Weather-informed Light-tissue Model-Based Dose Planning for Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy

Observational pilot study of multi-wavelength wearable light dosimetry for erythropoietic protoporphyria

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) causes painful light sensitivity, limiting quality of life. Our objective was to develop and validate a wearable light exposure device and correlate measurements with light sensitivity in EPP to predict and prevent symptoms.

METHODS

A wearable light dosimeter was developed to capture light doses of UVA, blue, and red wavelengths. A prospective observational pilot study was performed in which five EPP patients wore two light dosimeters for 3 weeks, one as a watch, and one as a shirt clip.

RESULTS

Standard deviation (SD) increases from the mean in the daily blue light dose increased the odds ratio (OR) for symptom risk more than the self-reported outdoor time (OR 2.76 vs. 2.38) or other wavelengths, and a one SD increase from the mean in the daily blue light wristband device dose increased the OR for symptom risk more than the daily blue light shirt clip (OR 2.45 vs. 1.62). The area under the receiver operator curve for the blue light wristband dose was 0.78, suggesting 78% predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that wearable blue light dosimetry worn as a wristband is a promising method for measuring light exposure and predicting and preventing symptoms in EPP.

Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight-based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp-based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments.

Objective

To compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre-incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp-based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light).

Methods

A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp-based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre-treatment, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up visits.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red-lamp (1-month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6-month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1-month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6-month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between -4.4% and 13.4% for 1-month, and -2.2% and +23.6% for 6-month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red-lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%.

Limitations

Ensuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days.

Conclusion

Indoor-daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp-based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV-block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter.

Clinical trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737.

Effective fluence and dose at skin depth of daylight and lamp sources for PpIX-based photodynamic therapy

SIGNIFICANCE

Skin-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used for the clinical treatment of actinic keratosis (AKs) and other skin lesions with continued expansion into the standard of care. Due to the spectral dependency of photosensitizer activation and skin optical fluence, there is a need for more accurate methods to estimate the delivered dose at depth from different PDT light sources and treatment regimens.

AIM

Develop radiometric methods for calculating photosensitizer-effective fluence and dose at depth and determine differences between red-lamp, blue-lamp, and daylight-based PDT treatments.

METHODS

Radiometric measurements of FDA-approved PDT lamp sources, outdoor daylight, and indoor daylight were performed for clinically relevant AK treatments. The protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) equivalent irradiance, fluence, and dose for each light source were calculated from the PpIX absorption spectrum and a 7-layer skin fluence model. The effective fluence and dose at depth was estimated by combining the spectral attenuation predicted at each wavelength and depth with the source fluence at each wavelength.

RESULTS

The red-lamp source had the highest illuminance (112,000 lumen/m²), but lowest PpIX-effective irradiance (9.6 W/m²), and highest effective fluence at depth (10.8 W/m² at 500 µm). In contrast, the blue light source had the lowest illuminance (2300 lumen/m²), but highest PpIX effective irradiance (37.0 W/m²), and ultimately the lowest effective fluence at depth (0.18 W/cm² at 500 µm). The daylight source had values of (outdoor | indoor) illuminance of (49,200 | 37,800 lumen/m²), effective irradiance of (19.2 | 10.7 W/m²), and effective fluence of (1.50 | 1.08 W/m² at 500 µm). The effective fluence and dose at depth facilitated the comparison of treatment regimens, for example, calculating an equivalent dose for a 2 hr indoor daylight treatment and a 10 min red-light treatment for the 300-1000 μm depth range.

CONCLUSIONS

The consideration of PpIX-effective fluence at varying depths is necessary to provide adequate comparisons of the delivered dose from PDT light sources. Methods for calculating radiometric fluence and delivered dose at depth were introduced, with open source MATLAB code, to help overcome the limitations of commonly used photometric and irradiance-based reporting.

Three-dimensional image-guided topical photodynamic therapy system with light dosimetry dynamic planning and monitoring

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown significant potential for skin disease treatment. As a key element, light is critical to influencing its treatment outcome, and light dosimetry is an issue of much concern for researchers. However, because of three-dimensional irregularity in shape and patient's movement during the therapy, irradiance hardly keeps uniform on the lesion and flux measurement remains a challenge. In this work, we report the development of a three-dimensional image-guided PDT system, and the method of dynamic irradiance planning and flux monitoring for lesions in different poses. This system comprises a three-dimensional camera for monitoring patients' movement during therapy, a computer for data analysis and processing, and a homemade LED array for forming uniform irradiance on lesions. Simulations on lesions of the face and arm show that the proposed system significantly increases effective therapy area, enhances irradiance uniformity, is able to visualize flux on the lesion, and reduces risks of burns during PDT. The developed PDT system is promising for optimizing procedures of PDT and providing better treatment outcomes by delivering controllable irradiance and flux on lesions even when a patient is moving.

SmartPDT®: Smartphone enabled real-time dosimetry via satellite observation for daylight photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) affects one quarter of over 60  year olds in Europe with the risk of transforming into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) is an effective and patient preferred treatment that uses sunlight to clear AK. Currently, there is no standardised method for measuring the light received during treatment.

METHODS

SmartPDT® is a smartphone-based application and web-portal, developed by siHealth Ltd, enabling remote delivery of dPDT. It uses satellite imagery and computational algorithms to provide real-time determination of exposure to PpIX-effective solar radiation ("light dose"). The application also provides forecast of expected radiant exposures for 24- and 48-hs prior to the treatment period. Validation of the real-time and forecasted radiant exposure algorithms was performed against direct ground-based measurement under all weather conditions in Chilton, UK.

RESULTS

Agreement between direct ground measurements and satellite-determined radiant exposure for 2-h treatment was excellent at -0.1 % ± 5.1 % (mean ± standard deviation). There was also excellent agreement between weather forecasted radiant exposure and ground measurement, 1.8 % ± 17.7 % at 24-hs and 1.6 % ± 25.2 % at 48-hs. Relative Root Mean Square of the Error (RMSE_r) demonstrated that agreement improved as time to treatment reduced (RMSE_r = 22.5 % (48 -hs), 11.2 % (24-hs), 5.2 % (real-time)).

CONCLUSION

Agreement between satellite-determined, weather-forecasted and ground-measured radiant exposure was better than any existing published literature for dPDT. The SmartPDT® application and web-portal has excellent potential to assist with remote delivery of dPDT, an important factor in reducing risk in an elderly patient population during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy

Effective treatment delivery in photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires coordination of the light source, the photosensitizer, and the delivery device appropriate to the target tissue. Lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and lamps are the main types of light sources utilized for PDT applications. The choice of light source depends on the target location, photosensitizer used, and light dose to be delivered. Geometry of minimally accessible areas also plays a role in deciding light applicator type. Typically, optical fiber-based devices are used to deliver the treatment light close to the target. The optical properties of tissue also affect the distribution of the treatment light. Treatment light undergoes scattering and absorption in tissue. Most tissue will scatter light, but highly pigmented areas will absorb light, especially at short wavelengths. This review will summarize the basic physics of light sources, and describe methods for determining the dose delivered to the patient.

Bring the Sunshine Indoors: Easy Dosimetry for Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy

Daylight photodynamic therapy (DPDT) is an effective and patient preferred treatment for the management of field change actinic keratosis. An important factor in DPDT is light dosimetry, to ensure that patients receive sufficient daylight for effective treatment, and this is the focus of the contribution to this issue by (La Rochelle et al. [2019] Photochem. Photobiol., https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13170). In this work, the authors present an easy-to-use method for obtaining real-time information about patient received light dose during treatment and for determining indoor locations best suited to DPDT.