Oxygen therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: We need to rethink and investigate

Effect of Acute Vasodilator Testing Using Oxygen in Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vasodilators, including oxygen, have not shown consistent beneficial effects on pulmonary hypertension due to valvular heart disease (PH-VHD). Therefore, the study aimed to assess the effect of 100% fractional inspiration of oxygen (FiO2) on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in patients with combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH) and isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH) due to PH-VHD.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted among patients with PH-VHD undergoing mitral or aortic valve replacement or repair. The study was conducted after induction of anesthesia and pulmonary artery catheterization. Cardiac output was obtained using thermodilution and all direct, and derived hemodynamic variables were obtained at 30% and 100% FiO2. The patients were stratified a priori into responders {(≥10 mmHg fall in mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP)} and non-responders.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients completed the acute vasodilator test. The mean age and body mass index of the study population was 41.8 ± 14.1 years and 21.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2, respectively. There was a significant decrease in MPAP (40.77 ± 12.07 mmHg vs 36.74 ± 13.3 mmHg; P < .001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) {(median; Interquartile range (IQR); 388; 371 vs 323; 362 dynes sec.cm-5; P < .001) at 100% FiO2. Transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG) also decreased significantly (P < .001 and P < .001). Cardiac output did not change significantly. The magnitude of decrease in MPAP, PVR, TPG, DPG, and pulmonary artery compliance (PAC) between CpcPH and IpcPH was comparable. Responders did not show a significantly greater fall in MPAP, PVR, TPG, DPG, and PAC after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Hyperoxia may lead to reduction in MPAP and PVR in both hemodynamic phenotypes of PH-VHD. A larger sample size is required to support or refute the findings of this study.

Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of supplemental oxygen therapy in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) who do not have hypoxemia at baseline is uncertain.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does supplemental oxygen improve echocardiographic parameters in nonhypoxemic patients with intermediate-risk PE?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This pilot trial randomly assigned nonhypoxemic patients with stable PE and echocardiographic right ventricle (RV) enlargement to receive anticoagulation plus supplemental oxygen for the first 48 h vs anticoagulation alone. The primary outcome was normal echocardiographic RV size 48 h after randomization. Secondary efficacy outcomes were the numerical change in the RV to left ventricle (LV) diameter ratio measured 48 h and 7 days after randomization with respect to the baseline ratio measured at inclusion.

RESULTS

The study was stopped prematurely because of the COVID-19 pandemic after recruiting 70 patients (mean ± SD age, 67.3 ± 16.1 years; 36 female [51.4%]) with primary outcome data. Forty-eight h after randomization, normalization of the RV size occurred in 14 of the 33 patients (42.4%) assigned to oxygen and in eight of the 37 patients (21.6%) assigned to ambient air (P = .08). In the oxygen group, the mean RV to LV ratio was reduced from 1.28 ± 0.28 at baseline to 1.01 ± 0.16 at 48 h (P < .001); in the ambient air group, mean RV to LV ratios were 1.21 ± 0.18 at baseline and 1.08 ± 0.19 at 48 h (P < .01). At 90 days, one major bleeding event and one death (both in the ambient air group) had occurred.

INTERPRETATION

In analyses limited by a small number of enrollees, compared with ambient air, supplemental oxygen did not significantly increase the proportion of patients with nonhypoxemic intermediate-risk PE whose RV to LV ratio normalized after 48 h of treatment. This pilot trial showed improvement in some ancillary efficacy outcomes and provides support for a definitive clinical outcomes trial.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04003116; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

The rationale, design, and methods of a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxygen therapy in patients with intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), reversal of hypoxic vasoconstriction could constitute a target for treatment that protects the right ventricular (RV) function until endogenous fibrinolysis occurs. The Air vs oxygen for Intermediate-Risk pulmonary embolism (AIR) trial aims to assess the effect of oxygen therapy in patients with intermediate-risk acute PE who do not have hypoxemia at baseline.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

AIR is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, proof-of-concept trial. A total of 90 patients hospitalized with intermediate-risk PE and an oxygen saturation of 90% or higher at baseline will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive supplemental oxygen or ambient air. The primary outcome is a RV/LV diameter ratio equal or less than 1.0 on echocardiography measured 48 hours after the start of treatment. Secondary efficacy outcomes are the numerical change in the ratio of the RV to the LV diameter measured 48 hours and 7 days after the start of treatment, with respect to the baseline ratio measured at randomization. Clinical adverse events will be also collected.

RESULTS

Enrollment started in July 2019 and is expected to proceed until 2022. Median age of the first 50 patients was 74 years (interquartile range, 61-81), and 50% were female.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial will provide information about the value of supplemental oxygen in patients with intermediate-risk acute PE who do not have hypoxemia at baseline. The results will contribute to research that may assist patients with intermediate-risk PE in the future.

Oxygen and pulmonary arterial hypertension: effects, mechanisms, and therapeutic benefits

Oxygen is a pulmonary vasodilator. Although treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is focused on pulmonary vasodilation, treatment guidelines do not recommend O2 therapy for patients unless they develop hypoxaemia. These guidelines point to a lack of evidence of benefit of O2 therapy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to evidence of lack of benefit in a single RCT involving patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. These guidelines did not identify major limitations with the Eisenmenger study or consider other evidence of therapeutic benefit. Recent advances in mechanistic understanding of O2 effects on pulmonary vascular tone, along with substantial evidence of acute effects of O2 in PAH patients, challenge the view that benefits of O2 arise only through correction of hypoxaemia. Evidence presented in this review shows that O2 acts as a pulmonary vasodilator in patients who are normoxaemic; that this probably involves an alveolar mechanism in addition to a blood-borne (oxyhaemoglobin) mechanism; and that therapeutic benefit of O2 does not depend on arterial O2 levels. This suggests that O2 has potential therapeutic benefit for all patients with PAH. Clinical guidelines and practice related to O2 therapy need to be reassessed, and further research is needed.