1
|
Boydell V, Holden J, Robins G, Mumah J, Abok B, Mudhune S, Guinard C, Quinn H, Bishop M. Can payment by results ensure equitable access to contraceptive services? a qualitative case study. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:106. [PMID: 37245037 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01919-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Leave No One Behind (LNOB) agenda compels sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) implementers to focus on the multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and inequalities. One strategy to address these is Payment by Results (PbR). Using the Women's Integrated Sexual Health (WISH) programme as a case study, this paper examines if and how PbR can ensure equitable reach and impact. METHODS Given the complexity of PbR mechanisms, a theory-based approach was used in the design and analysis of this evaluation, drawing on four case studies. These were conducted by reviewing global and national programme data and by interviewing 50 WISH partner staff at national level and WISH programme staff at global and regional levels. RESULTS The case studies found that inclusion of equity-based indicators in the PbR mechanism had demonstrable effects on people's incentives, on how systems work, and on modes of working. The WISH programme was successful in achieving its desired programme indicators. The use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) clearly incentivised several strategies for service providers to innovate and reach adolescents and people living in poverty. However, there were trade-offs between performance indicators that increased coverage and others that increased equitable access, as well as several systemic challenges that limited the possible incentive effects. CONCLUSIONS The use of PbR KPIs incentivised several strategies to reach adolescents and people living in poverty. However, the use of global indicators was too simplistic, resulting in several methodological issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Holden
- Foresight Development Associates, The Greenhouse N16, 49 Green Lanes, London, N16 9BU, UK
| | - Ginny Robins
- MSI Reproductive Choices, 1 Conway Street, Fitzroy Square, London, W1T 6LP, UK
| | - Joyce Mumah
- International Planned Parenthood Federation, CVS Plaza, 5Th Floor, Kasuku Road, Off Lenana Road, P.O. Box 30234, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Barnabas Abok
- International Planned Parenthood Federation, CVS Plaza, 5Th Floor, Kasuku Road, Off Lenana Road, P.O. Box 30234, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Sandra Mudhune
- International Planned Parenthood Federation, CVS Plaza, 5Th Floor, Kasuku Road, Off Lenana Road, P.O. Box 30234, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Caroline Guinard
- MSI Reproductive Choices, 1 Conway Street, Fitzroy Square, London, W1T 6LP, UK
| | - Heidi Quinn
- International Planned Parenthood Federation, CVS Plaza, 5Th Floor, Kasuku Road, Off Lenana Road, P.O. Box 30234, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Meghan Bishop
- Oxford Policy Management, Clarendon House, Cornmarket Street, Oxford, OH1 3HJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiendrebeogo CO, Joseph V, Bicaba F, Bila A, Bicaba A, Druetz T. Does abolishing user fees for family planning increase contraception use? An impact evaluation of the national policy in Burkina Faso. J Glob Health 2022; 12:04086. [PMID: 36227754 PMCID: PMC9559360 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.04086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Unmet needs for contraception constitute a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. Several mechanisms have been tested to reduce the financial barrier and facilitate access to family planning services, with inconclusive results. Based on the positive impacts following the introduction of free health care for pregnant women, Burkina Faso decided to extend its national policy and abolished direct payment for family planning services. This study aims to evaluate the impact of this policy on contraceptive use and unmet needs for contraception among women of reproductive age (WRA) in Burkina Faso. Methods This study uses two different study designs to examine the impact of a user fee removal policy on contraceptive use across a panel of 1400 households randomly selected across eight health districts. Data were collected using a standardized socio-demographic questionnaire at three different time points during the pilot and scale-up phases of the fee abolition program. The questionnaire was administered six months after the launch of the pilot fee abolition program in four health districts. For the remaining four health districts, the survey was conducted one year prior to and six months after the implementation of the program in those areas. All WRA in the households were eligible to participate. A cross-sectional study design was used to determine the association between knowledge of the fee abolition policy among WRA and actual use of contraceptives by WRA six months after the policy's implementation and across all eight districts. Additionally, a pre-post study with a non-randomized, reflexive control group was designed using repeated surveys in four health districts. Hierarchical logistic mixed effects models were adjusted for a set of time-variant individual variables; the impact was assessed by a difference-in-differences approach that compared pre-post changes in contraception use in women who knew about the new policy and those who did not. Results Of the 1471 WRA surveyed six months after the removal of user fees for family planning services, 56% were aware of the policy's existence. Knowledge of the fee abolition policy was associated with a 46% increase probability of contraceptive use among WRA six months after the policy's implementation. Among the subset of the participants who were surveyed twice (n = 507), 65% knew about the fee removal policy six months after its introduction and constitute the intervention group. Pre-post changes in contraceptive use differed significantly between the intervention (n = 327) and control groups (n = 180). Removing user fees for family planning led to an 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.49, 1.31) increase in the likelihood of using contraception. In the study area, the policy reduced the prevalence of unmet needs for contraception by 13 percentage points. Conclusions Removing user fees for family planning services is a promising strategy to increase access to, and reduce unmet needs for, contraception. A broader dissemination of the policy's existence will likely increase its impact on the overall population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheick Oumar Tiendrebeogo
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vena Joseph
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frank Bicaba
