Can interruption/withdrawl of anti-retroviral therapy provide personalized immunotherapy against HIV-1?

A Plausible Framework Reveals Potential Similarities in the Regulation of Immunity against Some Cancers and Some Infectious Agents: Implications for Prevention and Treatment

Different frameworks, which are currently employed to understand how immune responses are regulated, can account for different observations reported in the classical literature. I have argued that the predominant frameworks, employed over the last two/three decades to analyze the circumstances that determine whether an immune response is generated or this potential is ablated, and that determine the class of immunity an antigen induces, are inconsistent with diverse classical observations. These observations are "paradoxical" within the context of these frameworks and, consequently, tend to be ignored by most contemporary researchers. One such observation is that low and high doses of diverse types of antigen result, respectively, in cell-mediated and IgG antibody responses. I suggest these paradoxes render these frameworks implausible. An alternative framework, The Threshold Hypothesis, accounts for the paradoxical observations. Some frameworks are judged more plausible when found to be valuable in understanding findings in fields beyond their original compass. I explore here how the Threshold Hypothesis, initially based on studies with chemically well-defined and "simple antigens", most often a purified protein, can nevertheless shed light on diverse classical and more recent observations in the fields of immunity against cancer and against infectious agents, thus revealing common, immune mechanisms. Most cancers and some pathogens are best contained by cell-mediated immunity. The success of the Threshold Hypothesis has encouraged me to employ it as a basis for proposing strategies to prevent and to treat cancer and those infectious diseases caused by pathogens best contained by a cell-mediated attack.

What Determines the Class of Immunity an Antigen Induces? A Foundational Question Whose Rational Consideration Has Been Undermined by the Information Overload

Activated CD4 T helper cells are required to activate B cells to produce antibody and CD8 T cells to generate cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In the absence of such help, antigens inactivate B cells and CD8 T cells. Thus, the activation or inactivation of CD4 T cells determines whether immune responses are generated, or potentially ablated. Most consider that the activation of CD4 T cells requires an antigen-dependent signal, signal 1, as well as a critical costimulatory signal, initiated when a pattern recognition receptor (PRR) engages with a danger- or pathogen-associated molecular pattern (DAMP or PAMP). Most also envisage that the nature of the DAMP/PAMP signal determines the Th subset predominantly generated and so the class of immunity predominantly induced. I argue that this framework is implausible as it is incompatible with diverse observations of the variables of immunization affecting the class of immunity induced. An alternative framework, the threshold hypothesis, posits that different levels of antigen mediated CD4 T cell interactions lead to the generation of different Th subsets and so different classes of immunity, that it is compatible with these observations. This alternative supports a rational approach to preventing and treating diverse clinical conditions associated with infectious disease and, more speculatively, with cancer.

The Problem of Host and Pathogen Genetic Variability for Developing Strategies of Universally Efficacious Vaccination against and Personalised Immunotherapy of Tuberculosis: Potential Solutions?

Rational vaccination against and immunotherapy of any infectious disease requires knowledge of how protective and non-protective immune responses differ, and how immune responses are regulated, so their nature can be controlled. Strong Th1 responses are likely protective against M tuberculosis. Understanding how immune class regulation is achieved is pertinent to both vaccination and treatment. I argue that variables of infection, other than PAMPs, primarily determine the class of immunity generated. The alternative, non-PAMP framework I favour, allows me to propose strategies to achieve efficacious vaccination, transcending host and pathogen genetic variability, to prevent tuberculosis, and personalised protocols to treat disease.

Analyzing some concepts of immune regulation of the last three decades: Fostering greater research resilience despite the information overload. A personal view

There is considerable interest in whether increased investment in science, made by society, pays dividends. Some plausibly argue the increased rate of production of information results in an ossification of the canon. Reports, challenging the canon, fall by the wayside. The field thus becomes increasingly complex, reflecting not so much the reality of nature but how we investigate the subject. I suggest that focusing on and resolving the paradoxes evident within a canon will free the logjam, resulting in more resilient research. Immunology is among the fastest growing of biological sciences and is, I suggest, an appropriate case study. I examine the commonly accepted frameworks employed over the last three decades to address two major, related immunological questions: what determines whether antigen activates or inactivates CD4 T cells, and so whether immune responses are initiated or this potential ablated; secondly, what determines the Th subset to which the activated Th cells belong, thus determining the class of immunity generated. I show there are major paradoxes within these frameworks, neglected for decades. I propose how research focused on resolving paradoxes can be better fostered, and so support the evolution of the canon. This perspective is pertinent in facing critical issues on how immune responses are regulated, and to more general issues of both the philosophy of science and of science policy.The last section is in response to questions and comments of the reviewers. It brings together several considerations to express my view: the same frameworks, formulated in response to the two questions, are useful in understanding the regulation of the immune response against model antigens, against self and foreign antigens, those of tumors and of pathogens.

Facing the Increased Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant M. tuberculosis: Exploring the Feasibility of Realising Koch’s Aspiration of Immunotherapy of Tuberculosis

Koch attempted to treat tuberculosis in the late 1800s by administering an antigenic extract derived from the pathogen to patients. He hoped to bolster the patient’s protective immunity. The treatment had diverse results. In some, it improved the patient’s condition and in others led to a worsening state and even to death. Koch stopped giving his experimental treatment. I consider here three issues pertinent to realizing Koch’s vision. Rational immunotherapy requires a knowledge of what constitutes protective immunity; secondly, how on-going immune responses are regulated, so the patient’s immunity can be modulated to become optimally protective; thirdly, a simple methodology by which treatment might be realized. I deliberately cast my account in simple terms to transcend barriers due to specialization. The proposed immunotherapeutic treatment, if realizable, would significantly contribute to overcoming problems of treatment posed by antibiotic resistance of the pathogen.

Pathogen Dose in Animal Models of Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Infections and the Potential Impact on Studies of the Immune Response

Viral hemorrhagic fever viruses come from a wide range of virus families and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide each year. Animal models of infection with a number of these viruses have contributed to our knowledge of their pathogenesis and have been crucial for the development of therapeutics and vaccines that have been approved for human use. Most of these models use artificially high doses of virus, ensuring lethality in pre-clinical drug development studies. However, this can have a significant effect on the immune response generated. Here I discuss how the dose of antigen or pathogen is a critical determinant of immune responses and suggest that the current study of viruses in animal models should take this into account when developing and studying animal models of disease. This can have implications for determination of immune correlates of protection against disease as well as informing relevant vaccination and therapeutic strategies.