Multicenter laparoscopic evaluation of the peritoneum in peritoneal dialysis patients

Laparoscopic observations of adhesions between peritoneal dialysis catheters and intraperitoneal organs: A retrospective, observational study

Laparoscopy provides extensive data for the decannulation of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and is being increasingly used to diagnose encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. However, there are few reports on the methods of decannulation of peritoneal dialysis catheters. In this study, we examined the laparoscopic findings and postoperative complications of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter removal. A total of 119 laparoscopic decannulations of peritoneal dialysis catheters were performed between 2003 and 2018 at the Juntendo University Hospital and Juntendo University Nerima Hospital. Laparoscopy was performed during peritoneal dialysis catheter removal by a gastrointestinal surgeon. Patient characteristics such as age, sex, duration of peritoneal dialysis, history of peritonitis and age at the time of peritoneal dialysis termination were assessed. Of these 119 cases, 19 (16.0%) showed adhesion between the peritoneal dialysis catheter and intraperitoneal organs. There were 13 (10.9%) cases involving a tangled omentum, 4 (3.4%) cases involving the small intestine and 2 (1.7%) cases of adhesions extending from the bowels to the abdominal wall. No postoperative complications were associated with the laparoscopic surgery. In these cases, blind decannulation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter may result in injury to the gastrointestinal tract in patients with adhesions. Therefore, we need to pay attention to adhesions between peritoneal dialysis catheters and intraperitoneal organs, and laparoscopy could be a valuable tool in detecting such adhesions and ensuring patient safety.

Literature review: Combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy

Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the recommended renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Complementary hemodialysis (HD) once per week for PD patients can aid in achieving adequate dialysis and extend the duration of PD treatment. In Japan, this therapy is termed “combined therapy with PD and hemodialysis (combPDHD).” CombPDHD represents a treatment option for PD patients for whom adequate dialysis cannot be maintained. CombPDHD has been widely applied in Japanese PD patients; however, it is much less common outside of Japan. Clinical evidence, particularly regarding long-term prognosis and appropriate duration of treatment, remains insufficient.

Summary

CombPDHD will be required as an alternative for increasing the dose of PD under various conditions, such as a loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and peritoneal functional failure. The Japanese regimen for combPDHD involves 5 or 6 days of PD, combined with one weekly session of hemodialysis. According to some reports, the potential benefits of combPDHD are peritoneal rest with improved peritoneal function and delay in membrane deterioration. CombPDHD prevents peritoneal dysfunction and reduces cardiovascular complications by adjusting the fluid volume and improving renal anemia. Increased D/PCr indicates a deterioration in peritoneal function and is an independent risk factor for encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS). It is previously reported that no significant differences in combPDHD duration were observed between EPS and non-EPS groups. Laparoscopic findings involving patients with combPDHD revealed that there was a difference in abdominal wall degeneration depending on the intra-abdominal cavity of each case. Recently, prospective studies on long-term peritoneal function, survival, and hospitalization in combPDHD have been reported. However, reviews evaluating combPDHD long-term outcomes in multicenter and prospective studies are lacking.

Conclusion

It is difficult to continue PD alone with a declining RKF or when self-management is poor. Hence, combPDHD should be started to adjust the fluid volume, with adequate dialysis dose and peritoneal rest. This therapy is useful from a lifestyle viewpoint during the transition period from PD to HD and should not be continued indefinitely.

Dialysis Duration and Glucose Exposure Amount Do Not Increase Mortality Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study From 2004 to 2012

Background

Although the bio-incompatibility of glucose-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution is well documented, it is used worldwide. How PD duration and the amount of dialyzate glucose exposure affect survival in patients with end-stage renal disease remain inconclusive due to improper study designs in the extant literature.

Methods

All incident patients with PD from 2004 to 2007 who were older than 18 years in Taiwan were included. Patients were censored when they received a transplant or at the end of 2012. Glucose exposure through PD solution was calculated by the mean glucose contained per liter when receiving PD. For those who had already shifted to hemodialysis (HD) and survived longer than 2, 3, and 4 years (the index dates), the cause-specific Cox regression model was used to make the survival comparison by PD duration and mean glucose concentration in these three cohorts, respectively. The model was adjusted by demographics, case-mix, time cohort (2004–2005 vs. 2006–2007), peritonitis episode (none vs. ≥once), and mean PD solution glucose exposure (tertile).

Results

A total of 3,226 patients were included, with a mean age of 53.4 ± 15.2 years, 44.6% being male, and 34.2% having diabetes mellitus. The 1, 2, 3, and 4-year survival rates were 94, 87, 80, and 74%, while technical survival rates were 86, 70, 56, and 45%, respectively. The overall transplant events were 309 (9.6%) only. There were 389, 495, and 553 incident patients with PD shifting to HD included in 2-, 3-, and 4-year cohort, respectively. The population with moderate glucose concentration exposure had the highest mortality, and the high glucose concentration exposure had non-significant lower mortality in each cohort. In various fixed time-window cohorts, the duration of PD treatment did not increase mortality risk after adjustments. In addition, glucose exposure did not affect the mortality rate.

Conclusion

For incident PD patients with PD duration no longer than 4 years, neither PD duration nor glucose exposure amount increases the long-term mortality risk.