Informing adaptive management strategies: Evaluating a mechanism to predict the likely qualitative size of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in New Zealand using data available in the early response phase of simulated outbreaks

Modelling the field personnel resources to control foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in New Zealand

The objective of the study was to simulate New Zealand's foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) operational plan to determine personnel requirements for an FMD response and understand how the numbers of front-line staff available could affect the size and duration of FMD outbreaks, when using stamping-out (SO) measures with or without vaccination. The model utilized a national dataset of all known livestock farms. Each simulation randomly seeded infection into a single farm. Transmission mechanisms included direct and indirect contacts, local and airborne spread. Prior to each simulation, the numbers of personnel available for front-line tasks (including contact tracing, surveillance of at-risk farms, depopulation and vaccination) were set randomly. In a random subset of simulations, vaccination was allowed to be deployed as an adjunct to SO. The effects of personnel numbers on the size and duration of epidemics were explored using machine learning methods. In the second stage of the study, using a subset of iterations where numbers of personnel were unconstrained, the number of personnel used each day were quantified. When personnel resources were unconstrained, the 95^th percentile and maximum number of infected places (IPs) were 78 and 462, respectively, and the 95^th percentile and maximum duration were 69 and 217 days, respectively. However, severe constraints on personnel resources allowed some outbreaks to exceed the size of the UK 2001 FMD epidemic which had 2026 IPs. The number of veterinarians available had a major influence on the size and duration of outbreaks, whereas the availability of other personnel types did not. A shortage of veterinarians was associated with an increase in time to detect and depopulate IPs, allowing for continued transmission. Emergency vaccination placed a short-term demand for additional staff at the start of the vaccination programme, but the overall number of person days used was similar to SO-only strategies. This study determined the optimal numbers of front-line personnel required to implement the current operational plans to support an FMD response in New Zealand. A shortage of veterinarians was identified as the most influential factor to impact disease control outcomes. Emergency vaccination led to earlier control of FMD outbreaks but at the cost of a short-term spike in demand for personnel. In conclusion, a successful response needs to have access to sufficient personnel, particularly veterinarians, trained in response roles and available at short notice.

Investigations into a trigger-based approach for initiating emergency vaccination to augment stamping out of foot-and-mouth disease in New Zealand: a simulation study

AIMS

To investigate an adaptive management approach to the deployment of emergency vaccination as an additional measure to stamping out (SO) during simulated outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in New Zealand.

METHODS

A simulation modelling (n=6000 simulations) approach was used. The study population comprised all known farms in New Zealand with FMD-susceptible livestock. Each simulation started with infection seeded into a single randomly selected farm. Each outbreak was randomly assigned to one of four control strategies, comprising SO only; trigger-based vaccination (TRV) where SO was augmented with vaccination if an early decision indicator trigger operating between Days 11-35 of the response indicated a large outbreak was developing; SO plus vaccination started randomly on Days 11-35 of the response (VACr); and SO plus vaccination with a fixed start on Day 21 of the response (VACf). Other parameters, such as the number of personnel available were also varied randomly. Generalised additive models (GAM) were used to evaluate variables associated with the number of infected premises (IP) and epidemic duration.

RESULTS

The mean number of IP was 29 (median 9, min 1, max 757), while epidemics lasted on average 26.9 (median 18, min 1, max 220) days. These excluded 303 extreme outbreaks larger than the UK 2001 FMD epidemic (2,030 cases). Univariable analysis of the pooled vaccination results vs. SO, showed that vaccination significantly reduced the number of IP (p<0.001) and outbreak duration (p<0.001). GAM of large outbreaks revealed that only the TRV strategy was significantly protective compared to SO alone, reducing the odds of a large outbreak by 22% (OR=0.78; 95% CI=0.63-0.96). The number of veterinarians was non-linearly associated with large outbreaks, with low numbers increasing the odds of a large outbreak, but above 200 veterinarians, the odds reduced. Time to first detection was also non-linearly associated with large outbreaks, with detections <13 days protective and longer detection times increasing the odds of a large outbreak. GAM of long outbreaks showed similar findings, except that all three vaccination strategies significantly reduced duration. Overall, the TRV strategy resulted in the smallest and shortest epidemics.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An adaptive management approach that deployed vaccination in response to a trigger when a large outbreak was developing outperformed SO and reduced the odds of large or long outbreaks more than the other two vaccination strategies, although the differences between the three vaccination strategies were statistically small. This study provides highly relevant insights into the dynamics of disease establishment and spread that will guide New Zealand's readiness for responding to highly infectious disease incursions such as FMD.