Heterologous Liposarcomatous Differentiation in Malignant Phyllodes Tumor is Histologically Similar but Immunohistochemically and Molecularly Distinct from Well-differentiated Liposarcoma of Soft Tissue

Malignant phyllodes tumor with EGFR variant III mutation: A rare case report with immunohistochemical and genomic studies

A female in her 60's presented with a left-sided breast mass. A core needle biopsy specimen showed diffuse proliferation of a round cell tumor, which was positive for vimentin, NKX2.2, BCOR, and focal CD99 on immunohistochemistry (IHC). No fusion genes of the Ewing family sarcomas were detected. With a tentative diagnosis of primary breast sarcoma (PBS), total mastectomy was performed after chemotherapy. The resected tissues showed proliferation of round or spindle-shaped tumor cells with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, exhibiting solid and fascicular arrangements but no epithelial component or organoid pattern. While IHC indicated no particular histological diagnosis, genomic examination revealed gene alterations in MED12 p.G44D, MLL2 (KMT2D) p.T1496fs*27, and EGFR variant III (vIII). Moreover, a retrospective IHC study showed overexpression of EGFRvIII. A malignant phyllodes tumor (PT) with extensive sarcomatous overgrowth was indicated as an integrative diagnosis. This is a rare case of a malignant PT harboring EGFRvIII. The present case provides an importance of accurate diagnosis and genomic analysis of rare breast tumors, as malignant PT and PBS are different in its treatment strategy and prognosis.

Refining the classification of breast phyllodes tumours

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms that pose recurrent classification challenges, in large part due to the multiple histological parameters of stromal hypercellularity and atypia, stromal mitotic count, stromal overgrowth and tumour borders, that are used for grading. While the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Breast Tumours provides recommendations on diagnostic features, defining criteria are not always applied in routine practice. Lack of concordance among pathologists in typing and grading further underscores the classification difficulties, especially in the borderline category. Although there has been significant molecular information on phyllodes tumours in recent years which has been diagnostically helpful, it has not been translated into daily clinical practice. In order to refine the classification of phyllodes tumours into one that is simple yet comprehensive, reproducible and prognostically precise, a multipronged approach is needed that leverages on global contributions of the International Fibroepithelial Consortium, support by the International Collaboration on Cancer Classification and Research (IC³ R) in amalgamating evidence translation, and guidance from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) for standardised reporting. It is hoped that the evidence generated can be used towards refining the classification of phyllodes tumours for the future.

FISH Diagnostic Assessment of MDM2 Amplification in Liposarcoma: Potential Pitfalls and Troubleshooting Recommendations

MDM2 amplification represents the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of liposarcoma, whose assessment is based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis. Despite its diagnostic relevance, no univocal interpretation criteria regarding FISH assessments of MDM2 amplification have been established so far, leading to several different approaches and potential diagnostic misinterpretations. This study aims to address the most common issues and proposes troubleshooting guidelines for MDM2 amplification assessments by FISH. We retrospectively retrieved 51 liposarcomas, 25 Lipomas, 5 Spindle Cell Lipoma/Pleomorphic Lipomas, and 2 Atypical Spindle Cell Lipomatous Tumors and the corresponding MDM2 FISH analysis. We observed MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas cases only (43 out of 51 cases) and identified three MDM2-amplified patterns (scattered (50% of cases), clustered (14% of cases), and mixed (36% of cases)) and two nonamplified patterns (low number of signals (82% of cases) and polysomic (18% of cases)). Based on these data and published evidence in the literature, we propose a set of criteria to guide MDM2 amplification analysis in liposarcoma. Kindled by the compelling importance of MDM2 assessments to improve diagnostic and therapeutic liposarcoma management, these suggestions could represent the first step to develop a univocal interpretation model and consensus guidelines.

Mesenchymal lesions of the breast

Mesenchymal lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous range of entities with diverse clinical, histological, and molecular features, as well as biological behaviour. Their morphologic overlap with non-mesenchymal lesions (such as metaplastic carcinoma and phyllodes tumour) and relative rarity also pose significant diagnostic challenges. In this review, we summarize the salient features of selected mesenchymal lesions of the breast, emphasizing those that are the most common and problematic. Vascular, fibroblastic/myofibroblastic, adipocytic, and smooth muscle lesions are each covered with regard to their clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis, while recent advances and the role of immunohistochemistry and molecular tests are also highlighted.

Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Update on Molecular Profile With Focus on Pediatric Population

CONTEXT.—

This review article derives from the breast pathology lecture at the Eighth Princeton Integrated Pathology Symposium (PIPS VIII).

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a literature review and update on fibroepithelial lesions of the breast with molecular findings and findings regarding the pediatric population.

DATA SOURCES.—

The sources include extensive literature review, personal research, and experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Given significant differences in prognosis and management of fibroepithelial lesions, we aim to provide readers with pertinent definitions, pathomorphology, molecular findings, and management for each diagnosis, with insights on the pediatric population.

Survey of recurrent diagnostic challenges in breast phyllodes tumours

BACKGROUND

Breast phyllodes tumours (PTs) are graded as benign, borderline, or malignant by analysis of multiple histological features. PT grading is often inconsistent, likely due to variation in the weighting of grading criteria by pathologists.

DESIGN

The hierarchy of use of diagnostic criteria was identified using a 20-question survey.

RESULTS

In all, 213 pathologists from 29 countries responded. 54% reported 10-50 PT cases per year. Criteria considered key to PT diagnosis were: increased stromal cellularity (84.3%), stromal overgrowth (76.6%), increased stromal mitoses (67.8%), stromal atypia (61.5%), stromal fronding (59.0%), periductal stromal condensation (58.0%), irregular tumour borders (46.3%), and/or lesional heterogeneity (33.7%). The importance of grading parameters were: mitotic activity (55.5%), stromal overgrowth (54.0%), stromal atypia (51.9%), increased stromal cellularity (41.7%), and nature of the tumour border (38.9%). 49% would diagnose malignant PT without a full array of adverse features. 89% used the term "cellular fibroepithelial lesion (FEL)" for difficult cases; 45% would diagnose an FEL with stromal fronding (but lacking other PT features) as fibroadenoma (FA), 35% FEL, and 17% PT. 59% deemed clinico-radiological findings diagnostically significant; 68% considered age (≥40 years) important in determining if an FEL was a FA or PT. In FELs from young patients, increased stromal cellularity (83%), fronding (52%), and mitoses (41%) were more common. 34% regarded differentiating cellular FA from PT as a specific challenge; 54% had issues assigning a borderline PT grade.

CONCLUSION

Criteria for grading PT lie on a spectrum, leading to interpretive variability. The survey highlights the criteria most used by pathologists, which do not completely align with WHO recommendations.

Re-Classification with Outcome Correlation of Previously Diagnosed Malignant Phyllodes Tumors Applying the 2016 Consensus Guidelines

Background. Classification of phyllodes tumors is challenging due unclear diagnostic criteria, recently addressed by consensus review criteria. Herein, we reviewed all malignant phyllodes tumor resections and reclassified them based on the consensus guidelines, correlating with outcome. We hypothesize that application of criteria would result in a significant proportion being "down-graded" to either borderline or benign phyllodes tumor. Methods. Primary resections of malignant phyllodes tumor were reviewed by four AP board-certified, breast fellowship-trained pathologists. Morphologic variables delineated in consensus guidelines (ie stromal cellularity, cellular atypia, tumor border, presence of heterologous elements, presence of stromal overgrowth) were evaluated. Following review, cases were reclassified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Results. Upon reclassification, 20% (5/20) cases were "down-graded" to borderline phyllodes tumor while 80% (15/20) remained malignant phyllodes tumor. Two morphologic features were statistically significant including broadly infiltrating tumor border in 80% (12/15) of malignant phyllodes tumors compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumor (0/5) (p = 0.004) and stromal overgrowth in 67% (10/15) of malignant phyllodes tumor compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumors (0/5) (p = 0.03). Upon review of the pathology reports, 30% (6/20) contained all 5 histomorphologic variables delineated in the consensus review criteria. Malignant phyllodes tumor resulted in five cases with recurrence (33.3%, 5/15) and three cases with metastases (20.0%, 3/15) and borderline phyllodes tumor resulted in one case with recurrence (20.0%, 1/5) and no metastases (0/5). Conclusion. The consensus guidelines for phyllodes tumor are useful for subclassification. We hypothesize that standardize reporting of the histomorphologic variables may lead to better consensus.

