1
|
Turkheimer LM, Shen C, Leonard M, Gooding J, Kuron M, Showalter SL. Physicians Are Unable to Consistently Predict Patient Health Literacy in a Breast Clinic. J Surg Res 2024; 301:499-503. [PMID: 39042978 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health literacy (HL) is a patient's capacity to understand health information. Low HL is associated with worse cancer outcomes and adherence to treatment regimens. This study aimed to test physicians' ability to predict their patients' HL after an initial consultation to determine if routine HL screening is valuable. METHODS From February 2023 through June 2023, patients seen at an academic breast clinic completed a validated, self-reported HL assessment. Surgical and medical oncologists estimated their patients' HL by answering the same HL questionnaire based on their perception of the patient visit. Patient and physician scores were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficient. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations between physicians' ability to predict HL and other variables. RESULTS The cohort included 210 patient HL scores with corresponding physician scores for each. Most patients (75.7%) had adequate HL. There was moderate agreement between the patient and physician HL scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.677, P < 0.01), meaning physicians could somewhat predict their patient's HL. Physicians were worse at predicting HL when patients had low HL. There was no difference in physicians' ability to predict HL based on patient age (P = 0.09) or race (P = 0.29). Additionally, we found no difference in the ability to predict HL based on the physician's specialty (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS After an initial consultation, physicians cannot accurately predict patient HL, particularly in patients with lower HL. Given the impact of low HL on a patient's ability to make treatment decisions and adhere to treatment plans, using a validated tool to measure HL is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Turkheimer
- Department Of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Chengli Shen
- Department Of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Madeline Leonard
- School Of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jordan Gooding
- School Of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michael Kuron
- College Of Arts And Sciences, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department Of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Turkheimer LM, Yan J, Millard T, Ragoowansi H, Showalter SL. Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Evaluating the POWER Trial. J Surg Res 2024; 302:585-592. [PMID: 39181025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation therapy (RT) omission is acceptable in older women with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). However, RT rates in this population remain high, causing concern for overtreatment. Conversely, patients who omit RT and do not complete a course of AET are at risk of undertreatment. In the Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER) trial, participants receive 90 days of preoperative endocrine therapy to assess tolerance before deciding about RT. This study aimed to determine the rates of undertreatment and overtreatment institutionally and among POWER trial participants. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive, estrogen receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- breast cancer, ≤ 3 cm, who had BCS between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized as undertreated (BCS alone), overtreated (BCS + RT + AET), or appropriately treated (BCS + RT or BCS + AET). RESULTS The cohort included 478 patients, of whom 62 (12.97%) were undertreated, 202 (42.26%) were overtreated, and 214 (44.77%) were appropriately treated. Appropriately treated patients were more likely to be aged 70-79 years (P < 0.0001) and have high health literacy (P = 0.0003). Of the 37 patients (7.71%) in the POWER trial, more were appropriately treated than patients not in the POWER trial (81.1% versus 44.8%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Despite long-standing guideline changes, RT utilization remains high. This study highlights how a novel patient-centered approach to guide adjuvant therapy decisions may increase the number of appropriately treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Turkheimer
- Department of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Janet Yan
- School of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Trish Millard
- Department of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Henna Ragoowansi
- School of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Canin B, Casas-Silva E, Denicoff A, Braun-Inglis C, Okado I, Bakos A. Through the Lens of Patient Partners: Challenges in Accrual of Older Adults to NCI Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:125-134. [PMID: 36519817 PMCID: PMC9949584 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The workshop "Engaging Older Adults in Cancer Clinical Trials Conducted in the NCI Clinical Trials Network: Challenges and Opportunities" included a Patient Stakeholder Workgroup that explored the needs and concerns of older adults with cancer regarding clinical trials. To accomplish this, the workgroup conducted patient focus groups in which participants were interviewed, recorded conversations were analyzed and coded, and salient themes were identified. The focus groups identified general barriers to accrual such as complex consent forms, general communication, restrictive eligibility, nonreferrals, patient costs, cultural insensitivity, limited accessibility in community settings, and transportation issues. They also identified the influence of knowledgeable information presenters, improved care, family or caregiver support, and the desire to help others as drivers or reasons to participate in clinical trials. The workshop concluded that multi-level interventions could be used to increase the accrual of older adults to National Cancer Institute clinical trials as well as others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc
- Correspondence to: Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc, PhD, MSW, FAOSW, University of Louisville, 2301 S. 3rd St, Louisville, KY 40292, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Beverly Canin
- SCOREboard Patient Advocate Board, The Cancer and Aging Research Group, USA
| | - Esmeralda Casas-Silva
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, Informatics and Data Science Program, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Andrea Denicoff
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Christa Braun-Inglis
- Clinical Faculty, UH Nancy Atmospera-Walch School of Nursing, University of Hawaii Cancer Center/Hawaii M/U NCORP, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Izumi Okado
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Alexis Bakos
