Efficacy of narrow-band ultraviolet-B therapy in patch-stage mycosis fungoides: A clinical study and review of the literature

Effectiveness of narrowband ultraviolet B monotherapy versus combination therapy with systemic agents in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides and the association with plaque lesions

OBJECTIVE

Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) has been recommended as first-line therapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) in international guidelines. NB-UVB can be used as monotherapy or part of a multimodality treatment regimen. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and optimal patients of NB-UVB in combination with systemic therapies in MF. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the combination versus NB-UVB monotherapy in early-stage MF and if plaque lesion status was related to these effects.

METHODS

This observational cohort study included 247 early-stage MF patients who had received NB-UVB combined with systemic therapies vs. NB-UVB monotherapy from 2009 to 2021. The primary outcome was partial or complete response. Overall response rate and median time to response were calculated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using the Cox model.

RESULTS

In 139 plaque-stage patients, the response rate for combination therapy group was higher than that of monotherapy group (79.0% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.006). The adjusted HR for combination therapy compared with NB-UVB monotherapy was 3.11 (95% CI 1.72-5.63). The combination therapy group also showed shorter time to response (4 vs. 6 months, p = 0.002). In 108 patch-stage patients, the response rate and time to response in two treatment groups showed no significant difference. There was therefore an observed interaction with patients' plaque lesion status for the effect size of NB-UVB combination therapy. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding systemic treatments to NB-UVB did not improve the treatment outcome of patch-stage patients, but it surpassed NB-UVB monotherapy for early-stage patients with plaques.

How to Sequence Therapies in Mycosis Fungoides

OPINION STATEMENT

Choice of therapy in mycosis fungoides is based on both patient- and lymphoma-specific factors, such as disease characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms and effect on quality of life, potential associated toxicities of therapy, response and tolerance to prior lines of therapy, and convenience and practicality. Generally, we sequence therapies from least toxic, targeted, nonimmunosuppressive to more toxic, immunosuppressive and from single agent to multiple agents, as necessary. If more toxic, immunosuppressive agents are required to alleviate disease burden or symptoms, we generally use them just long enough to control the disease, then transition to a maintenance regimen with less toxic, less immunosuppressive agents.

[Papular mycosis fungoides in elderly: Report of two cases]

Papular mycosis fungoides (MF) is an uncommon clinical variant of early MF without prognostic implications that follows an indolent course over years. It is characterized by the presence of multiple, small, pruritic, flat-topped, erythematous papules, often presenting as a nonspecific papular eruption which makes early diagnosis difficult. We describe two cases of elderly patients with papular MF, a probably underdiagnosed entity, which causes a significant deterioration in quality of life of patients who may benefit from specific treatments such as phototherapy.