Seasonality and photoperiod influence in vitro production of buffalo embryos

Factors Affecting the Efficiency of In Vitro Embryo Production in Prepubertal Mediterranean Water Buffalo

Embryos from prepubertal water buffalo can be produced using laparoscopic ovum pickup (LOPU) and in vitro embryo production (IVEP). However, to date, it is unclear what factors and environmental conditions can affect LOPU-IVEP efficiency in prepubertal animals, especially buffalo. In this study, we explored the impact of season, age and individual variation among female donor animals, as well as the effect of the sire used for in vitro fertilization. Donor animals between 2 and 6 months of age were stimulated using gonadotropins prior to LOPU, which was performed at two-week intervals. Following in vitro maturation and fertilization, the resulting embryos were then cultured to the blastocyst stage until they were either vitrified or transferred into recipient animals. The number of follicles available for aspiration and embryo development rates was stable throughout the year. As animals became older, there was a slight trend for fewer COCs recovered from LOPU and better embryo development. There was a large individual variation in both ovarian response and the developmental competence of oocytes among donors. The bull used for fertilization also had a significant impact on embryo development. Upon embryo transfer, pregnancy rates were not affected by the number of embryos transferred per recipient. The best pregnancy rates were achieved when transferring blastocysts, compared to compact morula or hatched blastocysts. Finally, vitrification had no effect on pregnancy rate compared to fresh embryos.

In Vitro Production of Embryos from Prepubertal Holstein Cattle and Mediterranean Water Buffalo: Problems, Progress and Potential

Laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) coupled with in vitro embryo production (IVEP) in prepubertal cattle and buffalo accelerates genetic gain. This article reviews LOPU-IVEP technology in prepubertal Holstein Cattle and Mediterranean Water Buffalo. The recent expansion of genomic-assisted selection has renewed interest and demand for prepubertal LOPU-IVEP schemes; however, low blastocyst development rates has constrained its widespread implementation. Here, we present an overview of the current state of the technology, limitations that persist and suggest possible solutions to improve its efficiency, with a focus on gonadotropin stimulations strategies to prime oocytes prior to follicular aspiration, and IVEP procedures promoting growth factor metabolism and limiting oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Reproductive seasonality influences oocyte retrieval and embryonic competence but not uterine receptivity in buffaloes

Since buffaloes are a seasonal, polyestrous species, optimizing reproduction during the non-breeding season is a key factor in increasing the reproductive and productive efficiency of herds. Ovum pick-up associated with in vitro embryo production and embryo cryopreservation is an alternative to reduce seasonal impacts. We studied the effects of seasonality in buffalo oocyte donors and embryo recipients during the favorable and non-favorable breeding seasons. Donors were evaluated for oocyte recovery and blastocyst production rate as dFBS (donors in favorable breeding season) or dNBS (donors in non-favorable breeding season). Embryos produced from dFBS or dNBS were cryopreserved by vitrification or the slow-freeze method for direct transfer and transferred to recipients in the favorable (rFBS) or non-favorable breeding season (rNBS). The heifers or cows were subjected to a fixed-time embryo transfer protocol and conception rates were determined on day 30 and on day 60. The oocyte recovery was lower in dFBS than in dNBS (7.6 vs. 10.0 oocyte/OPU, p = 0.0262); while no difference was found comparing blastocyst production rate (23.7% vs. 30.9% of blastocysts, respectively). Embryos from dFBS resulted in greater (p = 0.0013) conception rates on day 30 compared to dNBS (46.5% vs. 22.4%, respectively), despite the breeding season. The rFBS and rNBS treatments had similar (p = 0.6714) conception rates on day 30 (38.0% vs. 33.0%, respectively), indicating similar uterine receptivity. However, heifers on FBS had higher (p = 0.0003) conception rates on day 30 than cows (73.9% vs. 13.3%, respectively) when receiving embryos from dFBS. Vitrification and direct transfer had similar (p = 0.1698) conception rates on day 30 (30.4% vs. 41.4%, respectively). In conclusion, in vitro-produced embryos derived from dFBS were more competent in establishing pregnancy than dNBS counterparts, independent of recipients' reproductive seasonality. Heifers achieved better conception rates than cows during the favorable breeding season when the embryo came from dFBS. Cryopreserved in vitro produced embryos represent a reliable alternative to reduce seasonal variations in buffalo reproduction. The data elucidate the seasonal effects on embryo competence and on recipients' uterine receptivity, affording new strategies to implement ovum pick-up associated with in vitro embryo production programs in buffalo herds.