Bronchodilator responsiveness as a predictor of success for bronchial thermoplasty

PULMONARY DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC AND REHABILITATION TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH OVERLAP ASTHMA AND CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASES

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To analyze the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment in the conditions of halo aerosol therapy and when using different groups of fixed-dose aerosol inhalers in patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases overlap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: A total 112 patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases overlap. All patients carefully collected allergic history, anamnesis of life, and disease. The study includes assessment of resting anthropometric data, physical activity habits, blood pressure, structure and quality of nutrition, family and economic data.

RESULTS

Result: After a course of rehabilitation treatment, lung ventilation improved in all groups of patients compared to controls. The dynamics of FER indicators after the rehabilitation treatment had some differences for each group of patients in relation to the control groups. If in all A groups (control) the increase in FER indicators was insignificant, then in all B groups of patients it was significant, and differed from 14,6% up to 36%.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Thus, a differentiated approach to the use of fixed-dose aerosol inhalers increases the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment under conditions of halo aerosol therapy in patients with various genesis of bronchi-obstructive syndrome.

Which Endoscopic Procedure to Use and in What Patient? Valves, Coils, Foam, and Heat in COPD and Asthma

Despite the latest developments in therapeutic agents targeting airway endotypes, a significant proportion of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain symptomatic. Endoscopic therapies have a complementary role in the management of these airway diseases. The sustained efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) among patients with asthma over 10 years has been encouraging, as it has been shown to improve symptom control and reduce hospital admissions and exacerbations. Studies suggest that BT helps ameliorate airway inflammation and reduce airway smooth muscle thickness. While studies suggest that it is as effective as biologic agents, its role in the management of severe asthma has yet to be clearly defined and GINA 2022 still suggests limiting its use to patients with characteristics of the various populations studied. Conversely, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction has shown promise among patients with advanced COPD. Rigorous patient selection is important. Patients with minimal collateral ventilation (CV) and higher heterogeneity index have shown to benefit the most from endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy. For those with ongoing CV, endobronchial coils would be more appropriate. Both therapeutic modalities have demonstrated improved quality of life, effort tolerance, and lung function indices among appropriately selected patients. The emerging evidence suggests that endoscopic procedures among airway disease still have a substantial role to play despite the development of new therapeutic options.

Bronchial smooth muscle cell in asthma: where does it fit?

Asthma is a frequent respiratory condition whose pathophysiology relies on altered interactions between bronchial epithelium, smooth muscle cells (SMC) and immune responses. Those leads to classical hallmarks of asthma: airway hyper-responsiveness, bronchial remodelling and chronic inflammation. Airway smooth muscle biology and pathophysiological implication in asthma are now better understood. Precise deciphering of intracellular signalling pathways regulating smooth muscle contraction highlighted the critical roles played by small GTPases of Rho superfamily. Beyond contractile considerations, active involvement of airway smooth muscle in bronchial remodelling mechanisms is now established. Not only cytokines and growth factors, such as fibroblats growth factor or transforming growth factor-β, but also extracellular matrix composition have been demonstrated as potent phenotype modifiers for airway SMC. Although basic science knowledge has grown significantly, little of it has translated into improvement in asthma clinical practice. Evaluation of airway smooth muscle function is still limited to its contractile activity. Moreover, it relies on tools, such as spirometry, that give only an overall assessment and not a specific one. Interesting technics such as forced oscillometry or specific imagery (CT and MRI) give new perspectives to evaluate other aspects of airway muscle such as bronchial remodelling. Finally, except for the refinement of conventional bronchodilators, no new drug therapy directly targeting airway smooth muscle proved its efficacy. Bronchial thermoplasty is an innovative and efficient therapeutic strategy but is only restricted to a small proportion of severe asthmatic patients. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies specifically oriented toward airway smooth muscle are needed to improve global asthma care.

