Improved diabetes management in Swedish schools: results from two national surveys

Type 1 diabetes in schools: An integrative review of the literature

PROBLEM

Children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) spend a large amount of time at school. Subsequently, school staff often need education around T1D management to optimise related outcomes. Education is particularly essential in primary school settings, due to lack of independence.

AIM

With no published review summarising the provision of diabetes education to schools, this integrative literature review aimed to investigate and present available literature regarding T1D education to school staff.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

This included studies published after 2013 in English, examining education provided to primary schools who support students with T1D. Systematic reviews, other non-empirical articles and records only containing abstracts were excluded.

SAMPLE

Overall, 15 relevant studies were identified.

ANALYSIS

Quality appraisal was undertaken using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tools.

RESULTS

There was wide variation in the number of school staff that had received training in the management of T1D. Studies reported that even schools with glucagon available had no trained staff to administer; while many studies did not differentiate results based on geographical location such as metropolitan or rural settings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in the provision of education around T1D management in school settings. There is need for further research into differences in the provision of diabetes education across different geographical and rural areas.

IMPLICATIONS

For children living with T1D to receive optimal management at school there needs to be improved access to ongoing support, training and awareness for school staff and a more standardised approach to the provision of diabetes education from health professionals.

Management of Diabetes during School Hours: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study in Denmark

Managing diabetes is complicated for many children. It often requires support from an adult during the school day. In Denmark, most children spend 30-35 h a week at school. Nevertheless, diabetes management in schools remains largely uninvestigated. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and organization of diabetes management in Danish primary schools from the personnel's perspective. All primary schools in Denmark were invited to participate in the study (n = 2129), and 525 schools were included. A questionnaire was constructed and sent by email. Questionnaire data are presented in the descriptive statistics and compared with the ISPAD guidelines. According to 77.2% of respondents, school personnel had received training in diabetes management, and 78.5% of the schools had at least one person available for diabetes support every day. Respondents felt prepared to help the students with counting carbohydrates (38.9%), dosing insulin (39.1%), and helping the students during high (52.1%) or low (60.3%) blood sugar levels, insulin chock (35.2%), or during activities (36.3%). Yet, diabetes management was a challenging task. Only 61.7% had an action plan for diabetes management, 37.4% had face-to-face information meetings with the parents, and 55.1% of respondents reported having sufficient time to cooperate with the parents.

Childhood-onset type 1 diabetes and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with educational attainment: a population-based sibling-comparison study

AIM

To examine the association of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with educational outcomes from compulsory school to university.

METHODS

Using multiple Swedish nationwide registers, we followed up on 1,474,941 individuals born in Sweden from 1981-1995 to December 31, 2013. Associations of T1D and ADHD with achieving educational milestones (from compulsory school to university) and school performances were estimated using logistic and linear regression models and sibling comparison models.

RESULTS

Compared to their peers, children with both T1D and ADHD were less likely to achieve any of the educational attainments, including completing compulsory school (adjusted OR [aOR] [95% CI]: 0.43[0.26,0.72]), be eligible to and finishing upper secondary school (0.26[0.19,0.36], 0.24[0.17,0.35], respectively), and starting university (0.38[0.17,0.90]). The odds of achieving these educational milestones were substantially lower in children with ADHD alone (aORs: 0.14-0.44), but were slightly worse or no differences in children with T1D alone (aORs: 0.86-1.08). All associations above remained similar in the sibling comparison models.

CONCLUSION

Children and adolescents with both T1D and ADHD had long-term educational underachievement, with ADHD being the major contributor. Our findings suggest the importance of assessing ADHD in children with T1D and targeted support for minimizing the education gap between the affected children and their peers.

Care and Safety of Schoolchildren with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Parental Perceptions of the School Nurse Role

Schoolchildren with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) need supervision in the management of their disorder by the school nurse, securing proper care and safety in the school environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the parents’ perceptions regarding the care and safety of their children with T1DM at school. In this cross-sectional study, 356 parents of children with T1DM attending primary and secondary school (convenience sample) completed the “Parents’ Opinions about School-based Care for Children with Diabetes” and the “Safety of children with T1DM at school”. The majority (58.8%) noted that their children received some care from a school nurse, less than half (44.6%) declared feeling very safe concerning diabetes care, and 42.5% reported high levels of diabetes management satisfaction. Younger age of the child (p < 0.001), school nurses’ advanced diabetic care skills (p < 0.001), existence of school nurse’s office (p < 0.05) and higher educational level of the father were positively correlated with higher parental feelings of safety and satisfaction. The presence of a school nurse was associated with higher academic performance (p < 0.001), significantly fewer absences due to the disorder (p < 0.001) and better diabetes management (p < 0.043). The daily presence of a school nurse in school decreases absenteeism, greatly improves school performance and enhances diabetic management of schoolchildren with T1DM.

