Presepsin as a predictor of early onset neonatal sepsis in the umbilical cord blood of premature infants with premature rupture of membranes

Diagnostic value of maternal, cord blood and neonatal biomarkers for early-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An accurate diagnosis of early-onset sepsis (EOS) is challenging because of subtle symptoms and the lack of a good diagnostic tool, resulting in considerable antibiotic overtreatment. A biomarker, discriminating between infected and non-infected newborns at an early stage of the disease, could improve EOS prediction. Numerous biomarkers have been tested, but have never been compared directly.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of early biomarkers and their diagnostic value in maternal samples, umbilical cord blood, and neonatal serum.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to 1 March 2023, without restrictions on publication date, population, or language.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles describing the diagnostic value of at least one biomarker in the detection of EOS in neonates, independent of gestational age, were included.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Three independent researchers assessed the articles using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed with all manuscripts describing diagnostic accuracy using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of 2296 identified articles, 171 reports were included in the systematic review and 69 in the meta-analysis. Literature showed mixed and inconsistent evidence for most biomarkers and sample types, because of a lack of a uniform EOS case definition, small sample sizes, and large heterogeneity between studies. Interesting markers were procalcitonin (pooled sensitivity 79%, 95% CI 71-84%; specificity 91%, 95% CI 83-96%, n = 11) and interleukin (IL)-6 (pooled sensitivity 83%, 95% CI 71-90%; specificity 87%, 95% CI 78-93%, n = 8) in umbilical cord blood and presepsin (pooled sensitivity 82%, 95% CI 62-93%; specificity 86%, 95% CI 73-93%, n = 3) and serum amyloid A (pooled sensitivity 92%, 95% CI 75-98%; specificity 96%, 95% CI 78-99%, n = 4) in neonatal serum. Studies on the combination of biomarkers were scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

A biomarker stand-alone test is currently not reliable for direct antibiotic stewardship in newborns, although several biomarkers show promising initial results. Further research into biomarker combinations could lead to an improved EOS diagnosis, reduce antibiotic overtreatment, and prevent associated health-related problems.

Investigating the Association between Serum and Hematological Biomarkers and Neonatal Sepsis in Newborns with Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is associated with important mortality and morbidity. The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between serum and hematological biomarkers with early onset neonatal sepsis in a cohort of patients with prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM) and to calculate their diagnostic accuracy. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1355 newborns with PROM admitted between January 2017 and March 2020, who were divided into two groups: group A, with PROM ≥ 18 h, and group B, with ROM < 18 h. Both groups were further split into subgroups: proven sepsis, presumed sepsis, and no sepsis. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Random Effects Generalized Least Squares (GLS) regression were used to evaluate the data. (3) Results: The statistically significant predictors of neonatal sepsis were the high white blood cell count from the first (p = 0.005) and third day (p = 0.028), and high C-reactive protein (CRP) values from the first day (p = 0.004). Procalcitonin (area under the curve-AUC = 0.78) and CRP (AUC = 0.76) measured on the first day had the best predictive performance for early-onset neonatal sepsis. (4) Conclusions: Our results outline the feasibility of using procalcitonin and CRP measured on the first day taken individually in order to increase the detection rate of early-onset neonatal sepsis, in the absence of positive blood culture.

Predictive value of serum inflammatory markers for histological chorioamnionitis among women with preterm premature rupture of membranes after undergoing cervical cerclage

PURPOSE

To determine the predictive value of maternal White Blood Cells (WBC), neutrophils, and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for diagnosing Histological Chorioamnionitis (HCA) among women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM) who underwent cervical cerclage.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among women with singleton pregnancy and PPROM, who underwent cervical cerclage during 2018-2020.

