Comparison of different luminex single antigen bead kits for memory B cell-derived HLA antibody detection

Comparison of HISTO SPOT HLA AB With Cross-Match Results

Single antigen bead assays have revolutionised the identification and definition of HLA-specific antibodies and HLA-specific antibody profiles present in patients awaiting transplantation are routinely characterised to inform organ allocation. For highly sensitised patients with a lower likelihood of finding a compatible donor, de-listing of unacceptable antigens is an option to release organ offers. In this study, 164 serum samples from 106 potential renal transplant recipients were tested using HISTO SPOT HLA AB in parallel with testing by LABScreen Single Antigen (One Lambda) and cross-matching by both CDC and flow cytometry. The results were analysed to assess the ability of HISTO SPOT HLA AB to predict a cross-match result and to understand the relative sensitivity of this test compared with other available assays. 136 samples analysed were positive for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using HISTO SPOT HLA AB. Of these, 17 (12.5%) were CDC positive, and 82 (60.3%) were positive by flow cytometry. A total of 28 sera which were negative for DSAs using HISTO SPOT HLA AB were negative by CDC and 25 (89.3%) were also flow cytometry cross-match negative. In this early study, HISTO SPOT HLA AB has a 100% negative predictive value for CDC and 89.3% for flow cytometry cross-matching. HISTO SPOT may therefore prove a useful additional tool to inform de-listing strategies and to facilitate transplantation in highly sensitised patients.

A modeling approach for mean fluorescence intensity value harmonization and cutoff prediction for luminex single antigen bead assays of two different vendors

Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) kits from One Lambda (OL) and Lifecodes (LC) are widely used for HLA antibody detection but have substantial differences in design and assay protocol resulting in different mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values. Here, we present a non-linear modeling approach to accurately convert MFI values between two vendors and to establish user-independent MFI cutoffs when analyzing big datasets. HLA antibody data from a total of 47 EDTA-treated sera tested using both OL and LC SAB kits were analyzed. MFI comparisons were made for the common 84 HLA class I and 63 class II beads. In the exploration set (n = 24), a non-linear hyperbola model on raw MFI corrected by locus-specific highest self MFI subtraction yielded the highest correlation (class I r2 : 0.946, class II r2 : 0.898). Performance of the model was verified in an independent validation set (n = 12) (class I r2 : 0.952, class II r2 : 0.911). Furthermore, in an independent cohort of post-transplant serum samples (n = 11) using the vendor-specific MFI cutoffs dictated by the current model, we found 94% accuracy in bead-specific reactivity assignments by the two vendors. We recommend using the non-linear hyperbola modeling approach with self HLA correction and locus-specific analyzes to harmonize MFI values between two vendors in particular research datasets. As there are considerable variations between the two assays, using MFI conversion for individual patient samples is not recommended.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

How to measure human leukocyte antigen-specific B cells

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The implementation of highly sensitive immune assays measuring anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has modified alloimmune risk stratification and diagnosis of rejection. Nonetheless, anti-HLA antibodies represent the downstream effector mechanism of the B-cell response. Better characterizing the cellular components of the humoral immune response (including memory B cells (mBCs) and long-lived plasma cells) could help to further stratify the alloimmune risk stratification and enable discovery of new therapeutic targets. Several tests that characterize HLA-specific mBCs, either functionally or phenotypically, have been developed in the last years, showing promising applications as well as some limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Functional assays involving ex vivo polyclonal activation of mBC have been refined to allow the detection of HLA-specific mBC capable of producing anti-HLA Abs, using different and complementary detection platforms such as multiplex Fluorospot and single antigen bead assay on culture supernatants. Detection of circulating HLA-specific B cells by flow cytometry remains hindered by the very low frequency of HLA-specific mBC.

SUMMARY

Technological refinements have allowed the development of tests detecting HLA-specific mBC. Further evaluation of these assays in clinical trials, both for immune risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy (desensitization strategies, rescue therapies for ABMR) are now urgently needed.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Peptides Derived From Mismatched Paternal Human Leukocyte Antigen Predicted to Be Presented by HLA-DRB1, -DRB3/4/5, -DQ, and -DP Induce Child-Specific Antibodies in Pregnant Women

Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Epitopes (PIRCHE) are known to be a significant risk factor for the development of donor HLA-specific antibodies after organ transplantation. Most previous studies on PIRCHE limited their analyses on the presentation of the HLA-DRB1 locus, although HLA-DRB3/4/5, -DQ, and -DP are also known for presenting allopeptides to CD4+ T cells. In this study, we analyzed the impact of predicted allopeptides presented by these additional loci on the incidence of HLA-specific antibodies after an immunization event. We considered pregnancy as a model system of an HLA immunization and observed child-specific HLA antibody (CSA) development of 231 mothers during pregnancy by samples being taken at delivery. Our data confirm that PIRCHE presented by HLA-DRB1 along with HLA-DRB3/4/5, -DQ, and -DP are significant predictors for the development of CSA. Although there was limited peptidome overlap observed within the mothers’ presenting HLA proteins, combining multiple presenting loci in a single predictor improved the model only marginally. Prediction performance of PIRCHE further improved when normalizing scores by the respective presenters’ binding promiscuity. Immunogenicity analysis of specific allopeptides could not identify significant drivers of an immune response in this small cohort, suggesting confirmatory studies.