A comprehensive next-generation sequencing assay for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa

Descriptive Study of the Clinical and Molecular Features of Epidermolysis Bullosa Patients in a Romanian European Reference Network-Skin Affiliated Reference Center

BACKGROUND

During the last 10 years, in Romania, progress has been made for the welfare of patients suffering from epidermolysis bullosa (EB). In five university hospitals, affiliated with the National Program for the Treatment of Rare Diseases, highly trained specialists diagnose and treat patients with this rare condition. Regarding diagnosis, limitations still exist as immunofluorescence mapping and molecular genetic analysis are not accessible, and generally not reimbursed. Our objective is to present the experience in diagnosing EB patients at Colentina Clinical Hospital, highlighting genotype-phenotype correlations observed in our cohort of patients.

METHODS

The records of the patients enrolled between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed considering clinical aspects, and, when available, immunofluorescence mapping, transmission electron microscopy, and genetic molecular analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were identified, of whom 31 cases were of dystrophic EB, three were of junctional EB, and 11 were of simplex EB. For 11 cases, the EB type could not be determined. Regarding EB simplex, two patients with KRT5 mutations and three patients with KRT14 mutations with various clinical expressions, from mild phenotype to severe forms, were identified. Three severe junctional EB patients were registered in our database and for one of the patients, two previously unreported mutations in the LAMA3 gene were identified. Regarding dystrophic EB, 31 cases were identified, of which 25 were recessive dystrophic cases and six were dominant dystrophic cases. Molecular genetic testing was performed for 15 patients, and the most common variant was c.425A>G, identified in six cases.

DISCUSSIONS

Two previously unreported mutations were identified, namely, COL7A1 c.5416G>C, a heterozygous missense variant in a patient with a mild phenotype, mainly with nail involvement, and COL7A1 c.5960del, a variant that generates a frameshift in exon 72 resulting in a premature stop codon; this variant was identified in two siblings with a severe recessive dystrophic.

CONCLUSION

Important steps have been made in identifying the correct and complete diagnosis, as well as the characterization of EB patients addressing our reference center. The findings underscore the pivotal role of molecular genetic testing in confirming diagnoses and elucidating inheritance patterns, especially in cases with atypical presentations or de novo mutations.

Identification of novel KRT5 gene variants in two Chinese patients with sporadic form of epidermolysis bullosa simplex: A case report

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS), a rare genetic disorder characterized by fragile skin that is prone to blistering and tearing, is primarily caused by mutations in genes encoding keratin proteins, such as KRT5 and KRT14. This study aimed to identify the pathogenic gene variants responsible for the sporadic form of EBS in two Chinese patients. Blood samples were collected from patients and their parents, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for variant screening. Two novel gene variants were identified within the KRT5 gene: c.1399A>T (p.Ile467Phe) in patient 1 and c.1412G>A (p.Arg471His) in patient 2. These variants were absent in the unaffected parents and a control group of 100 healthy individuals. These two novel gene variants within the KRT5 gene may be responsible for EBS, thus improving understanding of the genetic basis of EBS.

Evolution of genome diagnostics in epidermolysis bullosa: Unveiling the power of next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Genome diagnostics is considered gold standard diagnostics for epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of rare disorders characterized by blistering and wounding of mucocutaneous tissues. EB is caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins of the dermo-epidermal junction. Accurate genetic diagnosis of EB is crucial for prognostication, counselling and precision-medicine. Genome diagnostics for EB started in 1991 with the introduction of Sanger sequencing (SS), analysing one gene at a time. In 2013, SS was superseded by next-generation sequencing (NGS), that allow for high-throughput sequencing of multiple genes in parallel. Several studies have shown a beneficial role for NGS in EB diagnostics, but its true benefit has not been quantified.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit of NGS in EB by systematically evaluating the performance of different genome diagnostics used over time based on robust data from the Dutch EB Registry.

