In search of a good fit: CPAP therapy mask selection for obstructive sleep apnoea

Therapieadhärenz drei Monate nach Einleitung einer nichtinvasiven CPAP-Therapie bei 1078 Patienten mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe (OSA)

Einleitung Die nächtliche kontinuierliche positive Überdruckatmung (CPAP) gilt als therapeutischer Goldstandard einer obstruktiven Schlafapnoe (OSA). Die CPAP-Therapie stellt zumeist eine Dauertherapie mit geringen Nebenwirkungen dar. Trotzdem ist die Therapietreue unbefriedigend. In dieser Arbeit wurden die Therapietreue betrachtet und typische Probleme katalogisiert.

Methode 1078 OSA-Patienten wurden nach diagnostischer Polygrafie (PG) oder Polysomnografie (PSG) auf eine CPAP-Therapie eingestellt. Die Therapietreue wurde nach 3 Monaten nachverfolgt. Folgende Therapieadhärenz-Gruppen wurden festgelegt: 1. gute CPAP-Einstellung und Nutzung, 2. CPAP-Abbruch nach anfänglicher Nutzung, 3. mangelnde CPAP-Nutzung wegen Nebenwirkungen, 4. Abbruch aufgrund fehlender Motivation/geringem Leidensdruck, 5. Masken-Unverträglichkeit, 6. CPAP-Versagen aufgrund fehlenden Therapieeffekts, 7. Umstellung auf anderes Beatmungsverfahren, 8. keine Kontrolle erfolgt.

Ergebnisse Von 1078 CPAP-Patienten erschienen 830 Patienten (77 %) zur Therapiekontrolle. Hiervon waren 450 Patienten (54,2%) in Gruppe 1, 216 Patienten (26%) in Gruppe 2, 71 Patienten (8,5%) in Gruppe 3, 35 Patienten (4,2%) in Gruppe 4, 14 Patienten (1,7%) in Gruppe 5, 3 Patienten (0,4 %) in Gruppe 6 und 41 Patienten (4,9%) in Gruppe 7. Ein geringer obstruktiver Ereignisindex, niedriger CPAP-Druck und tendenziell auch ein geringer Epworth-Sleepiness-Score waren Prädiktoren für CPAP-Versagen. Für die Therapietreue konnten keine signifikanten Prädiktoren dargestellt werden.

Diskussion Eine effektive Therapienutzung von 54% nach 3 Monaten ist ein suboptimales Ergebnis. Prädiktoren für CPAP-Versagen waren Parameter, die vor Therapie auf geringen Leidensdruck der Patienten deuteten. Trotz großer Patientenkohorte konnten keine signifikanten CPAP-Adhärenz-Prädiktoren durch anthropometrische oder PSG-Daten dargestellt werden. Vielmehr könnten Erfahrungen in den ersten Therapietagen ausschlaggebend sein. CPAP-Geräte bieten Komforteinstellungen, die kenntnisgerecht auf den Patienten individualisiert werden müssen. Eine große Auswahl an unterschiedlichen Maskenformen erfordert Erfahrung und Training bei der patientenorientierten Maskenanpassung. Eine 3-monatige Wiedervorstellung erscheint zu lang, um Therapieprobleme zeitnah mit dem Patienten zu besprechen. Telemedizinische Möglichkeiten oder kurzfristige telefonische Beratungsoptionen sollten in Betracht gezogen werden.

[Adherence to CPAP Three Months after Starting Therapy in 1078 Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)]

INTRODUCTION

 Nocturnal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The CPAP therapy is a long-term treatment but does come with few possible side effects. The adherence to the therapy is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, adherence to therapy was assessed and typical problems were classified.

METHODS

 1078 OSA patients received CPAP therapy after a diagnostic polygraphy (PG) or polysomnography (PSG). Adherence to therapy was followed up three months after treatment induction. The following therapy adherence groups were defined: 1. correctly calibrated CPAP and good adherence, 2. CPAP non-acceptance, after initial use, 3. CPAP intolerance use due to side effects, 4. discontinuation due to lack of motivation/low rates of symptoms. 5. mask intolerance, 6. CPAP failure due to a lack of perceived treatment effect, 7. Change to another non-invasive ventilation method, 8. No control carried out.

RESULTS

 Out of 1078 OSA patients a therapy control was performed in 830 patients (77 %). Of these, 450 patients (54.2 %) were placed in group 1, 216 patients (26 %) in group 2, 71 patients (8.5 %) in group 3, 35 patients (4.2 %) in group 4, 14 patients (1.7 %) in group 5, 3 patients (0.4 %) in group 6 and 41 patients (4.9 %) in group 7. A mild obstructive index, low CPAP pressure and, as a trend, a low Epworth- Sleepiness score were predictors of CPAP failure. No significant predictors could be shown for adherence to therapy.

DISCUSSION

 An effective treatment use of 54 % after 3 months is a suboptimal result. Predictors of CPAP failure were parameters that indicated that the patient was less symptomatic prior to therapy. Despite a large patient cohort, neither anthropometric nor PSG-data provided any significant CPAP adherence predictors. Rather, experiences in the first nights of use could be decisive. CPAP devices offer comfort settings that have to be personalised to patients' needs and wants. A large selection of different mask shapes requires experience and training in patient-centred mask fitting. A three-month follow-up appointment seems too long to discuss therapy problems with the patient in a timely manner. Telemedical options or short-term telephone appointments should be considered.

Mask side-effects in long-term CPAP-patients impact adherence and sleepiness: the InterfaceVent real-life study

Background

For some patients, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) remains an uncomfortable therapy despite the constant development of technological innovations. To date, no real life study has investigated the relationship between mask related side-effects (MRSEs) and CPAP-non-adherence (defined as < 4 h/day) or residual-excessive-sleepiness (RES, Epworth-Sleepiness-Scale (ESS) score ≥ 11) in the long-term.

Methods

The InterfaceVent-CPAP study is a prospective real-life cross-sectional study conducted in an apneic adult cohort undergoing at least 3 months of CPAP with unrestricted mask-access (34 different masks). MRSEs were evaluated using visual-analogue-scales, CPAP-data using CPAP-software, sleepiness using ESS.

Results

1484 patients were included in the analysis (72.2% male, median age 67 years (IQ_25–75: 60–74), initial Apnea–Hypopnea-Index (AHI) of 39 (31–56)/h, residual AHI_flow was 1.9 (0.9–4) events/h), CPAP-treatment lasted 4.4 (2.0–9.7) years, CPAP-usage was 6.8 (5.5–7.8) h/day, the prevalence of CPAP-non-adherence was 8.6%, and the prevalence of RES was 16.17%. Leak-related side-effects were the most prevalent side-effects (patient-reported leaks concerned 75.4% of responders and had no correlation with CPAP-reported-leaks). Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluating explanatory-variable (demographic data, device/mask data and MRSEs) effects on variables-of-interest (CPAP-non-adherence and RES), indicated for patient-MRSEs significant associations between: (i) CPAP-non-adherence and dry-mouth (p = 0.004); (ii) RES and patient-reported leaks (p = 0.007), noisy mask (p < 0.001), dry nose (p < 0.001) and harness pain (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

In long-term CPAP-treated patients, leak-related side-effects remain the most prevalent side-effects, but patient-reported leaks cannot be predicted by CPAP-reported-leaks. Patient-MRSEs can be independently associated with CPAP-non-adherence and RES, thus implying a complementary role for MRSE questionnaires alongside CPAP-device-reported-data for patient monitoring.

Trial registration InterfaceVent is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03013283).