1
|
Maria H, Valentino PL, Healey PJ, Kwon YK. Small-for-size syndrome in a 9.7 kg pediatric recipient with a whole liver graft. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14716. [PMID: 38420659 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) in pediatric liver transplant recipients, particularly those weighing less than 10 kg, is rare. This report describes a case of a 15-month-old whole liver transplant recipient who suffered SFSS, and systematic literature review was performed to identify outcomes of such cases and potential risk factors for SFSS. CASE PRESENTATION A 15-month-old toddler with a history of biliary atresia underwent a deceased donor whole liver transplant. The graft weighed 160 g, resulting in a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of 1.6%. The post-operative course was complicated by SFSS, characterized by massive ascites causing hemodynamic instability and compromised hepatic artery flow. Pharmacological intervention with octreotide was initiated, and the patient eventually recovered. CONCLUSION In small pediatric recipients, especially those weighing less than 10 kg, the native liver body weight ratio (LBWR) is significantly higher. When selecting an appropriately sized graft for these recipients, this higher ratio should be taken into consideration. The literature review suggests that a GRWR of less than 2% is associated with a higher incidence of small-for-size syndrome in small pediatric recipients weighing less than 10 kg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haytham Maria
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Pamela L Valentino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Patrick J Healey
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yong K Kwon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bluhme E, Henckel E, Jorns C. Potential of neonatal organ donation and outcome after transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14486. [PMID: 36792069 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is limited by access to suitable organs. Infant recipient waitlist mortality is increased due to the scarcity of size-matched organs. Neonatal organ donors have been proposed as an underutilized source of donor organs. However, the literature on the actual prevalence and outcome of neonatal organ donation and transplantation is fragmented and not well analyzed. This literature review aims to summarize the available literature on the potential of neonatal organ donation and to analyze published cases of neonatal organ transplantation. A systematic search of the Medline and Cochrane databases yielded 2964 articles, which were screened for eligibility. In total, 86 articles were considered eligible, of which 34 were included in the literature review: 8 articles describing the potential of neonatal organ donation programs, and 26 articles describing clinical transplantation. Current evidence suggests there is a large pool of potential neonatal organ donors. In contrast, the literature on neonatal organ donor utilization is sparse. However, case series of successful kidney, heart, liver, hepatocyte, and multivisceral transplantation using organs from neonatal donors are summarized. Although good posttransplant organ function was achieved, the use of neonatal organs is associated with increased risk of thrombosis in both kidney and liver transplantation. Neonatal organ donation is a promising alternative for expanding the current donor pool. Experience is limited, but reported patient and graft survival are acceptable and more research on the subject is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Bluhme
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ewa Henckel
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neonatology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carl Jorns
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ren J, Dong C, Sun C, Wang K, Zhang W, Zheng W, Qin H, Han C, Yang Y, Zhang F, Wei X, Gao W, Zheng H. The impact of portal vein reconstruction on portal vein complications after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft. Surgery 2023; 173:537-543. [PMID: 36424198 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine whether the different methods of portal vein reconstruction have an impact on the occurrence of portal vein complications after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft. METHODS A total of 567 recipients were eligible for enrollment in this study and were divided into the following 2 groups according to the type of portal vein reconstruction: group 1 underwent anastomosis of the left and right bifurcations of the recipient portal vein to the donor portal vein (type 1), whereas group 2 underwent anastomosis of the bevel formed by the main trunk and right branch of the recipient portal vein to the donor portal vein (type 2). Postoperative portal vein complications and recipient and graft survival rates were compared between the 2 groups before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS Portal vein complications occurred in 53 (9.3%) patients, including 46 recipients with portal vein stenosis and 7 with portal vein thrombosis. After propensity score matching, the incidence of portal vein stenosis in group 2 was lower than that in group 1 (P = .035). The first diagnosis time of portal vein stenosis in group 2 was later than that in group 1 (P = .033), and the incidence of early portal vein stenosis was lower than that in group 1 (P = .009). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of portal vein thrombosis and recipient and graft survival rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Type 2 portal vein reconstruction appears to be a viable technique in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation with left lobe graft that can effectively reduce the incidence of portal vein stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiashu Ren
- The First Central Clinical School, Tianjin Medical University, China
| | - Chong Dong
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Chao Sun
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Weiping Zheng
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Hong Qin
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Chao Han
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Fubo Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Xinzhe Wei
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Pediatric Transplantation, Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China.