METHODS

The diagnostic performances of SS and NGS were systematically evaluated in a retrospective observational study including all index cases with a clinical diagnosis of EB in whom genome diagnostics was performed between 01 January 1994 and 01 January 2022 (n = 308), registered at the Dutch EB Expertise Centre.

RESULTS

Over time, a genetic diagnosis was made in 289/308 (94%) EB cases. The diagnostic yield increased from 89% (SS) to 95% (NGS). Most importantly, NGS significantly reduced diagnostic turnaround time (39 days vs. 211 days, p < 0.001). The likelihood of detecting variants of uncertain significance and additional findings increased from 5% and 1% (SS) to 22% and 13% (NGS) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study quantifies the benefit of NGS-based methods and demonstrate they have had a major impact on EB diagnostics through an increased diagnostic yield and a dramatically decreased turnaround time (39 days). Although our diagnostic yield is high (95%), further improvement of genome diagnostics is urgently needed to provide a genetic diagnosis in all EB patients.

Next-generation sequencing in dermatology

Over the past decade, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has advanced our understanding, diagnosis, and management of several areas within dermatology. NGS has emerged as a powerful tool for diagnosing genetic diseases of the skin, improving upon traditional PCR-based techniques limited by significant genetic heterogeneity associated with these disorders. Epidermolysis bullosa and ichthyosis are two of the most extensively studied genetic diseases of the skin, with a well-characterized spectrum of genetic changes occurring in these conditions. NGS has also played a critical role in expanding the mutational landscape of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, enhancing our understanding of its molecular pathogenesis. Similarly, genetic testing has greatly benefited melanoma diagnosis and treatment, primarily due to the high prevalence of BRAF hot spot mutations and other well-characterized genetic alterations. Additionally, NGS provides a valuable tool for measuring tumor mutational burden, which can aid in management of melanoma. Lastly, NGS demonstrates promise in improving the sensitivity of diagnosing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. This article provides a comprehensive summary of NGS applications in the diagnosis and management of genodermatoses, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, highlighting the impact of NGS on the field of dermatology.

Mutational analysis of epidermolysis bullosa in Taiwan by whole-exome sequencing complemented by RNA sequencing: a series of 77 patients

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of hereditary skin diseases characterized by skin fragility. Primary data on Taiwanese population remain scarce.

METHODS

We gathered clinical information from EB patients at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from January, 2012, to June, 2021. Diagnostic tests including transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence studies, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) were performed. The pathogenicity of novel splice-site mutations was determined through reverse transcriptase-PCR of skin mRNA followed by Sanger and/or RNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven EB patients from 45 families were included: 19 EB simplex, six junctional EB, and 52 dystrophic EB. Pathogenic variants were identified in 37 of 38 families (97.4%), in which WES was used as a first-line tool for mutational analysis; RNA sequencing determined pathogenic variants in the remaining one family. A total of 60 mutations in EB-related genes were identified, including 22 novel mutations. The mutations involved KRT5, KRT14, PLEC, COL17A1, LAMB3, LAMA3, ITGB4, and COL7A1. Over one-quarter of DEB patients had EB pruriginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinct clinical presentation and molecular pathology of EB in Taiwan expand our understanding of this disorder. WES was an effective first-line diagnostic tool for identifying EB-associated variants. RNA sequencing complemented WES when multiple potentially pathogenic splice-site mutations were found.

Targeted NGS in Diagnostics of Genodermatosis Characterized by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Symptom Complex in 268 Russian Children

The pathogenic variants of genes encoding proteins, participating in the formation and functioning of epidermis and dermo-epidermal junctions, create a large variety of clinical phenotypes from: small localized to severe generalized dermatitis, as well as early, or even, prenatal death due to extensive epidermis loss. The diagnostic panel in this study was developed for the purposes of identifying these pathogenic genetic variants in 268 Russian children, who possessed the epidermolysis bullosa symptom complex in a selection of 247 families. This panel included the targeted areas of 33 genes, which are genetic variants that can lead to the development of the phenotype mentioned above. The usage of next generation sequencing allowed the revelation of 192 various altered alleles (of which 109 alleles were novel, i.e., had not been described previously). In addition, it allowed the definition of the genetic variants that are both typical for most of the examined children and for the separate ethnic groups inhabiting modern Russia. We found that the most characteristic mutations for the Dargin and Chechen ethnic groups are the c.3577del deletion in the COL7A1 gene and the c.2488G>A missense mutation in the COL17A1 gene, respectively. In addition, the study of haplotypes of microsatellite markers, which we managed to conduct in the Dargin population, confirmed the presence of the founder effect.