- Société d’Études et de Recherches en Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Alice Bila
- Société d’Études et de Recherches en Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Abel Bicaba
- Société d’Études et de Recherches en Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Thomas Druetz
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche en santé publique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang W, Tumlinson K. Free Access to a Broad Contraceptive Method Mix and Women's Contraceptive Choice: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Stud Fam Plann 2021; 52:3-22. [PMID: 33533061 PMCID: PMC7990714 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Financial barriers may restrict women's ability to use their preferred contraceptive methods, especially long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). Providing free access to a broad contraceptive method mix, including both LARC and short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC), may increase contraceptive use, meet women's various fertility needs, and increase their agency in contraceptive decisions. Linking facility and individual data from eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa, we use a propensity score approach combined with machine learning techniques to examine how free access to a broad contraceptive method mix affects women's contraceptive choice. Free access to both LARC and SARC was associated with an increase of 3.2 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval: 0.006, 0.058) in the likelihood of contraceptive use, driven by greater use of SARC. Among contraceptive users, free access did not prompt women to switch to LARC and had no effect on contraceptive decision-making. The price effects were larger among older and more educated women, but free access was associated with lower contraceptive use among adolescents. While free access to contraceptives is associated with a modest increase in contraceptive use for some women, removing user fees alone does not address all barriers women face, especially for the most vulnerable groups of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chang
- Wei Chang, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Katherine Tumlinson
- Katherine Tumlinson, Assistant Professor, Department of Maternal and Child Health and Faculty Fellow, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ortega B, Sanjuán J, Casquero A. Illicit financial flows and the provision of child and maternal health services in low- and middle-income countries. BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS 2020; 20:15. [PMID: 32653039 PMCID: PMC7353727 DOI: 10.1186/s12914-020-00236-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Illicit financial flows (IFFs) drain domestic resources with harmful social effects, especially in countries which are too poor to mobilise the revenues required to finance the provision of essential public goods and services. In this context, this article empirically examined the association between IFFs and the provision of essential health services in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS Firstly, a set of indicators was selected to represent the overall coverage of essential health services at the country level. Next, a linear multivariate regression model was specified and estimated for each indicator using cross-sectional data for 72 countries for the period 2008-2013. RESULTS After controlling for other relevant factors, the main result of the regression analysis was that an annual 1 percentage point (p.p.) increase in the ratio of IFFs to total trade was associated with a 0.46 p.p. decrease in the level of family planning coverage, a 0.31 p.p. decrease in the percentage of women receiving antenatal care, and a 0.32 p.p. decrease in the level of child vaccination coverage rates. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that, for the whole sample of countries considered, at least 3.9 million women and 190,000 children may not receive these basic health care interventions in the future as a consequence of a 1 p.p. increase in the ratio of IFFs to total trade. Moreover, given that family planning, reproductive health, and child immunisation are foundational components of health and long-term development in poor countries, the findings show that IFFs could be undermining the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bienvenido Ortega
- Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Estructura Económica), Universidad de Málaga, Campus El Ejido, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - Jesús Sanjuán
- Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Estructura Económica), Universidad de Málaga, Campus El Ejido, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - Antonio Casquero
- Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Estructura Económica), Universidad de Málaga, Campus El Ejido, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vyas S. Violence Against Women in Tanzania and its Association With Health-Care Utilisation and Out-of-Pocket Payments: An Analysis of the 2015 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. East Afr Health Res J 2019; 3:125-133. [PMID: 34308205 PMCID: PMC8279224 DOI: 10.24248/eahrj-d-19-00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Violence against women is a major public health concern. In addition to adverse physical, mental, and sexual and reproductive health consequences, violence against women confers a considerable cost to health services and the health sector as well as to individuals and households in the form of out-of-pocket expenditures. This study aimed to assess whether physical or sexual violence against women is associated with higher health-care utilisation rates and out-of-pocket expenditures in Tanzania. Methods: This study used data from the 2015 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the association between health-care utilisation and partner and non-partner violence among 9,304 women. Outpatient and inpatient health expenditures were analysed using means and t-tests. Results: Women who had ever experienced physical or sexual violence (partner or non-partner) were significantly more likely to utilise health services, and in particular outpatient services, than never abused women. Out-of-pocket expenditures for out-patient care, however, did not differ by abuse status. This was in contrast to inpatient care, wherein, although abused women were not more likely to have higher utilisation rates compared with never abused women, abused women were significantly more likely to incur higher average out-of-pocket expenditures for inpatient visits. This significant difference in expenditure was possibly because of the different inpatient services sought—abused women were more likely to seek care because of illness, while never-abused women were more likely to seek care for pregnancy and delivery. Conclusion: This study highlights how violence against women in Tanzania potentially translates to higher health-care utilisation, possibly because of the long-term or chronic effects of persistent abuse. Health-care policies should, therefore, consider issues such as accessibility and affordability for health services. Additionally, governments should address the issue of violence against women more widely, thereby reducing their own costs as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Vyas