School-based management of type 1 diabetes in the Republic of Ireland: a cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis

BACKGROUND

Qualitative research regarding the experience of diabetes self-care management in schools is underrepresented in published literature. In addition, there are methodologic limitations in some of the existing studies.

AIMS

To investigate experiences of school-based diabetes self-care management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Cross-sectional mixed-methods questionnaire survey. Sentiment analysis was undertaken of free-text responses by primary caregivers of young children and adolescents or adolescents themselves in relation to experiences regarding school-based support for self-care. Statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly negative (1) to strongly positive (5). Responses were also grouped using thematic analysis. A quantitative analysis of the similarities and differences in responses between primary and secondary school students was undertaken.

RESULTS

Text responses for analysis were present in 273 (65%) primary and 226 (56%) secondary school questionnaires. Sentiment analysis yielded mean scores of 3.5 and 2.8 for primary and secondary students, respectively. Three major themes were identified in the statements, namely attitude, education/knowledge, and resources. Scores within each theme were significantly higher for primary compared to secondary students. Attitude scored highest and education/knowledge scored lowest in both groups. Comments in relation to resources were significantly more frequent in primary school questionnaires, and comments regarding education and knowledge were more commonplace in secondary school responses.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that experiences regarding self-care management of type 1 diabetes are generally more positive among primary school students. Education and knowledge of school staff should be a particular area of focus in both cohorts.

School practice and preparedness in caring for children with type 1 diabetes: A Saudi nationwide cross-sectional study

AIM

We aimed to identify gaps in school care and support required for students with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional nationwide study using self-administered surveys that targeted teachers and parents of students with T1DM in Saudi Arabia from August to December 2019.

RESULTS

We collected surveys from 632 parents and 983 teachers. Responses were received from all 13 regions in Saudi Arabia, with the majority representing governmental schools. Results showed that 172 students (27.3%) had no available help at school to perform blood glucose measurement, 178 students (28.3%) were left with no hypoglycemia treatment, 374 students (59.6%) took their insulin dose for breakfast at home, and 40.0 (6.4%) students omitted insulin. Overall, school admission refusal was reported by 73 students (11.7%). Students with no available help to manage their hypoglycemia or to inject insulin at school had a higher hemoglobin A1c and poorer academic performance.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a significant gap between schools' local practices and international recommendations, which impacted students' safety, diabetes control, and school achievement. Our study findings will support the creation of the Saudi T1DM school practice guidelines necessary to improve the care of students with T1DM.

Care of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in school - An interventional study

OBJECTIVES

Paucity of data from India on care of children with Type 1 diabetes in schools. Aims: To study assess the knowledge, attitude, practices and fear of Type 1 diabetes in school teachers and to assess the impact of an educational model on the fear of teachers and care of children in Type 1 DM at school hours.

METHODS

A community based study, involving school teachers and the intervention being educating them about diabetes conducted. Data pertaining to basic demography, attitude of teachers towards diabetic children, Hypoglycemia fear factor survey- parent version with worries domain and preparedness of school was collected. An education program was conducted on diabetes care in children. Immediately and after three months, the proforma details and HFSP-W scores reassessed.

RESULTS

Forty two teachers (mean age: 38.7±5.4; M:F ratio 2:40) participated in the study. Post intervention, a higher willingness to have the diabetic child in class (100 vs. 57.1%; p>0.05), better support in daily care (100 vs. 92%; p>0.05), participation in sports activities (100 vs. 7.1%; p<0.05) observed. HFSP-W scores were 38.8±4.5 (pre-intervention), 22.5±4.3 (immediate post intervention) and 29.5±3.2 (at 3months) (p<0.05). To study the determinants of improvement in HFSP-W a regression analysis was performed: presence of glucometer the most likely determining factor (T=1.999, p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant element of fear in the minds of teachers towards hypoglycemia which improves with a structured education program.

Diminished school-based support for the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents compared to younger children

AIMS

To evaluate diabetes management at school in a large cohort of adolescents with type 1 diabetes and to compare the level of support provided to adolescents with that provided to younger children.

METHODS

Questionnaires were distributed to adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending nine regional and tertiary paediatric diabetes services in the Republic of Ireland. The data collected included patient demographics, treatment regimen and support provided for self-care management. Results were compared with a similar cohort of primary school children with type 1 diabetes, studied using similar methodology.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 405 adolescents with a median age of 15 years, of whom 215 (54%) were on multiple daily injections and 128 (32%) were on pump therapy. Eighty-five percent of pump users administered their bolus insulin in classrooms, whereas 76% of those on a multiple daily injection regimen injected outside the classroom. Girls were less likely to administer bolus insulin in an office (10% vs 19%) and more likely to administer it in the bathroom (50% vs 34%; P=0.01). Twenty-five adolescents (12%) on multiple daily injection regimens did not administer bolus insulin at school. Compared to primary school children with type 1 diabetes, adolescents were less likely to use pump therapy, have an emergency treatment plan and have a designated staff member responsible for care needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Support provided to adolescents with type 1 diabetes is diminished compared with that provided to younger schoolchildren.