Integrated Management Strategies for Epidermolysis Bullosa: Current Insights

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare genodermatoses that is characterized by skin fragility resulting from minor trauma. There are four major subtypes, namely, EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB and Kindler EB, depending upon the localization of defective protein and resulting plane of blister formation. The phenotype is heterogeneous in terms of severity and majority of them present at birth or neonatal period. Currently, the treatment is mainly supportive and requires multidisciplinary care. The complex molecular pathology creates difficulty in discovering a unified curative treatment approach. But with arduous efforts, significant progress has been made in the development of treatment strategies in the last decade. The management strategies range from targeting the underlying causative factor to symptom-relieving approaches, and include gene, mRNA, protein, cell and combination therapies. In this review, we enumerate the promising approaches that are currently under various stages of investigation to provide effective treatment for patients with EB.

A retrospective analysis of diagnostic testing in a large North American cohort of patients with epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has significant implications for prognosis, management, and genetic counseling.

OBJECTIVE

To describe diagnostic testing patterns and assess diagnostic concordance of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunofluorescence mapping (IFM), and genetic analysis for EB.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort included patients enrolled in the Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database from January 1, 2004, to July 8, 2019. Tests concluding the same EB type (EB simplex, junctional EB, dominant dystrophic EB, and recessive dystrophic EB) were considered concordant; those concluding different EB types were considered discordant; and those with nonspecific/nondefinitive results were equivocal.

RESULTS

A total of 970 diagnostic tests were conducted from 1984 to 2018 in 771 patients. Genetic analyses were performed chronologically later than IFM or TEM (P < .001). The likelihood of undergoing genetic analysis was greater for junctional EB and recessive dystrophic EB, and the same for dominant dystrophic EB as compared with EB simplex. TEM results in 163 patients were equivocal (55%), concordant (42%), and discordant (3%). IFM results in 185 patients were equivocal (54%), concordant (42%), and discordant (4%).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic testing has shifted in favor of genetic analysis. TEM and IFM frequently offer equivocal findings when compared to the specificity afforded by genetic analysis.

Whole exome sequencing identified a novel compound heterozygous variation in COL7A1 gene causing dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a series of severe genetic conditions affecting skin and nails caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene. DEB has a strong phenotypic variability. In the present study, we recruited a case with a boy exhibiting typical DEB indication, and performed a clinical, genetic, and experimental investigation, followed by a prenatal diagnosis on their current pregnancy. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel compound heterozygous variation in COL7A1, consisting of two variants, namely c.191T>C (p.Leu64Pro) and c.5124G>A (p.Leu1708=) in the proband. In vitro study by minigene system indicated that c.5124G>A would result in an increased ratio of a transcript with exon‐skipping, which supported its pathogenicity. Further prenatal detection confirmed the genotype–phenotye co‐separation in this family. In conclusion, the findings in our study expanded the mutation spectrum of DEB, and emphasized the importance of paying attention to specific synonymous variants in the filtering process.

