Study on the co-infection of children with severe community-acquired pneumonia

Severe Pneumonia Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Adenovirus in Children from 2 to 24 Months at Children's Hospital 1 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

In Vietnam, due to the lack of facilities to detect respiratory viruses from patients' specimens, there are only a few studies on the detection of viral pathogens causing pneumonia in children, especially respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and adenovirus (Adv). Here, we performed a cross-sectional descriptive prospective study on 138 children patients from 2 to 24 months old diagnosed with severe pneumonia hospitalized at the Respiratory Department of Children's Hospital 1 from November 2021 to August 2022. The number of patients selected in this study was based on the formula n = ([Z(1 - α/2)]2 × P [1 - P])/d2, with α = 0.05, p = 0.5, and d = 9%, and the sampling technique was convenient sampling until the sample size was met. A rapid test was used to detect RSV and Adv from the nasopharyngeal swabs and was conducted immediately after the patient's hospitalization. Laboratory tests were performed, medical history interviews were conducted, and nasotracheal aspirates were collected for multiplex real-time PCR (MPL-rPCR) to detect viral and bacterial pathogens. The results of the rapid test and the MPL-rPCR in the detection of both pathogens were the same at 31.9% (44/138) for RSV and 8.7% (7/138) for Adv, respectively. Using MPL-rPCR, the detection rate was 21% (29/138) for bacterial pathogens, 68.8% (95/138) for bacterial-viral co-infections, and 6.5% (9/138) for viral pathogens. The results showed few distinctive traits between RSV-associated and Adv-associated groups, and the Adv group children were more prone to bacterial infection than those in the RSV group. In addition, the Adv group experienced a longer duration of treatment and a higher frequency of re-hospitalizations compared to the RSV group. A total of 100% of Adv infections were co-infected with bacteria, while 81.82% of RSV co-infected with bacterial pathogens (p = 0.000009). This study might be one of the few conducted in Vietnam aimed at identifying viral pathogens causing severe pneumonia in children.

Viral and bacterial microorganisms in Vietnamese children with severe and non-severe pneumonia

To investigate potential respiratory pathogens in children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and risk factors for severe disease. This prospective study was conducted among 467 children at the Thai Binh Paediatric Hospital, Vietnam between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2021. Clinical data and laboratory results were collected. Twenty-four respiratory microorganisms were tested from nasopharyngeal swabs using real-time PCR. Logistical regression was used to estimate a factor's adjusted odd ratios of the severity of disease. Mean age of patients = 15.4 ± 13.3 months, 63.0% were male. Over 97% of patients had a positive PCR result. 87% of patients were positive for multiple (up to eight) microorganisms. Rhinovirus (46%), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (24%), enterovirus (17%), and parainfluenza viruses-3 (13%) were the most frequent viruses. H. influenzae (61%), S. pneumoniae (45%) and M. catarrhalis (30%) were the most common bacteria. 128 (27%) cases were classified as severe pneumonia. Presence of smokers at home (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.27-3.52, P value = 0.004), CRP level ≥ 50 mg/dL (aOR  6.11, 95% CI  3.86-9.68, P value < 0.0001), RSV (aOR  1.78, 95% CI  1.07-2.96, P value = 0.03) and H. influenzae (aOR  1.66, 95% CI  1.03-2.67, P value = 0.04) PCR detection associated with a higher risk of severe pneumonia; ,. Causative agents of pneumonia in children are complex. Children positive with RSV and H. influenzae need to be closely monitored to prevent severe pneumonia.

Utilizing metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis and lung microbiome probing of pediatric pneumonia through bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pediatric intensive care unit: results from a large real-world cohort

Background

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a powerful method for pathogen detection in various infections. In this study, we assessed the value of mNGS in the pathogen diagnosis and microbiome analysis of pneumonia in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples.

Methods

A total of 104 pediatric patients with pneumonia who were admitted into PICU between June 2018 and February 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 101 subjects who had intact clinical information were subject to parallel comparison of mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) for pathogen detection. The performance was also evaluated and compared between BALF-mNGS and BALF-culture methods. Moreover, the diversity and structure of all 104 patients' lung BALF microbiomes were explored using the mNGS data.

Results

Combining the findings of mNGS and CMTs, 94.06% (95/101) pneumonia cases showed evidence of causative pathogenic infections, including 79.21% (80/101) mixed and 14.85% (15/101) single infections. Regarding the pathogenesis of pneumonia in the PICU, the fungal detection rates were significantly higher in patients with immunodeficiency (55.56% vs. 25.30%, P =0.025) and comorbidities (40.30% vs. 11.76%, P=0.007). There were no significant differences in the α-diversity either between patients with CAP and HAP or between patients with and without immunodeficiency. Regarding the diagnostic performance, the detection rate of DNA-based BALF-mNGS was slightly higher than that of the BALF-culture although statistically insignificant (81.82% vs.77.92%, P=0.677) and was comparable to CMTs (81.82% vs. 89.61%, P=0.211). The overall sensitivity of DNA-based mNGS was 85.14% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.96%-92.34%). The detection rate of RNA-based BALF-mNGS was the same with CMTs (80.00% vs 80.00%, P>0.999) and higher than BALF-culture (80.00% vs 52.00%, P=0.045), with a sensitivity of 90.91% (95%CI: 70.84%-98.88%).

