Permanent pacemaker implantation in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A systematic review and evidence quality assessment

Impact of the operative technique on mid- and long-term results following paediatric heart transplantation

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the impact of the bicaval technique versus the biatrial technique (by Lower and Shumway) in paediatric heart transplant patients. Only a few studies investigate this matter regarding the long-term outcome after paediatric heart transplantation. We compared the two surgical methods regarding survival, the necessity of pacemaker implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All 134 patients (aged <18 years) - (group-1) biatrial (n = 84), versus (group-2) bicaval (n = 50), who underwent heart transplantation between October 1988 and December 2021, were analysed. Freedom from events were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential differences were analysed using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. Mean ± standard deviation: Bypass time (per minutes) was higher in the group 1 as compared with group 2 (P = 0.050). Survival was not significantly different (P = 0.604) in either groups. Eighteen patients required permanent pacemaker implantation in the group 1 and only one patient required it in the group 2 (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric heart transplantation using bicaval technique results similar long-term survival compared with the biatrial technique. The incidence of atrial rhythm disorders was significantly higher in the biatrial group, requiring a higher frequency of pacemaker implantation in this group. As a results, the bicaval technique has replaced the biatrial technique in our centre.

Pediatric heart transplantation in infants and small children under 3 years of age: Single center experience - "Early and long-term results"

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the early and long-term survival after ABO-compatible heart transplantation in children under 3 years of age from 1991 to 2021 at our center. This retrospective and descriptive study aimed to identify serious adverse events associated with mortality after pediatric heart transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

46 patients with congenital heart failure (37%) in end-stage heart failure have undergone a pediatric heart transplantation. Primary outcome of interest was survival at follow-up time.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) follow-up time (y), age (y), body-weight (kg) and BMI (kg/cm²) were 13.2 (5.7-19.5), 0.9 (0.2-2.0), 6.8 (4.3-10.0) and 14.2 (12.3-15.7). Twenty-four (52%) patients were male. 15 patients (33%) had a single ventricle physiology. At 30- days survival rate was 94 ± 4%. Survival rate at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years post HTx was 87 ± 5%, 84 ± 6%, 79 ± 6% and 63 ± 8%. One child underwent re-transplantation after 4 years, and another one after 11 years - in both cases due to graft failure. Higher early mortality in patients under 3 months of age and in patients with single ventricle physiology. Transplant free survival at 15 years was in children with cardiomyopathy better (71 ± 10%) than in those with congenital heart disease (50 ± 13%). One or more previous heart surgeries prior to HTx (n = 21) were associated to more mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric heart transplantation has acceptable long-term results and is still the best therapeutic option in children with end-stage cardiac failure. Underlying anomalies and single ventricle physiology, age below 3 months had a significant impact on survival.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and donor age affecting permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation

Aims

The need for permanent pacemakers (PMs) after heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim was to determine the influence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), donor age, and other risk factors on PM implantations early and late after HT and its effect on survival.

Methods and results

A retrospective, single‐centre study was performed including HTs from 1984 to July 2018. Early PM was defined as PM implantation ≤90 days and late PM as PM > 90 days. Risk factors for PM and survival after PM were determined with (time‐dependent) multivariable Cox regression. Out of 720 HTs performed, 62 were excluded (55 mortalities ≤30 days and 7 retransplantations). Of the remaining 658 patients, 95 (14%) needed a PM: 38 (6%) early and 57 (9%) late during follow‐up (median 9.3 years). Early PM risk factors were donor age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, P < 0.001], ischaemic time (HR 1.01, P < 0.001), and in adults amiodarone use before HT (HR 2.02, P = 0.045). Late PM risk factors were donor age (HR 1.03, P = 0.024) and CAV (HR 3.59, P < 0.001). Late PM compromised survival (HR 2.05, P < 0.001), while early PM did not (HR 0.77, P = 0.41).

Conclusions

Risk factors for early PM implantation were donor age, ischaemic time, and in adults amiodarone use before HT. Late PM implantation risk factors were donor age and CAV. Late PM diminished survival, which is probably a surrogate marker for underlying progressive cardiac disease.