Epidermolysis Bullosa With Congenital Absence of Skin: Congenital Corneal Cloudiness and Esophagogastric Obstruction Including Extended Genotypic Spectrum of PLEC, LAMC2, ITGB4 and COL7A1

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare and genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by skin fragility and blister formation occurring spontaneously or after minor trauma. EB is accompanied by congenital absence of skin (EB with CAS) in some patients. Pathogenic variants of COL7A1 are responsible for EB with CAS in the vast majority of cases. Type and subtype diagnosis of EB with CAS generally requires specific immunohistological examinations that are not widely available plus targeted gene analysis. The present study aimed to determine the clinical features of five patients affected by EB with CAS and to identify the underlying genetic defects using whole exome sequencing (WES) followed by focused analysis of the target genes. Four patients had generalized skin involvement and one had localized defects. Two patients exhibited extremely severe skin manifestations and congenital cloudy cornea along with pyloric atresia, and one had partial esophagogastric obstruction and anuria due to vesicoureteric obstruction. In the WES analysis, the average coverage of the target exons was 99.05% (726 of 733 exons), with a range of 96.4–100% for individual genes. We identified four novel and two known pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of five distinct genes in the examined families: PLEC:c.2536G > T (p.Glu846Ter); LAMC2:c.3385C > T (p.Arg1129Ter); KRT5:c.429G > A (p.Glu477Lys); ITGB4:c.794dupC (p.Ala266SerfsTer5); COL7A1:c.5440C > T (p.Arg1814Cys); and COL7A1:c.6103delG. All alleles were inherited from the parents, except for the KRT5 variant as a de novo finding. The findings reveal extremely rare phenotypes found in EB with CAS, namely congenital cloudy cornea, esophagogastric obstruction, and anuria, and extend the genotypic spectrum of EB-related genes. The data confirm that WES provides very high coverage of coding exons/genes and support its use as a reasonable alternative method for diagnosis of EB. The present data from an underrepresented population in Southeast Asia could further broaden the knowledge and research on EB.

Epidermolysis Bullosa: Pediatric Perspectives

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare congenital genetic conditions that result in painful blistering of the skin and mucous membranes, which occur with minor trauma or friction. There are many types and subtypes of EB that need to be distinguished, as the management and prognosis of each can vary significantly. We aim to perform an up-to-date literature review on congenital EB for healthcare providers in pediatrics. We performed a review of existing literature in the English language on EB via PubMed Clinical Queries, using key words such as "epidermolysis bullosa", "congenital" and "children". We reviewed EB based on the following subheadings: epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and clinical prediction guidelines. EB is due to mutation in a number of genes, some types are autosomal dominant while others are autosomal recessive. The underlying mechanism is a defect in attachment between or within the epidermis and dermis of the skin. There are four main types: epidermolysis bullosa simplex, dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, junctional epidermolysis bullosa, and Kindler syndrome. The diagnosis is suspected based on symptoms and confirmed by skin biopsy and definitive genetic testing. The severity of EB can range from mild to fatal. Severe complications may arise in some EB types and subtypes within the eye, ear, nose, upper airway, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. There is no cure for the condition to date. Optimal management must be multidisciplinary, and involves wound care, pain control, controlling infections, nutritional support, and prevention and treatment of complications. EB presents in different forms. Treatment is supportive. The prognosis of milder forms is good. Children severely affected with EB and their families live a misery life with impaired quality of life. Health care workers must be aware of the suffering in these families and proactively support them.

Diagnosis and Care of the Newborn with Epidermolysis Bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare genetic disorders that are characterized by fragile skin. Because of its rarity, many neonatologists may not be familiar with the current diagnosis and treatment recommendations for EB. The classification of EB was updated in 2020. The diagnosis of EB is now more heavily based on genetic rather than clinical or histologic features. In this review, we summarize the basic classification of EB, the preferred methods of diagnosis including a panel of next-generation sequencing for all types of EB, as well as specific immunofluorescence and electron microscopy of skin biopsies in special circumstances. We also review the principles of skin care for the newborn with EB and discuss the possible associated comorbidities including infectious, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary complications. Lastly, we discuss the approach to educating the family about the diagnosis, prognosis, and care of an infant with EB and describe resources for the successful transition of the infant from the hospital to the home.

