Viral hepatitis in patients on hemodialysis

Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 among Hemodialysis Patients in Mexico: First Identification of Chronic Infection

The global distribution of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is attributed to its capacity to spread through several routes of transmission; hemodialysis has gained increased amounts of attention in recent years. Although Mexico is considered a hyperendemic region for hepatitis E, no HEV surveillance is performed in the country. The frequency of HEV in hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been determined. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional single-center analytical study including 67 serum samples from HD patients. Anti-HEV IgG and IgM antibodies and the viral genome were determined; partial regions within the HEV genome were sequenced for further phylogenetic analysis. Globally, 14.9% of the tested patients exhibited reactivity for IgG antibodies against HEV, and none showed reactivity to IgM. A total of 5.9% of the samples showed HEV genome amplification, and sequencing confirmed the identity of genotype 3; subsequent analysis of positive cases revealed two acute cases and chronic hepatitis E infection in one patient. Notably, the chronic patient was negative for anti-HEV IgG antibodies. Our findings highlight the importance of viral genome testing in HD patients and the need to establish guidelines for HEV detection in Mexico.

Global epidemiology of HBV infection among hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hemodialysis (HD) is a life-saving procedure that purifies the blood in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Among all major complications, blood-borne diseases like hepatitis B virus (HBV) may be exposed as serious side effects of hemodialysis. A comprehensive review of the global burden of HBV among HD patients has not been written so far. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the globally epidemiology of HBV infection among HD patients.

METHODS

Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, articles that investigated the prevalence of HBV among HD patients were searched from the major databases such as EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science collection, and Scopus. Pooled prevalence with 95% CI and identification of heterogeneity were obtained using the random effects model and Cochran's Q-test, respectively, and quantification was evaluated using the I2 statistics. All statistical analyses were performed by STATA 14.1 statistical software.

RESULTS

among 322 datasets (795,623 cases) that included in this study, the pooled prevalence of HBV infection among HD patients was 7.32% (95% CI: 6.53-8.15%; I2 = 97.91%), including 7.57% (95% CI: 6.69-8.48%) for HBsAg and 6.09% (95% CI: 4.05-8.49%) for DNA, respectively. In addition, based on geographic area, the prevalence was 7.44% (95% CI: 6.35-8.61%) in Asia, 4.32% (95% CI: 2.21-7.04%) in North America, 7.07% (95% CI: 6.35-8.61%) in Europe, 5.52% (95% CI: 3.60-7.78%) in Africa, 8.45% (95% CI: 5.81-11.78%) in Oceania, and 9.73% (95% CI: 7.11-12.70%) in South America.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis indicates a relatively high prevalence of HBV infection in HD patients, even in some developed countries. Considering that ESRD patients are not able to properly respond to the vaccination strategies in order to develop an acceptable immunity, vaccination of healthy individuals is highly recommended to arm their bodies for possible immunocompromise conditions in the future. Moreover, donated blood in blood transfusion centers should be checked for possible hepatitis B virus infection using sensitive molecular tests.

A real world comparison of HepB (Engerix-B®) and HepB-CpG (Heplisav-B®) vaccine seroprotection in patients receiving maintenance dialysis

BACKGROUND

Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recommended for dialysis patients. Two reports comparing seroprotection (SP) rates following HepB and HepB-CpG in vaccine-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease enrolled few dialysis patients (n = 122 combined). SP rates in a subset of dialysis patients were not reported or not powered to detect statistically significant differences. SP rates in those requiring additional vaccine series or booster doses are not known.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis including dialysis patients completing HepB or HepB-CpG vaccination between January 2019 and December 2020. Vaccine-naïve patients received a series of HepB or HepB-CpG (Series 1). A repeat series was given to nonresponders (Series 2). A booster regimen consists of one dose of either vaccine. Primary outcome was achieving SP (anti-HBs >10 mIU/mL) at least 60 days after the last HBV vaccine dose for Series 1 and Series 2, and achieving SP at least 3 weeks post-booster.

RESULTS

For Series 1 (n = 3509), SP after HepB vaccination was significantly higher (62.9% versus 50.1% for HepB-CpG; P < 0.0001). Series 2 (n = 1040) and booster (n = 2028) SP rates were similar between vaccines. Patients that received up to four HepB-CpG doses had higher SP rates compared with four doses of HepB (82.0% versus 62.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SP rates in hepatitis B vaccine-naïve dialysis patients administered a recommended four doses of HepB were higher than those recommended two doses of HepB-CpG. SP rates were higher and achieved sooner if HepB-CpG was utilized initially and, if needed, for Series 2. Optimal HepB-CpG dosing deserves further study.