Positive predictive value of biopsy of palpable masses following mastectomy

Screening chest wall ultrasound in the mastectomy patient

BACKGROUND

While there are clear guidelines regarding chest wall ultrasound in the symptomatic patient, there is conflicting evidence regarding the use of ultrasound in the screening of women post-mastectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of screening chest wall ultrasound after mastectomy and to assess features of detected malignancies.

METHODS

This IRB approved, retrospective study evaluates screening US examinations of the chest wall after mastectomy. Asymptomatic women presenting for screening chest wall ultrasound from January 2016 through May 2017 were included. Cases of known active malignancy were excluded. All patients had at least one year of clinical or imaging follow-up. 43 exams (8.5 %) were performed with a history of contralateral malignancy, 465 exams (91.3 %) were performed with a history of ipsilateral malignancy, and one exam (0.2 %) was performed in a patient with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

RESULTS

During the 17-month period, there were 509 screening US in 389 mastectomy patients. 504 (99.0 %) exams were negative/benign. Five exams (1.0 %) were considered suspicious, with recommendation for biopsy, which was performed. Out of 509 exams, 3 (0.6 %) yielded benign results, while 2 (0.39 %) revealed recurrent malignancy, with a 95 % confidence interval (exact binomial) of 0.05 % to 1.41 % for screening ultrasound. Both patients who recurred had previously recurred, and both had initial cancer of lobular histology.

CONCLUSION

Of 509 chest wall screening US exams performed in mastectomy, 2 malignancies were detected, and each patient had history of invasive lobular carcinoma and at least one prior recurrence prior to this study, suggesting benefit of screening ultrasound in these populations.

Diagnostic ultrasound of the chest wall in the symptomatic patient after mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Lack of standardized imaging recommendations among mastectomy patients has led to variability in how recurrences are detected.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the findings and assess the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound in the evaluation of symptomatic post-mastectomy patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single institution, retrospective study included 749 consecutive diagnostic chest wall ultrasound examinations performed in mastectomy patients, from January 2016 to June 2017. Chest wall ultrasound evaluated the mastectomy bed with or without reconstruction. Electronic health records were queried for the primary breast cancer histology prior to mastectomy, clinical symptoms prompting the diagnostic ultrasound, ultrasound findings, subsequent cytology and pathology, and follow-up data. Excluded were patients with a known recurrence, asymptomatic patients, and those with <2 years of clinical or imaging follow-up. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among the 749 ultrasounds performed, 58 malignancies were identified for a 7.7% (58/749) malignancy rate, with a median tumor size of 20 mm. Patients diagnosed with a malignancy most often presented with a palpable abnormality (79.3%, 46/58) or skin changes (13.8%, 8/58) and rarely with pain (1.7%, 1/58). Patients who underwent a biopsy yielding a benign result most often presented with a palpable abnormality (41.5%, 287/691), pain (25.6%,177/691), or postoperative swelling/suspected fluid collection (17.8%, 123/691). Diagnostic ultrasound yielded a 91.4% sensitivity (95% CI 81.0, 97.1), 96.1% specificity (95% CI 94.4, 97.4), 66.3% PPV₃ (95% CI 57.4, 74.1), and 99.3% negative predictive value (95% CI 98.3, 99.7) for cancer detection. There were 5 false negative ultrasound cases after a skin punch biopsy was performed due to clinically suspicious skin changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest wall ultrasound has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of breast cancer recurrence in symptomatic patients after mastectomy. Skin changes remain an important clinical manifestation of a cancer recurrence.

DNA methylation patterns of RAR-β2 and RASSF1A gene promoters in FNAB samples from Greek population with benign or malignant breast lesions

BACKGROUND

Promoter hypermethylation is common in Breast Cancer (BC) with studies mainly in histological specimens showing frequent methylation of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) compared with normal tissues. The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of promoter methylation of RAR-β2 and RASSF1A genes in breast FNAB material aiming to evaluate the methylation status of these two genes as biomarker for detecting BC in Greek population.

METHODS

FNAB material from 104 patients was collected for cytological evaluation and epigenetic analysis. DNA was extracted and subjected to bisulfite conversion. A methylation-specific PCR was carried out and the final products were separated with electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels.

RESULTS

From 104 samples, RASSF1A hypermethylation was observed in 78 (75%) and RAR-β2 hypermethylation in 64 (61.6%). 84% and 78% of the cases diagnosed with breast malignancy (n = 50) were methylated for RASSF1A and RAR-β2, respectively. Methylated RASSF1A and RAR-β2 were also detected in 88.3% and 76.5% in samples diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy (n = 17) and in 57.2% of samples diagnosed with atypia (n = 14). The Odds Ratio for breast malignancy was 4.545 in patients with RASSF1A hypermethylation and 9.167 in patients with RAR-β2 hypermethylation underlying their promoter's methylation positive correlation with breast malignancy.

CONCLUSION

To optimize the sensitivity and specificity of this epigenetic setting, more TSGs related to BC should be gradually imported in our evaluated methylation panel and be validated in a larger study sample with the aim that the obtained epigenetic profiles will provide clinicians with valuable tools for management of BC patients in Greece.

Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up

To assess the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for operative planning of patients with breast cancers who were initially diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy.With the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with breast cancers who underwent CESM and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) prior to operation and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. The patients with breast cancer diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy without mammography were included for analysis. The size and number of cancers on low-energy mammograms (LE-MG), recombined subtracted mammograms (RSM), and CE-MRI were recorded and compared with microscopic histopathologic data and at least 5 years of clinical follow-up data.Fifty-one cancerous breasts of 46 patients were included in the analysis. All the principal cancers could be detected by RSM or CE-MRI; however, only 45 were by LE-MG. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the size on microscopy were 0.44 for LE-MG, 0.77 for RSM, and 0.84 for CE-MRI (all P-values ≤.001). Regarding the microscopic reports, RSM or CE-MRI had sensitivities of 100% and a positive predictive value of 63.6% for multicentric cancers. One breast cancer with partial mastectomy recurred after 3 years of follow-up.CESM was feasible for assessing the cancer extension and multicentric cancers as secondary examination in patients with diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy.