Cardiorespiratory optimal point during exercise testing is related to cardiovascular and all-cause mortality

Cardiorespiratory optimal point in post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study

The varied clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 infection have raised concerns about long-term consequences, especially "long-COVID" or "post-COVID-19 syndrome." In this context, the cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) within the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) emerges as a crucial metric for evaluating functional capacities and detecting cardiovascular and pulmonary anomalies post-COVID-19. This study aimed to assess COP values among post-COVID-19 patients and categorized them based on the initial severity of their disease. In this cross-sectional study conducted in the Northeast Brazil, 80 patients (26 females and 54 males) previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 underwent CPET. We clinically stratified patients into mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 categories and assessed COP values and other cardiorespiratory metrics. We found differences in the predicted COP between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 (p=0.042). Additionally, patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 record had an average COP value exceeding 22. Other parameters, including respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope, did not differ across the groups. Patients with a history of severe COVID-19 showed altered COP values, suggesting potential discrepancies in cardiovascular and respiratory system integration. The outcomes emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and assessment of the cardiorespiratory domain for post-COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between elevated COP in post-severe COVID-19 and its long-term prognostic implications.

Effect of dry dynamic apnea on aerobic power in elite rugby athletes: a warm-up method

Objective: While long-term dynamic breath-holding training has been extensively studied to enhance cardiopulmonary function in athletes, limited research has explored the impact of a single breath-holding session on subsequent athletic capacity. In addition, Dry Dynamic Apnea (DA) has a more immediate physiological response than wet and static breath-holding. This study aims to assess the immediate effects of a single session of DA on the aerobic power and hematological parameters of elite athletes. Methods: Seventeen elite male rugby athletes (average age 23.5 ± 1.8) participated in this study. Two warm-up protocols were employed prior to incremental exercise: a standard warm-up (10 min of no-load pedaling) and a DA warm-up (10 min of no-load pedaling accompanied by six maximum capacity breath holds, with 30 s between each breath hold). Fingertip blood indicators were measured before and after warm-up. The incremental exercise test assessed aerobic parameters with self-regulation applied throughout the study. Results: Compared to the baseline warm-up, the DA warm-up resulted in a significant increase in VO2peak from 3.14 to 3.38 L/min (7.64% change, p < 0.05). HRmax increased from 170 to 183 bpm (7.34% change, p < 0.05), and HRpeak increased from 169 to 182 bpm (7.52% change, p < 0.05). Hematocrit and hemoglobin showed differential changes between the two warm-up methods (PHematocrit = 0.674; Phemoglobin = 0.707). Conclusion: This study investigates how DA influences physiological factors such as spleen contraction, oxygen uptake, and sympathetic nerve activation compared to traditional warm-up methods. Immediate improvements in aerobic power suggest reduced vagus nerve stimulation, heightened sympathetic activity, and alterations in respiratory metabolism induced by the voluntarily hypoxia-triggered warm-up. Further research is warranted to comprehensively understand these physiological responses and optimize warm-up strategies for elite athletic performance.

The cardiorespiratory optimal point as a discriminator of lesion severity in adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), which depends on maximal exertion and is reduced in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), is associated with lesion severity. The lowest ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (the minimum value of VE/VO2) reflects the cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) as best possible respiration-circulatory interaction and may discriminate between lesion types without the need for maximal exertion. However, data on COP in ACHD is scarce.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed stable ACHD with moderate (N.=13) and severe lesions (N.=17) reporting to our outpatient clinic undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The primary outcome of the study was the difference of COP between moderate and severe lesions. Secondary outcomes were between group differences of the submaximal variable exercise oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and peak O2 pulse (O2pulsemax) as a surrogate for peripheral oxygen extraction and stroke volume increase during exercise.

RESULTS

The group of severe lesions displayed higher COP (29.5±7.0 vs. 25.2±6.2, P=0.028) as well as lower O2pulsemax (13.3±8.4 vs. 14.9±3.4 mL/beat/kg 102, P=0.038). VO2peak (17.4±6.5 vs. 20.8±8.5 mL/kg/min, P=0.286) and OUES (1.5±0.7 vs. 1.8±0.9, P=0.613) showed a trend towards lower values in severe lesions. COP was a better between group discriminator than O2pulsemax (area under the curve 73.8% vs. 72.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

As a submaximal variable, COP discriminated between moderate and severe lesions and may prove beneficial in a highly vulnerable population that is often unable to undergo exertional testing.

Cardiorespiratory Optimal Point Is a Submaximal Exercise Test Variable and a Predictor of Mortality Risk: THE BALL STATE ADULT FITNESS LONGITUDINAL LIFESTYLE STUDY (BALL ST)

PURPOSE

The cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) is the minimum ventilatory equivalent for oxygen. The COP can be determined during a submaximal incremental exercise test. Reflecting the optimal interaction between the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, COP may have prognostic utility. The aim of this investigation was to determine the relationship between COP and all-cause mortality in a cohort of apparently healthy adults.

METHODS

The sample included 3160 apparently healthy adults (46% females) with a mean age of 44.0 ± 12.5 yr who performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess the relationship between COP and mortality risk. Prognostic peak oxygen uptake (V˙ o2peak ) and COP models were compared using the concordance index.

RESULTS

There were 558 deaths (31% females) over a follow-up period of 23.0 ± 11.9 yr. For males, all Cox proportional hazards models, including the model adjusted for traditional risk factors and V˙ o2peak , had a positive association with risk for mortality ( P < .05). For females, only the unadjusted COP model was associated with risk for mortality ( P < .05). The concordance index values indicated that unadjusted COP models had lower discrimination compared with unadjusted V˙ o2peak models ( P < .05) and V˙ o2peak did not complement COP models ( P ≥ .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiorespiratory optimal point is related to all-cause mortality in males but not females. These findings suggest that a determination of COP can have prognostic utility in apparently healthy males aged 18-85 yr, which may be relevant when a maximal exercise test is not feasible or desirable.