1
|
Zhang Q, Su X, Liu L, Huang M, Wu W, Zhang H, Wu C, Fu Q, Gao P, Ling L, Chen W, Xu B, Liao Y, Li J, Wang C. The Outcome of Transplanting Kidneys From Very Small Pediatric Deceased Donors. Transplantation 2023; 107:1564-1572. [PMID: 36788440 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidneys from very small pediatric donors (VSPDs, aged <2 y) are underutilized. Concerns regarding potentially inferior outcomes hinder the use in pediatric recipients. METHODS All pediatric kidney-only transplants from <18-year-old donors between January 2012 and May 2021 in our center were included in this study. Outcomes were compared between VSPD and normal pediatric donor (NPD, aged 2-18 y) groups, and 3-y death-censored graft survival was assessed by the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Of all 252 enrolled patients, 149 (59.1%) received kidneys from NPDs and 103 (40.9%) from VSPDs. The 3-y graft survival rates of the NPD and VSPD groups were 91.2% and 88.6%, respectively ( P = 0.385). The adjusted hazard ratio of 3-y graft loss was 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-2.5; P = 0.659) for the VSPD group compared with the NPD group. There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 y posttransplant observed between NPD and VSPD groups (86.9 ± 26.8 versus 87 ± 27.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; P = 0.991). Patients (n = 12, 4.8%) who received kidneys from donors <5 kg contributed 5 (5/39, 12.8%) with delayed graft function and the sole primary nonfunction in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS Although attention to preventing complications is necessary, especially for kidneys from donors <5 kg, kidneys from VSPDs did not appear to impart added risk for 3-y graft loss and renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingchuan Huang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenrui Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pengfei Gao
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liuting Ling
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenting Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bowen Xu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Liao
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Santis Feltran L, Genzani CP, Hamamoto F, Fonseca MJBM, de Camargo MFC, de Oliveira NLG, de Freitas Amaral FC, Baptista JC, Koch Nogueira PC. Encouraging outcomes of using a small-donor single graft in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2022; 37:1137-1147. [PMID: 34651246 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05296-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of small pediatric kidneys as single grafts for transplantation is controversial, due to the potential risk for graft thrombosis and insufficient nephron mass. METHODS Aiming to test the benefits of transplanting these kidneys, 375 children who underwent kidney transplantation in a single center were evaluated: 49 (13.1%) received a single graft from a small pediatric donor (≤ 15 kg, SPD group), 244 (65.1%) from a bigger pediatric donor (> 15 kg, BPD group), and 82 (21.9%) from adult living donors (group ALD). RESULTS Groups had similar baseline main characteristics. After 5 years of follow-up, children from the SPD group were comparable to children from BPD and ALD in patient survival (94%, 96%, and 98%, respectively, p = 0.423); graft survival (89%, 88%, and 93%, respectively, p = 0.426); the frequency of acute rejection (p = 0.998); the incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (p = 0.671); the odds ratio for severely increased proteinuria (p = 0.357); the rates of vascular thrombosis (p = 0.846); and the necessity for post-transplant surgical intervention prior to discharge (p = 0.905). The longitudinal evolution of eGFR was not uniform among groups. The three groups presented a decrease in eGFR, but the slope of the curve was steeper in ALD children. At 5 years, the eGFR of the ALD group was 10 ml/min/1.73m2 inferior to the others. At that time, the eGFR from the SPD group was statistically similar to the BPD group (p = 0.952). CONCLUSION In a specialized transplant center, the use of a single small pediatric donor kidney for transplantation is as successful as bigger pediatric or adult living donors, after 5 years of follow-up. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana de Santis Feltran
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, Rua Guapiaçu 121-91, São Paulo, SP, 04024-020, Brazil.