RESULTS

A total of 55 eligible women were included in the final analysis, including 36 (61.02%) cases with HCA and 19 (38.98%) without HCA. Women with HCA had higher WBC count (12.31 ± 2.80) × 109/L and neutrophil count (9.67 ± 2.90)×109/L than those without HCA (10.35 ± 2.53) × 109/L and 7.82 ± 2.82 × 109/L, respectively) (both p < 0.05). The cut-off value of WBC count at 10.15×109/L was found to be the most effective in identifying HCA, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.56-0.86; p = 0.012), sensitivity of 86.11%, specificity of 57.90%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 79.49%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 68.75%, and Youden index of 0.44. The combination of WBC + neutrophil had a slightly higher (AUC = 0.711, 95% CI: 0.57-0.86; p = 0.011), specificity (68.42%), and PPV (81.25%), but lower sensitivity (72.22%), than the WBC count alone. A cut-off value of neutrophil at 7.46 × 109/L was effective in identifying HCA, with an AUC of 0.689 (95% CI: 0.53-0.84; p = 0.022).

DISCUSSION

Combination use of WBC+neutrophil was found to be the most accurate predictor of HCA among women with PPROM after surgery of cervical cerclage.

Can Presepsin Be Valuable in Reducing Unnecessary Antibiotic Exposure after Birth?

Background: Due to a lack of rapid, accurate diagnostic tools for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) at the initial suspicion, infants are often unnecessarily given antibiotics directly after birth. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for EOS before antibiotic initiation and to investigate whether presepsin can be used to guide clinicians’ decisions on whether to start antibiotics. Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, all infants who started on antibiotics for EOS suspicion were consecutively included. Presepsin concentrations were determined in blood samples collected at the initial EOS suspicion (t = 0). In addition to this, samples were collected at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the initial EOS suspicion and from the umbilical cord directly after birth. The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin was calculated. Results: A total of 333 infants were included, of whom 169 were born preterm. We included 65 term and 15 preterm EOS cases. At the initial EOS suspicion, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.70) in the term-born infants compared to 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.95) in the preterm infants. A cut-off value of 645 pg/mL resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% in the preterm infants. The presepsin concentrations in cord blood and at other time points did not differ significantly from the concentrations at the initial EOS suspicion. Conclusions: Presepsin is a biomarker with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for EOS (culture-proven and clinical EOS) in preterm infants and might be of value in reducing antibiotic exposure after birth when appended to current EOS guidelines. However, the small number of EOS cases prevents us from drawing firm conclusions. Further research should be performed to evaluate whether appending a presepsin-guided step to current EOS guidelines leads to a safe decrease in antibiotic overtreatment and antibiotic-related morbidity.

Cord blood presepsin as a predictor of early-onset neonatal sepsis in term and preterm newborns

BACKGROUND

To date, no studies on presepsin values in cord blood of term infants with risk factors for early-onset sepsis (EOS) are available, whereas only one study reported presepsin values in cord blood of preterm infants at risk. In this study, we investigated the presepsin values in cord blood of term and preterm infants with documented risk factors for EOS.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective pilot study, we enrolled neonates presenting with documented risk factors for EOS. P-SEP levels were assessed in a blood sample collected from the clamped umbilical cord after the delivery in 93 neonates, using a point-of-care device. The primary outcome of our study was to evaluate the role of cord blood P-SEP in predicting clinical EOS in term and preterm infants.

RESULTS

During the study period, we enrolled 93 neonates with risk factors for EOS with a gestational age ranging between 24.6 and 41.6 weeks (median 38.0). The median P-SEP value in all infants was 491 pg/ml (IQR 377 - 729). Median cord P-SEP values were significantly higher in infants with clinical sepsis (909 pg/ml, IQR 586 - 1307) rather than in infants without (467 pg/ml, IQR 369 - 635) (p = 0.010). We found a statistically significant correlation between cord P-SEP value at birth and the later diagnosis of clinical sepsis (Kendall's τ coefficient 0.222, p = 0.002). We identified the maximum Youden's Index (best cut-off point) at 579 pg/ml, corresponding to a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 71.8% in predicting clinical sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum Youden's index was 579 pg/ml for clinical EOS using cord P-SEP values. This could be the starting point to realize multicenter studies, confirming the feasibility of dosing P-SEP in cord blood of infants with risk factors of EOS to discriminate those who could develop clinical sepsis and spare the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