Diagnostic concordance of phyllodes tumour of the breast

AIMS

Phyllodes tumours (PT) are rare and distinct breast tumours, which span a morphological continuum. Classification into benign, borderline and malignant categories reflects their biology and clinical behaviour and is essential to guide management. This study aims to assess the diagnostic agreement of PT using the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) breast pathology external quality assurance (EQA) scheme data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six PTs were identified in the EQA scheme, which were diagnosed by an average of 607 participants/circulation. Data on diagnostic categories were collected and representative slides were reviewed. The level of concordance between reporting pathologists was assessed. There were 14 benign, six borderline and six malignant PT. The overall rate of diagnosis agreement was 86% when analysed as benign lesions, borderline PT and malignant lesions, which decreased to 79% when diagnosed as PT (irrespective of grade) and to 63% when the diagnosis was further refined to PT categories (benign, borderline and malignant PTs). The highest agreement rate was observed in malignant PT (86%) and the lowest in borderline PT (42%). Malignant heterologous elements, stromal overgrowth and leaf-like architecture are features associated with higher concordance rates. Lower-priority features were stromal expansion, clefting and multinodularity.

CONCLUSION

The concordance of PT diagnosis, as an entity, is high, but its classification into benign, borderline and malignant has variable agreement levels, with borderline tumours having the lowest concordance rate. More research to refine the diagnostic criteria for categorisation of PT is warranted to improve concordance between pathologists.

A Case of Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast with Mixed Liposarcoma: Case Report and Literature Review

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) account for less than 1% of breast tumors, and malignant PTs account for even less. Here, we described an unusual case of malignant PT with mixed liposarcoma (myxoid liposarcoma [MLP] and pleomorphic liposarcoma [PLP]). A 52-year-old woman discovered a small lump in her left breast. Twenty years later, the lump suddenly grew within 1 month. Mammography showed space-occupying lesions of the left breast. Histologically, the tumor was characterized by hypercellular stroma covering the epithelium and protrusion of the myoepithelium into the cyst to form a lobulated structure; regions of loose mucus and hypercellular structures alternated. A region of peripheral benign fibroadenoma was also observed, and many stellate and spindle cells or signet ring-like cells were identified in loose areas. Some areas showed a characteristic thin branching vascular pattern. In the cell-rich area, adipocytes and odd megakaryocytes were observed. Atypical mitotic figures were observed in the cell-rich and mucus areas (16 mitoses/10 high-power fields [HPF] and 2 mitoses/10 HPF, respectively). In the immunohistochemical analysis, a small number of tumor cells were positive for AE1/3 and vimentin, whereas all cells were negative for cytokeratin 34βE12, E-cadherin, p63, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and S-100, ruling out the possibility of metaplastic carcinoma. Interestingly, cyclin-dependent kinase 4, mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), and p16 were strongly positive in both loose mucus and cell-rich areas. However, the fluorescence in situ hybridization test results showed that MDM2 was not amplified. Combined with morphological characteristics, these findings supported that the tumor was a mixed malignant PT with MLP and PLP. Our patient did not receive radiation therapy, and after 47 months of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred. This case report serves to expand the morphologic spectrum of mixed malignant PT with liposarcoma.

Fibroepithelial lesions revisited: implications for diagnosis and management

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast, comprising the fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, are a unique group of neoplasms that share histological characteristics but possess different clinical behaviour. The fibroadenoma is the commonest benign breast tumour in women, while the phyllodes tumour is rare and may be associated with recurrences, grade progression and even metastasis. The diagnosis of fibroadenoma is usually straightforward, with recognised histological variants such as the cellular, complex, juvenile and myxoid forms. The phyllodes tumour comprises benign, borderline and malignant varieties, graded using a constellation of histological parameters based on stromal characteristics of hypercellularity, atypia, mitoses, overgrowth and the nature of tumour borders. While phyllodes tumour grade correlates with clinical behaviour, interobserver variability in assessing multiple parameters that are potentially of different biological weightage leads to significant challenges in accurate grade determination and consequently therapy. Differential diagnostic considerations along the spectrum of fibroepithelial tumours can be problematic in routine practice. Recent discoveries of the molecular underpinnings of these tumours may have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Periductal Stromal Tumors and Phyllodes Tumors Represent a Spectrum of Fibroepithelial Lesions: What Is in a Name?