- Division of Cancer Prevention, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Victoria M, Marie B, Dominique R, Caroline A, Marc-Karim BD, Julien M, Sophie L, Anne-Déborah B. Breast reconstruction and quality of life five years after cancer diagnosis: VICAN French National cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:449-461. [PMID: 35608713 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06626-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with breast cancer (BC) who have a mastectomy may subsequently undergo breast reconstruction (BR). This study aimed to identify (1) factors associated with having BR, (2) factors associated with immediate BR (IBR) and delayed BR (DBR), and (3) associations between no BR, IBR and DBR and physical and mental quality of life (QoL) 5 years after diagnosis. METHODS Analyses were based on data from the national French cancer cohort VICAN, which followed a representative sample of cancer survivors, including BC survivors, for 5 years after diagnosis. BR and BR type (IBR/DBR) were identified using medico-administrative databases. The SF12 scale was used to measure mental and physical QoL. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with BR, and linear models to evaluate associations between BR and BR type with QoL. RESULTS Of the 1192 BC survivors in VICAN, 32.6% (n = 388) had a mastectomy. Among them, 60.1% (n = 233) had BR. Of these, 38.6% (n = 90) and 61.4% (n = 143) had IBR and DBR, respectively. Compared with women who had BR, women who did not were more likely to be older and to have a lower level of health literacy. Compared with women who did not have BR, those with IBR had better mental QoL, while those who had either IBR or DBR had better physical QoL. CONCLUSION Older women and those with inadequate health literacy were less likely to have BR. This may reflect women's preferences, inequalities in care options offered after a mastectomy, and socioeconomic barriers to accessing BR. These issues need further exploration. Furthermore, BR was associated with a better long-term physical QoL. IBR was associated with better mental QoL and should be promoted when possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Memoli Victoria
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France
| | - Bannier Marie
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Rey Dominique
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France
| | | | - Ben Diane Marc-Karim
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France
| | - Mancini Julien
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France.
- APHM, BIOSTIC, Hop Timone, Marseille, France.
| | - Lauzier Sophie
- Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Canada
| | - Bouhnik Anne-Déborah
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sarver MM, Rames JD, Ren Y, Greenup RA, Shammas RL, Hwang ES, Hollenbeck ST, Hyslop T, Butler PD, Fayanju OM. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Surgical Outcomes after Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:760-771. [PMID: 35426388 PMCID: PMC9347225 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women of color with breast cancer are less likely to undergo post-mastectomy reconstruction compared with White women, but it is unclear whether their perioperative outcomes are worse. The goal of this study was to investigate differences in preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complications by race/ethnicity among women with breast cancer undergoing postmastectomy reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN Data were collected from the National Inpatient Sample database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2012 to 2016. Patient demographics, types of reconstruction, comorbid conditions, Charlson-Deyo Combined Comorbidity (CDCC) scores, length of stay (LOS), and perioperative complications were abstracted. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were performed to model LOS and likelihood of postoperative complications, respectively. RESULTS Compared with White women (n = 19,730), Black women (n = 3,201) underwent autologous reconstruction more frequently (40.7% vs 28.3%), had more perioperative comorbidities (eg diabetes: 12.9% vs 5.8%), higher CDCC scores (% CDCC ≥ 4: 5.5% vs 2.7%), and longer LOS (median 3 vs 2 days, all p < 0.001). Being Black (vs White: +0.13 adjusted days, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.19) was also associated with longer LOS and an increased likelihood of surgical complications (vs White: odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.42, both p < 0.01), but this association did not persist when outcomes were limited to microsurgical complications. CONCLUSION Disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction between Black and White women extend beyond access to care and include perioperative factors and outcomes. These findings suggest an important opportunity to mitigate inequities in reconstruction through perioperative health optimization and improved access to and co-management with primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa M Sarver
- From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (Sarver, Rames)
- Divisions of Surgical Oncology (Sarver, Greenup, Hwang, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Jess D Rames
- From the Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (Sarver, Rames)
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Rames, Shammas, Hollenbeck), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Yi Ren
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC (Ren, Greenup, Hwang, Hyslop, Fayanju)
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC (Ren, Greenup, Hwang, Hyslop, Fayanju)
- Divisions of Surgical Oncology (Sarver, Greenup, Hwang, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
- Department of Surgery, and Departments of Population Health Sciences (Greenup, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Ronnie L Shammas
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Rames, Shammas, Hollenbeck), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC (Ren, Greenup, Hwang, Hyslop, Fayanju)
- Divisions of Surgical Oncology (Sarver, Greenup, Hwang, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Scott T Hollenbeck
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Rames, Shammas, Hollenbeck), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC (Ren, Greenup, Hwang, Hyslop, Fayanju)
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (Hyslop), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| | - Paris D Butler
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Butler)
| | - Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC (Ren, Greenup, Hwang, Hyslop, Fayanju)
- Divisions of Surgical Oncology (Sarver, Greenup, Hwang, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
- Department of Surgery, and Departments of Population Health Sciences (Greenup, Fayanju), Duke University School of Medicine, NC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Special Considerations in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Survivors. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2022; 49:195-208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
