An HLA-B7-specific antibody in an HLA-B*07 positive patient explained by a nonexpressed allele (HLA-B*07:181N )

Comparison of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single-pass high-resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs

Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation.

Improvement in HLA-typing by new sequence-specific oligonucleotides kits for HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 loci

Polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific oligonucleotide is commonly used for HLA-typing. We replaced our LabType SSO HD (HD) kits with LabType SSO XR (XR) kits (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, California) for HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 following acquisition of a LABScan3D analyzer. The XR kits have more bead regions than the HD kits, allowing for an extended number of probes and exon coverage. They are claimed to improve typing resolution and to diminish the number of allele ambiguities, including common and well-documented (CWD) and null alleles to be resolved. We retrospectively selected patients who had their first HLA-typing performed with the HD kits and their second determination with the XR kits between 2015 and 2016. Forty-two patients were selected for HLA-A typing comparison, and 48 for HLA-B and 41 for HLA-DRB1. XR kits significantly decreased the number of allele ambiguities for HLA-A and -B. On the other hand, the improvement was limited for the HLA-DRB1 locus. The XR kits did not resolve all the CWD HLA allele ambiguities, which may be important for organ and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. The XR kits eliminated 88%, 62%, and 27% of null allele ambiguities for HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 loci, respectively. In conclusion, the XR kits allow for a significant improvement of HLA-typing resolution for HLA-A and -B loci in comparison with HD kits. In contrast, the number of oligonucleotides in the XR HLA-DRB1 kit should be extended to include exon 3 at the very least. It could also be interesting to include oligonucleotides allowing HLA-DRB3, 4, and 5 typing.