Conclusions

mNGS is valuable in the etiological diagnosis of pneumonia, especially in fungal infections, and can reveal pulmonary microecological characteristics. For pneumonia patients in PICU, the mNGS should be implemented early and complementary to CMTs.

Antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Vietnamese children with severe pneumonia: a cross-sectional study

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common bacterium that causes community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. The rate of S. pneumoniae resistance to antibiotics is increasing, particularly in patients with severe CAP. Therefore, the level of antibiotic resistance of S. pneumoniae causing severe CAP in Vietnamese children requires regular monitoring.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Nasopharyngeal aspiration specimens from children were cultured, isolated, and examined for S. pneumoniae. Bacterial strains were assessed for antimicrobial susceptibility, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined.

Results

Eighty-nine strains of S. pneumoniae were isolated from 239 children with severe CAP. The majority of isolates were completely non-susceptible to penicillin (1.1% intermediate, 98.9% resistant) and highly resistant to erythromycin (96.6%) and clarithromycin (88.8%); the rate of resistance to ceftriaxone was 16.9%, with the proportion of intermediate resistance at 46.0%; 100% of strains were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. For most antibiotics, MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were equal to the resistance threshold according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2021; penicillin had an eight-fold increase in MIC₉₀ (64 mg/L) and ceftriaxone had a 1.5-fold increase in MIC₉₀ (6 mg/L).

Conclusion

Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates described in this study were resistant to many antibiotics. Penicillin should not be the first-line antibiotic of choice, and ceftriaxone at an enhanced dose should be used instead.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of deregulated long non-coding RNA RPPH1 in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) is one of the most common critical and acute diseases in the respiratory and acute medicine department. The expression and significance of lncRNA RPPH1 (RPPH1) in SCAP were assessed aiming to explore a biomarker assisting in the screening and management of SCAP.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective study enrolled 97 SCAP patients, 102 mild community-acquired pneumonia (MCAP) patients, and 65 healthy individuals. The serum expression of RPPH1 of study subjects was evaluated using PCR. The diagnostic and prognostic significance of RPPH1 in SCAP was evaluated by ROC and Cox analyses. Meanwhile, the correlation of RPPH1 with patients' clinicopathological features was evaluated by spearman correlation analysis to evaluate its role in assessing disease severity.

RESULTS

A significant downregulation of RPPH1 was observed in the serum of SCAP patients compared with MCAP and healthy individuals. RPPH1 was positively correlated with ALB (r = 0.74) and negatively correlated with C-reactive protein (r = -0.69), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (r = -0.88), procalcitonin (r = -0.74), and neutrophil (r = -0.84) of SCAP patients, which are associated with the development and severity of SCAP. Additionally, reduced RPPH1 was closely associated with the 28-day development-free survival of SCAP patients and served as an adverse prognostic indicator together with procalcitonin.

CONCLUSIONS

Downregulated RPPH1 in SCAP could act as a diagnostic biomarker screening SCAP from healthy and MCAP individuals and act as a prognostic biomarker predicting patients' disease conditions and outcomes. The demonstrated significance of RPPH1 in SCAP could assist the clinical antibiotic therapies of SCAP patients.

Prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarise the prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with severe pneumonia to understand the prevalence of severe pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens, improve clinical decision-making and guide antibiotic use.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched through November 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language studies enrolled consecutive cases of patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia, with complete aetiological analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We conducted literature retrieval on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library to estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia, Mycoplasma and Legionella in patients with severe pneumonia. After double arcsine transformation of the data, a random-effects model was used for meta-analyses to calculate the pooled prevalence of each pathogen. Meta-regression analysis was also used to explore whether the region, different diagnostic method, study population, pneumonia categories or sample size were potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 75 eligible studies with 18 379 cases of severe pneumonia. The overall prevalence of atypical pneumonia is 8.1% (95% CI 6.3% to 10.1%) In patients with severe pneumonia, the pooled estimated prevalence of Chlamydia, Mycoplasma and Legionella was 1.8% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.9%), 2.8% (95% CI 1.7% to 4.3%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2.8% to 5.3%), respectively. We noted significant heterogeneity in all pooled assessments. Meta-regression showed that the pneumonia category potentially influenced the prevalence rate of Chlamydia. The mean age and the diagnostic method of pathogens were likely moderators for the prevalence of Mycoplasma and Legionella, and contribute to the heterogeneity of their prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

In severe pneumonia, atypical pathogens are notable causes, especially Legionella. The diagnostic method, regional difference, sample size and other factors contribute to the heterogeneity of prevalence. The estimated prevalence and relative heterogeneity factors can help with microbiological screening, clinical treatment and future research planning.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022373950.