7
|
Lizarraga IM, Schroeder MC, Jatoi I, Sugg SL, Trentham-Dietz A, Hoeth L, Chrischilles EA. Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8752-8765. [PMID: 34251554 PMCID: PMC8595775 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10426-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differences in patient characteristics and decision-making preferences have been described between those who elect breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM), or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for breast cancer. However, it is not known whether preferred and actual decision-making roles differ across these surgery types, or whether surgery choice reflects a woman's goals or achieves desired outcomes. METHODS Women diagnosed with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer across eight large medical centers responded to a mailed questionnaire regarding treatment decision-making goals, roles, and outcomes. These data were linked to electronic medical records. Differences were assessed using descriptive analyses and logistic regression. RESULTS There were 750 study participants: 60.1% BCS, 17.9% UM, and 22.0% CPM. On multivariate analysis, reducing worry about recurrence was a more important goal for surgery in the CPM group than the others. Although women's preferred role in the treatment decision did not differ by surgery, the CPM group was more likely to report taking a more-active-than-preferred role than the BCS group. On multivariate analysis that included receipt of additional surgery, posttreatment worry about both ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence was higher in the BCS group than the CPM group (both p < 0.001). The UM group was more worried than the CPM group about contralateral recurrence only (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Women with CPM were more likely to report being able to reduce worry about recurrence as a very important goal for surgery. They were also the least worried about ipsilateral breast recurrence and contralateral breast cancer almost two years postdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid M Lizarraga
- Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mary C Schroeder
- Division of Health Services Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Ismail Jatoi
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sonia L Sugg
- Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Carbone Cancer Center and Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Islam T, Musthaffa S, Hoong SM, Filza J, Jamaris S, Cheng ML, Harun F, Abdullah Din N, Abd Rahman Z, Mohamed KN, Ho GF, Kaur R, Taib NA. Development and evaluation of a sustainable video health education program for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Malaysia. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:2631-2638. [PMID: 32968861 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05776-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Wider breast cancer (BC) treatment options, short consultation time with physicians, lack of knowledge, and poor coping skills at the time of diagnosis may affect patients' decisions causing treatment delays and non-adherence. To address this gap, a breast care nurse video orientation program was started. Our aim was to evaluate the video on patients' knowledge, satisfaction, and treatment adherence. METHODS The video was developed using the BC delay explanatory model. A self-administered pre- and post-survey on 241 newly diagnosed BC patients in University Malaya Medical Center was performed. The Wilcoxon matched paired signed rank test was used to evaluate patients' pre and post perceived knowledge using a Likert scale 0 to 4 (0 = "no knowledge," 4 = "a great degree of knowledge"). Treatment adherence among participants were measured after 1-year follow-up. RESULTS Eighty percent of the patients reported that the video met or exceeded their expectations. In total 80.5% reported that the video was very effective and effective in improving their perspective on BC treatments. There was improvement in perceived knowledge for treatment options (mean scores; M = 0.93 versus M = 2.97) (p < 0.001) and also for perceived knowledge on types of operation, information on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, healthy diet, physical activity after treatments, and care of the arm after operation(p < 0.001). In total 89.4%, 79.3%, and 85.9% adhered to surgical, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy recommended treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION The video improved patients' perceived knowledge and satisfaction. The program improved access not only to new BC patients but also the public and found sustainable using the YouTube platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Islam
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Suhaida Musthaffa
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - See Mee Hoong
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jasmine Filza
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Suniza Jamaris
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mao Li Cheng
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Faizah Harun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Noraizam Abdullah Din
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Zarinah Abd Rahman
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kamar Noraini Mohamed
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Gwo Fuang Ho
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ranjit Kaur
- Breast Cancer Welfare Association Malaysia (BCWA), Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Nur Aishah Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- UM Cancer Research Institute (UMCRI), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Patients with cancer face high expectations for performing health literacy activities necessary for self-management and decision making, but only 12% of adults in the United States are proficient in health literacy. This review explores evidence regarding what is known about functional, interactive, and critical health literacy in adult oncology populations. LITERATURE SEARCH The review was conducted by searching extensively in the CINAHL® Plus database. DATA EVALUATION Of 614 articles retrieved from the literature search, 22 were included in the final sample. Most were cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational studies. SYNTHESIS Health literacy research in the United States focuses primarily on functional health literacy, but studies that include interactive and/or critical health literacy indicate their applicability in adult oncology populations. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Additional research is needed to clarify the role of health literacy in cancer care to develop effective interventions that facilitate self-management and decision making.
