Comparison of basiliximab vs antithymocyte globulin for induction in pediatric heart transplant recipients: An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation database

Impact of induction therapy on cytomegalovirus infection and post-transplant outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving routine antiviral prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

Induction therapy has been increasingly used in pediatric heart transplantation. This study evaluated the impact of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) versus basiliximab as induction therapy on post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, rejection at 1 year, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving antiviral prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 96 patients (age < 18 years) analyzed, 46 (47.9%) patients received basiliximab, and 50 (52.1%) received ATG. Median follow-up was 3.0 (IQR, 1.7-4.9) years with 32.3% reporting CMV infection. The ATG group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had similar incidences of CMV infection (36% vs. 28.3%, p = .418), CMV viremia (22% vs. 19.6%, p = .769), and CMV-positive tissue biopsy (30% vs. 22%, p = .486). The ATG group had lower incidences of rejection at 1 year (16% vs. 36.9%, p = .022) and CAV (4% vs. 23.9%, p = .006) with no difference in mortality (8% vs. 15.2%, p = .343), compared with the basiliximab group. Multivariate analysis showed that induction with ATG was associated with a lower risk of rejection at 1 year (OR, .31; 95% CI, .09-.94; p = .039) with no impact on the incidences of CMV infection (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, .54-7.89; p = .292), CAV (HR, .30; 95% CI, .04-2.58; p = .275), and mortality (HR, .39; 95% CI, .09-1.82; p = .233) compared to basiliximab induction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, induction with ATG was associated with reduction in risk of rejection at 1 year with no effects on CMV infection, CAV, and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients with universal antiviral prophylaxis compared with basiliximab induction therapy.

Antithymocyte globulin induction therapy and myocardial complement deposition in pediatric heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) consists of polyclonal antibodies directed primarily against human T lymphocytes but may contain antibodies with affinity for other tissues in the transplanted organ, resulting in complement (C4d) deposition. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) of adult cardiac transplants. We examined the relationship of induction immunosuppression with ATG and C4d deposition in EMB of pediatric cardiac transplants.

METHODS

Results of C4d immunohistochemistry were available from all EMB of patients transplanted at our center between June 2012 and April 2018 (n = 48) who received induction immunosuppression with either ATG (n = 20) or basiliximab (n = 28) as the standard of care.

RESULTS

C4d deposition in the first year post-heart transplant was more commonly seen among patients who received ATG induction (20% of EMBs in ATG group vs 1% of EMBs in basiliximab group; p < .0001). C4d deposition related to ATG was observed early post-transplant (50% ATG vs 0% basiliximab on first EMB; p < .0001 and 35% ATG vs 0% basiliximab on the second EMB; p = .0012). While this difference waned by the third EMB (5% ATG vs 0% basiliximab; p = .41), positive C4d staining persisted to the sixth EMB in the ATG group only (6%).

CONCLUSION

C4d deposition is common on EMB up to 1 year post-pediatric cardiac transplant following ATG induction. This high rate of positive C4d staining in the absence of histologic AMR after ATG induction therapy must be accounted for in making clinical decisions regarding cardiac allograft rejection diagnosis and treatment.

Impact of induction strategy change on first-year rejection in pediatric heart transplantation at a single center-From postoperative basiliximab to either postoperative anti-thymocyte globulin or preoperative basiliximab

BACKGROUND

Our pediatric heart transplant center transitioned from post-bypass basiliximab (BAS) induction to either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or pre-bypass BAS. The purpose of this study was to compare first-year rejection rates before and after this change.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of pediatric heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was first-year rejection. Bivariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable regression were performed across eras.

RESULTS

Forty-three early era patients (55%) received post-bypass BAS, and 35 late era patients (45%) received pre-bypass BAS (n = 17) or ATG (n = 18). First-year rejection decreased in the late era (31% vs 53%, p = .05). This finding was more pronounced after excluding infants (38% vs 73%, p = .006). Late era was associated with a decreased likelihood of rejection (all cohort OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.66; infants excluded OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.61). No differences in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, donor-specific antibody, or infection were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer late era patients receiving ATG or pre-bypass BAS induction had first-year rejection compared to the early era patients receiving standard post-bypass BAS induction. This programmatic shift in induction strategy was readily achievable and potentially effective in reducing first-year rejection.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Passive Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibody Therapies

Passive antibody therapies have a long history of use. In the 19th century, antibodies from xenographic sources of polyclonal antibodies were used to treat infections (diphtheria). They were used often as protection from infectious agents and toxins. Complications related to their use involved development of immune complexes and severe allergic reactions. As a result, human source plasma for polyclonal antibodies became the preferential source for antibodies. They are used to treat infection, remove toxins, prevent hemolytic disease of the newborn, modify inflammatory reactions, and control autoimmune diseases. Continued improvements in processing decreased the transfusion/infusion transmission of infections. In the late 20th century (∼1986), monoclonal antibodies were developed. The first monoclonal antibodies were of xenographic source and were wrought with problems of immunogenicity. These forms of antibodies did not gain favor until chimerization took pace in the mid-1990s and in 1998 two monoclonal antibodies were approved one to treat respiratory syncytial virus and the other for breast cancers. Further development of humanized and then fully human monoclonal antibodies has led to an evolution of therapies with these agents. Monoclonal antibodies are being researched or approved to treat a multitude of diseases to include oncologic, inflammatory, autoimmune, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, allergic, benign hematologic, infections, orthopedic, coagulopathy, metabolic and to decrease morbidity of disease (diminution of pain), modify disease progression, and potentially anatomic development. In this chapter, we will review the history of use of these passive antibody therapies, their mechanism of action, pharmacologic-therapeutic classification, particular medical indication, adverse reactions, and potential future use of these medications.