Bumble bee colony growth and reproduction on reclaimed surface coal mines

Acute toxicity and bioaccumulation of common urban metals in Bombus impatiens life stages

Metal contamination is ubiquitous in urban areas and represents a risk to arthropod species. Bees are exposed to metals while foraging within contaminated landscapes from multiple sources. Eliminating the risk of bee exposure to metals is complex, and requires an understanding of how bees become contaminated, how metals accumulate within bee bodies, and how this exposure influences their health. We selected Bombus impatiens, the common eastern bumble bee, as our focal species because it is the most frequently encountered bumble bee species in the eastern United States and common within urban greenspaces. The aims of this study were to quantify the lethal concentration exposure limit (LC50) for B. impatiens foragers, assess the bioaccumulation ability of environmentally relevant concentrations of common urban metals in adults, larvae, and pupae, and compare the LC50 values against field relevant concentrations collected by foraging bumble bees within a legacy city. Bumble bees were orally exposed to arsenic oxide, cadmium chloride, or chromium oxide in sucrose solution to encourage consumption. The LC50 for arsenic (As2O3 36.4 mg/L), cadmium (CdCl2 10.3 mg/L), and chromium (CrO3 189.6 mg/L) are 202×, 79×, and 1459× greater than concentrations found within urban bumble bee collected provisions, respectively. Adult bumble bees fed field realistic concentrations of metals accumulate significant amounts of cadmium and lead within their bodies, but do not accumulate chromium and arsenic. Additionally, adults accumulate significantly higher concentrations of metals than brood. While bumble bee foragers are unlikely to encounter lethal metal concentrations while foraging in contaminated landscapes, it is crucial to consider and understand how sublethal concentrations impact overall colony functioning. The results from this study highlight the need to identify hazards and bioaccumulation ability of common metals as bees respond differently to each metal species, as well as the impacts of metal mixtures on bioaccumulation and toxicity.

Climate warming and bumble bee declines: the need to consider sub-lethal heat, carry-over effects, and colony compensation

Global declines in abundance and diversity of insects are now well-documented and increasingly concerning given the critical and diverse roles insects play in all ecosystems. Habitat loss, invasive species, and anthropogenic chemicals are all clearly detrimental to insect populations, but mounting evidence implicates climate change as a key driver of insect declines globally. Warming temperatures combined with increased variability may expose organisms to extreme heat that exceeds tolerance, potentially driving local extirpations. In this context, heat tolerance limits (e.g., critical thermal maximum, CTmax) have been measured for many invertebrates and are often closely linked to climate regions where animals are found. However, temperatures well below CTmax may also have pronounced effects on insects, but have been relatively less studied. Additionally, many insects with out-sized ecological and economic footprints are colonial (e.g., ants, social bees, termites) such that effects of heat on individuals may propagate through or be compensated by the colony. For colonial organisms, measuring direct effects on individuals may therefore reveal little about population-level impacts of changing climates. Here, we use bumble bees (genus Bombus) as a case study to highlight how a limited understanding of heat effects below CTmax and of colonial impacts and responses both likely hinder our ability to explain past and predict future climate change impacts. Insights from bumble bees suggest that, for diverse invertebrates, predicting climate change impacts will require a more nuanced understanding of the effects of heat exposure and additional studies of carry-over effects and compensatory responses by colonies.

The importance of competition between insect pollinators in the Anthropocene

Resource competition likely plays an important role in some insect pollinator declines and in shaping effects of environmental change on pollination services. Past research supports that competition for floral resources affects bee foragers, but mostly with observational evidence and rarely linking foraging with population change. An increasing number of studies ask whether resources limit pollinator populations, using field measurements of reproductive success, time series and models. Findings generally support positive effects of floral resources, but also highlight the potential importance of nest site availability and parasitism. In parallel, recent experiments strengthen evidence that competition reduces access to floral resources. Developing common currencies for quantifying floral resources and integrating analyses of multiple limiting factors will further strengthen our understanding of competitive interactions and their effects in the Anthropocene.