Plethysmography Derived Gas Trapping Lacks Utility in Predicting Response to Bronchial Thermoplasty

There is a paucity of literature on measurable baseline parameters predicting response and guiding selection for bronchial thermoplasty. This study examines whether baseline gas trapping, as assessed by plethysmography, is associated with a response to bronchial thermoplasty at 12 months.

43 consecutive patients with severe asthma (mean±sd age 57.6±13.3 years) were evaluated at baseline and 12 months post bronchial thermoplasty. Data collected at both time points included spirometry, body plethysmography and four clinical outcome measures, namely Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, annual exacerbation frequency, maintenance oral corticosteroid requirement and short-acting β-agonist use.

At baseline, participants had severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 49.1±15.8%) with marked gas trapping (residual volume (RV) 150.3±40.8%, RV/total lung capacity (TLC) 51.3±10.5%), poor symptom control (ACQ 3.3±1.0) and frequent exacerbations (median 4, interquartile range 8). 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty, significant improvements were observed in all four clinical outcome measures. However, baseline RV and RV/TLC were not significantly associated with changes in ACQ nor any other clinical outcome measure, and changes in RV and RV/TLC did not significantly correlate with a change in any clinical outcome measure.

Plethysmography-derived gas trapping does not demonstrate utility in predicting response and guiding selection for bronchial thermoplasty. An improvement in gas trapping was not associated with positive clinical outcomes, suggesting that this may not be the dominant mode of action of bronchial thermoplasty in generating clinical improvement.

This study examined whether measuring gas trapping by plethysmography could be used to predict response to bronchial thermoplasty; no association was foundhttps://bit.ly/3tJN1X8

Asthma with Fixed Airflow Obstruction: From Fixed to Personalized Approach

Asthma is generally characterized by variable symptoms such as dyspnea and wheezing and variable airflow obstruction. This review focuses on a subset of patients suffering from asthma with persistent airflow limitation that is not fully reversible (asthma with fixed airflow obstruction, FAO). The pathophysiology, the risk factors and the clinical outcomes associated with FAO are presented, as well as the distinct clinical entity of severe asthma and its inflammatory subtypes (T2 and non-T2). The current strategies for the treatment of these endotypes and treatment of the distinct Asthma/COPD overlap (ACO) phenotype are described. Management and medical interventions in FAO and/or ACO patients demand a holistic approach, which is not yet clearly established in guidelines worldwide. Finally, a treatment algorithm that includes FAO/ACO management based on pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, guideline-based management for specific co-morbidities, and modification of the risk factors is proposed.

Bronchial Thermoplasty in Severe Asthmatics At 5 Years: The PAS2 Study

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty is a device-based treatment for subjects ≥18 years with severe asthma poorly controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. The Post-FDA Approval Clinical Trial Evaluating Bronchial Thermoplasty in Severe Persistent Asthma (PAS2) study collected data on severe asthmatics undergoing this procedure.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the 5-year efficacy and safety results in severe asthmatics who have undergone bronchial thermoplasty?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, observational, multi-center study conducted in the United States and Canada. Subjects aged 18-65, taking inhaled corticosteroids ≥1000μg/day (beclomethasone or equivalent) and long-acting β-agonists ≥80μg/day (salmeterol or equivalent) were included. Severe exacerbations, hospitalization, emergency department visits, and medication usage were evaluated for the 12 months prior to and at years 1-5 post-treatment. Spirometry was evaluated at baseline and at years 1-5 post-treatment.

RESULTS

284 subjects were enrolled at 27 centers; 227 subjects (80%) completed 5 years of follow-up. By year 5 post-treatment, the proportion of subjects with severe exacerbations, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations was 42.7%, 7.9%, and 4.8%, respectively, compared to 77.8%, 29.4%, and 16.1% in the 12 months prior to treatment. The proportion of subjects on maintenance oral corticosteroids decreased from 19.4% at baseline to 9.7% at 5 years. Analyses of subgroups based on baseline clinical and biomarker characteristics revealed a statistically significant clinical improvement among all subgroups.