| | - Hong Zheng
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Key Laboratory of Transplant Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin First Central Hospital, China; Research Institute of Transplant Medicine, Nankai University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández-Fructuoso JR, Gil-Sánchez FJ, Sáez-Miravete S, Pina-Molina JM, Fuentes-Gutiérrez C, Lloreda-García JM, Olmo-Sánchez M, Mañas-Uxo MI, García-González A, Leante-Castellanos JL. Implementation of a neonatal donation protocol in the neonatal intensive care unit: A single-center experience. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14403. [PMID: 36165676 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of specific protocols for neonatal donation contributes to the rarity of neonatal donors. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the implementation of a neonatal donation protocol in our NICU. METHODS In this single-center study, we conducted a retrospective chart review of neonatal deaths in our NICU from January 2013 to January 2022. The study was divided into two periods: before and after the implementation of a neonatal donation protocol. The referral rates of potential neonatal donors to the OPO in the two periods were compared using the chi-square test. A p value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Sixty-four infants were reviewed. Seven (10.9%) met the inclusion criteria for potential neonatal donors after DCC. The referral rate of potential neonatal donors increased from 2.5% to 16.7% after the implementation of this protocol (p = .041), and one infant (4.1%) became an effective heart-valve donor. CONCLUSION The implementation of a local neonatal donation protocol could have contributed to increase the referral rate of potential neonatal donors in our NICU. Following the implementation of a local neonatal donation protocol, we were able to perform a heart-valve donation for the first time in our unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Salvadora Sáez-Miravete
- Intensive Care Unit, Donor Coordination Unit, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | - José Miguel Pina-Molina
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | | | | | - María Olmo-Sánchez
- Neonatology Unit, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | | | - Ana García-González
- Neonatology Unit, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Outflow reconstruction of left lateral graft with two widely spaced hepatic veins in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Surgery 2022; 172:391-396. [PMID: 35210103 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation using the left lateral segment of the liver is the most common type of pediatric liver transplantation. An appropriate surgical approach is crucial for decreasing the risk of vascular complications using these grafts with anatomical variations. METHODS Between January 2017 and December 2020, 631 living donor liver transplantations using left lateral segment grafts were performed at Tianjin First Central Hospital. The grafts from 162 (25.7%) donors have 2 hepatic vein openings. A total number of 21 transplantations using left lateral segment grafts with 2 widely spaced hepatic vein openings were performed. In group 1, the unification venoplasty technique with interposition vein graft was used at the back table for the reconstruction of hepatic vein from grafts. In group 2, dual hepatic vein reconstructions were performed, in which venoplasty of recipients' left hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and inferior vena cava was performed to create a large orifice for anastomosis with segment Ⅱ hepatic vein from the graft. Segment III hepatic vein from the graft was anastomosed with the recipient's right hepatic vein. The incidence, treatment, and outcomes of hepatic venous outflow obstruction were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 12.8 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hepatic venous outflow obstruction between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Dual hepatic vein reconstruction is an alternate surgical option for grafts with 2 widely spaced hepatic veins, and it is associated with ideal graft recovery and vascular condition. However, long-term follow-up is still needed to verify the efficacy and safety of this approach.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peters M, Sturm E, Hartleif S, Capobianco I, Radtke A, Müller M, Gerbig I, Schäfer J, Königsrainer A, Nadalin S. Whole liver transplantation in children under 10 kg: How to minimize the high risks of a still challenging procedure. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14222. [PMID: 34994042 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole liver transplantation in infants <10 kg is a rare procedure with moderate outcomes (67%-79% graft survival at 1 year) and high rates of vascular complications (hepatic artery thrombosis 5-26%). METHODS Retrospective single-center analysis of whole liver transplantation in infants <10 kg and systematic review of the literature focused on survival rates and surgical complications. RESULTS Between January 2005 and December 2020, 175 liver transplantations in 173 children were performed at our center. A total of 92 (53%) children weighed less than 10 kg; 19 (21%) of them underwent WLT and constitute the study population. Median age of the recipients was 10 months (21 days-24 months) and median body weight 6.5 (3.1-9.8) kg. Median age of the donors was 5 (1-84) months and median body weight 6.1 (4-21) kg. Median donor-to-recipient body weight ratio was 1.2 (range: 0.6-4.5). Postoperatively, neither hepatic artery nor portal vein thrombosis occurred. A biliary complication occurred in 4 cases: 1 bile leak (early), 3 anastomotic stenoses (1 delayed and 2 late), and 1 non-anastomotic stenosis (late). Patient survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. Overall, death-censored graft survival after 1, 5, and 10 was 100%. CONCLUSION Our results are excellent in terms of complications and graft and patient survival. This involves not only high-end surgical performance but also close interdisciplinary perioperative cooperation based on strong standard operating procedures and mainly focused on fluid management, hemostasiology, and strict monitoring of vessel patency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maren Peters
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ekkehard Sturm
- Department of Pediatrics, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Hartleif
- Department of Pediatrics, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ivan Capobianco
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Arnold Radtke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Müller
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ines Gerbig
- Department of Pediatrics, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schäfer