Group B Streptococcus Early-Onset Disease: New Preventive and Diagnostic Tools to Decrease the Burden of Antibiotic Use

The difficulty in recognizing early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) in a timely manner due to non-specific symptoms and the limitations of diagnostic tests, combined with the risk of serious consequences if EONS is not treated in a timely manner, has resulted in a low threshold for starting empirical antibiotic treatment. New guideline strategies, such as the neonatal sepsis calculator, have been proven to reduce the antibiotic burden related to EONS, but lack sensitivity for detecting EONS. In this review, the potential of novel, targeted preventive and diagnostic methods for EONS is discussed from three different perspectives: maternal, umbilical cord and newborn perspectives. Promising strategies from the maternal perspective include Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prevention, exploring the virulence factors of GBS, maternal immunization and antepartum biomarkers. The diagnostic methods obtained from the umbilical cord are preliminary but promising. Finally, promising fields from the newborn perspective include biomarkers, new microbiological techniques and clinical prediction and monitoring strategies. Consensus on the definition of EONS and the standardization of research on novel diagnostic biomarkers are crucial for future implementation and to reduce current antibiotic overexposure in newborns.

Prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in umbilical cord blood analysis: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the inflammatory markers studied in umbilical cord blood and to analyze the performance of the three markers most frequently studied for the prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

An integrative review from 1995 to 2021 was performed, with a search in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and gray literature databases, using the terms "neonates," "newborns," "neonatal sepsis," "early-onset neonatal sepsis," "neonatal infection," "inflammatory markers," "biomarkers," "cord blood," "fetal blood."

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTIONS

Study evaluation was limited to primary studies, prospective, observational or intervention, descriptive or analytical, that assessed the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis using inflammatory markers in umbilical cord blood, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Qualitative studies, reports, review studies, and case series were excluded. Only studies with a punctuation ≥ 6 in the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were included.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were the most frequently studied markers. The best performance for C-reactive protein was observed at a 0.2 mg/L cutoff, with a sensitivity of 82% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Procalcitonin presented the best performance at a 0.5 ng/mL cutoff with 87.5% sensitivity and 98.7% negative predictive value. Interleukin-6 presented the best performance at a 108.5 ng/mL cutoff, with 95% sensitivity and 97.4% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of markers in the umbilical cord for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis, could contribute to a more assertive therapy for the neonate and anticipate sepsis screening. Since the cost is less and technically easier, C-reactive protein is recommended for routine use.

Association of subclinical markers of inflammation with preterm premature rupture of membranes and adverse neonatal results: a case control study

AIM

The study aims to investigate the relationship between subclinical inflammatory factors, which are known to be closely related to inflammation, with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and adverse postpartum outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The case control type study was conducted between January 1, 2021, and January 2022. 525 pregnant women, including 272 PPROM and 253 normal patients, were added to the study.

RESULTS

There was a positive relationship between PPROM and PCT (platelet crit), MPV (mean platelet volume), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and MLR (monocytes to lymphocyte ratio) values. ROC analysis, PCT > 0.19, MPV > 8.78, NLR > 2.82, and MLR > 0.24 were significantly related to improved risk of PPROM (P < 0.05). In logistic regression analysis, a one-unit rise in PCT resulted in a 3.9-fold rise in RDS risk and a one-unit increase in NLR resulted in a 1.6-fold significant rise in sepsis risk (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

NLR and PCT parameters were found to be related to adverse neonatal outcomes.

Presepsin for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a severe disease, particularly in preterm infants. Timely diagnosis can be challenging owing to unspecific presentation and questionable performance of the common markers of infection. Presepsin was recently proven to be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of EOS.

