Safety of using real-time sensor glucose values for treatment decisions in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study

Evidence from clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Meeting increased regulatory requirements for clinical evaluation of medical devices marketed in Europe in accordance with the Medical Device Regulation (EU 2017/745) is challenging, particularly for high-risk devices used in children.

METHODS

Within the CORE-MD project, we performed a scoping review on evidence from clinical trials investigating high-risk paediatric medical devices used in paediatric cardiology, diabetology, orthopaedics and surgery, in patients aged 0-21 years. We searched Medline and Embase from 1st January 2017 to 9th November 2022.

RESULTS

From 1692 records screened, 99 trials were included. Most were multicentre studies performed in North America and Europe that mainly had evaluated medical devices from the specialty of diabetology. Most had enrolled adolescents and 39% of trials included both children and adults. Randomized controlled trials accounted for 38% of the sample. Other frequently used designs were before-after studies (21%) and crossover trials (20%). Included trials were mainly small, with a sample size <100 participants in 64% of the studies. Most frequently assessed outcomes were efficacy and effectiveness as well as safety.

CONCLUSION

Within the assessed sample, clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children were of various designs, often lacked a concurrent control group, and recruited few infants and young children.

IMPACT

In the assessed sample, clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children were mainly small, with variable study designs (often without concurrent control), and they mostly enrolled adolescents. We provide a systematic summary of methodologies applied in clinical trials of medical devices in the paediatric population, reflecting obstacles in this research area that make it challenging to conduct adequately powered randomized controlled trials. In view of changing European regulations and related concerns about shortages of high-risk medical devices for children, our findings may assist competent authorities in setting realistic requirements for the evidence level to support device conformity certification.

Technologies for Diabetes Self-Monitoring: A Scoping Review and Assessment Using the REASSURED Criteria

BACKGROUND

Self-management is an important pillar for diabetes control and to achieve it, glucose self-monitoring devices are needed. Currently, there exist several different devices in the market and many others are being developed. However, whether these devices are suitable to be used in resource constrained settings is yet to be evaluated.

AIMS

To assess existing glucose monitoring tools and also those in development against the REASSURED which have been previously used to evaluate diagnostic tools for communicable diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed for peer-review articles published in either English, Spanish or Portuguese in the last 5 years. We selected papers including information about devices used for self-monitoring and tested on humans with diabetes; then, the REASSURED criteria were used to assess them.

RESULTS

We found a total of 7 continuous glucose monitoring device groups, 6 non-continuous, and 6 devices in development. Accuracy varied between devices and most of them were either invasive or minimally invasive. Little to no evidence is published around robustness, affordability and delivery to those in need. However, when reviewing publicly available prices, none of the devices would be affordable for people living in low- and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Available devices cannot be considered adapted for use in self-monitoring in resource constraints settings. Further studies should aim to develop less-invasive devices that do not require a large set of components. Additionally, we suggest some improvement in the REASSURED criteria such as the inclusion of patient-important outcomes to increase its appropriateness to assess non-communicable diseases devices.

Ambulatory glucose profile analysis of the juvenile diabetes research foundation continuous glucose monitoring dataset-Applications to the pediatric diabetes population

BACKGROUND

Increased continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use presents both the benefit and burden of increased data for clinicians to rapidly analyze. The ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) is an evolving a universal software report for CGM data analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES

We utilized the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation-CGM dataset to evaluate the AGP across a broad spectrum of patients to show how AGP can be used clinically to assist with CGM-related decision making. We hypothesized that AGP metrics would be different across age and HbA1c strata.

SUBJECTS

AGPs were generated from the JDRF-CGM trial dataset for all periods during which there were ≥10 days of CGM coverage in the 2 weeks adjacent to an HbA1c measurement yielding 1101 AGPs for 393 unique subjects.

METHODS

AGPs were stratified by age group (8-14, 15-24, and ≥25 years) and HbA1c (within or above target for age) and compared for between group differences in AGP metrics via two-factor ANOVA. Glycemic differences between time periods were analyzed via segmented regression analysis.

RESULTS

Glucose exposure (average and estimated A1c) and variability (standard deviation and interquartile range) were different between the low and high HbA1c levels. Within a given HbA1c level all age groups were significantly different from each other with older patients having lower averages with less variability than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AGP analysis of the JDRF-CGM data highlights significant differences in glycemic profiles between pediatric and adult age groups and between well and less well-controlled patient populations.