Role for immune monitoring to tailor induction prophylaxis in pediatric heart recipients

Immune cell function assay and T lymphocyte counts lack association with rejection or infection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Immune cell function assay (ICFA) and CD3 lymphocyte counts have been considered to be useful in discerning the overall intensity of immunosuppression in pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients.

METHODS

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate trends of ICFA and CD3 lymphocyte counts and their association with adverse outcomes post-OHT.

RESULTS

A total of 381 ICFA and 493 CD3 laboratory values obtained in 78 patients within six months post-OHT were analyzed. There were 14 patients treated for biopsy-proven acute rejection, four of whom had ISHLT grade 2R/3A rejection. In patients with rejection versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 122 (IQR 74.5-308) cells/mm² and 224.5 (IQR 132-343.5) ng/ml compared to 231.8 (IQR 68-421) cells/m² and 191 (IQR 81.5-333) ng/mL (p = NS for both). Twenty-six patients had at least one detectable cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia within the study timeframe. In patients with viremia versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 278.5 (IQR 68-552) cells/mm² and 130 (IQR 48-284) ng/ml compared to 195 (IQR 74.5-402.5) cells/mm² and 212 (IQR 89-342) ng/ml (p = NS for both).

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between these immune markers and adverse outcomes. In the absence of larger pediatric studies justifying the role of these tests in identifying elevated risk profiles post OHT, we do not recommend their routine use.

Clinical approach to acute cellular rejection from the pediatric heart transplant society

BACKGROUND

Early detection of cardiac allograft rejection is crucial for post-transplant graft survival. Despite the progress made in immunosuppression strategies, acute cellular rejection remains a serious complication during and after the first post-transplant year, and there is a continued lack of consensus regarding its treatment, especially in pediatric transplant patients.

METHODS

An open request was placed via the listserv to the membership of the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS). Along with a broad literature search, numerous institutional protocols were pooled, analyzed and consolidated. A clinical approach document was generated highlighting areas of consensus and practice variation.

RESULTS

The clinical approach document divides cellular rejection by International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grades and provides management strategies for each, including persistent cellular rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellular rejection treatment can be tailored to the clinical status, graft function, and the grade of cellular rejection. A case of mild and asymptomatic rejection may not require treatment, whereas a higher-grade rejection or rejection with graft dysfunction or hemodynamic compromise may require aggressive intravenous therapies, changes to maintenance immunosuppression therapy and augmented surveillance.

A multicenter survey on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A case for development of consensus guidelines for screening, surveillance, and treatment?

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are the main malignancy seen after pediatric heart transplant and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Prior to the development of detailed guidelines, we sought to identify trends in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric PTLD. All Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) institutions were surveyed. No identifiable patient information was shared. From 56 PHTS centers, 22 responses were received (39.3%). 100% agree PTLD cannot be diagnosed solely based on elevated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) load. All respondents routinely screen for EBV by blood PCR, but frequency of screening varies. There was intermediate consensus regarding the use of computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET) in surveillance management for PTLD. Most centers require a diagnostic biopsy before initiating new treatment for PTLD (14 of 18, 77.8%), but many reduce immune suppression based on elevated EBV without pathologic PTLD (16 of 22, 72.7%). Beyond immune modulation, rituximab is most commonly used (9 of 13, 69.2%). Consultation with oncology is common (17 of 17, 100%), but timing varies widely. Our survey highlights significant elements of agreement and significant practice variation among PHTS institutions regarding pediatric PTLD. Reduction of immune suppression prior to pathologic diagnosis of PTLD is a common management strategy. When this fails, rituximab is used, but is most often reserved until after confirmation of the diagnosis. Oncology subspecialists are commonly involved in these cases. Our findings highlight the need to develop improved guidelines for evaluation and treatment of pediatric PTLD.

A Review of Induction with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

Pediatric heart transplantation (pHTx) represents only a small proportion of cardiac transplants. Due to these low numbers, clinical data relating to induction therapy in this special population are far less extensive than for adults. Induction is used more widely in pHTx than in adults, mainly because of early steroid withdrawal or complete steroid avoidance. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is the most frequent choice for induction in pHTx, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin^®) (Sanofi Genzyme) is the most widely-used ATG preparation. In the absence of large, prospective, blinded trials, we aimed to review the current literature and databases for evidence regarding the use, complications, and dosages of rATG. Analyses from registry databases suggest that, overall, ATG preparations are associated with improved graft survival compared to interleukin-2 receptor antagonists. Advantages for the use of rATG have been shown in low-risk patients given tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-free regimen, in sensitized patients with pre-formed alloantibodies and/or a positive donor-specific crossmatch, and in ABO-incompatible pHTx. Registry and clinical data have indicated no increased risk of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in children given rATG after pHTx. A total rATG dose in the range 3.5–7.5 mg/kg is advisable.

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society 2014 Consensus Statement: Pharmacotherapies in Cardiac Critical Care Immune Therapy

OBJECTIVE

In this Consensus Statement, we review the etiology and pathophysiology of inflammatory processes seen in critically ill children with cardiac disease. Immunomodulatory therapies aimed at improving outcomes in patients with myocarditis, heart failure, and transplantation are extensively reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

The author team experience and along with an extensive review of the medical literature were used as data sources.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The authors synthesized the data in the literature to present current immumodulatory therapies. For each drug, the physiologic rationale, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetics are synthesized, and the evidence in the literature to support the therapy is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunomodulation has a crucial role in the treatment of certain pediatric cardiac diseases. Immunomodulatory treatments that have been used to treat myocarditis include corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and azathioprine. Contemporary outcomes of pediatric transplant recipients have improved over the past few decades, partly related to improvements in immunomodulatory therapy to prevent rejection of the donor heart. Immunosuppression therapy is commonly divided into induction, maintenance, and acute rejection therapy. Common induction medications include antithymocyte globulin, muromonab-CD3, and basiliximab. Maintenance therapy includes chronic medications that are used daily to prevent rejection episodes. Examples of maintenance medications are corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Rejection of the donor heart is diagnosed either by clinically or by biopsy and is treated with intensification of immunosuppression.