INTERPRETATION

Five years after treatment, subjects experienced decreases in severe exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency department visits and corticosteroid exposure. All subgroups demonstrated clinically significant improvement, suggesting that bronchial thermoplasty improves asthma control in different asthma phenotypes.

Bronchoscopic treatments for early-stage peripheral lung cancer: Are we ready for prime time?

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and surgical lobectomy remains the preferred therapy for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Medical comorbidities and advanced age preclude resection in many patients and minimally invasive ablative therapies are needed for treatment. Stereotactic ablative radiation is established as an effective modality in this patient group, although may be contraindicated in some patients with prior radiation exposure, comorbidities or centrally positioned tumours. Percutaneous ablative methods are available, although are frequently associated with significant complications. Numerous endoscopic ablative techniques are under evaluation. With a more favourable safety profile and the ability to provide diagnosis and staging information potentially within a single procedure, there is a strong rationale for development of bronchoscopic ablative modalities. In the following article, the authors aim to explore the role bronchoscopic ablation may play in treatment of peripheral lung tumours, and to describe a pathway to establishing these modalities as part of routine care. The current status of several bronchoscopic ablative options is discussed in detail.

Recent Developments In Bronchial Thermoplasty For Severe Asthma

PURPOSE

Bronchial thermoplasty is approved in many countries worldwide as a non-pharmacological treatment for severe asthma. This review summarizes recent publications on the selection of patients with severe asthma for bronchial thermoplasty, predictors of a beneficial response and developments in the procedure and discusses specific issues about bronchial thermoplasty including effectiveness in clinical practice, mechanism of action, cost-effectiveness, and place in management.

RESULTS

Bronchial thermoplasty is a treatment option for patients with severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma, such as nonadherence, poor inhaler technique, comorbidities, under treatment, and other behavioral factors. Patients treated with bronchial thermoplasty in clinical practice have worse baseline characteristics and comparable clinical outcomes to clinical trial data. Bronchial thermoplasty causes a reduction in airway smooth muscle mass although it is uncertain whether this effect explains its efficacy since other mechanisms of action may be relevant, such as alterations in airway epithelial, gland, and/or nerve function; improvements in small airway function; or a placebo effect. The cost-effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty is greater in countries where the costs of hospitalization and emergency department are high. The place of bronchial thermoplasty in the management of severe asthma is not certain, although some experts propose that bronchial thermoplasty should be considered for patients with severe asthma associated with non-type 2 inflammation or who fail to respond favorably to biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial thermoplasty is a modestly effective treatment for severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma. Asthma morbidity increases during and shortly after treatment. Follow-up studies provide reassurance on the long-term safety of the procedure. Uncertainties remain about predictors of response, mechanism(s) of action, and place in management of severe asthma.

Predicting the Response to Bronchial Thermoplasty

BACKGROUND

Although it is established that not all patients respond to bronchial thermoplasty (BT), the factors that predict response/nonresponse are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To identify baseline factors that predict clinical response.

METHODS

The records of 77 consecutive patients entered into the Australian Bronchial Thermoplasty Registry were examined for baseline clinical characteristics, and outcomes measured at 6 and 12 months after BT, such as change in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, exacerbation frequency, the requirement for short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) medication and oral corticosteroids, and improvement in spirometry.

RESULTS

This was a cohort of patients with severe asthma: aged 57.7 ± 11.4 years, 57.1% females, 53.2% of patients taking maintenance oral steroids, 43% having been treated with an mAb, mean FEV₁ of 55.8% ± 19.8% predicted.