OBJECTIVE

To assess presepsin accuracy for the diagnosis of EOS.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. No publication date restrictions were applied. The literature search was limited to the English language. Articles were checked for duplication.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were studies that (1) included term or preterm newborns (defined as newborns with gestational age ≥37 weeks or <37 weeks, respectively); (2) included a diagnosis of EOS, defined as culture-proven sepsis for primary analysis and as either clinical or culture-proven sepsis for secondary analysis; and (3) assessed presepsin values during the initial workup for suspected EOS. Exclusion criteria were studies that (1) did not include EOS cases; (2) lacked data on presepsin sensitivity and/or specificity; and (3) were case reports, commentaries, or reviews. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 tool, and data were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcomes of interest for both the primary and secondary analyses were presepsin sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for the diagnosis of EOS.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies of 245 (4.9%) met inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. Twenty-three studies of 245 (9.4%) met the inclusion criteria for the secondary analysis. In the primary analysis, among 12 studies and 828 newborns of any gestational age, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95), respectively; pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 131.69 (95% CI, 54.93-310.94). Subgroup analysis showed that presepsin specificity was associated with the inclusion of only EOS or all neonatal sepsis. Presepsin accuracy was not associated with gestational age, measurement with chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing, country where the study was performed, or risk of bias judgment. In the secondary analysis, among 23 studies and 1866 newborns, accuracy was significantly associated with only test type.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that presepsin was an accurate biomarker of EOS. Clinical trials are warranted to assess its usefulness and safety to reduce early antibiotic exposure, particularly in preterm newborns.

Hemodynamic assessment in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the hemodynamic differences in women with pPROM versus physiological pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective case control study of 15 patients with pPROM and 45 controls. Patients and controls were submitted at enrollment to a non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation with UltraSonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM), and to blood tests to check white blood cells count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. We followed pPROM patients until delivery noting fetal/neonatal and maternal unfavorable outcomes (maternal fever, APGAR 1' and 5'< 7, stillbirth).

RESULTS

Patients with pPROM showed higher values of cardiac output (9.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.1 ± 0.85, p < 0.01), lower systemic vascular resistances (792.1 ± 162 vs 1006.2 ± 110.7, p < 0.01), higher minute distance (32.3 ± 7.8 vs 25 ± 2.8, p < 0.01), lower Potential to Kinetic Energy Ratio (16.5 ± 5.3 vs 22.4 ± 6.8, p < 0.01), higher heart rate (97.5 ± 15.4 vs 82.4 ± 12, p < 0.01) and higher oxygen delivery (1313.2 ± 325.8 vs 1080.7 ± 151.8, p < 0.01) vs. controls. Six out of 15 pPROM patients had an unfavorable outcome. There were no significant differences in CRP levels and WBC count at admission in the two pPROM subgroups, whereas maternal hemodynamics was characterized by lower SVR (718 ± 72 vs 863 ± 123, p = 0.02) in subsequently complicated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal hemodynamics is altered in pPROM patients, with a lower Systemic Vascular Resistance and higher Cardiac Output vs. controls. This hyperdynamic circulation appears to anticipates the changes of serum markers of inflammation (CRP, WBC count) and seems to be more pronounced at admission in pPROM patients developing unfavorable outcomes.

Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the past, present and future

Sepsis remains a significant cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Neonatal sepsis presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms that necessitate tests to confirm the diagnosis. Early and accurate diagnosis of infection will improve clinical outcomes and decrease the overuse of antibiotics. Current diagnostic methods rely on conventional culture methods, which is time-consuming, and may delay critical therapeutic decisions. Nonculture-based techniques including molecular methods and mass spectrometry may overcome some of the limitations seen with culture-based techniques. Biomarkers including hematological indices, cell adhesion molecules, interleukins, and acute-phase reactants have been used for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. In this review, we examine past and current microbiological techniques, hematological indices, and inflammatory biomarkers that may aid sepsis diagnosis. The search for an ideal biomarker that has adequate diagnostic accuracy early in sepsis is still ongoing. We discuss promising strategies for the future that are being developed and tested that may help us diagnose sepsis early and improve clinical outcomes. IMPACT: Reviews the clinical relevance of currently available diagnostic tests for sepsis. Summarizes the diagnostic accuracy of novel biomarkers for neonatal sepsis. Outlines future strategies including the use of omics technology, personalized medicine, and point of care tests.