Periductal stromal tumors (PSTs) of the breast are considered as a rare subtype of phyllodes tumors. These rare fibroepithelial lesions display a biphasic morphology, characterized by a cellular stroma surrounding benign ducts. Unlike phyllodes tumors, they do not present with a leaflike architecture, rendering a biopsy diagnosis of a PST very challenging. In this report, we compare the histopathological features of a PST with those of a borderline phyllodes tumor. We discuss the differences and similarities between both entities, and we highlight the potential pitfalls of the respective biopsies. Both cases illustrate that PSTs and phyllodes tumors are part of the same spectrum. This biological spectrum implies that "hybrid" lesions do exist, which can be hard to classify.

Not Every Fat-Containing Lesion on Mammogram is a Benign Finding: Case Report and Review of Breast Malignant Phyllodes Tumor with Heterologous Liposarcomatous Differentiation

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are a rare fibroepithelial tumor of the breast. Histopathological confirmation of stromal and epithelial component is required for making the diagnosis of PT, and stromal component carries an increased risk of sarcomatous transformation. We present imaging findings of a histologically proven case of malignant PT with heterologous liposarcomatous transformation of the breast.

Molecular updates in adipocytic neoplasms✰

Adipocytic neoplasms include a diversity of both benign tumors (lipomas) and malignancies (liposarcomas), and each tumor type is characterized by its own unique molecular alterations driving tumorigenesis. Work over the past 30 years has established the diagnostic utility of several of these characteristic molecular alterations (e.g. MDM2 amplification in well- and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, FUS/EWSR1-DDIT3 gene fusions in myxoid liposarcoma, RB1 loss in spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma). More recent studies have focused on additional molecular alterations which may have therapeutic or prognostic impact. This review will summarize several of the important molecular findings in adipocytic tumors that have been described over the past 10 years.

Primary Breast Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/ Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) and its higher-grade counterpart, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL), are extraordinarily rare tumors in the breast. The main differential diagnostic consideration of primary breast ALT/WDL is malignant phyllodes tumor with liposarcomatous differentiation, and the main differential diagnostic consideration of DDL in the breast is metaplastic breast carcinoma, particularly the spindle cell type, with heterologous sarcomatous differentiation. These differential diagnoses may be particularly challenging when evaluating limited core needle biopsy sampling. MDM2 and/or CDK4 protein overexpression and gene amplification are beneficial ancillary studies that can help establish the diagnosis of primary breast ALT/WDL and DDL, and effectively rule out the diagnoses of malignant phyllodes tumor and metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Metaplastic Breast Cancer Masquerading as Liposarcoma of the Breast: A Case Report following Oncoplastic Treatment

Mammary liposarcoma is among the rarest of breast tumours. Here we report the presentation, macroscopic, microscopic, and immunohistochemical features of an extremely rare case of metaplastic carcinoma with extensive pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation. A 47-year-old woman presented with bilateral grade III breast ptosis and a 3 × 4 cm mass in the lower outer quadrant of the left breast. Mammography and ultrasound confirmed a well-defined mass. A core biopsy performed was diagnosed as pleomorphic liposarcoma. Microscopically, this was a well-defined, lobulated tumour comprising solid sheets of large pleomorphic and spindle cells with bizarre forms, vacuolated cytoplasm, and ample mitoses. Atypical lipoblasts were easily identifiable. Due to the strong, though patchy, cytokeratin expression, the diagnosis of metaplastic carcinoma with pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation was made. Extensive sampling, careful search for a biphasic pattern, ductal carcinoma in situ, and/or epithelial differentiation, and a panel of broad-spectrum cytokeratins are essential to establish the diagnosis.

Lipomatous tumors of the breast: A contemporary review

Breast tumors with lipomatous or liposarcomatous components are infrequently encountered, but can be a source of diagnostic difficulty if the context of the fatty differentiation is not recognized. Among the true adipocytic tumors, lipoma is the most common lipomatous tumor arising in the breast. Several mammary spindle cell tumors may show adipocytic differentiation, including fibroepithelial tumors and myofibroblastoma. Liposarcomatous components most often arise in malignant phyllodes tumors, as opposed to primary liposarcomas of the breast which are believed to be uncommon. This article will review the spectrum fat-containing tumors of the breast with an emphasis on differential diagnosis and insights from recent molecular studies.