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moreira LR, Ewerling F, Barros AJD, Silveira MF. Reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods by women with demand for contraception not satisfied: an assessment of low and middle-income countries using demographic and health surveys. Reprod Health 2019; 16:148. [PMID: 31601246 PMCID: PMC6788119 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0805-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nonuse of contraceptive methods by women in need of contraception may impact their sexual and reproductive health. The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for nonuse of contraception among women with demand for contraception not satisfied in low and middle-income countries (considering both overall countries and various subgroups of women). Methods We used the latest Demographic and Health Survey data from 47 countries. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for nonuse of contraceptive methods was performed among sexually active women with demand for contraception not satisfied. The prevalence of each reported reason was also evaluated according to marital status, woman’s age and schooling, area of residence, wealth index, and parity. Wealth-related absolute inequality for each reason was also evaluated using the Slope Index of Inequality. A pro-rich inequality pattern means that the reason is more prevalent among the richest women while a pro-poor means the reason is more common among the poorest ones. Results On average, 40.9% of women in need of contraception were not using any contraceptive methods to avoid pregnancy. Overall, the most prevalent reasons for nonuse of contraceptives were “health concerns” and “infrequent sex,” but the prevalence of each reason varied substantially across countries. Nonuse due to “opposition from others” was higher among married than unmarried women; in turn, the prevalence of nonuse due to “lack of access” or “lack of knowledge” was about two times higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Women with less schooling more often reported nonuse due to “lack of access.” Pro-rich inequality was detected for reasons “health concerns,” “infrequent sex,” and “method-related”, while the reasons “other opposed,” “fatalistic,” “lack of access,” and “lack of knowledge” were linked to patterns of pro-poor inequality. Conclusions Family planning promotion policies must take into account the different reasons for the nonuse of contraceptive methods identified in each country as well as the contextual differences regarding women of reproductive age (such as social norms and barriers that prevent women from accessing and using contraceptives).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laísa Rodrigues Moreira
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro, 1160 - 3rd floor. Centro, Pelotas, 96020-220, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Ewerling
- International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - Aluisio J D Barros
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro, 1160 - 3rd floor. Centro, Pelotas, 96020-220, Brazil.,International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - Mariangela Freitas Silveira
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro, 1160 - 3rd floor. Centro, Pelotas, 96020-220, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ali M, Azmat SK, Hamza HB, Rahman MM, Hameed W. Are family planning vouchers effective in increasing use, improving equity and reaching the underserved? An evaluation of a voucher program in Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:200. [PMID: 30922318 PMCID: PMC6440079 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4027-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low modern contraceptive prevalence rate and high unmet need in Pakistan aggravates the vulnerabilities of unintended pregnancies and births contributing to maternal morbidity and mortality. This research aims to assess the effectiveness of a free, single-purpose voucher approach in increasing the uptake, use and better targeting of modern contraceptives among women from the lowest two wealth quintiles in rural and urban communities of Punjab province, Pakistan. Methods A quasi-interventional study with pre- and post-phases was implemented across an intervention (Chakwal) and a control district (Bhakkar) in Punjab province (August 2012–January 2015). To detect a 15% increase in modern contraceptive prevalence rate compared to baseline, 1276 women were enrolled in each arm. Difference-in-Differences (DID) estimates are reported for key variables, and concentration curves and index are described for equity. Results Compared to baseline, awareness of contraceptives increased by 30 percentage points among population in the intervention area. Vouchers also resulted in a net increase of 16% points in current contraceptive use and 26% points in modern methods use. The underserved population demonstrated better knowledge and utilized the modern methods more than their affluent counterparts. Intervention area also reported a low method-specific discontinuation (13.7%) and high method-specific switching rates (46.6%) amongst modern contraceptive users during the past 24 months. The concentration index indicated that voucher use was more common among the poor and vouchers seem to reduce the inequality in access to modern methods across wealth quintiles. Conclusion Vouchers can substantially expand contraceptive access and choice among the underserved populations. Vouchers are a good financing tool to improve equity, increase access, and quality of services for the underserved thus contributing towards achieving universal health coverage targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moazzam Ali
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
| | - Syed Khurram Azmat
- Division of Health Information Systems, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Uro-gynecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hasan Bin Hamza
- Health Policy, System Strengthening and Information Analysis Unit, Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Md Mizanur Rahman
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Waqas Hameed
- Department of Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, Marie Stopes Society, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|