1
|
Yi NJ, Kim J, Hong SY, Kang HG. Combined liver-kidney transplantation in pediatric patients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14666. [PMID: 38059323 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is a surgical procedure that involves transplanting both liver and kidney organs. There are two types of CLKT: simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (smLKT) and sequential LKT (sqLKT). CLKT accounts for a small percentage of liver transplantations (LTs), particularly in pediatric cases. Nevertheless, the procedure has demonstrated excellent outcomes, with high survival rates and lower rejection rates. The main indications for CLKT in pediatric patients differ somewhat from that in adults, in which end-stage kidney disease after LT is the major indication. In children, congenital diseases are common reason for performing CLKT; the examples of such diseases include autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease with congenital hepatic fibrosis which equally affects both organs, and primary hyperoxaluria type 1, a primary liver disease leading kidney failure. The decision between smLKT or sqLKT depends on the dominant organ failure, the specific pathophysiology, and available organ sources. However, there remain significant surgical and societal challenges surrounding CLKT. Innovations in pharmacology and genetic engineering have decreased the necessity for CLKT in early-diagnosed cases without portal hypertension or kidney replacement therapy. Nonetheless, these advancements are not universally accessible. Therefore, decision-making algorithms should be crafted, considering region-specific organ allocation systems and prevailing medical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Gyung Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loos S, Kemper MJ, Schmaeschke K, Herden U, Fischer L, Hoppe B, Levart TK, Grabhorn E, Schild R, Oh J, Brinkert F. Long-term outcome after combined or sequential liver and kidney transplantation in children with infantile and juvenile primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1157215. [PMID: 37009285 PMCID: PMC10064088 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1157215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Combined or sequential liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT/SLKT) restores kidney function and corrects the underlying metabolic defect in children with end-stage kidney disease in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1). However, data on long-term outcome, especially in children with infantile PH1, are rare. Methods All pediatric PH1-patients who underwent CLKT/SLKT at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Results Eighteen patients (infantile PH1 n = 10, juvenile PH1 n = 8) underwent transplantation (CLKT n = 17, SLKT n = 1) at a median age of 5.4 years (1.5-11.8). Patient survival was 94% after a median follow-up of 9.2 years (6.4-11.0). Liver and kidney survival-rates after 1, 10, and 15 years were 90%, 85%, 85%, and 90%, 75%, 75%, respectively. Age at transplantation was significantly lower in infantile than juvenile PH1 (1.6 years (1.4-2.4) vs. 12.8 years (8.4-14.1), P = 0.003). Median follow-up was 11.0 years (6.8-11.6) in patients with infantile PH1 vs. 6.9 years (5.7-9.9) in juvenile PH1 (P = 0.15). At latest follow-up kidney and/or liver graft loss and/or death showed a tendency to a higher rate in patients with infantile vs. juvenile PH1 (3/10 vs. 1/8, P = 0.59). Discussion In conclusion, the overall patient survival and long-term transplant outcome of patients after CLKT/SLKT for PH1 is encouraging. However, results in infantile PH1 tended to be less optimal than in patients with juvenile PH1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Loos
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Correspondence: Sebastian Loos
| | - Markus J. Kemper
- Department of Pediatrics, Asklepios Klinik Nord Heidberg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kaja Schmaeschke
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uta Herden
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Hoppe
- German Hyperoxaluria Center, c/o Kindernierenzentrum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Enke Grabhorn
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raphael Schild
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jun Oh
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital, University Children's Research@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Brinkert
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pacheco MP, Carneiro-D'Albuquerque LA, Mazo DF. Current aspects of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:45-61. [PMID: 35126839 PMCID: PMC8790396 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after liver transplantation (LT) exerts a severe effect on the survival of patients. The widespread adoption of the model for end-stage liver disease score strongly impacted CKD incidence after the procedure, as several patients are transplanted with previously deteriorated renal function. Due to its multifactorial nature, encompassing pre-transplantation conditions, perioperative events, and nephrotoxic immunosuppressor therapies, the accurate identification of patients under risk of renal disease, and the implementation of preventive approaches, are extremely important. Methods for the evaluation of renal function in this setting range from formulas that estimate the glomerular filtration rate, to non-invasive markers, although no option has yet proved efficient in early detection of kidney injury. Considering the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as a factor of utmost importance after LT, early nephroprotective strategies are highly recommended. They are based mainly on delaying the application of CNI during the immediate postoperative-period, reducing their dosage, and associating them with other less nephrotoxic drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil and everolimus. This review provides a critical assessment of the causes of renal dysfunction after LT, the methods of its evaluation, and the interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and belatedly after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana P Pacheco
- Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque
- Division of Digestive Organs Transplant, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel F Mazo
- Division of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 05403-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences of University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-878, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gautier S, Monakhov A, Tsiroulnikova O, Voskanov M, Miloserdov I, Dzhanbekov T, Meshcheryakov S, Latypov R, Chekletsova E, Malomuzh O, Khizroev K, Dzhiner D, Pashkova I. Deceased vs living donor grafts for pediatric simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience. J Clin Lab Anal 2020; 34:e23219. [PMID: 31967359 PMCID: PMC7307349 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In conditions of limited experience of pediatric simultaneous liver‐kidney transplantation (SLKT) using grafts from living and deceased donors, there is a certain need to validate the approach. Patients The retrospective study of 18 pediatric patients who received SLKT between 2008 and 2019. Results Grafts were obtained from both living and deceased donors. The patients’ age ranged from 2 to 16 years (9 years ±4). The body weight of the children varied from 9.5 to 39 kg (22 kg ±9). The follow‐up period lasted from 1 to 109 months (median 38 months ±35). The various graft combinations were used in both groups. There was no mortality during the follow‐up. There was no significant difference in baseline parameters in recipients who received grafts from living and deceased donors except age (7.5 years ±2.2 vs 11.8 years ±4.1; P = .038). Rate of complications > grade II was higher among recipients of deceased donor SLKT (7.7% vs 60%; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.04‐58.48; P = .044). All the patients are alive with both grafts functioning. All the living donors returned to the normal life. Conclusion SLKT is a safe and effective procedure for children with both simultaneous end‐stage liver disease and end‐stage renal disease. Both living donor partial liver and kidney transplantation and deceased donor liver‐kidney transplantation can be considered as safe and feasible options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Gautier
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Artem Monakhov
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Tsiroulnikova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Voskanov
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Igor Miloserdov
- Surgical Department #1, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Timur Dzhanbekov
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Meshcheryakov
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Robert Latypov
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Chekletsova
- Department of Pediatrics, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Malomuzh
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Khizri Khizroev
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Deniz Dzhiner
- Surgical Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Irina Pashkova
- Department of Pediatrics, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.I. Shumakov, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|