the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Electronic pneumatic jet injector-assisted intralesional triamcinolone acetonide is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars in children. It should be considered as an alternative non-traumatic delivery method, especially in children with needle phobia or severe pain during previous needle injections.

Pediatric Keloids and Review of the Efficacy of Current Treatment Modalities

BACKGROUND

Keloids and hypertrophic scars are the result of excessive fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition in the wound healing process, leaving patients with irritating and cosmetically displeasing lesions. Despite there being numerous modalities for treatment, keloids are notoriously recalcitrant to therapy and recurrence rates are high.

OBJECTIVE

Because many keloids begin to develop during childhood and adolescence, it is important to better understand which treatment options may be best suited toward the pediatric population specifically.

METHODS

We reviewed 13 studies that focus specifically on effectiveness of treatment options for keloids and hypertrophic scars in the pediatric population. These studies cover 545 keloids in 482 patients, all aged 18 and younger.

RESULTS

Many treatment modalities were used, with multimodal treatment being the most common (76%). There were 92 instances of recurrence, with a total recurrence rate of 16.9%.

CONCLUSION

Data from the combined studies suggest that keloid development is less common before adolescence and that higher rates of recurrence are observed among patients who have received monotherapy compared with those who received multimodal treatments. More well-designed studies with standardized ways of assessing outcomes are needed to expand our understanding on how to optimally treat keloids in the pediatric population.

Risk factors associated with keloid infections: A five-year retrospective study

Keloid infections reduce patient-reported quality of life greatly. Characteristics and risk factors of keloid infections have not been thoroughly studied. So, a retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on the potential risk factors, microbiologic cultures and histological findings. Keloid patients consulting for surgical interventions were included in this study. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. 564 patients were recruited with the keloid infection rate being 22.4%. For adult patients, age above 40 years (OR, 2.84; P = .000), disease duration of 12 years or more (OR, 3.03; P = .000), the number of keloids over 3 (OR, 1.59; P = .050) and the presence of family history (OR, 1.91; P = .027) were significantly associated with keloid infections. Suppurative keloids were located mostly in thorax (61.79%). For the under-age subgroup(n = 25), family history was frequently seen in patients with infections. Microbiologic cultures revealed a mixed spectrum of bacteria including Staphylococcus (25%), Actinomyces (30%) and Prevotella (10%). The rate of epidermoid cysts was 19.7% in histological examination. Age > 40 years, disease duration ≥12 years, the number of keloids >3 and the presence of family history are risk factors for keloid infections.

Radiation induced mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland following post-operative radiotherapy to the earlobe for keloid prophylaxis

Radiation-induced malignancies (RIMs) are rare but well-documented late toxicities associated with exposure to radiation or radiotherapy. A keloid scar is a common benign proliferation of scar tissue which commonly develops at the site of an injury, such as on the earlobe after ear-piercing. While typically reserved for management of malignancies, radiotherapy is often utilized in the management of some benign conditions, including keloids. Given the benign nature of keloids, any theoretical late toxicity from radiotherapy, particularly a life-threatening toxicity such as a RIM, is particularly concerning. Here, we report a case of a 34-year-old male who presented with a radiation induced mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland which developed in a previously irradiated field ten years after the patient received electron radiotherapy for a keloid of the earlobe. Using available literature, we estimate the risk of a RIM of the parotid gland from a typical course of radiotherapy to the earlobe as 0.007% per year.

Location Propensity for Keloids in the Head and Neck

Importance: The difficulty associated with concealing keloids located in the face and neck regions often results in disfigurement and psychological stress for patients. Objective: The purpose of this review is to determine if specific regions on the head and neck have a greater propensity to develop keloids to alert the facial plastic surgeon of regional keloid risk. Evidence Review: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Embase computerized searches were performed through January 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction following a predetermined protocol identifying 1445 keloid studies. Findings: The prevalence of keloids in different regions of the head and neck was evaluated among 1598 head and neck keloids in the final analysis. Three of nine studies evaluated keloids specific to the ear and described a combined 1194 ear keloids locations (53.0% lobule, 22.9% cartilaginous region, 0.3% both, and 23.7% unspecified). One study reported exclusively on 82 neck keloids 72% of which were located in the submental or submandibular region. The remaining five studies evaluated 322 head and neck keloids more generally and showed 70.2% ear, 9.6% unspecified, 6.5% peri-/postauricular, 5.6% beard area, 2.2% scalp/forehead, 2.2% chin, 1.6% lateral face, 1.6% neck, and 0.3% central face keloids. Conclusions and Relevance: The ear, periauricular regions, bearded facial regions, and submandibular and submental sites show the highest propensity for keloid development in the head and neck region. The lowest keloid risk occurred in the central face region. Risk factors in relation to facial and neck regions associated with the formation of keloids should be taken into consideration before performing elective procedures in keloid susceptible individuals.