School-Based Management of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Recommendations, Advances, and Gaps in Knowledge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) spend much of their waking time in the school environment. However, there is limited empirical understanding of the challenges youth face in managing their T1D at school. There is even less literature focused on potential interventions to improve health or psychological outcomes in youth with T1D in this milieu. This review seeks to summarize the recent literature on diabetes T1D management in the school setting, including recommendations for care, barriers, and targets for intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

T1D organizations recommend strong collaboration amongst families, school personnel, and health care providers to enable successful T1D management in schools. While challenges remain according to parent, child, and teacher reports, perceptions of school-based management of T1D show signs of improvement. The few existing school-based intervention studies have generally focused on educational or structural interventions to improve diabetes care. The management of T1D within the school setting is critical for overall diabetes management. While barriers to effective T1D care have been examined, a greater understanding of the impact of new diabetes technologies and well-characterized interventions is lacking in this area.

Management of type 1 diabetes in primary schools in Ireland: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Parents reported experiences of support for diabetes management in schools are variable. Recent data from European countries are sparse and experiences in the Irish primary school setting have not been described previously.

AIM

To describe parents' experiences of support for diabetes management in primary schools in Ireland.

METHODS

Questionnaires were distributed through nine regional and tertiary paediatric diabetes services to parents of children aged 4-13 years with type 1 diabetes attending primary school. Data sought included patient demographics, treatment regimens, diabetes education of school staff, assistances received, and interactions between the school and family.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 418 parents of primary school children with type 1 diabetes. Twenty-six percent of children were not on intensive insulin therapy. Children on a multiple daily injection regime who were unable to self-administer insulin had administration facilitated by attendance of a parent in 95% of cases. Seventy-eight percent of parents were phoned by the school regarding diabetes management, particularly those of younger children (p < 0.001). More than half of parents attended the school at least once per month to assist with diabetes management, particularly those of younger children (p < 0.001). Younger children were also more likely to have a special needs assistant (p < 0.001) and have a written management plan (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research has demonstrated deficits in care with respect to access to intensive insulin therapy, individualised care plans and a high burden on families which should be addressed through the National Clinical Programme for Paediatrics and Neonatology and relevant government departments.

Being Facilitators in a Challenging Context-School Personnel's Experiences of Caring for Youth with Diabetes Type 1

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe school personnel's experiences of caring for youth with diabetes type 1.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A qualitative design was chosen for this study. Data were collected with individual interviews that were subjected to inductive qualitative content analysis. The sample consisted of 24 school personnel (teachers, principals and school nurses) from Swedish schools. All had experience with youth aged 6 to 18 years old with diabetes type 1.

RESULTS

School personnel experienced caring for youth with diabetes type 1 as "Being facilitators in a challenging context" and described establishing trusting relationships, finding strategies to support self-care, feeling uncertain and incapable in need of education, and dealing with unclear responsibility.

CONCLUSIONS

School personnel (teachers, principals and school nurses) are key professionals supporting youth with diabetes type 1 and self-care in school. Lack of education and unclear responsibility created feelings of uncertainty and insecurity for school personnel and a need for mandatory education of school personnel regarding T1DM and self-care, including legislation was identified.

IMPLICATIONS

Mandatory education should be provided for all school personnel regarding diabetes type 1, self-care and current legislation. A liason position in form of a nurse specialist should manage the education.

"KiDS and Diabetes in Schools" project: Experience with an international educational intervention among parents and school professionals

BACKGROUND

Although it is known that school care is a major challenge in diabetes treatment, there is still no published international initiative.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to introduce an international educational intervention tool, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) KiDS and Diabetes in Schools project (KiDS project), and to describe its impact on diabetes knowledge and behavior of caregivers and school professionals.

METHODS

The KiDS project was developed with the support of IDF and the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes and provides online free material in 10 languages, directed to caregivers and school personnel. A pilot evaluation of the KiDS intervention was performed in Brazil. An educational intervention was conducted in 5 primary schools, with 42 parents and school staff, followed by 2 individual interviews after 1 and 3 months. The results were evaluated in a qualitative study with a descriptive design based on content analysis.

RESULTS

School staff acquired new knowledge on diabetes and its treatment. They felt more confident when helping students with diabetes and said the educational intervention promoted a positive impact on the teacher-student relationship, on the caring for health, and on school infrastructure. Family members of children with diabetes stated that the educational intervention gave them an opportunity to strengthen and update information on treatment and improve their knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

The KiDS project is the first international tool directed to foster a safe and supportive environment and a better understanding of diabetes in schools. In this pilot evaluation, it achieved the goal of informing and changing the behavior of parents and school staff, thus improving the care provided to children with diabetes in schools.