Anaphylactic Shock at the Beginning of Hemodialysis

Hypersensitive Reactions During Hemodialysis Treatment: What Do We Need to Know?

Kidney replacement therapies (KRTs) including hemodialysis (HD) are one of the treatment options for most of the patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although HD is vital for these patients, it is not hundred percent physiological, and various adverse events including hypersensitivity reactions may occur. Fortunately, these reactions are rare in total and less when compared to previous decades, but it is still very important for at least two reasons: First, the number of patients receiving kidney replacement treatment is increasing globally; and the cumulative number of these reactions may be substantial. Second, although most of these reactions are mild, some of them may be very severe and even lead to mortality. Thus, it is very important to have basic knowledge and skills to diagnose and treat these reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur at any component of dialysis machinery (access, extracorporeal circuit, medications, etc.). The most important preventive measure is to avoid the allergen. However, even with very specific test, sometimes the allergen cannot be found. In mild conditions, HD can be contained with non-specific treatment (topical creams, antihistaminics, corticosteroids). In more severe conditions, treatment must be stopped immediately, blood should not be returned to patient, drugs must be stopped, and rules of general emergency treatment must be followed.

Complement-mediated dialysis reaction during regular hemodialysis treatment: a case report

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis reactions (HDRs) are similar to complement activation-related pseudo allergy (CARPA), a hypersensitivity reaction that occurs when administering certain (nano)drugs intravenously. The pathomechanism of CARPA was described based on animal experiments. Typical CARPA-like dialysis reactions, which occur at the start of hemodialysis, have been reported using polysulfone dialyzers. However, to our knowledge, this is the first dialysis reaction that occurred towards the end of hemodialysis treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report describes a 52-year-old Caucasian male patient who had been receiving chronic hemodialysis for 3 years and exhibited a CARPA reaction during his third hour of treatment. Upon activation of the microbubble alarm, the extracorporeal system recirculated for five minutes. Following reconnection, the patient exhibited a drop in systemic blood pressure, chest pain, and dyspnea after five minutes. Symptoms disappeared spontaneously after reducing the speed of the blood pump, placing the patient in a Trendelenburg position, and administering a bolus infusion from the dialysis machine. The remaining dialysis treatment was uneventful.

CONCLUSION

Numerous case reports about reactions occurring with modern high-efficiency polysulfone dialyzers have been published. However, due to changes in the material structure by the manufacturers, we have not encountered such cases lately. The recently reported increase in thromboxane-B2 and pulmonary arterial pressure and complement activation upon re-infusion of extracorporeal blood following dialysis may explain the reaction observed here.

Evaluating Risk Factors for Developing Allergic Reactions during Plasma Exchange Using Fresh-frozen Plasma: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective Allergic reactions are a severe complication of plasma exchange (PEx). Few reports have analyzed allergic reactions during PEx using fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) as a replacement solution. We therefore clarified the relationship between risk and exacerbation factors that lead to the onset of PEx-related allergic reactions, particularly PEx, using FFP, and examined whether or not allergic reactions were predictable. Methods This retrospective study included 88 consecutive patients who underwent PEx with FFP as a replacement solution at Kitasato University Hospital. The patients were grouped according to the presence of allergic reactions and compared. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U test, and a binomial logistic analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using EZR software program, version 1.54, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results There were 44 allergic reaction cases. The average time to the onset of an allergic reactions was 63.5 (45-93) minutes. The allergic reaction-onset group had significantly higher average albumin (Alb) levels than did the non-allergic reaction-onset group. The binomial logistic analysis identified Alb levels as independent risk factors for allergic reactions. The receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an Alb level ≥3.4 g/dL as a risk factor for allergic reactions (area under the curve: 0.731; 95% confidence interval: 0.622-0.84). Conclusion Allergic reaction onset occurred approximately one hour after PEx initiation in the critical period. A serum Alb level ≥3.4 g/dL was identified as a risk factor for predicting allergic reactions. Patients with Alb levels ≥3.4 g/dL at the first PEx should be monitored for allergic reaction symptoms.

