Comparison of quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a Moroccan city

Subjective cognitive complaints in end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cognitive impairment is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is associated with compromised quality of life and functional capacity, as well as worse clinical outcomes. Most previous research and reviews in this area were focused on objective cognitive impairment, whereas patients' subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) have been less well-understood. This systematic review aimed to provide a broad overview of what is known about SCCs in adult ESRD patients. Electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2022, which identified 221 relevant studies. SCCs appear to be highly prevalent in dialysis patients and less so in those who received kidney transplantation. A random-effects meta-analysis also shows that haemodialysis patients reported significantly more SCCs than peritoneal dialysis patients (standardised mean difference -0.20, 95% confidence interval -0.38 to -0.03). Synthesis of longitudinal studies suggests that SCCs remain stable on maintenance dialysis treatment but may reduce upon receipt of kidney transplant. Furthermore, SCCs in ESRD patients have been consistently associated with hospitalisation, depression, anxiety, fatigue, and poorer quality of life. There is limited data supporting a strong relation between objective and subjective cognition but preliminary evidence suggests that this association may be domain-specific. Methodological limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Effects of dialysis modality on mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: A cohort study

METHODS

Using a retrospective 15-year cohort, stratified by age, this study aimed to analyze the effect of dialysis modality on mortality of ESRD patients in a city of China. Study data were from the medical insurance information system of Kunshan, Jiangsu Province of China, and 1484 patients with ESRD, enrolled from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2019 were included in this study. The primary outcome event was all-cause mortality, which was calculated in months. Dialysis modalities included hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Survival analysis and competing-risk regression model were performed in this study.

RESULTS

HD costs significantly higher medical expense than the PD treatment regimen. The mean survival time was 121.28 (SE = 3.020) months for HD patients, while that was 94.68 (SE = 3.534) months for the PD. Ten-year survival rates of the young, middle-aged, and elderly were 0.82, 0.56, and 0.26, respectively. For the young (SHR = 0.869, 95% CI: 0.525-1.436) and middle-aged (SHR = 0.715, 95% CI: 0.484-1.057) ESRD patients, different dialysis modalities exhibited no statistical significance on the survival, but for the elderly, HD had a lower risk of mortality than PD (SHR = 0.747, 95% CI: 0.581-0.961).

CONCLUSION

Survival of the young and middle-aged ESRD patients was superior to that of the elderly. Considering both survival time and direct medical costs, we recommend that PD could be a better choice for young and middle-aged ESRD patients, while HD may be suitable for older patients.

Construction of haemodialysis nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study

AIMS

To establish a sensitive, scientific and practical evaluation system for haemodialysis nursing and to provide a reference for the evaluation of haemodialysis nursing quality.

DESIGN

Through a literature review and Delphi method.

METHOD

According to the literature review, a preliminary nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were established, and an expert survey questionnaire was designed. Finally, the evaluation system for the nursing-sensitive quality indicators was determined using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

Thirteen nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were finally constructed, including two structural indicators, three process indicators and eight outcome indicators. The effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert survey questionnaires was 100%, the coefficient of judgement basis is 0.956, the coefficient of familiarity is 0.833, the coefficient of authority is 0.895, and the Kendall's harmony coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 0.158 ~ 0.307 and 0.170 ~ 0.315, respectively, with statistical significance (p < .05).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, the nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were developed by the Delphi method and included structural indicators, outcome indicators and process indicators, which made up for some deficiencies noted in previous studies. The authors have provided a more reliable and comprehensive basis for evaluating the quality and safety of haemodialysis nursing in the future.