Implications of ram sperm rheotaxis analysed by microfluidics for fertility

New approaches in bovine spermatozoa evaluation and their relationship with male fertility

Male fertility potential depends on physical, endocrine, and genetic factors responsible for producing functional male gametes. Although the main function of the male gamete, the spermatozoon, is to deliver its genetic material to the oocyte, this premise has been modified over the past few years. It is believed that the spermatozoon provides essential factors for fertilization and pre-implantation embryo development. A viable/healthy spermatozoon has functional subcellular compartments (nucleus, acrosome, midpiece, and flagellum) due to the actions of proteins, transcripts, and epigenetic marks in the organelles present in them that have important roles in reproductive biology. Male fertility potential reflects viable spermatozoa with proper function. Therefore, new approaches to functional sperm analysis are essential. Additionally, intrinsic factors and sperm molecules constitute potential biomarkers of viable spermatozoa and male fertility. Among these factors are proteins, the genome, and coding and non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs, that act during fertilization and early embryo development. Research has been seeking increasingly efficient tools to predict fertility and functional studies of these molecules through gene and protein expression. Thus, analytical tools are essential to identify and classify viable and functional spermatozoa, to evaluate assisted reproductive male potential.

Microfluidic chip as a promising evaluation method in assisted reproduction: A systematic review

The aim of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is to select the high-quality sperm, oocytes, and embryos, and finally achieve a successful pregnancy. However, functional evaluation is hindered by intra- and inter-operator variability. Microfluidic chips emerge as the one of the most powerful tools to analyze biological samples for reduced size, precise control, and flexible extension. Herein, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore databases until March 2023. We displayed and prospected all detection strategies based on microfluidics in the ART field. After full-text screening, 71 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. The percentages of human and mouse studies equaled with 31.5%. The prominent country in terms of publication number was the USA (n = 13). Polydimethylsiloxane (n = 49) and soft lithography (n = 28) were the most commonly used material and fabrication method, respectively. All articles were classified into three types: sperm (n = 38), oocytes (n = 20), and embryos (n = 13). The assessment contents included motility, counting, mechanics, permeability, impedance, secretion, oxygen consumption, and metabolism. Collectively, the microfluidic chip technology facilitates more efficient, accurate, and objective evaluation in ART. It can even be combined with artificial intelligence to assist the daily activities of embryologists. More well-designed clinical studies and affordable integrated microfluidic chips are needed to validate the safety, efficacy, and reproducibility. Trial registration: The protocol was registered in the Open Science Frame REGISTRIES (identification: osf.io/6rv4a).

Lab-on-chip (LoC) application for quality sperm selection: An undelivered promise?

Quality sperm selection is essential to ensure the effectiveness of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). However, the methods employed for sperm selection in ART often yield suboptimal outcomes, contributing to lower success rates. In recent years, microfluidic devices have emerged as a promising avenue for investigating the natural swimming behavior of spermatozoa and developing innovative approaches for quality sperm selection. Despite their potential, the commercial translation of microfluidic-based technologies has remained limited. This comprehensive review aims to critically evaluate the inherent potential of lab-on-chip technology in unraveling sophisticated mechanisms encompassing rheotaxis, thermotaxis, and chemotaxis. By reviewing the current state-of-the-art associated with microfluidic engineering and the swimming of spermatozoa, the goal is to shed light on the multifaceted factors that have impeded the broader commercialization of these cutting-edge technologies and recommend a commercial that can surmount the prevailing constraints. Furthermore, this scholarly exploration seeks to enlighten and actively engage reproductive clinicians in the profound potential and implications of microfluidic methodologies within the context of human infertility.

Rheotaxis of sperm in fertile and infertile men

Sperm rheotaxis refers to the ability of sperm cells to align their swimming direction with or against fluid flow. Positive rheotaxis (PR) is the tendency of sperm cells to swim against the flow. Herein, we describe sperm rheotaxis in fertile and infertile males, using a microfluidic platform and focus on rheotaxis as a potential marker of male fertility. A previously reported computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) plugin for Image-J was used to detect and analyze the motion of human sperm cells in microfluidic environments. The fabricated microchannels mimic the female reproductive tracts and use an image-processing program to monitor sperm swimming behavior in semen samples from fertile and infertile men. We have constructed an image-processing pipeline. The image-processing pipeline incorporated strengthens object detection and particle tracking to adapt to sperm that are out of focus while swimming on the same track. PR% was defined as the number of PR sperm cells over the number of motile sperm cells. The results showed that the percentage of PR correlates with fertility, wherein the fertile male specimens showed a higher PR% than the other groups (P < 0.05). There is no difference in progressive motility between the control group (fertile men with normal sperm analysis) and group 1 (G1; infertile men with normal sperm analysis). However, PR% was lower (P < 0.05) in the G1 group (13.5 ± 0.4%) compared to the control group (40.3 ± 3.3%) and group 2 (G2; infertile with reduced sperm motility) (15.3 ± 4.6%). Thus, PR% may be used as a novel parameter to explain infertility even in situations where basic sperm analysis following the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines is unable to do so. We propose to use PR% as a novel parameter for sperm analysis and as a method of sperm selection in assisted reproductive technology.