The Emerging Role of Presepsin (P-SEP) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in the Critically Ill Infant: A Literature Review

Sepsis causes high rates of morbidity and mortality in NICUs. The estimated incidence varies between 5 and 170 per 1000 births, depending on the social context. In very low birth-weight neonates, the level of mortality increases with the duration of hospitalization, reaching 36% among infants aged 8-14 days and 52% among infants aged 15-28 days. Early diagnosis is the only tool to improve the poor prognosis of neonatal sepsis. Blood culture, the gold standard for diagnosis, is time-consuming and poorly sensitive. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, currently used as sepsis biomarkers, are influenced by several maternal and fetal pro-inflammatory conditions in the perinatal age. Presepsin is the N-terminal fragment of soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST): it is released in the bloodstream by monocytes and macrophages, in response to bacterial invasion. Presepsin seems to be a new, promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of sepsis in neonates as it is not modified by perinatal confounding inflammatory factors. The aim of the present review is to collect current knowledge about the role of presepsin in critically ill neonates.

The Utility of Neutrophil CD64 and Presepsin as Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Monitoring Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis

Background

Neonatal septicemia is a critical medical situation; current conventional laboratory methods still have many limitations and diagnostic obstacles. For this purpose, last decades have witnessed a challenge between the battery of sepsis biomarkers including many leukocyte surface antigens, not only for early diagnostic purposes but also for better follow-up and good management of sepsis patients.

Aim

To evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring performance of both neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) and presepsin as sepsis biomarkers compared to each other and to the conventional laboratory sepsis parameters aiming to decide which is the best fitting for routine daily use in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Methods

235 neonates were enrolled from three Egyptian neonatal ICUs, during the period from November 2015 till March 2018; they were classified into two main groups: the control group (n = 102) and the sepsis group (n = 133). Laboratory sepsis evaluation included highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP), CBC, in addition to nCD64 (flow cytometry technique), and presepsin measurement (CLEIA technique combined with Magtration® technology); the diagnosis was confirmed thereafter by positive blood culture results (BacT/Alert system). Sixty-two of the enrolled sepsis neonates were subjected to follow-up assessment; they were reclassified according to their clinical improvement at the second time assessment into (group 1: sepsis group without improvement) (n = 20) and (group 2: improved sepsis group) (n = 42).

Results

Significant increase in nCD64 and presepsin values was found in sepsis groups compared to the controls. At cutoff 41.6%, nCD64% could discriminate the presence of septicemia with sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 93.6 %, and AUC 0.925, while presepsin at cutoff 686 pg/ml achieves sensitivity 82.7%, specificity 95.5%, and AUC 0.887, respectively. Significant increase in nCD64 (P < 0.001) and hs-CRP (P=0.018) values was observed in severe sepsis/septic shock patients compared to nonsevere sepsis patients. Delta change percentage (dC%) between initial and follow-up evaluations for both improved and nonimproved sepsis patients was dC Z value −5.904 for nCD64% followed by dC Z value −4.494 for presepsin.

Conclusion

nCD64 and presepsin are valuable early diagnostic and monitoring sepsis biomarkers; the highest sensitivity could be achieved by a univariant sepsis marker in this study was recorded by the nCD64% biomarker, while the highest specificity was documented by presepsin. Combined measurement of both achieves the highest diagnostic performance in sepsis neonates. Either of CD64 or presepsin combined with hs-CRP associated with better performance than any of them alone. nCD64 carries an additional promising role in reflecting sepsis prognosis.

Reference ranges of presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) in term and preterm neonates without infection, in relation to gestational and postnatal age, in the first 28 days of life

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reference ranges of presepsin in term and preterm neonates without infection, with respect to gestational and postnatal age, within the first 28 days of life.

METHODS

A total of 144 neonates born at 24-42 weeks' gestation, including healthy term and preterm neonates without clinical signs or symptoms of infection, were included in this prospective observational study. Presepsin measurements included cord blood levels and serum levels on postnatal days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28.