| | - Camila Penteado Genzani
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, Rua Guapiaçu 121-91, São Paulo, SP, 04024-020, Brazil
| | - Fernando Hamamoto
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, Rua Guapiaçu 121-91, São Paulo, SP, 04024-020, Brazil
| | | | | | - Nara Léia Gelle de Oliveira
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, Rua Guapiaçu 121-91, São Paulo, SP, 04024-020, Brazil
| | - Fabio Cabral de Freitas Amaral
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, Rua Guapiaçu 121-91, São Paulo, SP, 04024-020, Brazil
| | - Jose Carlos Baptista
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Cesar Koch Nogueira
- Department of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cetiner M, Paul A, Treckmann JW, Dittmann S, Büscher R, Hoyer PF, Büscher AK. Small donors for small recipients - excellent growth and long-term function of single kidney grafts. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2735-2745. [PMID: 34626504 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Small-donor kidneys (≤20 kg donor weight, SDK) are preferably transplanted en bloc in adults. Concerns about thrombotic complications or hyperfiltration hinder their use in children, particularly as single grafts. Low centre experience and donor-to-recipient size are rated critical regarding outcomes. We evaluated SDK transplantation (SDTx) in paediatric recipients at a specialized transplant centre. Between 2008 and 2018, SDTx was performed in 40 children (mean age 5.4 ± 1.4 years, single grafts n = 38, donor weight ≤10 kg: n = 10). Perioperative complications were rare (n = 3), mainly thromboses despite immediate heparinization and resulted in graft loss in one patient. Overall, early and long-term GFR were excellent (76 ± 21 and 100 ± 11 ml/min/1.73 m2 , first month and year 5, respectively). Three patients presented with delayed graft function. Graft volume increased significantly (69 ± 38 vs. 111 ± 33 ml within 5 years; P < 0.0001). Patients showed catch-up growth to normal range (SDS for height -2.06 ± 1.6 to -1.60 ± 1.5). Stratification by recipient age and donor weight revealed superior results in young recipients (≤3 years) and ≤10 kg donors, respectively. Outcome of single SDK grafts was excellent. Gain of GFR and graft volume was even higher in patients with very small donor or recipient size, regardless of a reduced donor-to-recipient weight ratio. Therefore, SDTx should be considered favouring small paediatric recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metin Cetiner
- Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Paul
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Juergen W Treckmann
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Susanne Dittmann
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Rainer Büscher
- Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter F Hoyer
- Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja K Büscher
- Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peng J, Dai H, Zhang H, Yu S, Xie X, Peng F, Lan G, Hu S, Wang Y, Tang X, Guo Y, Gao C, Fang C, Nie M, Yuan X, Zhong M, Tang Z, Li T, Sun S, Yao H, Hou J, Huang R, Peng L. Comparison of Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Extremely Low Body Weight ≤5kg Versus Larger Body Weight Pediatric Donors. Front Immunol 2021; 12:738749. [PMID: 34531876 PMCID: PMC8438242 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.738749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplantation from donors who weigh ≤5 kg is performed at only a few transplant centers owing to the high complication and low graft survival rates associated with this approach. Methods We retrospectively compared the results of kidney transplantation at our center between January 2015 and December 2019 based on the following pediatric donor criteria: donor body weight ≤5 kg (n=32), 5 kg< donor weight ≤20 kg (n=143), and donor weight >20 kg (n=110). We also perform subgroup analysis of kidney transplantation outcomes from ≤5 kg donors, using conventional (dual separate and classic en-bloc KTx)/novel (en-bloc KTx with outflow tract) surgical methods and allocating to adult/pediatric recipients. Results The death-censored graft survival rates from extremely low body weight ≤5kg at 1 month, and 1, 3, and 5 years were 90.6%, 80.9%, 77.5%, and 73.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower than that from larger body weight pediatric donors. However, the 3-, and 5-year post-transplantation eGFRs were not significantly different between the pediatric and adult recipient group. The thrombosis (18.8%) and urinary leakage (18.8%) rates were significantly higher in the donor weight ≤5 kg group. Compared with 5 kg< donor weight ≤20 kg group, donor weight ≤5kg group was at elevated risk of graft loss due to thrombosis (OR: 13.4) and acute rejection (OR: 6.7). No significant difference on the outcomes of extremely low body weight donor kidney transplantation was observed between adults and pediatric recipients. Urinary leakage rate is significantly lower in the novel operation (8.7%) than in the conventional operation group (44.4%). Conclusions Although the outcomes of donor body weight ≤5kg kidney transplantation is inferior to that from donors with large body weight, it can be improved through technical improvement. Donors with body weight ≤5 kg can be considered as an useful source to expand the donor pool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawei Peng
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Helong Dai
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China.,Clinical Immunology Center, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hedong Zhang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Shaojie Yu
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Xubiao Xie
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Fenghua Peng
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Gongbin Lan
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Shanbiao Hu
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaotian Tang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yong Guo
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Chen Gao
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Chunhua Fang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Manhua Nie
