Dabrafenib-induced neutrophilic panniculitis in a child undergoing dual BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma multiforme

Drug-induced neutrophilic lobular panniculitis secondary to BRAF and MEK inhibitor used for treatment of low-grade glioma and its management

An 8-year-old boy presented with his mother for evaluation of an erythematous rash 3 weeks after the start of dual BRAF-MEK inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib for treatment of progression of low-grade glioma. Panniculitis has been reported as a rare adverse cutaneous event induced by BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, and the combined dual BRAF-MEK therapy. Based on the patient's history, clinical presentation, and histopathological findings, a diagnosis of drug-induced neutrophilic panniculitis was made. This case describes neutrophilic panniculitis as a potential cutaneous manifestation of dual BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy and describes the management of such side effects. Neutrophilic panniculitis is a relatively rare manifestation, characterized by neutrophilic inflammation in the subcutaneous tissue. Additionally, this case serves as a reminder to consider the cutaneous side effects of such therapies, given that MEK and BRAF inhibitors are increasingly used to treat primary brain tumors in the pediatric population. Routine inspection and early management may improve patients' quality of life and enable continuation of anticancer therapy.

Diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities from small-molecule inhibitor cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Advances in molecular biology and genetics have contributed to breakthrough treatments directed at specific pathways associated with the development of cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors (Nibs) aimed at a variety of cellular pathways have been efficacious; however, they are associated with significant dermatologic toxicities.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of dermatologic toxicities associated with Nibs categorized into the following five groups: (a) mitogen-activated protein kinase; (b) growth factor/multi-tyrosine kinase; (c) cell division/DNA repair; (d) signaling associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms; and (e) other signaling pathways. Prospective phase I, II, or III clinical trials, retrospective literature reviews, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and case reviews/reports were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities reviewed were associated with every class of Nibs and ranged from mild to severe or life-threatening adverse skin reactions. Inflammatory reactions manifesting as maculopapular, papulopustular/acneiform, and eczematous lesions were frequent types of dermatologic toxicities seen with Nibs. Squamous cell carcinoma with keratoacanthoma-like features was associated with a subset of Nibs. Substantial overlap in dermatologic toxicities was found between Nibs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologic toxicities from Nibs are diverse and may overlap between classes of Nibs. Recognition of the various types of toxicities from Nibs is critical for patient care in the era of "oncodermatology/dermatopathology."