RESULTS

BT resulted in an improvement in the ACQ score from 3.2 ± 1.0 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.1 at 6 months (P < .001). Exacerbation frequency in the previous 6 months reduced from 3.7 ± 3.3 to 0.7 ± 1.2 (P < .001). SABA requirement reduced from 9.3 ± 7.1 puffs/d to 3.5 ± 6.0 (P < .001), and 48.8% of patients were weaned completely off oral steroids. A significant improvement in FEV₁ was observed. Using multiple linear regression models, baseline ACQ score strongly predicted improvement in ACQ score (P < .001). Patients with an exacerbation frequency greater than twice in the previous 6 months showed the greatest reduction in exacerbations (-5.3 ± 2.8; P < .001). Patients using more than 10 puffs/d of SABA experienced the greatest reduction in SABA requirement (-12.4 ± 10.5 puffs, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The most severely afflicted patients had the greatest improvements in ACQ score, exacerbation frequency, and medication requirement.

Severe asthma phenotypes and endotypes

Current management of severe asthma relying either on guidelines (bulk approach) or on disease phenotypes (stratified approach) did not improve the burden of the disease. Several severe phenotypes are described: clinical, functional, morphological, inflammatory, molecular and microbiome-related. However, phenotypes do not necessarily relate to or give insights into the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms which are described by the disease endotypes. Based on the major immune-inflammatory pathway involved type-2 high, type-2 low and mixed endotypes are described for severe asthma, with several shared pathogenetic pathways such as genetic and epigenetic, metabolic, neurogenic and remodelling subtypes. The concept of multidimensional endotyping as un unbiased approach to severe asthma is discussed, together with new tools and targets facilitating the shift from the stratified to the precision medicine approach.

Bronchial Thermoplasty in Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: First Korean Cases

Bronchial thermoplasty is a nonpharmacological treatment for severe asthma that delivers thermal energy to the bronchial walls and reduces hypertrophied smooth muscle mass. Previous studies have shown its efficacy and safety, resulting in approval from the Food and Drug Administration in 2010. In Korea, the first bronchial thermoplasty was carried out in 2014; 4 patients have undergone the procedure so far. This case series presents the medical history and treatment outcomes of these 4 patients. All patients presented with uncontrolled asthma despite optimal medical treatment. Bronchial thermoplasty was performed at the right lower lobe, left lower lobe, and both upper lobes in order at 3-week intervals. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Two patients had significant decreases in exacerbations and required a lower dose of inhaled corticosteroids after the procedure. One patient had slightly fewer exacerbations but failed to reduce the use of systemic corticosteroids. One patient had no change in symptoms. One limitation of bronchial thermoplasty is the difficulty of predicting clinical responders. However, since more therapeutic options are needed in the management of severe asthma, especially T2-low asthma, discussion with experts about the feasibility and necessity of bronchial thermoplasty will ensure the best possible care.

Patient-specific targeted bronchial thermoplasty: predictions of improved outcomes with structure-guided treatment

Bronchial thermoplasty is a recent treatment for asthma in which ablative thermal energy is delivered to specific large airways according to clinical guidelines. Therefore, current practice is effectively "blind," as it is not informed by patient-specific data. The present study seeks to establish whether a patient-specific approach based on structural or functional patient data can improve outcomes and/or reduce the number of procedures required for clinical efficacy. We employed a combination of extensive human lung specimens and novel computational methods to predict bronchial thermoplasty outcomes guided by structural or functional data compared with current clinical practice. Response to bronchial thermoplasty was determined from changes in airway responses to strong bronchoconstrictor simulations and flow heterogeneity after one or three simulated thermoplasty procedures. Structure-guided treatment showed significant improvement over current unguided clinical practice, with a single session of structure-guided treatment producing improvements comparable with three sessions of unguided treatment. In comparison, function-guided treatment did not produce a significant improvement over current practice. Structure-guided targeting of bronchial thermoplasty is a promising avenue for improving therapy and reinforces the need for advanced imaging technologies. The functional imaging-guided approach is predicted to be less effective presently, and we make recommendations on how this approach could be improved. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Bronchial thermoplasty is a recent treatment for asthma in which thermal energy is delivered via bronchoscope to specific airways in an effort to directly target airway smooth muscle. Current practice involves the treatment of a standard set of airways, unguided by patient-specific data. We consider the potential for guided treatments, either by functional or structural data from the lung, and show that treatment guided by structural data has the potential to improve clinical practice.