Novel mutations of epidermolysis bullosa identified using whole-exome sequencing in Indonesian Javanese patients

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of inherited blistering skin diseases known to have heterogenicity of phenotypes and genotypes. There are four main types of EB: simplex, junctional, dystrophic, and Kindler syndrome, which are further classified into 34 distinct subtypes. Twenty different gene mutations are responsible for the loss of function and integrity of the basal membrane zone. In limited-resource settings such as Indonesia, diagnoses of hereditary skin disease often rely on clinical features. This limitation was managed by using the Clinical Diagnostic Matrix EB for clinical diagnosis support and whole-exome sequencing for genetic analysis. This study is the first whole-exome sequencing analysis of Javanese Indonesian patients with EB. The genetic analysis from four patients with EB identified all novel mutations unreported in the dbSNP database. There are Kindler syndrome with FERMT1 frameshift mutation in exon 4, at c.388A (p.I130fs), which causes truncated protein; junctional EB generalized intermediate (JEB-GI) subtype with missense mutation at LAMB3 gene position c.A962C (p.H321P); and recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) a missense mutation at COL7A1 gene position c.G5000T (p.G1667V). The whole-exome sequencing was further verified by Sanger sequencing. The new mutations' finding is possibly due to the limited genetic database in the Malayo-Polynesian ethnic group. Indonesia has hundreds of ethnic groups, and the Javanese is the largest ethnic group that populates Indonesia. Genetic data of these ethnic groups is important to be established in the international genetic database. This combination of clinical diagnostic and genetic analysis tools with whole-exome sequencing confirmed the challenging diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa.

Identification and Computational Analysis of Novel Pathogenic Variants in Pakistani Families with Diverse Epidermolysis Bullosa Phenotypes

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) includes a group of rare gesnodermatoses that result in blistering and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes. Genetically, pathogenic variants in around 20 genes are known to alter the structural and functional integrity of intraepidermal adhesion and dermo-epidermal anchorage, leading to four different types of EB. Here we report the underlying genetic causes of EB phenotypes segregating in seven large consanguineous families, recruited from different regions of Pakistan. Whole exome sequencing, followed by segregation analysis of candidate variants through Sanger sequencing, identified eight pathogenic variants, including three novel (ITGB4: c.1285G>T, and c.3373G>A; PLEC: c.1828A>G) and five previously reported variants (COL7A1: c.6209G>A, and c.1573C>T; FERMT1: c.676insC; LAMA3: c.151insG; LAMB3: c.1705C>T). All identified variants were either absent or had very low frequencies in the control databases. Our in-silico analyses and 3-dimensional (3D) molecular modeling support the deleterious impact of these variants on the encoded proteins. Intriguingly, we report the first case of a recessively inherited form of rare EBS-Ogna associated with a homozygous variant in the PLEC gene. Our study highlights the clinical and genetic diversity of EB in the Pakistani population and expands the mutation spectrum of EB; it could also be useful for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of the affected families.

Gene panel for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa: proposal for a viable and efficient approach

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa is characterized by cutaneous fragility and blistering. Historically, diagnosis is achieved by immunofluorescence mapping or transmission electron microscopy, both involving biopsy procedures. Genetic analysis, especially through next-generation sequencing, is an important tool for the diagnosis of this disease. In Brazil, access to diagnostic methods is limited, and consequently, most patients do not have an accurate diagnosis. Diagnosis allows the indication of prognosis and genetic counselling of the patient.

Objectives

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a gene panel compared to immunofluorescence mapping and transmission electron microscopy by analyzing its benefits, limitations, and economic aspects.

Methods

The gene panel included the 11 main genes associated with epidermolysis bullosa. The techniques were compared, assessing the average cost, advantages, and limitations, through a price survey and literature review.

Results

Both immunofluorescence mapping and transmission electron microscopy require skin biopsy, are dependent on the investigator’s expertise, and are subject to frequent inconclusive results. The gene panel is effective for the conclusive diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa, presents high efficiency and accuracy, is economically feasible, and excludes the need for biopsy. The gene panel allows for prognosis, prenatal genetic diagnosis, and genetic counseling.