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoqiong Yuan
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Mingda Zhong
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Zhouqi Tang
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Tengfang Li
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Siyu Sun
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Hengchang Yao
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Jianfei Hou
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Ruixue Huang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Longkai Peng
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Clinical Research Center for Organ Transplantation in Hunan Province, Changsha, China.,Clinical Immunology Center, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sampaio MS, Lum EL, Homkrailas P, Gritsch HA, Bunnapradist S. Outcomes of small pediatric donor kidney transplants according to donor weight. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2403-2412. [PMID: 34431138 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A small pediatric deceased donor (SPD) weight cutoff whether to transplant as en bloc (EB) or single pediatric (SP) kidney is uncertain. Using UNOS/OPTN data (2000-2019), 27 875 SPDs were divided by (i) EB (11.4%) or SP (88.6%) and (ii) donor weight [≤10 (5.4%), >10-15 (8.3%), >15-18 (3.7%), >18-20 (2.9%), and >20 kg (79.7%)]. SP >20 kg and adult deceased donors (grouped by Kidney Donor Profile Index, KDPI, <30, 30-85, and >85) were used as references. The primary outcome was 10-year graft failure. In SP <10 kg, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall graft failure was 1.64 (1.38-2.20) compared with EB <10 kg, and 1.45 (1.18-1.80) compared with SP >20 kg. In SP >10-15 kg, HR was 1.31 (1.12-1.54) compared with EB >10-15 kg, and 1.04 (0.91-1.18) compared with SP >20 kg. In SP >15 kg, the risk was the same as SP >20 kg. Ten-year overall graft survival of SP 12 kg was comparable to SP >20 kg (62% vs. 57%). Ten-year death censored graft failure of SP >10-15 kg (70%) and SP >15-18 kg (70%) was like the adult donors with KDPI 30-85 (67%). In conclusion, we recommend single kidney transplants from SPDs with weight >12 kg to adult recipients in centers with experience in SPD transplants to optimize organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Santos Sampaio
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Nephrology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erik Lawrence Lum
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Piyavadee Homkrailas
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hans Albin Gritsch
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mo H, Ko H, Chung CTY, Kim HK, Han A, Min S, Ha J. Single versus en bloc kidney transplant from donors less than or equal to 15 kg to pediatric recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13719. [PMID: 32374480 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
With small kidneys, EBKTs could provide sufficient renal mass but could lead to inefficient use of resources, while SKTs could result in insufficient function due to small renal mass. We aimed to compare the outcomes of EBKT and SKT from small donors weighing ≤15 kg to pediatric recipients. We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who met the inclusion criteria between January 1, 1984, and April 30, 2019, at a single institution. Of a total of 23 patients, 12 received EBKT and 11 received SKT. The median age of donors, weight of donors, and weight of recipients were comparable between the two groups. The median age of recipients and median weight of allografts were greater in the EBKT group than in the SKT group. The median follow-up was 53.9 months. There was no significant difference in eGFR, protein creatinine ratios at 1-year follow-up, and overall graft survival. The size of the kidney increased by approximately 13%-43% in the EBKT group and 40%-60% in the SKT group. This study demonstrated that kidneys from small donors weighing 5-15 kg could be split in pediatric recipients without compromising the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyejin Mo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunmin Ko
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Hyo Kee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ahram Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangil Min
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jongwon Ha
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sui M, Zhao W, Zhu Y, Zeng L, Zhang L. Increasing deceased donor transplants among pediatric candidates under the revised allocation strategy in China. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13829. [PMID: 33070449 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxing Sui
- Organ Transplantation Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenyu Zhao
- Organ Transplantation Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Youhua Zhu
- Organ Transplantation Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.,The Committee of Experts of China Organ Donation, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zeng
- Organ Transplantation Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Organ Transplantation Department, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Organ Donation Office, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoyer DP, Dittmann S, Büscher A, Benkö T, Treckmann JW, Gallinat A, Kribben A, Paul A, Hoyer PF. Kidney transplantation with allografts from infant donors-Small organs, big value. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13794. [PMID: 32757309 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although infant organ donors remain a rare source of organs for transplantation, technical challenges have resulted in increased rates of complications and inferior graft function. The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcomes of kidneys procured from juvenile and infant donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated all kidney transplants from deceased donors < 16 years of age performed at our center between 01/2008 and 08/2019. We defined three groups based on quartiles of donor body weight: <13 kg (infant donors), 13-40 kg (juvenile donors), and > 40 kg (standard criteria donors). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS Ninety-two transplants were included in this study. Out of 92 recipients, there were 32 (34.8%) adult and 60 (65.2%) pediatric patients. All groups demonstrated excellent graft function and survival on both short and long-term follow-up. 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year graft survival rates for the standard criteria donor group were 100%, 95.2%, and 88.4%, respectively, compared with 95.8% for infant and 95% for juvenile donors at all times (P = .79). eGFR at 5 years was 98.9 ± 5.5, 74.1 ± 6.2, and 81.6 ± 6.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 for infant, juvenile, and standard criteria donors, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSION Infant donor allografts can be transplanted with excellent long-term outcomes in both pediatric and adult recipients. Implanting them as single allografts onto pediatric candidates allows for the transplantation of two patients. As such, pediatric recipients should be prioritized for these donor organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter Paul Hoyer
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Susanne Dittmann
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Büscher
- Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tamas Benkö
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Gallinat
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kribben
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Paul
- General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Su X, Shang W, Liu L, Li J, Fu Q, Feng Y, Zhang H, Deng R, Wu C, Wang Z, Pang X, Nashan B, Feng G, Wang C. Transplantation of a single kidney from pediatric donors less than 10 kg to children with poor access to transplantation: a two-year outcome analysis. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:250. [PMID: 32616005 PMCID: PMC7330989 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01895-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to kidney transplantation by uremic children is very limited due to the lack of donors in many countries. We sought to explore small pediatric kidney donors as a strategy to provide transplant opportunities for uremic children. Methods A total of 56 cases of single pediatric kidney transplantation and 26 cases of en bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors with body weight (BW) less than 10 kg were performed in two transplant centers in China and the transplant outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results The 1-year and 2-year death-censored graft survival in the en bloc kidney transplantation (KTx) group was inferior to that in the single KTx group. Subgroup analysis of the single KTx group found that the 1-year and 2-year death-censored graft survival in the group where the donor BW was between 5 and 10 kg was 97.7 and 90.0%, respectively. However, graft survival was significantly decreased when donor BW was ≤5 kg (p < 0.01), mainly because of the higher rate of thrombosis (p = 0.035). In the single KTx group, the graft length was increased from 6.7 cm at day 7 to 10.5 cm at 36 months posttransplant. The estimated glomerular filtration rate increased up to 24 months posttransplant. Delayed graft function and urethral complications were more common in the group with BW was ≤5 kg. Conclusions Our study suggests that single kidney transplantation from donors weighing over 5 kg to pediatric recipients is a feasible option for children with poor access to transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenjun Shang
- Kidney Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Construction Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Yonghua Feng
- Kidney Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Construction Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Ronghai Deng
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhigang Wang
- Kidney Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Construction Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinlu Pang
- Kidney Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Construction Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Björn Nashan
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, People's Republic of China
| | - Guiwen Feng
- Kidney Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Construction Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. .,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Small Split Pediatric Kidneys to Expand the Donor Pool: An Analysis of Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Data. Transplantation 2020; 103:2549-2557. [PMID: 30893290 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased use of pediatric deceased donor kidneys could enlarge the deceased donor kidney pool. Kidney transplant outcomes from small pediatric donors were compared with those from ideal kidney (IK) and expanded criteria kidney (ECK) donors to understand the optimal use of pediatric donor kidneys. METHODS Kaplan-Meier analyses compared long-term patient and death-censored graft survival of en bloc kidney (EBK) and split kidney (SpK) transplants from small pediatric donors (aged ≤8 y and weight <30 kg) with those from IK and ECK. Posttransplant serum creatinine) was compared among these cohorts. Deceased donor kidney disposition was determined from small pediatric donors with ≥1 organ transplanted. RESULTS Patient and death-censored graft survival were similar among recipients of IK, EBK, and SpK transplants, and were superior to those of recipients of ECK. EBK and SpK transplants from donors 5-30 kg had first-year graft loss similar to ECK. Long-term graft survival and serum creatinine with kidneys from SpK donors >10 kg were better than that with ECK donors. About 3901 transplants were performed from 3660 pediatric donors (53% yield). CONCLUSIONS Pediatric kidneys can augment the kidney donor pool and should not be considered ECK. If 90% of kidneys from donors (aged ≤8 y and weight <30 kg) with ≥1 organ transplanted been used (as SpK when >10 kg) an additional 159 kidney transplants per year could have been performed. Expanding the use of pediatric kidneys should be further explored by the transplant community.
