Reducing the Human Burden of Breast Cancer: Advanced Radiation Therapy Yields Improved Treatment Outcomes

A National Survey of Breast Surgeons and Radiation Oncologists on Contemporary Axillary Management in Mastectomy Patients

BACKGROUND

Management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer has undergone significant change over the past decade through landmark clinical trials. This study aimed to assess national practice patterns in axillary management in patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and examines what guides provider recommendations.

METHODS

A national case-based survey study was performed of surgeons and radiation oncologists from July to August 2020. Surgeons were identified through the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) after review and approval by the ASBrS Research Committee, and radiation oncologists were identified through an institutional database. Both descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 994 providers responded-680 surgeons and 314 radiation oncologists. Surgeons were older and in practice longer (p < 0.05) and treated a higher percentage of breast patients (81% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). Most surgeons were hospital-employed (43%), whereas most radiation oncologists were in private practice (40%; p < 0.001). Fifty-two percent of surgeons routinely send sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for frozen section (52%) during mastectomy, of which 78% proceed directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if positive. There was significant variability in treatment recommendations between the two groups among the hypothetical cases (p < 0.001). In the setting of low disease burden in the SLNs, > 30% of surgeons recommended ALND, while radiation oncologists recommend axillary radiotherapy over axillary clearance (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is significant heterogeneity in the management of the axilla in mastectomy patients with pathologically positive SLNs, both between and among surgeons and radiation oncologists. Efforts should be made to assist both groups in identifying de-escalation opportunities to ensure that mastectomy patients with positive SLNs are treated appropriately.

Survival Comparisons Between Early Male and Female Breast Cancer Patients

We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) and standardized mortality rate (SMR) of the male breast cancer (MBC) with female breast cancer (FBC) after propensity score matching. Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), the early breast cancer patients (T1-2N0-2M0) were extracted from 1998-2007. This study included 1,111 and 2,151 patients with early MBC and FBC, respectively, whose clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced. At a mean follow-up time of 97 months, 10-year OS rate was 58.3% in the MBC group and 68.7% in the FBC (log-rank test, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.29 to 1.64). Adjusted HR for OS between MBC and FBC were revealed from propensity score matched-multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.73). Similar adjusted SMRs between MBC and FBC ((SMR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.83,2.14) for FBC and (SMR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.88-2.28) for MBC) were observed. The nomogram was constructed for FBC, and predicted probabilities were generally good (C-index = 0.71), whose area under curve is higher than TNM stage classification (0.74 vs 0.62). OS was significantly decreased among early MBC patients compared with FBC, but similar SMRs and its trends by age groups were observed between MBC and FBC except for young patients.

Incidence of isolated local breast cancer recurrence and contralateral breast cancer: A systematic review

An increasing number of women is surviving breast cancer and due to that at risk of developing an isolated ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) or a contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Patients' main concern is cancer recurrence. Patient counseling on breast cancer recurrence is challenging. In order to provide healthcare professionals and patients more guidance, a systematic literature review of the incidence of isolated IBTR and CBC in women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer was performed. Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 until October 2015. Multicenter studies reporting an IBTR or CBC rate in curatively treated adult females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer were included. The initial search yielded 6998 potentially relevant articles. Twenty were eligible for inclusion, representing 25 recurrence incidence rates. Both isolated IBTR and CBC incidence rates steadily increased with the length of follow-up, indicating that IBTR and CBC occur even more than 15 years after diagnosis. The annual incidence rate of isolated IBTR and CBC in women diagnosed with an early invasive breast cancer was 0.6% (range: 0.4-1.1%) and 0.5% (range: 0.2-0.7%), respectively. Analyzed data were lacking information about important risk factors and given treatment with regard to the incidence of recurrence, which hampers the prediction of patient tailored recurrence risks. The presented rates are therefore the best available estimates of isolated IBTR and CBC annual incidence rates based on the current literature. Healthcare professionals could use these rates in their communication with patients diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer.