Immediate nipple reconstruction in combination with implant reconstruction using dermal sling

Guiding Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction: Literature Review and Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Nipple-areola complex reconstruction (NAR) most commonly represents the finishing touch to breast reconstruction (BR). Nipple presence is particularly relevant to the patient's psyche, beyond any shadow of doubt. Many reconstructive options have been described in time. Surgery is easy, but final result is often disappointing on the long run.

METHODS

The goal of this manuscript is to analyze and classify knowledge concerning NAR techniques and the factors that influence success, and then to elaborate a practical evidence-based algorithm. Out of the 3136 available articles as of August 8th, 2020, we selected 172 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria, which we subdivided into 5 main topics of discussion, being the various NAR techniques; patient factors (including patient selection, timing and ideal position); dressings; potential complications and finally, outcomes/patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

We found 92 articles describing NAR techniques, 41 addressing patient factors (out of which 17 discussed patient selection, 14 described ideal NAC location, 10 described appropriate timing), 10 comparing dressings, 7 studying NAR complications, and 22 addressing outcomes and patient satisfaction. We elaborated a comprehensive decision-making algorithm to help narrow down the choice among NAR techniques, and choose the correct strategy according to the various scenarios, and particularly the BR technique and skin envelope.

CONCLUSIONS

No single NAR technique provides definitive results, which is why we believe there is no "end-all be-all solution". NAR must be approached as a case-by-case situation. Furthermore, despite NAR being such a widely discussed topic in scientific literature, we still found a lack of clinical trials to allow for more thorough recommendations to be elaborated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Buried Dermato-cutaneous Skin Flaps and Immediate Adipocyte Transfer: A Minimally Invasive Autologous Breast Reconstruction Technique

Autologous breast reconstruction historically required flaps that were invasive, required prolonged operative times and recoveries, and resulted in varying degrees of donor site morbidity. We present our early results with a minimally invasive completely autologous breast reconstruction technique utilizing buried dermato-cutaneous (DMC) flaps and immediate fat grafting. A 25-patient, 43-breast consecutive case series is presented.

Breast reconstruction with a dermal sling: a systematic review of surgical modifications

A dermal sling (DS) is used to cover the implant with two layers of tissue when immediate breast reconstruction is performed in women with large and ptotic breasts. It works as an autologous acellular dermal matrix/mesh that can be used to control the implant pocket and inframammary fold, without inferring an extra foreign material and higher costs. There is relatively little published about the DS technique. The primary aim of this study was to systematically review published surgical modifications to the dermal sling (DS). The secondary aim was to investigate what implants have been used. Relevant databases were searched for articles and abstracts published between January 1990 and September 2018. Inclusion criteria were studied and case reports on DS meeting the criteria defined in a PICO. Review articles were excluded. Total evidence for the different types of DSs was graded according to GRADE. A total of 428 abstracts were retrieved. Of these 373 abstracts did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded, leaving 54 abstracts. Nine categories of surgical modifications could be identified: classic dermal sling (DS) with minor modifications, non Wise-pattern mastectomy DS, nipple areola complex bearing DS, DS in combination with a matrix/mesh, DS as a suture line protection technique, DS with a modified circulatory basis, DS without an implant, DS as an immediate-delayed technique and pre-pectoral DS. The evidence for DS as a surgical technique is very low (GRADE ⊕). The DS can be used with both permanent implants and tissue expanders (GRADE ⊕).