Collapse
|
10
|
Chang ME, Baker SJ, Dos Santos Marques IC, Liwo AN, Chung SK, Richman JS, Knight SJ, Fouad MN, Gakumo CA, Davis TC, Chu DI. Health Literacy in Surgery. Health Lit Res Pract 2020; 4:e46-e65. [PMID: 32053207 PMCID: PMC7015264 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20191121-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Low health literacy is associated with poor health outcomes in many chronic diseases and may have an important role in determining surgical outcomes. This study aims to comprehensively review the current state of science on adult health literacy in surgery and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Methods: Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted to identify all studies from January 2002 through May 2018 that used validated instruments to assess health literacy among adult patients undergoing surgery. Studies were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and evaluated on findings by their focus on identifying health literacy levels, understanding associations with surgical outcomes, and/or developing interventions to address low health literacy. Key Results: There were 51 studies on health literacy with data from 22,139 patients included in this review. Low health literacy was present in more than one-third of surgical patients (34%, interquartile range 16%–50%). The most commonly used validated instrument for assessment of health literacy in the surgical population was the Newest Vital Sign. Most studies were focused on identifying the prevalence of low health literacy within a surgery population (84%, n = 43). Few studies focused on understanding the association of health literacy to surgical outcomes (12%, n = 6) and even fewer studies developed interventions to address health literacy (4%, n = 2). Discussion: Low health literacy is common among surgical patients. Important opportunities exist to better understand the role of health literacy in determining surgical outcomes and to develop more health literacy-sensitive models of surgical care. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2020;4(1):e45–e65.] Plain Language Summary: Health literacy has not been well-studied in surgery but likely plays an important role. In this article, we reviewed all current research on health literacy in surgery to help us understand where we are at and where we need to go. We found that low health literacy is common and we need more ways to address it in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel I. Chu
- Address correspondence to Daniel I. Chu, MD, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, KB 428, 1720 2nd Avenue S., Birmingham, AL 35294-0016;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Engelmann J, Fischer C, Nkenke E. Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2020; 48:661-665. [PMID: 32518020 PMCID: PMC7255739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online information for patients on orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A selection of search terms specific for orthognathic surgery was chosen and 150 websites were identified using the Internet search engines Google, Yahoo and Bing. Irrelevant websites were excluded. The remaining websites were assessed with a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool. EQIP evaluates the quality of medical patient information by measuring the three key aspects of content, structure, and identification data. RESULTS 48 relevant websites were identified. EQIP values ranged between 2 and 28 (median 13.65). While 37 of the 48 websites described details of the surgical procedures, only 13 mentioned possible risks and complications of the surgery. No differences were found between the websites of private practices, dentists and public hospitals, universities, or others (p = 0.66). Websites found by Google had a significantly lower EQIP score compared with Yahoo and Bing (11.12 vs. 16.60 for Yahoo and 16.23 for Bing; p = 0.012). The better the rank of the website, the higher the EQIP score (r = -0.411, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study reflected a large variation of quality of information on orthognathic surgery on the Internet. Therefore, surgeons must be aware that they might be confronted with unrealistic expectations of patients, who may underestimate the potential risks and drawbacks of orthognathic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Engelmann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Carmen Fischer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Emeka Nkenke
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Portelli Tremont JN, Downs-Canner S, Maduekwe U. Delving deeper into disparity: The impact of health literacy on the surgical care of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 2020; 220:806-810. [PMID: 32444064 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast surgical oncology is a unique field that involves complex cancer management and longstanding patient interactions with the healthcare system, making it potentially challenging for patients with low health literacy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding health literacy in breast cancer and identify future directions for research and potential intervention in breast surgical oncology. DATA SOURCES A search of relevant literature querying PubMed and Science Direct was performed and included the following keywords: health literacy, breast cancer, breast surgical oncology, surgery, outcomes, prevention, screening, healthcare utilization, chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS Limited health literacy may detrimentally affect understanding and outcomes in breast surgical oncology. Identifying ways providers can improve patient understanding and utilization of health information is important, and surgeons may have a pivotal role. Further studies addressing health literacy in breast surgical oncology is needed in order to better optimize care of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn N Portelli Tremont
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 170Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Bldg., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA.