RESULTS

The presepsin values corresponding to the 10th percentile ranged from 240.8 pg/mL (on day 1) to 129.9 pg/mL (on day 28), whereas those corresponding to the 90th percentile ranged from 725.8 pg/mL (on day 1) to 471.6 pg/mL (on day 28). Significantly higher presepsin levels were observed in cesarean deliveries than in spontaneous deliveries (p: 0.012 to <0.001), in gestational ages ≤ 32 weeks than in gestational ages ≥37 weeks (p: <0.05 to <0.001), and in cases with a maternal history of chorioamnionitis than in those without (p: <0.05 to <0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our findings revealed, for the first time, the reference ranges of presepsin in healthy term and preterm neonates without infection with respect to gestational and postnatal age, sex, and body weight. Presepsin levels within the first 28 days of life seem likely to be affected by the type of delivery, gestational and postnatal age, birth weight, and presence of respiratory distress syndrome or maternal chorioamnionitis.

Predictive value of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and white blood cells for chorioamnionitis among women with preterm premature rupture of membranes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictive value of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cells (WBC) for chorioamnionitis among women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study of all women with singleton pregnancy and PPROM admitted to a referral hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from 2016 to 2018. All women were hospitalized until delivery. The incidence of chorioamnionitis was recorded. Maternal serum CRP, procalcitonin, and WBC were measured on the day of admission and the day before termination of pregnancy. The diagnostic accuracy of each test was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 75 women with PPROM were included in the study. After termination of pregnancy, 34 (45.3%) were diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis. Those with chorioamnionitis had significantly higher serum levels of CRP both on admission (P=0.004) and before termination of pregnancy (P<0.001). The area under the curve for last CRP was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.84), indicating moderate accuracy. Procalcitonin and WBC had low accuracy to predict chorioamnionitis.

CONCLUSION

Among CRP, procalcitonin, and WBC, maternal serum CRP was found to be the most accurate predictor of chorioamnionitis among women with PPROM.

Early Inflammatory Markers for the Diagnosis of Late-Onset Sepsis in Neonates: The Nosodiag Study

Background: Early diagnosis is essential to improve the treatment and prognosis of newborn infants with nosocomial bacterial infections. Although cytokines and procalcitonin (PCT) have been evaluated as early inflammatory markers, their diagnostic properties have rarely been compared. Objectives: This study evaluated and compared the ability of individual inflammatory markers available for clinician (PCT, semi-quantitative determination of IL-8) and of combinations of markers (CRPi plus IL-6 or quantitative or semi-quantitative determination of IL-8) to diagnose bacterial nosocomial infections in neonates. Methods: This prospective two-center study included neonates suspected of nosocomial infections from September 2008 to January 2012. Inflammatory markers were measured initially upon suspicion of nosocomial infection, and CRP was again measured 12-24 h later. Newborns were retrospectively classified into two groups: those who were infected (certainly or probably) and uninfected (certainly or probably). Results: The study included 130 infants of median gestational age 28 weeks (range, 24-41 weeks). Of these, 34 were classified as infected and 96 as uninfected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) for PCT were 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.8-77.6%), 78.5% (95% CI, 67.8-86.9%), 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8-66.5%), 84.9% (95% CI, 74.6-92.2%), 2.7 (95% CI, 1.6-4.9), and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.8), respectively. Semi-quantitative IL-8 had the highest specificity (92.19%; 95% CI, 82.70-97.41%), PPV (72.22%; 95% CI, 46.52-90.30%) and LR+ (6.17, 95% CI, 2.67-28.44), but had low specificity (48.15%; 95% CI, 28.67-68.05%). Of all markers tested, the combination of IL-6 and CRPi had the highest sensitivity (78.12%; 95% CI, 60.03-90.72%), NPV (91.3%; 95% CI, 82.38-96.32%) and LR- (0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.49). The combination of IL-6 and CRPi had a higher area under the curve than PCT, but with borderline significance (p = 0.055). Conclusions: The combination of IL-6 and CRPi was superior to other methods, including PCT, for the early diagnosis of nosocomial infection in neonates, but was not sufficient for sole use. The semi-quantitative determination of IL-8 had good diagnostic properties but its sensitivity was too low for use in clinical practice.