Effect of glare illusion-induced perceptual brightness on temporal perception

Glossiness perception and its pupillary response

Recent studies have revealed that pupillary response changes depend on perceptual factors such as subjective brightness caused by optical illusions and luminance. However, the manner in which the perceptual factor that is derived from the glossiness perception of object surfaces affects the pupillary response remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between the glossiness perception and pupillary response through a glossiness rating experiment that included recording the pupil diameter. We prepared general object images (original) and randomized images (shuffled) that comprised the same images with randomized small square regions as stimuli. The image features were controlled by matching the luminance histogram. The observers were asked to rate the perceived glossiness of the stimuli presented for 3,000 ms and the changes in their pupil diameters were recorded. Images with higher glossiness ratings constricted the pupil size more than those with lower glossiness ratings at the peak constriction of the pupillary responses during the stimulus duration. The linear mixed-effects model demonstrated that the glossiness rating, image category (original/shuffled), variance of the luminance histogram, and stimulus area were most effective in predicting the pupillary responses. These results suggest that the illusory brightness obtained by the image regions of high-glossiness objects, such as specular highlights, induce pupil constriction.

Effects of a gap between the central and surrounding regions with luminance gradients on the feeling of being dazzled

The feeling of being dazzled is evoked by images consisting of an achromatic uniform center, surrounded by regions with luminance gradients. As the perceptual distinctness of the central region has been suggested to contribute to the feeling of being dazzled, we examined the effects of a gap between the central and surrounding regions on the feeling of being dazzled. The stimulus comprised a disk with uniform luminance surrounded by an annulus, of which the luminance was decreased from the inner boundary to the periphery. Three luminance profiles (linear, logistic, and inverse-logistic) of the surrounding luminance ramps were used. The distinctness of the disk decreased in the order of logistic, linear, and inverse-logistic profiles. The luminance of the disk, the maximum luminance of the annulus, and the gap size were also varied. When the luminance continuously transitioned from the disk to the annulus, the feeling of being dazzled was stronger for the inverse-logistic annulus luminance profile, compared with the logistic and linear profiles without a gap; however, it was not different for the three profiles with a gap. Further, the feeling of being dazzled increased when a gap was introduced for the logistic and linear profiles, but not for the inverse-logistic profile. These results suggest that the feeling of being dazzled was reduced by the perceptual indistinctness of the central disk for the logistic and linear annulus luminance profiles, while the gap restored the feeling of being dazzled by making the central disk perceptually distinct.

Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion

Visual-field (VF) anisotropy has been investigated in terms of spatial resolution of attention, spatial frequency, and semantic processing. Brightness perception has also been reported to vary between VFs. However, the influence of VF anisotropy on brightness perception using pupillometry has not been investigated. The present study measured participants' pupil size during glare illusion, in which converging luminance gradients evoke brightness enhancement and a glowing impression on the central white area of the stimulus, and halo stimuli, in which the same physical brightness of the glare illusion is used with a diverging luminance pattern. The results revealed greater stimulus-evoked pupillary dilation and glare-related dilated pupil reduction in the upper VF (UVF) compared with other VFs and halo-related pupillary changes, respectively. The stimulus-evoked pupillary dilation was affected by poor contrast sensitivity. However, owing to the superior cognitive bias formed by statistical regularity in natural scene processing of the glare illusion in the UVF, we found reduced pupillary dilation compared with the response to halo stimuli and the response from other VFs. These findings offer valuable insight into a method to reduce the potential glare effect of any VF anisotropy induced by the glare effect experienced in daily vision. An important practical implication of our study may be in informing the design of applications aimed at improving nighttime driving behavior. We also believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it offers valuable insights on VF anisotropy using evidence from pupillometry and the glare illusion.