Collapse
|
11
|
Outcome of kidney transplantation from young pediatric donors (aged less than 6 years) to young size-matched recipients. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15:213-220. [PMID: 31005637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pediatric donation is underutilized because of presumed increased risk of vascular thrombosis (VT) and graft loss. Using young pediatric donors (YPDs) for young pediatric recipients (YPRs) is suggested to be even at greater risk and therefore precluded in many centers. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of kidney transplantation (KT) from YPD to age-matched YPR. PATIENT AND METHODS A retrospective study of 118 pediatric KT performed between January 2007-July 2017. The authors identified KT with YPD (considered as those aged <6 years) and age-matched YPR. Organ allocation was performed based on the best paired size (YPR for YPR). Data were collected regarding donor and recipient characteristics, surgical and urological complications, graft loss, and outcomes. RESULTS Forty cases of YPD to age-matched YPR were identified (33.89% of the cohort). Mean recipient and donor age were 2.9 years (SD 1.68) and 2.24 years (SD 1.5), respectively. Mean recipient and donor weight were 12.7 kg (SD 4.1) and 13.7 kg (SD 4.15), respectively. Thirty of those young recipients (75%) weighed <15 kg. The most frequent primary renal disease was the congenital nephrotic syndrome. Nine out of 40 patients (22.5%) had received a previous KT before. Three received a combined liver-KT. Eight (20%) were classified as high immunological risk and 19 (47.5%) as high thrombotic risk. All allografts were implanted extraperitoneally and anastomosed to the iliac vessels. Major complications requiring reintervention occurred in seven patients (17.5%): three VT, three bleeding episodes, and one ureteral necrosis. Remarkably, only one surgical complication (VT) resulted in graft loss. Regarding long-term urological complications, four patients (10%) all with obstructive uropathy-developed vesicoureteral reflux to the graft. Actuarial graft survival at 1,5, and 10 years in the YPD to age-matched YPR cohort was 83% -78% -78%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (SD 3.2) (r = 7-10). Over time, eight patients lost their graft, not related to surgical factors in seven out of eight cases. CONCLUSION The authors suggest that KT using YPD for age-match YPR yields good results in expert centers, even in high-risk patients and is associated with good graft survival. In this series, surgical complications were rarely related to graft loss.
Collapse
|
12
|
How Small Is Too Small and How Young Is Too Young When Allocating Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidneys to Optimize Kidney Transplant Rates? Transplantation 2019; 103:2458-2459. [PMID: 30883455 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Utilisation of small paediatric donor kidneys for transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2019; 34:1717-1726. [PMID: 30238149 PMCID: PMC6775037 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-4073-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing need for kidney transplantation in the paediatric population and changing donor demographics, children without a living donor option will potentially be offered an adult deceased donor transplant of marginal quality. Given the importance of long-term graft survival for paediatric recipients, consideration is now being given to kidneys from small paediatric donors (SPDs). There exist a lack of consensus and a reluctance amongst some centres in transplanting SPDs due to high surgical complication rates, graft loss and concerns regarding low nephron mass and long-term function. The aim of this review is to examine and present the evidence base regarding the transplantation of these organs. The literature in both the paediatric and adult renal transplant fields, as well as recent relevant conference proceedings, is reviewed. We discuss the surgical techniques, long-term graft function and rates of complications following transplantation of SPDs. We compare graft survival of SPDs to adult deceased donors and consider the use of small paediatric donors after circulatory death (DCD) organs. In conclusion, evidence is presented that may refute historically held paradigms regarding the transplantation of SPDs in paediatric recipients, thereby potentially allowing significant expansion of the donor pool.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kloesel B, Verghese PS, Belani K. Issues in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-018-0269-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
15
|
Li J, Schild R, Herrmann J, Oh J, Fischer L, Koch M. Venous anastomosis by piggyback technique to avoid twisting of the pediatric en bloc kidney grafts. Pediatr Transplant 2018; 22. [PMID: 29341388 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This is the first report of using piggyback technique for the venous anastomosis in two pediatric recipients of small en bloc kidneys, which was found to be effective to avoid twisting of the grafts and vessels. The donors were aged 2 and 3 years with a body weight of 17 and 20 kg. The recipient age was 14 and 16 years with a body weight of 42 and 54 kg. The implantation was done extraperitoneally in the right iliac fossa. The donor's inferior vena cava was anastomosed to the recipient's distal caval vein side-to-side using 6-0 polydioxanone running suture as the piggyback technique, initially dealing with the short vena cava graft in the first case. At the end of the operation, the kidneys were positioned allowing the lateral aspect of each renal unit to face anteriorly as "closing the book." The cold ischemia time was 895 and 820 minutes, respectively. No vascular complication was observed postoperatively. The patients were discharged on POD 16 and POD 21 with an eGFR of 94 and 102 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. The graft function is stable during the 5- and 7-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raphael Schild
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Herrmann
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jun Oh
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chaudhuri A, Grimm P, Concepcion W. Small pediatric deceased donors for pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2016; 20:7-10. [PMID: 26916965 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abanti Chaudhuri
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Paul Grimm
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Waldo Concepcion
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|