Study limitations

It was not possible to find laboratories that perform transmission electron microscopy for epidermolysis bullosa diagnosis in Brazil.

Conclusion

This study supports the gene panel as the first-choice method for epidermolysis bullosa diagnosis.

Identification of a Novel COL17A1 Compound Heterozygous Mutation in a Chinese Girl with Non-Herlitz Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa

Non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB-nH), an autosomal recessive bullous genodermatosis, is characterized by generalized skin blistering from birth onward, dental anomalies, universal alopecia and nail dystrophy. The underlying defect is mutation of the COL17A1 gene encoding the type XVII collagen, resulting in losing structure for attachment of basal epithelial cells to the matrix. In present study, we described one case of congenitally affected female child aged 10 years, with skin blistering. Dermatologic examination revealed sparse, mild blisters on the face and hand, with profound enamel pitting of the teeth. Skin biopsy from proband's bullous skin displayed subepidermal bulla formation without acantholysis. The immunofluorescence of anti-type XVII collagen antibody staining showed loss of type XVII collagen staining at the basement membrane zone. A combination of whole exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing revealed the novel heterozygous mutations (c.4324C>T;p.Q1442* and c.1834G>C;p.G612R) in COL17A1 gene, which could be associated with the observed JEB-nH. One allele had a novel nonsense mutation (c.4324C>T;p.Q1442*), resulting in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and truncated collagen XVII; the other allele had a novel missense mutation of c.1834G>C;p.G612R in exon 22, causing a glycine-to-arginine substitution in the Gly-X-Y triple helical repeating motifs and decreasing the thermal stability of collagen XVII. Our findings indicate that the genetic test based on WES can be useful in diagnosing JEB-nH patients. The novel pathogenic mutations identified would further expand our understanding of the mutation spectrum of COL17A1 gene in association with the inherited blistering diseases.

Genetic and environmental factors underlying keratinocyte carcinoma risk

Recent large-scale GWAS and large epidemiologic studies have accelerated the discovery of genes and environmental factors that contribute to the risk of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), which includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This Review summarizes the genomic regions associated with SCC and BCC risk, examines the genetic overlap between SCC and BCC, and discusses biological pathways involved in SCC and BCC development. Next, we review environmental factors that are associated with KC risk, including those that are shared between SCC and BCC as well as others that associated with only one type of KC. We conclude with a critical appraisal of current research and potential directions for future research.

Rare Vesiculopustular Eruptions of the Neonatal Period

Numerous disorders present with vesiculopustular eruptions in the neonatal period, ranging from benign to life-threatening. Accurate and prompt diagnosis is imperative to avoid unnecessary testing and treatment for benign eruptions, while allowing for adequate treatment of potentially fatal disorders. In this review, we highlight several rare blistering diseases of the newborn. A diagnostic approach is outlined to provide clinicians with a framework for approaching a neonate with vesicles, pustules, or ulcers.

Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria

Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EB) umfasst eine Gruppe von Erkrankungen, die mit Hautfragilität und mechanisch verursachter Blasenbildung einhergehen. Die klinischen Manifestationen zeigen unterschiedliche Schweregrade, von lebensbedrohlich bis leicht. Im Kindesalter und bei Erwachsenen kann das klinische Bild typisch sein; allerdings kann bei Neugeborenen der EB-Subtyp klinisch häufig nicht bestimmt werden. Pathogene Varianten in 20 Genen sind bereits als krankheitsursächlich für die verschiedenen Formen der EB beschrieben. Die allelische Heterogenität ist sehr groß. Die Diagnostik basiert auf der genauen klinischen Untersuchung, der Familienanamnese und der molekulargenetischen Analyse. Aufgrund der genetischen Heterogenität und der Größe der Gene eignet sich die „Next-generation-sequencing“-basierte Multi-Gen-Panel-Diagnostik am besten. Teilweise sind Genotyp-Phänotyp-Korrelationen bekannt, sodass die genetische Diagnostik auch prognostisch eine Rolle spielt.