| | - Stephanie Downs-Canner
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 170Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Bldg., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA.
| | - Ugwuji Maduekwe
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 170Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Bldg., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Burks AC, Doede A, Showalter SL, Keim-Malpass J. Perceptions of Clinical Trial Participation Among Women of Varying Health Literacy Levels. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 47:273-280. [PMID: 32301926 DOI: 10.1188/20.onf.273-280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand the perceptions of risk, benefit, and the informed consent process after enrolling in and completing a phase 2 clinical trial using intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for early-stage breast cancer, and to determine how perceptions varied based on women's health literacy levels. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING 20 participants who had already completed a phase 2 IORT clinical trial for early-stage breast cancer at an academic medical center. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using structured interviews consisting of questions aimed to elicit responses from participants regarding experiences of informed consent and the research process. A validated brief health literacy questionnaire was used to determine health literacy levels of participants. The authors analyzed themes using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS Women with lower levels of health literacy reported feeling confident enough in the provider to make the decision to enroll in the clinical trial during the initial consultation, and, in general, women reported relying heavily on provider recommendation for enrolling in the clinical trial. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Tailored approaches for patients with limited health literacy are needed during the clinical trial consent process. Additional longitudinal research with a larger sample size can extend study results and provide insight into the most effective way to modify the informed consent process for patients with limited health literacy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gunn CM, Paasche-Orlow MK, Bak S, Wang N, Pamphile J, Nelson K, Morton S, Battaglia TA. Health Literacy, Language, and Cancer-Related Needs in the First 6 Months After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e741-e750. [PMID: 32216715 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Low health literacy (HL) and language negatively affect cancer screening and prevention behaviors; less is known about how they affect the patient's experience during cancer treatment. This study explores associations among HL, spoken language, and dimensions of cancer-related needs within 6 months of receiving a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS Women speaking English, Spanish, or Haitian Creole, enrolled in a patient navigation study at diagnosis, completed a survey in their primary spoken language at baseline and 6 months to characterize their cancer-related needs. HL was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool. Outcomes included the Cancer Needs Distress Inventory (CaNDI; n = 38 items) and the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy scale (CASE-Cancer) for cancer (n = 12 items). Linear regressions measured the impact of HL and language on total CaNDI and CASE-Cancer scale for cancer scores and subscales, adjusted for demographics. RESULTS At baseline, 262 women participated and 228 (87%) followed up at 6 months. Of these, 38% had adequate HL, 33% had marginal HL, and 29% had inadequate HL. Women with inadequate or marginal HL had higher median baseline CaNDI scores (P = .02) and lower self-efficacy scores (P = .008), relative to those with adequate HL. Haitian-Creole speakers had significantly lower CANDI scores at baseline (P = .03). Adjusting for demographics, differences in CaNDI scores at baseline remained significant for those with lower HL and Haitian-Creole speakers. At 6 months, differences in self-efficacy persisted for Haitian-Creole speakers. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that interventions oriented to mitigating HL and language barriers might reduce distress at the time of diagnosis and improve self-efficacy over the course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Gunn
- Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Sharon Bak
- Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Na Wang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytic Center, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Pamphile
- Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Kerrie Nelson
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Tracy A Battaglia
- Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lynn C, Quast L, Rogers H, Effinger K, Gilleland-Marchak J. Systematic Review of Health Literacy in Childhood Cancer Patients, Survivors, and Their Caregivers. J Pediatr Psychol 2020; 45:373-385. [DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
This systematic review examined the literature regarding health literacy among pediatric cancer patients, survivors, and their caregivers. Specific aims were to identify and summarize measures used, levels of and demographic correlates of health literacy, effects of health literacy interventions, and associations between health literacy and health outcomes.