- Department of Radiology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun C, Song Z, Dong C, Zheng W, Wang K, Qin H, Yang Y, Han C, Zhang F, Xu M, Cao S, Cao Y, Gao W, Shen Z. The diagnosis and management of intestinal obstruction after pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14123. [PMID: 34428333 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors, causes, and management of intestinal obstruction after pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed on pediatric liver transplantation recipients from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2019 at Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital. The cases of intestinal obstruction were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 1034 pediatric liver transplantations were performed during the study period, 66 intestinal obstructions were diagnosed in 61 recipients. Three recipients suffered intestinal obstructions twice, and one recipient suffered three times. Forty of the 66 cases were treated with non-surgical treatment, including fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, purgation, enema, and parenteral nutrition. Surgical intervention was performed in 26 cases. Diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal inflammatory stenosis, PTLD, and intestine perforation are essential causes of intestinal obstruction in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Diaphragmatic hernia was independent risk factors for intestinal obstruction. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rate of the recipients with or without intestinal obstruction were 98.4%, 96.5%, 96.5% and 95.3%, 94.4%, 94.0%, respectively, without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS Most cases of intestinal obstruction after liver transplantation in children can be remitted by non-surgical treatment, but there are still some cases need to be treated by surgery. Both measures are related to ideal outcomes, intestinal obstruction does not increase the mortality rate in pediatric liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Sun
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Zhuolun Song
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Chong Dong
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Weiping Zheng
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Qin
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Han
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Fubo Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Min Xu
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Shunqi Cao
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Yu Cao
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Gao
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| | - Zhongyang Shen
- Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Clinical Discipline (Organ Transplantation), Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vileito A, Hulzebos CV, Toet MC, Baptist DH, Verhagen EAA, Siebelink MJ. Neonatal donation: are newborns too young to be recognized? Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180:3491-3497. [PMID: 34105002 PMCID: PMC8589733 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04139-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Neonatal organ and tissue donation is not common practice in the Netherlands. At the same time, there is a transplant waiting list for small size-matched organs and tissues. Multiple factors may contribute to low neonatal donation rates, including a lack of awareness of this option. This study provides insight into potential neonatal organ and tissue donors and reports on how many donors were actually reported to the procurement organization. We performed a retrospective analysis of the mortality database and medical records of two largest neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands. This study reviewed records of neonates with a gestational age >37 weeks and weight >3000g who died in the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2016. During the study period, 259 term-born neonates died in the two NICUs. In total, 132 neonates with general contra-indications for donation were excluded. The medical records of 127 neonates were examined for donation suitability. We identified five neonates with documented brain death who were not recognized as potential organ and/or tissue donors. Of the remaining neonates, 27 were found suitable for tissue donation. One potential tissue donor had been reported to the procurement organization. In three cases, the possibility of donation was brought up by parents.Conclusion: A low proportion (2%) of neonates who died in the NICUs were found suitable for organ donation, and a higher proportion (12%) were found suitable for tissue donation. We suggest that increased awareness concerning the possibility of neonatal donation would likely increase the identification of potential neonatal donors. What is Known: • There is an urgent need for very small organs and tissues from neonatal donors What is New: • A number of neonates who died in the NICU were suitable organ or/and tissue donors but were not recognized as donors. • Knowledge on neonatal donation possibilities is also important for proper counseling of parents who sometimes inquire for the possibility of organ and tissue donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicija Vileito
- Department of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Christian V. Hulzebos
- Department of Neonatology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mona C. Toet
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dyvonne H. Baptist
- Department of Neonatology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eduard A. A. Verhagen
- Department of Neonatology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marion J. Siebelink
- University Medical Center Groningen Transplant Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gao W, Song Z, Ma N, Dong C, Meng X, Sun C, Qin H, Han C, Yang Y, Zhang F, Zheng W, Shen Z. Application of pediatric donors in split liver transplantation: Is there an age limit? Am J Transplant 2020; 20:817-824. [PMID: 31597001 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The experience of using pediatric donors in split liver transplant is exceedingly rare. We aim to investigate the outcomes of recipients receiving split pediatric grafts. Sixteen pediatric recipients receiving split liver grafts from 8 pediatric donors < 7 years were enrolled. The donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative course, postoperative complications, and graft and recipient survival rates were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 8.0 ± 2.3 months. The graft and recipient survival rates were 100%. The liver function remained in the normal range at the end of the follow-up time in all recipients. No life-threatening complications were seen in these recipients, and the only surgery-related complication was portal vein stenosis in 1 recipient. Cytomegalovirus infection was the most common complication (62.5%). The transaminase level was significant higher in extended right lobe recipients in the early postoperative days, but the difference vanished at the end of first week; postoperative complications and graft and recipient survival rates did not differ between left and right graft recipients. Notably, the youngest split donor graft (2.7 years old) was associated with ideal recipient outcomes. Split liver transplant using well-selected pediatric donors is a promising strategy to expand pediatric donor source in well-matched recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Gao
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhuolun Song
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Nan Ma
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Chong Dong
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingchu Meng
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Sun
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Qin
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Han
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Fubo Zhang
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Weiping Zheng
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhongyang Shen
- Organ Transplantation Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|