Expanded hemodialysis: what's up, Doc?

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in expanded hemodialysis (HDx), an emerging renal replacement therapy based on the use of medium cut-off membranes (MCO). Thanks to the internal architecture of these types of membranes, with a higher pore size and smaller fiber inner diameter to favor internal filtration rate, they can increase the removal of larger middle molecules in conventional hemodialysis. Secondarily, several reports suggest that this therapy potentially improve the outcomes for end-stage renal disease patients. However, HDx has not been defined yet and the characteristics of MCO membranes are not well stablished. The aim of this narrative review is to define HDx and summarize the dialyzers that have been used so far to perform this therapy, collect the evidence available on its efficacy and clinical outcomes compared with other hemodialysis techniques and settle the bases for its optimal prescription.

A porcine model of hemodialyzer reactions: roles of complement activation and rinsing back of extracorporeal blood

Hemodialysis reactions (HDRs) resemble complement-activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) to certain i.v. drugs, for which pigs provide a sensitive model. On this basis, to better understand the mechanism of human HDRs, we subjected pigs to hemodialysis using polysulfone (FX CorDiax 40, Fresenius) or cellulose triacetate (SureFlux-15UX, Nipro) dialyzers, or Dialysis exchange-set without membranes, as control. Experimental endpoints included typical biomarkers of porcine CARPA; pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), blood cell counts, plasma sC5b-9 and thromboxane-B2 levels. Hemodialysis (60 min) was followed by reinfusion of extracorporeal blood into the circulation, and finally, an intravenous bolus injection of the complement activator zymosan. The data indicated low-extent steady rise of sC5b-9 along with transient leukopenia, secondary leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia in the two dialyzer groups, consistent with moderate complement activation. Surprisingly, small changes in baseline PAP and plasma thromboxane-B2 levels during hemodialysis switched into 30%-70% sharp rises in all three groups resulting in synchronous spikes within minutes after blood reinfusion. These observations suggest limited complement activation by dialyzer membranes, on which a membrane-independent second immune stimulus was superimposed, and caused pathophysiological changes also characteristic of HDRs. Thus, the porcine CARPA model raises the hypothesis that a second "hit" on anaphylatoxin-sensitized immune cells may be a key contributor to HDRs.

Dialysis-associated allergic reactions during continuous renal replacement therapy and hemodialysis: A case report

Dialyzer reactions are long-appreciated complications of dialysis. Despite advances in dialysis machines and membranes, these life-threatening reactions still occur. It is imperative to recognize potential dialyzer reactions when assessing adverse dialysis events as reexposure to dialytic treatments could be life threatening. We present the case of a 72-year old woman with dialysis-requiring anuric acute kidney injury who experienced acute hypotension and cardiopulmonary arrest during both continuous renal replacement therapy and a subsequent hemodialysis treatment. We concluded that she had an anaphylactic reaction to an unidentified component of the dialysis equipment. Identification, work up, treatment, and reporting of dialyzer reactions are discussed in the context of this case.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hemodialysis Emergencies

Given the high comorbidity in patients on hemodialysis and the complexity of the dialysis treatment, it is remarkable how rarely a life-threatening complication occurs during dialysis. The low rate of dialysis emergencies can be attributed to numerous safety features in modern dialysis machines; meticulous treatment and testing of the dialysate solution to prevent exposure to trace elements, toxins, and pathogens; adherence to detailed treatment protocols; and extensive training of dialysis staff to handle medical emergencies. Most hemodialysis emergencies can be attributed to human error. A smaller number are due to rare idiosyncratic reactions. In this review, we highlight major emergencies that may occur during hemodialysis treatments, describe their pathogenesis, offer measures to minimize them, and provide specific interventions to prevent catastrophic consequences on the rare occasions when such emergencies arise. These emergencies include dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, venous air embolism, hemolysis, venous needle dislodgement, vascular access hemorrhage, major allergic reactions to the dialyzer or treatment medications, and disruption or contamination of the dialysis water system. Finally, we describe root cause analysis after a dialysis emergency has occurred to prevent a future recurrence.