Upgrade Rate and Imaging Features of Atypical Apocrine Lesions

Challenges and Clinical Relevance of Modern Breast Pathology Reporting: Your Questions Answered

BACKGROUND

Breast pathology reporting, especially for breast cancer, has evolved through the years, from terse succinct diagnostic conclusions with scant histological details to the current comprehensive reporting guidelines issued by major pathology colleges and bodies, including the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Pathology elements included in reporting guidelines are evidence based and contribute significantly to individualised and personalised patient management.

SUMMARY

This article is based on the lively interactive question and answer session that followed the breast pathology segment in the symposium jointly organised by the British Association of Urological Pathology, British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists, British Society of Gastroenterology and the Association of Breast Pathology, in November 2022, titled "Personalised histopathology reporting for personalised medicine."

KEY MESSAGES

The breast pathology session emphasised the clinical utility of breast pathology data items, incorporating a case-based approach by highlighting the relevance of pathology information in various clinical scenarios. This review included clinico-pathological discussion points on florid lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical apocrine adenosis, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy reporting, atypical ductal hyperplasia presenting at the margin, flat epithelial atypia versus columnar cell change, papilloma on core needle biopsy, margin status, mucocele-like lesion, total duct excision/microdochectomy specimen, and anterior and nipple margins in skin-sparing mastectomy. Effective communication and regular involvement of pathologists in breast multidisciplinary tumour boards are crucial.

European guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) developed jointly by EUSOMA, EUSOBI, ESP (BWG) and ESSO

INTRODUCTION

Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) include atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasias, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, papillary lesions, radial scars and fibroepithelial lesions as well as other rare miscellaneous lesions. They are challenging to categorise histologically, requiring specialist training and multidisciplinary input. They may coexist with in situ or invasive breast cancer (BC) and increase the risk of subsequent BC development. Management should focus on adequate classification and management whilst avoiding overtreatment. The aim of these guidelines is to provide updated information regarding the diagnosis and management of B3 lesions, according to updated literature review evidence.

METHODS

These guidelines provide practical recommendations which can be applied in clinical practice which include recommendation grade and level of evidence. All sections were written according to an updated literature review and discussed at a consensus meeting. Critical appraisal by the expert writing committee adhered to the 23 items in the international Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool.

RESULTS

Recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) diagnosis of a B3 lesion reported in this guideline, vary depending on the presence of atypia, size of lesion, sampling size, and patient preferences. After CNB or VAB, the option of vacuum-assisted excision or surgical excision should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with the patient is crucial for personalizing further treatment. De-escalation of surgical intervention for B3 breast lesions is ongoing, and the inclusion of vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) will decrease the need for surgical intervention in further approaches. Communication with patients may be different according to histological diagnosis, presence or absence of atypia, or risk of upgrade due to discordant imaging. Written information resources to help patients understand these issues alongside with verbal communication is recommended. Lifestyle interventions have a significant impact on BC incidence so lifestyle interventions need to be suggested to women at increased BC risk as a result of a diagnosis of a B3 lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide a state-of-the-art overview of the diagnosis, management and prognosis of B3 lesions in modern multidisciplinary breast practice.

Identifying women with increased risk of breast cancer and implementing risk-reducing strategies and supplemental imaging

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer in women, affecting 1 in 8 women in the United States (12.5%) in their lifetime. However, some women have a higher lifetime risk of BC because of genetic and lifestyle factors, mammographic breast density, and reproductive and hormonal factors. Because BC risk is variable, screening and prevention strategies should be individualized after considering patient-specific risk factors. Thus, health care professionals need to be able to assess risk profiles, identify high-risk women, and individualize screening and prevention strategies through a shared decision-making process. In this article, we review the risk factors for BC, risk-assessment models that identify high-risk patients, and preventive medications and lifestyle modifications that may decrease risk. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of various supplemental screening methods.

Ultrasound Features and Rate of Upgrade to Malignancy in Atypical Apocrine Lesions of the Breast

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ultrasound (US) features and rate of upgrade to malignancy in atypical apocrine lesions (AALs) of the breast, diagnosed on percutaneous needle biopsy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 AALs diagnosed by needle biopsy in 15 patients. For 16 of the 17 AALs, subsequent surgical excision (n = 14) or 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy (n = 2) was performed. Ultrasound features were retrospectively analyzed according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon.

RESULTS

Of 17 AALs, 13 (76.5%) were atypical apocrine hyperplasia; 3 (17.6%) were atypical apocrine adenosis; and 1 (5.9%) was combined atypical apocrine hyperplasia and atypical apocrine adenosis on needle biopsy. Subsequently, 4 of 16 AALs (25%) were upgraded to malignancy at surgical excision. On US imaging, all 17 lesions presented as masses, which were mainly irregular and noncircumscribed (n = 8) or oval/round and noncircumscribed (n = 7) with isoechogenicity or hypoechogenicity. Rarely, an AAL would show complex cystic and solid echogenicity (n = 1) or appear as a hypoechoic mass with oval shape and a circumscribed margin (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical apocrine lesions of the breast often showed suspicious malignant features on US imaging. Given the high upgrade rate (25%), the diagnosis of an AAL by needle biopsy warrants subsequent surgical excision.

Breast Atypical Apocrine Adenosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Atypical apocrine adenosis (AAA) is a benign lesion of the breast that is identified more frequently today than in the past when it was considered a rare diagnosis and commonly misdiagnosed as other malignant lesions of the breast. AAA is defined as the presence of apocrine cytology in a recognisable lobular unit associated with sclerosing adenosis. We present a case of an incidental finding of AAA and discuss diagnostic challenges and their implications on clinical management.

Surgical Management of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend counseling on risk-reduction strategies, including lifestyle modification, endocrine therapy, and bilateral mastectomy, for patients with classic-type lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) detected on core biopsy or surgical excision. Importantly, current diagnosis and treatment guidelines for classic-type LCIS do not include unilateral mastectomy for primary treatment or risk reduction. Prior studies reporting national practice patterns suggest increasing use of mastectomy for management of LCIS, with considerable variation by geographic region. However, these studies did not distinguish between uni- and bilateral mastectomies. This study aimed to investigate national practice patterns and factors associated with unilateral mastectomy.

METHODS

The study used the National Cancer Database to identify women with a diagnosis of LCIS from 2004 to 2013. Descriptive statistics were used to describe surgical treatment, and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify temporal, patient, and facility-level factors associated with receipt of uni- and bilateral mastectomy.

RESULTS

The study identified 30,105 women with LCIS. Of these woman, 5.4% received no surgery, 84.8% had surgical excision, 4% underwent unilateral mastectomy, and 5.1% underwent bilateral mastectomy. Adjusted analysis showed that young age, white race, insurance coverage, greater comorbidity, and geographic region (p < 0.001) were associated with receipt of both uni- and bilateral mastectomy. Additionally, more recent year of diagnosis was associated with receipt of bilateral mastectomy. Unilateral mastectomy rates within geographic regions ranged from 2.7% in New England to 8% in the South.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly as many patients underwent unilateral (4%) as bilateral mastectomy (5.1%), representing inappropriate care. These findings highlight an opportunity to reduce unnecessary care through improved provider and patient education regarding optimal management of LCIS.