Methods
The search strategy was executed in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library. Of the 842 unique studies retrieved, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review.
Results
Studies used a variety of validated and study-specific measures with no measure emerging as the standard. Levels of health literacy were typically assessed subjectively and across studies the majority of those sampled self-reported adequate health literacy. Few studies examined demographic correlates of health literacy, precluding the identification of consistent predictors. Health literacy intervention research for this population is in its infancy and only pilot projects were identified; effects could not be evaluated. No studies assessed the impact of health literacy on health outcomes.
Conclusions
Very few studies assessed health literacy in pediatric oncology. As treatment for childhood cancer becomes increasingly complex, and patients and caregivers are expected to have adequate understanding of health information, health literacy is a critical construct that should not be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Lynn
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | | | - Hannah Rogers
- Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University
| | - Karen Effinger
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Jordan Gilleland-Marchak
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Dobrozsi S, Tomlinson K, Chan S, Belongia M, Herda C, Maloney K, Long C, Vertz L, Bingen K. Education Milestones for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2019; 36:103-118. [PMID: 30600752 DOI: 10.1177/1043454218820906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of cancer in a child, adolescent, or young adult is an emotionally overwhelming time. To improve the quality of education and support provided to patients and caregivers with a new cancer diagnosis, we executed a quality improvement initiative to (a) define key education milestones for the delivery of essential education during the first 2 months following diagnosis and (b) to define role accountability within the multidisciplinary team for delivery of content and execution of tasks. To develop education milestones, we (a) identified educational content from review of the literature, (b) determined the sequence of content delivery through qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers, and (c) developed education milestones by evaluation of existing workflows. To develop task lists, we (a) determined which multidisciplinary team member was best suited to deliver specific content and (b) defined discrete tasks required to execute education milestones. Key content topics and preferred sequence are as follows: Emotional Adjustment to Diagnosis, When and How to Call the Doctor, Medication Management, Practical Needs, Line Care, and Access to Nontherapeutic Clinical Trials. Eight education milestones were defined across the initial 2 months following cancer diagnosis. The education milestones are paired with task lists. The education milestones and task lists guide the execution of complex education across a multidisciplinary service line in an emotionally challenging time. Early information focuses on essential content, role responsibility is clearly defined, and psychosocial support services are purposefully and iteratively integrated into care during the initial weeks following a cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Carolyn Herda
- 2 Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Catherine Long
- 3 Prevea Health/St. Vincent's Hospital, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | - Lori Vertz
- 3 Prevea Health/St. Vincent's Hospital, Green Bay, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Keim-Malpass J, Doede A, Showalter SL. Does patient health literacy impact adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients? Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:47-51. [PMID: 30636869 PMCID: PMC6309015 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s190249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Functional health literacy is critical for patients' functional understanding and management of disease including adherence to medications and treatment recommendations. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between self-reported health literacy and 1) decision to take adjuvant endocrine therapy and 2) adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy at 2 years among women with breast cancer. METHODS We initiated a prospective health literacy assessment to determine the relationship between health literacy and breast health outcomes. Among our overall cohort, we determined women who had estrogen receptor positive (ER+) disease and were recommended to take adjuvant endocrine therapy, those who initiated treatment, and those adherent at 2 years following diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were calculated to determine the relationship between health literacy and both initiation and adherence. RESULTS Among the 340 patients in the sample who were recommended to take adjuvant endocrine therapy, 296 (87.1%) initiated the therapy. Two-year follow-up data are available in 136 patients with ER+ tumors. Among the patients with 2-year longitudinal data available, 108 (79.4%) were adherent and still taking the endocrine therapy at 2 years following diagnosis. In univariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical significance between health literacy and initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy or adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy at 2 years. CONCLUSION Despite the underpinnings regarding health literacy and medication adherence supporting our hypothesis, we did not find an association between health literacy and the decision to initiate therapy or continued adherence at 2 years following diagnosis. Further study is needed to determine the nuances in adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Keim-Malpass
- Department of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA,
| | - Aubrey Doede
- Department of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA,
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee KC, Berg ET, Jazayeri HE, Chuang SK, Eisig SB. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77:180.e1-180.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|