The potential significance of alpha-enolase (ENO1) in lung adenocarcinomas - A utility of the immunohistochemical expression in pathologic diagnosis

Transcriptomic data exploration of consensus genes and molecular mechanisms between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung adenocarcinoma

Most current research has focused on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) alone; however, it is important to understand the complex mechanism of COPD progression to LUAD. This study is the first to explore the unique and jointly molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of COPD and LUAD across several datasets based on a variety of analysis methods. We used weighted correlation network analysis to search hub genes in two datasets from public databases: GSE10072 and GSE76925. We explored the unique and jointly molecular mechanistic signatures of the two diseases in pathogenesis through enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, and therapeutic targets analysis. Finally, the results were confirmed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Fifteen hub genes were identified: GPI, EZH2, EFNA4, CFB, ENO1, SH3PXD2B, SELL, CORIN, MAD2L1, CENPF, TOP2A, ASPM, IGFBP2, CDKN2A, and ELF3. For the first time, SELL, CORIN, GPI, and EFNA4 were found to play a role in the etiology of COPD and LUAD. The LUAD genes identified were primarily involved in the cell cycle and DNA replication processes; COPD genes we found were related to ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, ribosome, and T/B-cell receptor signaling pathways. The tumor microenvironment of LUAD pathogenesis was influenced by CD4 + T cells, type 1 regulatory T cells, and T helper 1 cells. T follicular helper cells, natural killer T cells, and B cells all impact the immunological inflammation in COPD. The results of drug targets analysis suggest that cisplatin and tretinoin, as well as bortezomib and metformin may be potential targeted therapy for patients with COPD combined LUAD. These signatures may be provided a new direction for developing early interventions and treatments to improve the prognosis of COPD and LUAD.

Characterizing heterogeneity of non-small cell lung tumour microenvironment to identify signature prognostic genes

Growing evidence has highlighted the immune response as an important feature of carcinogenesis and therapeutic efficacy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study focused on the characterization of immune infiltration profiling in patients with NSCLC and its correlation with survival outcome. All TCGA samples were divided into three heterogeneous clusters based on immune cell profiles: cluster 1 ('low infiltration' cluster), cluster 2 ('heterogeneous infiltration' cluster) and cluster 3 ('high infiltration' cluster). The immune cells were responsible for a significantly favourable prognosis for the 'high infiltration' community. Cluster 1 had the lowest cytotoxic activity, tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes and interferon‐gamma (IFN‐γ), as well as immune checkpoint molecules expressions. In addition, MHC‐I and immune co‐stimulator were also found to have lower cluster 1 expressions, indicating a possible immune escape mechanism. A total of 43 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that overlapped among the groups were determined based on three clusters. Finally, based on a univariate Cox regression model, prognostic immune‐related genes were identified and combined to construct a risk score model able to predict overall survival (OS) rates in the validation datasets.

The circ-AMOTL1/ENO1 Axis Implicated in the Tumorigenesis of OLP-Associated Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) may develop from a variety of oral potentially malignant disorders, but the mechanism of malignant transformation is still unknown. Among them, oral lichen planus (OLP) has a high prevalence. Previous studies have shown that α-enolase (ENO1) can promote cell proliferation and play an important role in tumorigenesis. In this study, we aim to explore the mechanism of ENO1 regulation in the process of OSCC tumorigenesis from OLP.

METHODS

ENO1 expression in tissues was determined by real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry. ENO1 was knocked down in cal-27 to observe the change in cell proliferation. Then, RNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses were conducted between OLP and OSCC samples. The expression of circ-AMOTL1, miRNA-22-3p, and miRNA-1294 was assessed using the real-time quantitative PCR. With knockdown and overexpression of circ-AMOTL1 in vitro, the change of ENO1 in the mRNA level was also assessed.

RESULTS

ENO1 was enhanced in the OSCC samples in comparison with OLP. Immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR results showed that ENO1 was significantly higher in OSCC tissue than in the OLP group, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). When ENO1 was knocked down in cal-27, cell proliferation was inhibited (p<0.05). The expression of miR-22-3p and miR-1294 was decreased in OSCC tissues, whereas ENO1 and circ-AMOTL1 increased. In an in vitro study, knockdown of circ-AMOTL1 resulted in a decrease of ENO1, while overexpression of circ-AMOTL1 led to an increase of ENO1 in the mRNA level.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed that ENO1 expression was elevated in OSCC and increased cell proliferation. In an in vitro study, ENO1 expression was promoted by circ-AMOTL1. ENO1 may play a role as a tumor-promoting gene in OSCC through the circ-AMOTL1/miR-22-3p/miR-1294 network. These novel findings may shed further light on the pathogenesis from OLP to OSCC and the potential precursor markers.

Up-regulated ENO1 promotes the bladder cancer cell growth and proliferation via regulating β-catenin

Bladder cancer (BC) is the ninth most common malignancy throughout the world. The molecular mechanisms of this disease remain largely unclear. The glycolytic enzyme enolase 1 (ENO1) has been shown to regulate the development of various cancers. However, the significance of ENO1 in BC is underdetermined. In this study, we found that ENO1 was highly expressed in BC tissues and cells. High expression of ENO1 was associated with the poor survival of BC patients. Using lentivirus-mediated knockdown and over-expression, we revealed that ENO1 was critical for the growth and proliferation of BC cells. ENO1 over-expression also promoted the proliferation of SV-HUC-1 cells. At the molecular level, the cell cycle and apoptosis related genes were regulated by ENO1. β-catenin expression was positively regulated by ENO1. Furthermore, ectopic expression of β-catenin reversed the effect of ENO1 knockdown on T24 cell proliferation and growth. Opposite results were observed in β-catenin knockdown T24 cells. Our findings suggested that ENO1 functioned as an oncogene in BC through regulating cell cycle, apoptosis and β-catenin. Targeting ENO1/β-catenin cascade may benefit for BC patients.