Assessment of sperm motility in livestock: Perspectives based on sperm swimming conditions in vivo

Evaluation of sperm motility is well-established in farm animals for quickly selecting ejaculates for semen processing into insemination doses and for evaluating the quality of preserved semen. Likewise, sperm motility is a fundamental parameter used by spermatologists in basic and applied science. Motility is commonly assessed using computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA). Recent increases in computational power, as well as utilization of mobile CASA systems and open-source CASA programs, broaden the possibilities for motility evaluation. Despite this technological progress, the potential of computer-generated motility data to assess male fertility remains challenging and may be limited. Relevance for fertility assessment could be improved if measurement conditions would more closely mimic the in vivo situation. Hence, this review is focused on the current trends of automated semen assessment in livestock and explores perspectives for future use with respect to the physiological and physical conditions encountered by sperm in the female reproductive tract. Validation of current CASA systems with more complex, microfluidic-based devices mimicking the female reproductive tract environment could improve the value of sperm kinematic data for assessing the fertilizing capacity of semen samples, not only for application in livestock but also for use in conducting assisted reproduction techniques in other species.

High concentration of growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9) to the ram semen had a negative effect on the sperm positive rheotaxis

Herein, the microfluidic device technique was used to investigate the effects of GDF-9 concentrations and exposure time on the ram sperm positive rheotaxis (PR). Semen was collected from six rams and utilized for PR, motility and sperm kinetic parameter analysis using a computer-assisted sperm analysis program with controlled flow velocity following 0, 10, 20 or 30 min of incubation at 37°C with GDF-9 (200 , 400 or 600 ng/ml; semen sample without GDF-9 was used as a control). Results revealed that there was not an interaction between effects of GDF-9 concentrations and incubation duration on PR% (p = .457) and TM% (p = .099). A simple main effects analysis showed that GDF-9 concentrations had an effect on PR% (p = .003). However, the incubation duration did not have an effect on PR% (p = .101). GDF-9 concentrations had not an effect on TM% (p = .817). By contrast, the incubation duration affected on TM% (p = .026). A higher PR% was found (p < .05) at 200 ng GDF-9 after 10 min (46.7 ± 10.3) and 20 min (45.5 ± 11.5) of incubation. After 30 min of incubation, the PR% was found lowest (p < .05) at 400 ng of GDF-9 (30.6 ± 14.1) and 600 ng of GDF-9 (32.2 ± 9.6). There was no difference (p > .05) in the sperm kinetic parameters between the four treatment groups. In conclusion, the ram sperms had the best rheotaxis properties after 10 and 20 min of incubation with 200 ng of GDF-9 and were sensitive to high concretions.

Rheotaxis quality index: a new parameter that reveals male mammalian in vivo fertility and low sperm DNA fragmentation

The female reproductive tract simultaneously guides and selects high-quality sperm using rheotaxis in mammalian species. Sperm quality, however, is traditionally evaluated only by their movement velocities and concentration using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), which ignores sperm rheotaxis. Here, by mimicking the female reproductive tracts' dimensions and hydrodynamic features, a new method is introduced to quantify sperm rheotaxis ability for evaluating semen quality. The combination of our RHEOtaxis quaLity indEX (RHEOLEX) and motile sperm concentration is able to predict sperm fertility levels in artificial insemination at various shear rates within 5 minutes. This means that RHEOLEX could be a biomarker for determining male in vivo fertility, unlike conventional semen quality parameters which fail to provide statistically significant predictions. In addition, a high RHEOLEX is associated with a low DNA fragmentation index (DFI), showing that this new parameter is able to identify low-DFI samples. Not only does this work highlight the importance of rheotaxis in determining male in vivo fertility, but it also provides a solid benchmark for developing fast microfluidic devices for male fertility prediction as well as DFI. Last, the data imply that the female reproductive tract might use rheotaxis to keep sperm with fragmented DNA from reaching the fertilization site.