Clinical practice guidelines for laboratory diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa

Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18377.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18829 available online

What's New in Genetic Skin Diseases

The discoveries of new genes underlying genetic skin diseases have occurred at a rapid pace, supported by advances in DNA sequencing technologies. These discoveries have translated to an improved understanding of disease mechanisms at a molecular level and identified new therapeutic options based on molecular targets. This article highlights just a few of these recent discoveries for a diverse group of skin diseases, including tuberous sclerosis complex, ichthyoses, overgrowth syndromes, interferonopathies, and basal cell nevus syndrome, and how this has translated into novel targeted therapies and improved patient care.

An overview of the genetic basis of epidermolysis bullosa in Brazil: discovery of novel and recurrent disease-causing variants

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genodermatosis that encompasses a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders classified in four major types: EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler syndrome. Our aim was to characterize recurrent and novel mutations associated to EB in a sample of Brazilian patients. Eighty-seven patients (25 EBS, 4 JEB and 58 DEB) were studied. We performed a next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel through ion torrent technology including 11 genes: KRT5, KRT14, PLEC, TGM5, LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, COL17A1, ITGB4, COL7A1, and FERMT1. A total of 72 different pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified, 32 of them are novel. The causal variant was detected in 82 patients (efficiency of 94.3%). Pathogenic variants in the residue 125 of KRT14 were identified in 32% of all EBS patients. In DEB patients, four COL7A1 variants were quite frequent, some of them clustered in specific Brazilian regions. Our study extends the spectrum of known mutations in EB and describes, for the first time, the genetic profile of EB patients from Brazil.

Whole exome sequencing identified two point mutations of COL7A1 and FLG in a Chinese family with dystrophic epidermolysis bullous pruriginosa and ichthyosis vulgaris

We report a 21-year-old man with recurrent bullous eruptions and severe itching on the lower legs and feet since 5 years of age. Dry, dirty brown, tile-like scales covered his lower legs with dystrophic toenails. Nodular prurigo-like lesions, scarring papules and milia remitted after the bullous eruptions. His father and another two family members had similar but mild presentations with recurrent bullae on the lower legs. Whole exome sequencing detected the heterozygous variants of COL7A1 c.6698G>A and FLG c.7249C>T in this pedigree. COL7A1 c.6698G>A was reported in bullous dermolysis of the newborn and FLG c.7249C>T was reported in ichthyosis vulgaris. Thus, the diagnosis of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa associated with ichthyosis vulgaris was made.

Advances in understanding the molecular basis of skin fragility

Skin fragility refers to a large group of conditions in which the ability of the skin to provide protection against trivial mechanical trauma is diminished, resulting in the formation of blisters, erosions, wounds, or scars. Acquired and physiological skin fragility is common; genetic disorders are rare but give insight into the molecular mechanisms ensuring skin stability. The paradigm is represented by inherited epidermolysis bullosa. This review is focused on recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of genetic skin fragility, including emerging concepts, controversies, unanswered questions, and opinions of the author. In spite of the advanced knowledge on the genetic causes of skin fragility, the molecular pathology is still expanding. Open questions in understanding the molecular basis of genetic skin fragility are the following: what are the causes of phenotypes which remain genetically unsolved, and what are the molecular modifiers which might explain phenotypic differences among individuals with similar mutations?  New mutational mechanisms and new genes have recently been discovered and are briefly described here. Comprehensive next-generation sequencing-based genetic testing improved mutation detection and facilitated the identification of the genetic basis of unclear and new phenotypes. Characterization of the biochemical and cell biological consequences of the genetic variants is challenging and laborious but may represent the basis for personalized therapeutic approaches. Molecular modifiers of skin fragility have been uncovered in particular animal and genetic models but not in larger cohorts of patients. This scientific progress is the basis for revisions of the epidermolysis bullosa classification and for innovative therapeutic approaches designed for this intractable condition.